I have been looking all over the internet for a way to run web browsers on the cloud(specifically Chrome and Firefox) while I am away. The solutions I found online allows me run these apps but do not allow me keep it running even after shutting off my PC.
I need help on any cloud service(s) that allows these features and is relatively cheap or free to setup, thanks.
Buy a VPS and install you favorite operating system with your browser... and you can run your browsers 24/7 with your pc off!!
Related
I was debugging a situation, where chrome keeps saying it is managed by third party organization. Whether it was due to the malware or not is yet to be seen. What bothers me that some process in Windows keeps creating the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Google\Chrome\NativeMessagingHosts\ registry entries even if I uninstall Chrome. Whether the key is created by legit app or malware it seems that native applications can communicate with chrome without user noticing or having mechanisms to disable the communication.
Now I am really concerned by the security issues connected with the existence of the mechanism of communication between browser and native applications through native messaging see here. I would prefer my browser not being able to see other applications in the system and other applications to see that browser is running or at least have an option to sandbox the browser and isolate it from native applications.
Is there a way to disable this kind of communication in Chrome and in the host system, in my case Windows but I would be interested in Linux as well.
We're having some issues running our Electron-based app on Debian 10 as it uses Chrome runtime, Chrome requires its sandbox to run and, on defaults, Chrome sandbox won't run on Debian.
Surely, basic solution would be to run without sandbox on Debian, but that option has massive security risks that I'm not comfortable with.
There are other options. The one described in Electron docs and oh so many tutorials is enabling kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone flag:
echo kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone = 1 | sudo tee /etc/sysctl.d/00-local-userns.conf
Supposedly that how it works on other desktop distributions, like Ubuntu. Yet there still are security risks that I just don't fully understand. So far I've found several relevant discussions:
https://lwn.net/Articles/673597/
https://forum.mxlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=54591
But I'm failing to grasp what exactly is the tradeoff here. How does enabling unprivileged_userns_clone affect security? What are these risks exactly? Are there better options to run Chrome sandbox on Debian securely (as we are stuck with it)?
I am looking in a way to have some kind of "image" (VM, Vagrant box, Docker container...???) with all the development tools needed to work on our software project, like a configured IDE (i.e. Eclipse or PyCharm), build and deployment tools.
After a bit of searching I found surprising little about this topic, while plenty about development environments that mirrors the production one. Almost every source I found considers installing development tools on the host, while deploying in a virtualized environment.
The first thing that comes to my mind is a virtual machine of some sort, maybe provisioned in an automated way (Packer + Ansible maybe). I have also seen some blog posts about running GUI applications in Docker containers via X.org.
Is there a better way? How did you solve the problem?
The ultimate goal is to let new hires being productive in hours instead of days.
UPDATE: After some research, I am currently evaluating:
Development in a Virtual Machine
Development with the support of Docker containers
Cloud IDEs
Have your IT department make an image of a development laptop and then use a confluence page for tweaking the images to the needs of the individual developer. Then use docker images for setting up any servers they will need. These can be run on the laptops. You can use docker swarm to have many docker images spun up if you need it.
I prefer to have dev tools installed on the host so every one do it its own way and I don't want to convert someone to specific tool.
If you want to go the other route and give your new hires a ready to use dev box, I would go with vagrant working in GUI mode + provisioning scripts. For example the jhipster project has a nice dev box, its pretty nice as they have many tools to be installed, its pretty neat so after you install vagrant/virtualbox (or vmware)/git on your host you're ready in minutes.
When I try to deploy a windows 10 app using remote debugger, I get this error "DEP0100 - deployment failed due to a developer licensing issue windows 10 while trying to remote a windows store app."
From what I understand, there is no concept of windows developer licensing in windows 10, all I have to do is to enable developer mode from settings.
I have still tried to renew developer license using powershell.
Is there any solution for this issue?
PS. Remote debugging was working earlier, it suddenly started giving this error.
Edit: This is happening only when remote debugger is running as a service.
This may seem like a really dumb solution, but I had the same issue and couldn't find what's wrong, until I enabled developer mode and it all worked.
To enable developer mode on Windows 10:
Click Start
Type "For Developers Settings"
Switch to "Developer Mode"
Not sure about this, but make sure the account you're using to run the service is allowed to do developer stuff on your machine.
Here's what I would do:
Generate an account on the machine with admin rights (e.g.
"myadminuser")
Log in as "myadminuser" and enable developer mode for
that account on the machine. (You might have to provide a Microsoft
account here) This will allow the account to install apps.
Configure the service to run with user "myadminuser".
I didn't try this, but this should work.
Currently I am exploring the possibilities and features of Google Chrome apps. As I see to run chrome apps we need to distribute them through chrome App Store. Could we develop a application as a chrome app, which will not need to release to general public or for a limited audience?
Is there anyway that we could package it to native OS executable like .exe in windows or .app in MacOS. So for users who doesn't have chrome installed will also can without any issue. Or at least could we distribute without submitting it to the App Store.
Also I am wondering whether we can run another application through chrome apps? For example I am planing to develop a java application and start with the chrome app.
You can distribute a Chrome App without using the Chrome Web Store, but you'll have to explain to users how to install it, and it's a little tricky: They have to open the Extensions window in Chrome and then drag the installation file to that window. Upon dropping it, there will be a dialog asking them if they want it installed. (They can't just double-click on a file or do anything else that's easy like that.)
Chrome Apps can't directly launch native apps, but they can communicate in various ways with native apps (or any apps) once those other apps are running.
(Some parts of your question are ungrammatical, so I can't be completely sure what you're asking, but the above is what I think you're asking.)
Chrome Extensions are only installable from the Web Store, but Applications can be privately hosted with some provisos: https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/hosting