here is the problem I'm stuck with:
I'm using Rails 4 & MySQL
I've Message which have one sender and one recipient.
I want to be able to archive messages but if sender archive a message, the recipient still can access to the message until he archive it too.
I've serialize a field :
serialize :archived_by, Array
which contains which user archived the message
but I can't figure out how to query with it.
Message.where("archived_by like ?", [1].to_yaml)
works well, returning messages archived by User '1'
Message.where.not("archived_by like ?", [1].to_yaml)
won't work, returning nothing
I would like to find something else than using a classic many to many ...
Thanks!
UPDATE
I finally decided to add 2 fields, one for the sender & one for the recipient to know which archived the message. If someone has the proper way to do this, tell us :)
If you are using postgresql you could query the informations.
As in answer Searching serialized data, using active record described, the downsize of serializer at least under mysql is, that you byepass native db abstraction.
Related
I'm running a local server playing around with an API using Django. I have a model called 'Users' populated with a few objects, and am using DefaultRouter.
I want to know what the URL would be if I were to DELETE a specific object from this model. For example, if I wanted to GET a user with an ID of 1 in this model, the URL would be: "localhost:8000/Users/1/". What would the equivalent be to DELETE this user?
I found an explanation of this on the REST API website (below), however, I don't understand what any of the syntaxes means.
What is {prefix}, {url_path}, {lookup} and [.format]? If anyone could provide an example of what this might be using a localhost that would be really helpful.
Thanks
Let us take an example of an API (URL) to update book data with id (pk) being 10. It would look something like this:
URL: http://www.example.com/api/v1/book/10/
Method: PUT/PATCH
With some data associated.
If you want to delete you just need to change method to DELETE instead of put or patch.
Regarding your second question lets compare the url with the parameters.
prefix: http://www.example.com/api/v1/book
lookup: 10
format: It specifies what type of data do you expect when you hit the API. Generally it is considered to be json.
url_path: In general, every thing after look up except query string is considered to be url_path.
I have to update a lot of data to mysql (~100Mio records!). Some records already exists, some have to be created. I also have to create some nested resources for each record.
I know the activerecord-import gem but as far as i know it can't handle nested records (or only with ugly workarounds). The issue is that I dont know the ID's for all nested records before they are created - and creating them in single queries takes time.
So lets say there is a model called Post and can have many Comments. My current code looks like this:
Post.transaction do
import_posts.each do |import_post|
post = Post.find_or_initialize_by(somevalue: import_post['somevalue']
post.text = import_post['text']
import_post['comments'].each do |import_comment|
comment = post.comments.find_or_initialize_by(someothervalue: import_comment['someothervalue'])
comment.text = import_comment['text']
end
post.save(validate: false) #Dont need validation - saves some time
end
end
This is just an example and it works but its far away from 'damn fast'. Are there any ideas how to speed up the data upload? Am I totally wrong?
Im working with Rails5 and ruby 2.4.
Thanks in advance!
I have been using XML to create invoices but I am updating my code and switching to using JSON.
When using XML I would get a set of XML returned and part of the data was the new Invoice ID.
However, so it seems at least, when I create a new invoice via the API using JSON, I just get "http/200" (or something like that) returned and no info about what the new invoice ID is!
I need the invoice ID so I can post an attachment.
I tried adding "?summarizeErrors=false" to the end of the URL but nothing was returned unless there was an issue - kinda what it says it does :-)
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Thanks, Jeremy
Its Ok....I resolved it. Wrong value populated in a property in the HTTP control I was using...ugh.
Im using EWS to update exchange appointments but sometimes I can't update them after they are created. I'm receiving:
"At least one recipient isn't valid., A message can't be sent because it contains no recipients."
The code is essentially:
Appointment appointment = getAppointment();
... set some properties
appointment.Update(ConflictResolutionMode.AlwaysOverwrite, SendInvitationsOrCancellationsMode.SendToNone);
Isn't that supposed to work? Beforehand I didn't use the SendInvitationsOrCancellationsMode.SendToNone enum, but even with that I get the same exception.
It's never a problem to create the appointment, it's always the updates that we are having problems with.
For the sake of the log, I send a solution here. I managed to solve it with a workaround. It accepts it if I add a new item to the OptionalAttendees collection, when it is empty. Since I add the SendInvitationsOrCancellationsMode.SendToNone flag, it will send nothing, but finally accepts it without an exception.
if (EWSItem.OptionalAttendees.Count == 0)
EWSItem.OptionalAttendees.Add("me#me.com");
EWSItem.Update(ConflictResolutionMode.AlwaysOverwrite,
SendInvitationsOrCancellationsMode.SendToNone);
Using the Box 1.0 REST API, I am trying to work with the functions in SOAP UI.
The API doc for get_managed_users with user_id=12345 (internal id retrieved with get_user_id call correctly) is returning all the users. The docs say that would be the case if you do not specify a user_id value. But my full command is: (Token and API key changed to protect the clueless)
https://www.box.com/api/1.0/rest?user_id=27360&auth_token=blahbalhblah1234&action=get_managed_users&api_key=someKeyYouShouldNotSee
Now I could work with the complete result list, but that won't scale as we get thousands of users into the system.
I can make a call with edit_managed_user, using the same user_id value and the change is reflected in the UI, and in the next get_managed_users call. Thus I do have the correct user_id value, I would so assume.
I tried testuser#gmail.com as the user_id value as well, and get the entire list back. This leads me to believe that somehow I am sending user_id wrong, but I just do not see it.
Any hints? Why, with what seems like a valid user_id value is it acting like it is absent or incorrect?
Most likely you have either called this method with an invalid user_id, or one that is not in your set of managed users. Can you double check that the user comes back in your list of already managed users?