I'm making a chrome extension and on a specific web page I have a table that has commented out information.
I'd like to remove the comment syntax so that the information is displayed in the table
What kind of content script would I need to parse the HTML for the specific comment syntax and then remove it?
Also, every time I pack my extension to a .crx file the file size nearly doubles. Is this standard? My 16 kb files are turning into a 40 MB extension- I'm worried that it isn't supposed to work like that.
First off, likely when you package your extension into a .crx file, you're putting the resulting .crx file in the same folder as your source files.
Then the next time that you package the extension, instead of your source folder having just the files you want to package, it has the files you want to package plus the previous .crx file. Every time this happens you effectively (just over) double the file size. To prevent this, make sure the .crx file is getting saved to the parent directory.
As far as the uncommenting HTML goes, I would check out this answer:
Uncomment html code using javascript
Related
I frequently have to reopen files from a link, or find it somewhere on the downloads folder. It is not that important and far too many downloads to properly save and sort them for when I will or will not need later.
So is there a way to simply make firefox (or chrome) open the already downloaded file instead downloading it again ?
Upon opening my VS Code project and selecting the single HTML file inside it, a prompt appeared stating that the HTML file doesn’t exist: “(Error: Unable to resolve nonexistent file [file path])”. I opened the only other VS Code project I have containing an HTML file and the single HTML file within that project had disappeared as well.
I then opened Finder and, navigating to the two projects, found that there were no longer HTML files inside either project folders; only the CSS and JavaScript files I had created were there. Having not opened or touched the projects for about a week or so, I’m confused as to how these two HTML files in two different projects are both now “nonexistent.”
So far I’ve tried to show hidden files in Finder, look up the file names in Spotlight Search, check my Trash bin, and search for the file in my iCloud Drive. However, I still haven’t been able to find or recover the files.
Try to change the file extension from .html to .blade.php . Close your vs code and try to open your projects again.
from the get started window open the folder or file there the drop down menu didn't work for me
I have a directory structure, containing a list of directories and files.
I want to give user an option of downloading a file. For downloading, I'm using HTML5 download attribute. It works perfectly.
But the directory structure i have can have dotfiles too, examples: .babelrc, .gitignore, .eslintrc, etc.
When I use the same technique to download such files, file is being downloaded with the same content but the file is no longer a dotfile. After downloading, let's say .gitignore, the file becomes gitignore.txt.
I'm using this for my project github-plus - Chrome extension to display size of each file, download link and an option of copying it's contents.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
I'm using this format:
Download
JSFIDDLE DEMO
Quoting HTML5 specification on downloading resources with the download attribute, about file type/extension :
If the claimed type is known, then alter filename to add an extension corresponding to claimed type.
Otherwise, if named type is known to be potentially dangerous (e.g. it will be treated by the platform conventions as a native executable, shell script, HTML application, or executable-macro-capable document) then optionally alter filename to add a known-safe extension (e.g. ".txt").
It seems that:
the part of the algorithm that finally choses the filename is platform-dependent
if the extension is not recognised, as in the case of dotfiles, the browser will try to determine it by using the file MIME type
dotfiles might be considered anyway as potentially harmful as they are hidden files on various platforms. This seems to be what happens in your case, with the initial dot being removed and the .txt extension appended.
Let's say I have a URL http://example.com/path/to/document.html
That's the html document, the file, that has no external css or js.
If I open it in Google Chrome and save it with Ctrl+S locally, the content is changed. The content of that html file starts with <!-- saved from url= which is not I want at all. I need to get the exact html document, even spaces count.
The second option is to copy it with Ctrl+U (View Source), Select All and paste it into new document, save it and rename it. This is better, however spaces, tabs and end of file will be different depending on what operation system I'm using.
I need the exact copy of that html file - byte to byte.
How to make it?
This is a practical question as I need slightly modify that document.
I'm sorry there is no any source code in my question, but this question is about web developing.
Any ideas?
Thank you.
P.S. Of course that document could be generated by php or whatever, the part of the code can be even extracted from the db, but not in my case. I know that's a plain file.
I'd delete the comment after saving from Chrome, use wget in a linux environment, or open the page as an InputStream in Java. Do all three, run a diff, and if two arrived identical assume that's the file on the server.
Why do you need a byte-for-byte copy of the file on the server anyway, and why can't you ftp the file? There is always the chance that the server will serve different html files depending on your user-agent, but there are other tools which may be better than Chrome for getting your copy and many can spoof a user-agent as well.
I have an A.chm file for my windows application which runs as expected.
When I decompile it using HTML workshop I get set of html files, .hhc file, .hhk file. When I compile another file B.chm from these extracted files without changing any of the files.((I want to add more html contents to this file but looks like I am losing some information after decompiling)) The output file I get is 72K where as the original file was 75K. B.chm's contents look all file when viewed in the chm viewer but the behavior is lost when when used with the application.
After reading around I found that if .hhp can be extracted from a .chm file then it can be re-constructed as it is without losing any mapping or aliases. Is that true?
How can I extract .hhp file from a .chm file?
Thanks,
Sam
No, Yes , and no.
The original hhp can't be guaranteed extracted
however since chm is an archive type, the project could have added all project files to the archive. I assume you already would have found them if that were the case.
If the decompile process does its administration, it can regenerate the .hhp to a certain degree.
Comments and #define names will probably be lost though, maybe more, but that should not result in problems when recompiling.
But of course it could be that the decompiler is limited. You could try some other (search for something from "keytools").
If not, then take "chmlib" and start drilling down into the format.