I've grid with several boxes in (<div>). Each box has inside a list with couple/ several links (simple ul li list with <a> elements). This link list is hidden, it shows only on hover.
It works really fine, but I have accessibility issue, namely, I can't get into any list element with "tab" key (box <div> works ok, it get focus, so the list is showing up), it is just skipping to next box element. I've tried with adding tabindex on each box and each list element inside, but it seems that this is not the solution.
Is there any CSS/ HTML solution for that? I can of course write simple JS, that will check where is focus and if focus has parent with focus option, but I would like to avoid it if possible.
How did you hide the link list? Using display: none or using visibility: hidden. (And that you apply this only to the list elements or also to the div? From your description, I guess it applies only to the list elements.) Content that is hidden using display: none is not keyboard accessible.
In order to make the list appear on hover, are you using a JavaScript event handler or CSS? If you are using JavaScript, you probably need to add an event listener that responds to keyboard events (e.g. onfocus, but as mentioned above, content hidden with display: none won't receive focus). In CSS, I always recommend adding the :focus pseudo-class whenever :hover is used (unless you want different styles for these things).
You may need to write some JavaScript that toggles the visibility of the lists when a parent div receives focus. (If you have tabindex on the div elements, as you say, they should already be able to receive focus.)
Related
Just like removeAttribute in JavaScript, after which the element won't be visible in the source.
You cannot remove an element from the DOM tree using CSS. You can only prevent it from being rendered in the layout with display: none; doing so does not prevent it from responding to events or cause it to be ignored by CSS selectors such as + and :nth-child(). You won't be able to interact with an element that's not there so you wouldn't be able to trigger events the usual way, but its "essence" remains, so to speak.
Its not possible with CSS.
Even if you use display:none, the element will be still in DOM tree.
CSS is for styling not for DOM manipulation. Use JavaScript for that.
display: none;
'Unlike the visibility property, which leaves an element in normal document flow,display: none removes the element completely from the document. It does not take up any space, even though the HTML for it is still in the source code. This is because it is, indeed, removed from the document flow. For all intents and purposes, the item is gone. This can be a good thing or a bad thing, depending on what your intentions are. It can also be damaging to your page if you misuse this property!'
https://www.lifewire.com/display-none-vs-visibility-hidden-3466884
You can use display: none to hide an element but it will still be on the DOM.
You can also use visibility: hidden and it will also still be on the DOM but the DOM will reflect the same vertical flow even though the element is hidden. In other words if the element is a block, a block space will still be reserved for the hidden element. And with display: none the space will also be removed along with the element as it is hidden.
Unless you use JavaScript, with CSS you are only changing the visibility of a DOM element that is existent on the DOM. Which can absolutely serve your purpose depending on what you are trying to do.
If you need more help, just comment with more detail and I'd be glad to help.
You actually can. Not directly in CSS but in combination with Javascript/jQuery you could.
In HTML give a class of "removeFromDom" to the Elements you want to have removed.
<p class="removeFromDom">your text here</p>
In CSS you add these Lines to make it invisible, if JS is not working.
.removeFromDom { display:none !important; visibility:hidden !important; }
In a jQuery file, that you load on any site, create this function::
$(document).ready(function() {
$(".removeFromDom").remove();
});
Et voila.. your jQuery file removes your Items from the DOM. I wouldn't recommend it for security reasons if there is a link nobody should be able to see anytime..
I'm trying to find a list of elements that are tabbable.
Adding tab-index to elements make them tabbable.
Some elements are tabbable by default like <input>.
Is there a list of these elements that are tabbable by default?
And optionally, why are they tabbable by deault?
The easiest way to find answers to such questions is by looking at the spec
I believe the list you are looking for is:
a elements that have an href attribute
link elements that have an href attribute
button elements
input elements whose type attribute are not in the Hidden state
select elements
textarea elements
Editing hosts
Browsing context containers
To answer your optional question: they are "tabbable" by default for usability issues. If you follow the principals of making a good, user friendly app, it should allow for a consistent navigation and discoverability among other things.
So, by making them "tabbable", in the order they appear in code, the default behavior is to allow the user to complete a form from top to bottom, with minimal clicks and moving around, this making the "thinking process" about what should be filled next unnecessary
https://allyjs.io/data-tables/focusable.html is probably the most comprehensive list I've ever found. Not only does it go over what is "expected" by the spec but also how all major browsers actually behave.
At https://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_global_tabindex.asp, it talks about the tabindex attribute in HTML 4.01, and how only certain elements could enter the tab order through the tabindex attribute.
Those elements were: <a>, <area>, <button>, <input>, <object>, <select>, and <textarea>.
I've been working with tab stuff for a few months now, and that list seems to fit with I've noticed as naturally tabbable.
I googled a bit, but maybe someone here can explain it to me why do pseudo elements, namely :before and :after, behave this way.
I have a content div, and inside it there are some elements - paragraphs, anchors, icon, etc. Let's say that on one anchor element I added an :after pseudo element and filled it with a content that will show an icon
a:after{
content:"\f001";
font-family: "Awesome icon font";
display: inline-block;
}
I can toggle the visibility of that element with a click on a button.
The issue is that when that element is hidden, no pseudo element is shown in the DOM. Once I toggle it's visibility (from display:none; to, let's say display: inline-block;) the pseudo element will be shown.
In a more concrete example I have a nav menu, that can be hidden or shown if I click on a 'hamburger' menu. One nav item is a shopping cart icon. I'm toggling the slide up animation with the click on the menu icon. All the textual menus will slide up nicely, but only when the animation is finished will the shop icon 'pop' into existence. Which looks kinda sloppy.
Why is this happening? Why is the display value, on the container in which the pseudo elements are nested in, controlling the display of the pseudo elements (even though they themselves have a display value that is different from none)? Not only does it affect their display value, when you inspect the DOM, if the container has display: none; value, there won't be any pseudo element present.
EDIT:
Example fiddle : http://jsfiddle.net/at4u56fy/
Lets see what documentation says...
About display: none;
This value causes an element to not appear in the formatting structure
(i.e., in visual media the element generates no boxes and has no
effect on layout). Descendant elements do not generate any boxes
either; the element and its content are removed from the formatting
structure entirely. This behavior cannot be overridden by setting the
'display' property on the descendants.
Please note that a display of 'none' does not create an invisible box;
it creates no box at all. CSS includes mechanisms that enable an
element to generate boxes in the formatting structure that affect
formatting but are not visible themselves. Please consult the section
on visibility for details.
Going further to formatting structure it says :
From the annotated document tree, generate a formatting structure.
Often, the formatting structure closely resembles the document tree,
but it may also differ significantly, notably when authors make use of
pseudo-elements and generated content. First, the formatting structure
need not be "tree-shaped" at all -- the nature of the structure
depends on the implementation. Second, the formatting structure may
contain more or less information than the document tree. For instance,
if an element in the document tree has a value of 'none' for the
'display' property, that element will generate nothing in the
formatting structure. A list element, on the other hand, may generate
more information in the formatting structure: the list element's
content and list style information (e.g., a bullet image).
Note that the CSS user agent does not alter the document tree during
this phase. In particular, content generated due to style sheets is
not fed back to the document language processor (e.g., for reparsing).
So its like if the element is set to display: none; user agents seem to ignore CSS generated content. Hence you might want to take a look at visibility: hidden; which should work for you.
According to the Mozilla Doc, the value none for the CSS attribute display does the following:
Turns off the display of an element (it has no effect on layout); all descendant elements also have their display turned off. The document is rendered as though the element did not exist.
I know this means I can't see the element. Since the element has no effect on the layout, it appears as if it does not exist.
My question is: does it still exist in the layout (it still responds to user events)? Or does it not exist in the layout at all (therefore not just appearance)?
Just to clarify:
I know the element still exists in the DOM. I'm asking if interaction with the view can still affect the state of that element. For example, if I click where a hidden element would have existed, does that still trigger an event?
I'm asking because I know you can target hidden elements in CSS like so:
input[type="checkbox"] {
display: none;
}
input[type="checkbox"]:checked + otherElement {
...
}
Some event must be firing or else the second CSS selector would not work.
Can someone explain this?
For example, if I click where a hidden element would have existed,
does that still trigger an event?
There is no such thing as "click where a hidden element would have existed".
For example, if a brick was not used in building a house, you can't touch it by touching the line between two other bricks, even if it could have been there otherwise.
So there are no user-caused events that apply to an invisible object not included in the layout.
However I am pretty sure it would still produce other events, for example ones reported by MutationObserver. I would expect events dispatched by dispatchEvent to work as well, though I hadn't tested this.
You cannot affect the state of an element that is display: none by interacting directly with the element, because that element is not rendered. However you can still affect its state by interacting with other elements that fire events that in turn change the state of that element via the DOM.
Some event must be firing or else the second CSS selector would not work.
Can someone explain this?
States and events are completely different. Events do not need to have fired for the state of an element to change, and when an element changes its state it does not necessarily fire any events. Selectors never operate on events; they are always state-based.
In your example, if the input element was already checked via the checked attribute, then the DOM loads with that element in that state to begin with, and no events would be fired, and it would still allow otherElement to match the selector immediately. Furthermore, it would continue to match that selector, until something happens that causes the input to become unchecked (or in CSS selector terms, :not(:checked)).
See my answer to this other question for a little more explanation on states vs events in CSS.
It will have no effect on your layout, as if it didn't exist, but the content is still present in the HTML DOM. The CSS attribute display:none is just that - a CSS attribute, and it does not modify your HTML content.
You can still perform javascript functions on the element.
I have an <img> element within a <div> element. I want the entire div (including the image) to scale down 10% (using transform) whenever the <div> is being clicked on. I have gotten it to work, but with one small issue: if the user clicks the image inside the div, nothing happens, whereas if the user clicks the background of the div, it works.
Essentially, how can I get the :active selector of .MyDiv:hover:active { /*scaling logic here*/ } to also work when children of MyDiv are clicked.
All help is greatly appreciated and I always accept an answer!
The :active pseudo-class and the div element
First things first, I'm pretty sure in a div element shouldn't have an activation state in the first place.
If we read through the user action pseudo-classes :hover, :active, and :focus section of the Selectors Level 3 W3C Recommendation, we find this:
The :active pseudo-class applies while an element is being activated by the user. For example, between the times the user presses the mouse button and releases it. On systems with more than one mouse button, :active applies only to the primary or primary activation button (typically the "left" mouse button), and any aliases thereof.
Now if we head over to the Interactive Content section of the HTML5 W3C Editor's Draft, we find this:
Certain elements in HTML have an activation behavior, which means that the user can activate them.
The user agent should allow the user to manually trigger elements that have an activation behavior, for instance using keyboard or voice input, or through mouse clicks. When the user triggers an element with a defined activation behavior in a manner other than clicking it, the default action of the interaction event must be to run synthetic click activation steps on the element.
I mention the HTML5 Editor's Draft over the HTML401 Recommendation as the HTML401 document doesn't go into great detail about activation states or user interaction. It does however mention activation on elements like the a element, but doesn't mention anything about it when defining the div element.
The div element doesn't have an "activation state" defined in the HTML5 recommendation. It has no Interactive Content category (unlike the a element) and doesn't state that an active state can be applied to it.
A Workaround
As discussed above, the div element shouldn't accept an :active state. For this reason I'm going to modify the HTML to use an element which does. For this, I'm using the a element:
<a href="javascript: void(0)">
<img />
</a>
Now this alone doesn't fix the IE issue. If you see this JSFiddle example, when clicking on the img element the a container isn't given an active state. So what can we do to fix this? Instead of just using :hover:active, I'm also going to use :hover:focus:
a:hover:active,
a:hover:focus {
outline: 0; /* Reset the default anchor tag focus style. */
background: #f00;
}
This gives us similar functionality on IE and all other browsers, as can be seen in this JSFiddle demo.
Two (potentially undesirable) side effects
The problem with this approach is that the element will retain its focussed state and you can now achieve this effect by accessing the element using your keyboard's tab key. Whenever you hover over the element in its focussed state, its style will change. It's not up to me to decide whether this is an undesirable side effect, however.
Your element is now a link. The href property is required in order for the element to be focussed in the first place.
Extra styling
As we're now using an a element instead of a div element, so we'll need to reset any browser default styles which distinguish your element as a link. For this we can simply:
a {
color: #000; /* Reset the color to black. */
cursor: default; /* Reset the cursor to default. */
text-decoration: none; /* Remove the underline. */
}
a img {
border: none; /* Remove border from image. */
}
Final JSFiddle demo.