I'm having an issue with flexbox on IE11 and while I'm aware there's lots of known issue, I haven't been able to find a solution...
<div class="latest-posts">
<article class="post-grid">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/image_output/cats-q-c-640-480-4.jpg" alt="" />
<div class="article-content">
<h2>THIS IS POST TITLE</h2>
<p>BLAH</p>
</div>
</article>
</div>
And the CSS...
img {
max-width: 100%;
}
.latest-posts {
margin: 30px auto;
}
article.post-grid {
width: 375px;
float: left;
margin: 0 25px 100px 0;
padding-bottom: 20px;
background-color: #fff;
border: 1px solid #f3f3f3;
border-radius: 2px;
font-size: 14px;
line-height: 26px;
display: flex;
flex: 1 0 auto;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: flex-start;
align-content: flex-start;
}
.article-content {
padding: 20px 35px;
}
Images are getting stretched within a flex container.
Applying align-items: flex-start (I figured, since "stretched" is the default value...) or justify-content: flex-start doesn't seem to work.
Codepen: example of what I mean
What am I doing wrong?
to avoid this funny behavior, you may reset the flex-shrink property.
This looks like a bug, despite what Microsoft says:
<'flex-shrink'>
Sets the flex shrink factor or negative flexibility for the flex item. The flex shrink factor determines how much a flex item will shrink relative to the other items in the flex container.
If omitted, the element's negative flexibility is "0". A negative value is not valid.
Source: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj127297%28v=vs.85%29.aspx https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us//library/hh772069%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
img {
max-width: 100%;
flex-shrink: 0;
}
img {
max-width: 100%;
flex-shrink: 0;
}
.latest-posts {
margin: 30px auto;
}
article.post-grid {
width: 375px;
float: left;
margin: 0 25px 100px 0;
padding-bottom: 20px;
background-color: #fff;
border: 1px solid #f3f3f3;
border-radius: 2px;
font-size: 14px;
line-height: 26px;
display: flex;
flex: 1 0 auto;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: flex-start;
align-content: flex-start;
}
article.post-grid .article-content {
padding: 20px 35px;
}
<div class="latest-posts">
<article class="post-grid">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/image_output/cats-q-c-640-480-4.jpg" alt="" />
<div class="article-content">
<h2>THIS IS POST TITLE</h2>
<p>Society excited by cottage private an it esteems. Fully begin on by wound an. Girl rich in do up or both. At declared in as rejoiced of together.</p>
</div>
</article>
<article class="post-grid">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/image_output/cats-q-c-640-480-4.jpg" alt="" />
<div class="article-content">
<h2>MUCH LONGER POST TITLE TO ILLUSTRATE HEIGHTS</h2>
<p>Recommend new contented intention improving bed performed age.</p>
</div>
</article>
<article class="post-grid">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/image_output/cats-q-c-640-480-4.jpg" alt="" />
<div class="article-content">
<h2>SHORT TITLE</h2>
<p>Merry alone do it burst me songs. Sorry equal charm joy her those folly ham. In they no is many both. Recommend new contented intention improving bed performed age. Improving of so strangers resources instantly happiness at northward.</p>
</div>
</article>
</div>
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/KzBOvq
I had image stretch on the cross-axis (stretch in height, using flex-direction: row).
This Stack Overflow Q/A helped me solve it:
Link here
I had to set the following CSS on my img:
align-self: flex-start;
You might need another value than flex-start of course, depending on your goal. Mine is to have my image be at the top of the row.
I had a similar bug in IE11.
The styles were taken from Bootstrap 4.1, so for the fluid images I had:
.img-fluid {
border: none;
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
}
In my case it appeared that the reason was in max-width: 100% so when I changed it to width: 100% the bug disappeared:
.img-fluid {
border: none;
height: auto;
width: 100%;
}
This solution is not for everyone's case but I hope it would be helpful.
in my case combination of "flex-shrink: 0" suggested by G-Cyr and "align-self: flex-begin" suggested by Rick Schoonbeek did the trick. I had a wrapper which was using flex box to center the image with a "justify-content: center;"
All was good in IE 11, Chrome, Safari except IE Edge was not able to display correctly. adding the two attributes on image resolved the problem with IE Edge.
I tried every solution here but nothing worked. The only thing I was using flexbox for was to vertically center an image shown when hovering another image. So I just used a more classic solution à la top: 50%; transform: translateY(-50%) and then it was ok. So essentially not using flexbox at all then.. #hateIE
I had an issue with stretched product images in IE11, and I did some research and tried different things.
This was my code:
.productImage {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
img {
position: absolute;
display: block;
height: 100%;
object-fit: contain;
top: 0;
}
}
I then realized that my image height: 100% was the culprit of the stretched image, and I simply removed my height, but then my image was at the top of my .productImage container instead of being centered vertically. I introduced flex here and positioned it through a simple align-items: center, but this of course didn't work in IE11. I also tried the flex-shrink: 0 but that didn't work either.
I then went ahead to skip using flex and tried the classic top: 50%; left: 50%; transform: translate(-50%, -50%); but this wasn't good either since I already had a transform in use for my zoom on hover effect on the image.
I ended up with this solution instead:
.productImage {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
img {
position: absolute;
display: block;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
margin: auto;
}
}
It worked like a charm
Related
Ok so I tried vertically aligning the text in my div. I tried all kinds of stuff. Turns out this little box is something I can't define and it is unknown and unwanted. I know that the green block is padding Anyone got a clue on this? This purple block is bugging me
.menu-intro {
position: relative;
}
.intro-img-div {
position: relative;
height: 300px;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
align-content: center;
margin: auto;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
object-fit: contain;
}
.menu-intro-img {
object-fit: contain;
position: relative;
width: 100%;
}
.menu-intro-text {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
flex-direction: column;
flex-flow: column;
height: 300px;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
z-index: 2;
max-width: 50%;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 20px;
text-align: center;
}
.menu-intro-h1 {
margin: 0;
font-size: 3em;
}
.menu-intro-text p {
font-size: 1.5em;
}
<main>
<h1 class="text-centered">Our Menu</h1>
<div class="menu">
<div class="menu-intro">
<div class="intro-img-div">
<img src="style/img/menuintroimg.jpeg" alt="Background image of our food" class="menu-intro-img">
</div>
<div class="menu-intro-text">
<h1 class="menu-intro-h1">A look at <span class="red-text">Jacque's</span></h1>
<p>Scroll down and see what we have to offer!</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</main>
TURNS out this space is space that isn't filled out by text but is still registered as part of the div. You need to define another way of justifying content inside the div
justify-content:space-evenly;
Your menu-intro-text is a flex with explicitly defined height: 300px.
The children elements looks to take less part of that height. So the purple area is a part that is left. And Inspector shows it to you in a convenient way. Now using this hint of the Inspector you can decide what to do: add more children to fill that unutilized space or you may want to distribute it with justify-content:space-evenly as it was proposed by #Andelo Motika above or, in my opinion, better with justify-content:space-around
I’m looking to implement a full height (no-scroll) layout which contains a square image.
Depending on the available height of the container the image should scale accordingly in width.
So far I’ve attempted to implement the layout using both — floats and flexbox — but any solution (including anything responded to similar questions here) either leads to an overlap between image/container and the additional content to the right or doesn’t calculate 100% as intended (e.g. by including the height of the header).
My most recent attempt looks like this:
body,
html {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
height: 100%;
}
.page {
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: stretch;
overflow: hidden;
background: #D8D8D8;
}
.header {
background: #FF9C9C;
padding: 5px;
}
.content {
display: flex;
height: 100%;
}
.image-container {
border: 1px solid #7100FF;
height: 100%;
}
img {
display: block;
height: 100%;
width: auto;
}
.aside {
background: #B6F0C7;
flex: 1 1 auto;
}
<div class="page">
<div class="header">
Header
</div>
<div class="content">
<div class="image-container">
<img src="http://placehold.it/100x100" alt="Card image">
</div>
<div class="aside">
<p>Other content</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
https://jsfiddle.net/s0846ozy/
It’s been a few years since I have worked with CSS. Looking forward to having a rather obvious flaw in my approach pointed out. Thanks!
EDIT:
It seems this issue is browser-specific. I’m using the latest Firefox.
object-fit won't solve the issue as far as I can tell and is something I’ve already explored.
I’ve added a JSFiddle for easier experimentation.
Chrome (expected):
Firefox (actual):
use this:
img {
object-fit: cover;
}
for preserving the aspect-ratio!!
I'd like to know how to shrink a row of images so that they all fit within a div with an unspecified height. The images should never scale up beyond their native height, and they must maintain their aspect ratio. Also, I'd like the height of the containing div to be limited to the native height of the tallest image. The image tags have no height or width attributes.
Here's a fiddle with what I have so far. I approached this using flexbox and object-fit: scale-down. The row of images in question are gray and are in the div with the green background. They currently do not scale at all, but they are at least centered vertically and horizontally how I'd like them to be. Here are before and after images of the effect I'd like to achieve (sorry for switching the green background to yellow in the images). Additional details below the code snippet, but that about sums up the basic question.
body {
font-family: arial;
font-size: 26px;
text-align: center;
color: black;
background-color: white;
}
.smallhint {
font-size: 16px;
color: #8c8c8c;
}
img {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
font-size: 0;
display: block;
object-fit: scale-down;
min-height: 0;
}
.flex-column {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
padding: 0px;
margin: 0px;
height: 90vh;
flex-grow: 0;
min-width: 0;
min-height: 0;
}
.flex-row {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
flex: 0 1.5 auto;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
background-color: green;
}
.context {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
max-height: 100%;
background-color: blue;
}
.primary {
position: relative;
z-index: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
padding: 0;
font-size: 0;
min-height: 0;
align-items: end;
background-color: orange;
}
.primary img {
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 3px;
border-color: black;
height: calc(100% - 2*3px);
}
.mask {
position: absolute;
z-index: 1;
top: 0;
right: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
font-size: 0;
}
.nonimage {
padding-top: 5px;
display: inline;
background-color: pink;
}
<div class="flex-column">
<div class="primary">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/200">
<div class="mask">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/200/FF000">
</div>
</div>
<div class="flex-row">
<div class="context">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/75x150">
</div>
<div class="context">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/150x75">
</div>
</div>
<div class="nonimage">
<div class="smallhint">Some Text<br>Other Text</div>
</div>
</div>
I'm working on a (fixed-height) interface styled with CSS and will likely be asking a series of questions. I'm not great at CSS, so I'm open to approaches that are very different from my failed attempt!
At the top is a single centered image ("primary image"), below that are two other images ("secondary images") in a row, and below that is some text. Eventually, I'd like both sets of images to be responsive to changes in the height and width of the browser. However, I'd like to preferentially scale down the secondary images more than the primary image when the browser is too short to contain everything at native dimensions. For this, it seemed like flexbox containers with various flex-grow values would work here; it seems to work with the primary image somewhat, but the secondary images refuse to scale.
Also, I'm aware that, even if my current approach worked, the object-fit: scale-down strategy would leave behind some unwanted "padding" that will result in visual space between the secondary images. I have a feeling a very different approach may be required to get the effect that I want in the end, since I want the images to sit adjacent to each other without extra space around them. Furthermore, there also seems to be an issue with the container itself when the browser becomes very thin, since a scrollbar appears but it should always be 90vh.
Thank you all for the input!
Add a min-height: 0; rule for .flex-row. I guess that means it was pretty close to working when I asked the question.
This solution retains the issue I mention in my question about the additional "padding" created around images when object-fit: scale-down (or cover) is used. So, that means I'll be asking another question about that topic!
For a web application, I'm to position an animated emoji along with some text in a div. These elements are to remain separated in a fully responsive way. Behold:
I'm using flex to accomplish this. That ensures that even if the screen size becomes extremely small, separation is still kept by stacking these one on top of the other.
To accomplish it, the whole outer div is wrapped in:
.act{
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
background-color: #E1F5FE;
padding: 10px;
border-radius: 10px;
align-items: center;
}
Next, the animated image inside the div is wrapped in:
.anim {
flex: 1 1;
min-width: 64px;
text-align: center;
}
.anim > img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
max-width: 50px;
}
Lastly, the text along with the image is wrapped in:
.txt {
flex: 1 1 180px;
text-align: center;
}
Did you notice the tear drops on the emoji? Those are separate from the image, and are to be animated in html5.
I can't figure out how to ensure those tear drops stay precisely around the eyes of the emoji. I have tried using a z-index alongwith position:absolute (e.g. see the following):
<div class="anim">
<div class="tear" style="z-index:2;position:absolute;margin-top: 30px;margin-left: 110px;"></div>
<div class="tear" style="z-index:2;position:absolute;margin-top: 30px;margin-left: 84px;"></div>
<img src="sad.png">
</div>
This isn't responsive at all.
Moreover, If I try usingposition:relative, that makes it impossible to overlap the tear shape over the emoji, regardless of what z-index I set.
Please help me fix this situation. Ideally, I want to stick to using flex because otherwise, it's perfect for my needs.
Note: Answers to a similar SO question don't help since I've already included what they're suggesting.
To accomplish that you need a wrapper around the image and text, that take the size of the image.
Here is a sample code, where I added an extra wrapper, image, around the anim, and then made the anim display as inline block.
Here the image wrapper become the flex item instead, and will allow the anim to behave and be sized as the image, and create the boundaries you need to be able to place the eyes at a fixed position on top the image.
Stack snippet
.act {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
background-color: #E1F5FE;
padding: 10px;
border-radius: 10px;
align-items: center;
}
.image {
flex: 1 1;
min-width: 64px;
text-align: center;
}
.anim {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
}
.anim>img {
width: 100%;
max-width: 50px;
}
.txt {
flex: 1 1 180px;
text-align: center;
}
.tear {
position:absolute;
top: 10px;
left: 30px;
width: 10px;
height: 10px;
background: blue;
}
.tear:first-child {
left: 10px;"
}
<div class="act">
<div class="image">
<div class="anim">
<div class="tear"></div>
<div class="tear"></div>
<img src="http://placehold.it/150">
</div>
</div>
<div class="txt">
Some text
</div>
</div>
I am trying to center some images (horizontally) which overflows their container divs.
The containers (and images, for that matter) have a height of 160px and I want to keep them with that height, even at smaller screen-sizes - but still keep the image horizontally centered.
I have tried margin: 0 auto; with no luck.
I came across an half-solution where it was suggested to use text-align: center; on the container div along with margin: 0 -100%; on the image itself. However this solution seems to only work with webkit based browsers.
In eg. Firefox the result is this:
HTML:
<div class="row-fluid">
<div class="span6">
<a>
<img src="image1.jpg">
</a>
</div>
<div class="span6">
<a>
<img src="image2.jpg">
</a>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.span6{
height: 160px;
overflow: hidden;
text-align: center;
padding: 0;
}
.span6 img{
height: 160px;
width: auto;
margin: 0 -100%; /*Only works for webkit based browsers*/
}
Any ideas? Thank you in advance.
.
EDIT:
I found out that editing margin: 0 -100%; to margin: 0 -50%; did the trick (both in Chrome, Firefox, IE, etc). However I am going with Andrey's solution since it is more likely cleaner, I assume.
May be this will help
.span {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}