Is canvas required? - html

I've been working with HTML5 drag and drop, and canvas. I'm trying to put the two together: I drag an element to a drop-area; in the drop-area I want to be able to move the dropped items around to position them as needed.
I know how to drop elements into a div, for ex, but:
does the drop-area have to be a canvas for (re)positioning?
is there a specific term for the moving/repositioning of elements in the drop-area/canvas. I've done a lot of searching and can't find a term for this specifically. simply 'dragging'??
sample drop-area.

No the canvas element is not required anyhow.
You can achieve the exact same result as the linked example you gave without using any canvas.
Here is an example code, among many others possible, certainly far from being perfect, but which does the same as your example, using only <div> elements, css and javascript, but it could also be made with svg.
// we will increment it to get the dragged element atop of everything
var zIndex = 0;
// our constructor
var newElement = function() {
var that = {};
// first get its dimension and position randomly
that.rad = Math.random() * 20 + 10;
// x and y are the center of our element
that.x = Math.random() * (500 - that.rad * 2) + that.rad;
that.y = Math.random() * (300 - that.rad * 2) + that.rad;
// define the element that will be appended to the doc
that.el = document.createElement('div');
// a shortcut to the style property of the element
// since we'll play with this to update our object's position
var s = that.el.style;
// don't forget we're talking in css
s.width = that.rad * 2 + 'px';
s.height = that.rad * 2 + 'px';
s.left = that.x - that.rad + 'px';
s.top = that.y - that.rad + 'px';
s.backgroundColor = get_random_color();
// needed to make be sure we're not in a corner of the circle shaped elements
that.isCircle = Math.random() > .5;
if (that.isCircle) {
that.el.className = 'circle';
}
// happens on mousedown
that.startDrag = function(x, y) {
that.lastX = x;
that.lastY = y;
s.zIndex = ++zIndex;
}
// happens on mousemove if we're the one being dragged
that.move = function(x, y) {
that.x += x - that.lastX;
that.y += y - that.lastY;
that.lastX = x;
that.lastY = y;
s.left = that.x - that.rad + 'px';
s.top = that.y - that.rad + 'px';
};
container.appendChild(that.el);
return that;
};
var elements = [];
for (var i = 0; i < (~~(Math.random() * 50)) + 15; i++) {
elements.push(newElement());
}
var dragged;
var mousedown = function(e) {
var rect = container.getBoundingClientRect();
var x = e.clientX - rect.left;
var y = e.clientY - rect.top;
dragged = null;
// sort our elements, higher zIndex firsts
elements.sort(function(a, b) {
return (+b.el.style.zIndex) - (+a.el.style.zIndex);
});
elements.forEach(function(el) {
// we already found the One, no need to go further
// (no "break;" in forEach method...)
if (dragged) return;
// is our mouse over the rectangular bounds of this element
if (x >= el.x - el.rad && x <= el.x + el.rad &&
y >= el.y - el.rad && y <= el.y + el.rad) {
if (el.isCircle) {
// a little bit of Pythagorian
var a = el.x - x;
var b = el.y - y;
var dist = Math.sqrt(a * a + b * b);
// too far from the center, we were in the corner
if (dist > el.rad) {
return;
}
}
// we got through here,
// tell the whole app we've got the One
dragged = el;
el.startDrag(x, y);
}
});
};
var mousemove = function(e) {
// nobody is being dragged, so don't do anything
if (!dragged) return;
// otherwise, tell the browser we handle the event
e.preventDefault();
e.stopPropagation();
// get the coordinates of our container
var rect = container.getBoundingClientRect();
// get the relative coordinates of our event
var x = e.clientX - rect.left;
var y = e.clientY - rect.top;
// move the dragged element accordingly
dragged.move(x, y);
};
var mouseup = function() {
// we dropped it..
dragged = null;
};
container.onmousedown = mousedown;
container.onmousemove = mousemove;
container.onmouseup = mouseup;
function get_random_color() {
var letters = '0123456789ABCDEF'.split('');
var color = '#';
for (var i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
color += letters[Math.round(Math.random() * 15)];
}
return color;
};
body {
text-align: center;
}
#container {
width: 500px;
height: 300px;
background-color: black;
margin: 0 auto;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
#container>div {
position: absolute;
opacity: .7;
}
.circle {
border-radius: 50%;
}
<div id="container"></div>
As you can see, I myself used the word dragged to refer to the object that we do move while we move the mouse with the button down. Yes, dragging is how this action is called...
But, this has very little to do with the HTML drag and drop API where what is important is not the positioning of your elements, but their content.
You can drag and drop elements into others, but it was mainly developed to drag data (external files or text content) to the document.
For this particular example, that would make things a lot harder and while the name "dragging" still applies to the action of the end-user, this shall not be confused with the API and every events related.

A canvas element is required by your linked canvas demo, but you can alternatively use the drag/drop API built into html+JS. And you can "manually" move DOM objects using mouse events as described in Kaiido's answer.
The canvas is required for your linked demo to work.
That exact demo was coded using a canvas element's drawing capabilities and that exact demo will not work if you try to substitute a DIV.
Think of html5 canvas as a re-writable bitmap. You can't "move" or "drag" anything on the canvas. Instead, you completely erase the canvas surface and redraw your circles in their new positions.
In the case of dragging, you listen for mousemove events on the canvas and reposition the circle under the mouse by the distance the mouse has moved since the last mousemove event.

Related

HTML5 / kineticJS getIntersection function implementation

I am learning kineticjs through tutorials provided at http://www.html5canvastutorials.com, things are good and easy to understand but, I am having issue in understanding the getIntersection function that i want to use among different objects while dragging to detect collision / overlapping objects.
As far as I have understood the example the getIntersection function expects a position and checks if its intersecting with any other object or not..
Though I got them but with some issues.
I am unable to accomplish this..
Below is the code that I have tried up to now..
<script>
var stage = new Kinetic.Stage({
container: 'container',
width: 1000,
height: 500,
opacity: 0.5
});
var layer = new Kinetic.Layer();
var previous_position;
var new_position;
var collision = false;
var colors = ['red', 'orange', 'yellow', 'green', 'blue', 'purple'];
var yellowBox = null;
for(var n = 0; n < 6; n++) {
// anonymous function to induce scope
(function() {
var i = n;
if(n < 3){
y = 50;
x = i * 100 + i * 10;
}else{
y = 150;
x = (i - 3) * 100 + (i - 3) * 10 ;
if(n == 3){
x = 0;
}
}
var box = new Kinetic.Rect({
x: x,
y: y,
width: 100,
height: 50,
fill: colors[i],
stroke: 'black',
strokeWidth: 4,
draggable: true,
name: colors[i]
});
box.on('dragstart', function() {
previous_position = {
x: this.attrs.x,
y: this.attrs.y
};
});
box.on('dragend', function() {
if(collision){
//this.setPosition(previous_position);
layer.draw();
collision = false;
}else{
//this.setPosition(new_position);
layer.draw();
}
});
box.on("dragmove", function(evt) {
console.log(layer.children.length);
if(layer.children.length > 1){
console.log('dragging');
new_position = {x: this.attrs.x,
y: this.attrs.y};
// var posBL = {x: this.attrs.x,
// y: this.attrs.height + this.attrs.y};
// var posTR = {x: this.attrs.x + this.attrs.width,
// y: this.attrs.y};
var posBR = {x: this.attrs.x + this.attrs.width,
y: this.attrs.y + this.attrs.height };
var collisionTL = this.getStage().getIntersections(new_position);
// var collisionBL = this.getStage().getIntersections(posBL);
// var collisionTR = this.getStage().getIntersections(posTR);
// var collisionBR = this.getStage().getIntersections(posBR);
console.log(collisionTL);
console.log(collisionTL.shapes);
// if(collisionTL.length > 1 || collisionBL.length > 0 || collisionTR.length > 0 || collisionBR.length > 0){
if(collisionTL.length > 1){
console.log(collisionTL.shapes);
collision = true;
}else{ //if(collisionBR.length > 0){
collision = true;
}
// for(i=0; i < collision.length; i++){
// // console.log(collision[i]._id);
// }
}
});
if(colors[i] === 'yellow') {
yellowBox = box;
}
layer.add(box);
})();
}
stage.add(layer);
</script>
in the dragmove event you guyz can see I get the four corner positions of the dragging box {commented right now} and with this I was able to detect the overlap / collision but it has 2 issues:
1. very slow with only 3 objects in my test
2. if non of the corner points intersect it didn't fire the collision stuff {for this one box can be bigger so it can cover the other entirely}
I would highly apreciate if anyone can please help me accomplish this stuff..
[A] Any object dragging if by any mean overlaps any other object I want it to show collision.
[B] If possible make getIntersection to work on a particular layer group whichever is possible
[C] any other workaround beside kineticJS to accomplish the above task
Regards
Ok, the developer of KineticJS is working on improving the .getIntersections() function... or at least he said he is. But until the function is improved you have to make your own collision detection function. Assuming that your objects are rectangles or can be broken into a series of points you should go with something like this:
Create a function which determines if a point is in a shape (if the corner of a rectangle is inside another rectangle) like so:
function checkCollide(pointX, pointY, objectx, objecty, objectw, objecth) { // pointX, pointY belong to one rectangle, while the object variables belong to another rectangle
var oTop = objecty;
var oLeft = objectx;
var oRight = objectx+objectw;
var oBottom = objecty+objecth;
if(pointX > oLeft && pointX < oRight){
if(pointY > oTop && pointY < oBottom ){
return 1;
}
}
else
return 0;
};
then you can do a big loop which iterates through all objects in a layer to check collision, like so:
var children = layer.getChildren();
for( var i=0; i<children.length; i++){ // for each single shape
for( var j=0; j<children.length; j++){ //check each other shape
if(i != j){ //skip if shape is the same
if(checkCollide(children[i].getX(), children[i].getY(), children[j].getX(), children[j].getY(), children[j].getWidth(), children[j].getHeight()))
alert('top left corner collided');
}
}
}
the checkCollide function I provided only checks the collision for the top left corner on each shape, so you have to modify the function to check all corners, it's not a long rewrite, and there are plenty tutorials even here on stackoverflow which deal with 'bounding rectangles collision detection'
This may seem like it is a very heavy function, but surprisingly it is still faster than .getIntersections(). Also, you should throw in extra if statements so that the function doesn't run through all the checks all the time.
I created a game myself and was using .intersects() and was having a lot of slow down. I switched over to this type of 'simpler' collision detection and now my game runs around 60FPS. http://cs.neiu.edu/~tsam/physics/index.phtml (test/test) if you want to check it out. You can view page source to see how I structured the collision detection to be more efficient (such as in checkIntersectsGoal() function.

Working with canvas to display only the drawn image and not whole canvas

With the plugin i found earlier on stackoverflow. Drawing has become smooth and nice. What i want is to only get the image part which i draw cropped from the canvas as an output and not the complete canvas. Can somebody help.
This is the code i am using for my canvas now: http://jsfiddle.net/sVsZL/1/
function canvasDisplay() {
var c=document.getElementById("canvas");
canvasImage=c.toDataURL("image/png");
document.getElementById("SSMySelectedImage").src=canvasImage;
}
Adding another answer because the other one was completely off.
Live Demo
What you need essentially is to keep track of a bounding box. What I do is create an object that holds the min values and max values of where you've drawn. This enables you to keep track of how big the image is and where it begins/ends.
this.dim = {minX : 9999, minY : 9999, maxX : 0, maxY : 0};
Then I created a function that checks the bounds.
this.setDimensions = function(x,y){
if(x < this.dim.minX){
this.dim.minX = x;
}
if(y < this.dim.minY){
this.dim.minY = y;
}
if(x > this.dim.maxX){
this.dim.maxX= x;
}
if(y > this.dim.maxY){
this.dim.maxY = y;
}
}
Make sure to check during clicking or moving.
this.mousedown = function(ev) {
tool.setDimensions(ev._x,ev._y);
};
this.mousemove = function(ev) {
tool.setDimensions(ev._x,ev._y);
};
And this is just a sample function that draws the portion to a new canvas that you could then save with toDataUrl
var button = document.getElementsByTagName("input")[0];
button.addEventListener("click", function(){
var savedCanvas = document.createElement("canvas"),
savedCtx = savedCanvas.getContext("2d"),
minX = PEN.dim.minX,
minY = PEN.dim.minY,
maxX = PEN.dim.maxX,
maxY = PEN.dim.maxY,
width = maxX - minX,
height = maxY - minY;
savedCanvas.width = width;
savedCanvas.height = height;
document.body.appendChild(savedCanvas);
savedCtx.drawImage(canvas,minX,minY,width,height,0,0,width,height);
});

AS3 zooming in and out where mouse clicked not at registration

I am trying to have a masked mouse panned image zoom in and out with a click and a double click mouse event. I got the image to zoom but it always zooms in on the left edge registration point, not where I click. I have absolutely no idea how to code this and have spent the whole day on the internet trying to figure it out with no luck. I am hoping someone can help me to figure this out!
import com.greensock.*;//Greensock Tweening Platform.
//Variables
var percX:Number;
var percY:Number;
var destX:Number;
var destY:Number;
//Image panned and masked
this.mask = mask_mc;
stage.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_MOVE,mousemove);
function mousemove(e:MouseEvent) {
if (mask_mc.hitTestPoint(stage.mouseX,stage.mouseY,false)) {
if (imgLoader.width>mask_mc.width) {//Avoids Scrolling if image is under mask area width
percX = mask_mc.mouseX/mask_mc.width;
}
if (imgLoader.height>mask_mc.height) {//Avoids Scrolling if image is under mask area height
percY = mask_mc.mouseY/mask_mc.height;
}
destX = -(imgLoader.width-mask_mc.width)*percX;
destY = -(imgLoader.height-mask_mc.height)*percY;
TweenMax.to(imgLoader,.5,{x:destX,y:destY});
}
}
//Add listeners for the imgLoader movie clip.
imgLoader.doubleClickEnabled = true;
imgLoader.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, increaseSize);
imgLoader.addEventListener(MouseEvent.DOUBLE_CLICK, decreaseSize);
//This function increases the scale of the image
function increaseSize(event:MouseEvent):void{
TweenLite.to(imgLoader, 1, {scaleX:2, scaleY:2});
}
//This function decreases the scale of the image
function decreaseSize(event:MouseEvent):void{
TweenLite.to(imgLoader, 1, {scaleX:1, scaleY:1});
}
This answer is derived from here
Add this function:
function scaleAroundMouse(objectToScale:DisplayObject, scaleAmount:Number, bounds:Rectangle = null, onComplete:Function = null):TweenLite {
// scaling will be done relatively
var relScaleX:Number = scaleAmount / objectToScale.scaleX;
var relScaleY:Number = scaleAmount / objectToScale.scaleY;
// map vector to centre point within parent scope
var scalePoint:Point = objectToScale.localToGlobal( new Point(objectToScale.mouseX, objectToScale.mouseY));
scalePoint = objectToScale.parent.globalToLocal( scalePoint );
// current registered postion AB
var AB:Point = new Point( objectToScale.x, objectToScale.y );
// CB = AB - scalePoint, objectToScale vector that will scale as it runs from the centre
var CB:Point = AB.subtract( scalePoint );
CB.x *= relScaleX;
CB.y *= relScaleY;
// recaulate AB, objectToScale will be the adjusted position for the clip
AB = scalePoint.add( CB );
// set actual properties
if(bounds){
var limits:Rectangle = new Rectangle(
bounds.x + (bounds.width - (objectToScale.width * relScaleX)),
bounds.y + (bounds.height - (objectToScale.height * relScaleY)),
(objectToScale.width * relScaleX) - bounds.width,
(objectToScale.height * relScaleY) - bounds.height
);
if(AB.x < limits.x) AB.x = limits.x;
if(AB.x > limits.x + limits.width) AB.x = limits.x + limits.width;
if(AB.y < limits.y) AB.y = limits.y;
if(AB.y > limits.y + limits.height) AB.y = limits.y + limits.height;
}
return TweenLite.to(objectToScale,1,{onComplete: onComplete, scaleX: scaleAmount, scaleY: scaleAmount, x: AB.x, y: AB.y);
}
Then update your sizing function to this:
function increaseSize(event:MouseEvent):void{
stopMouseMove();
scaleAroundMouse(imgLoader, 2, null, resumeMouseMove);
}
function decreaseSize(event:MouseEvent):void{
stopMouseMove();
scaleAroundMouse(imgLoader, 1, null, resumeMouseMove);
}
function stopMouseMove():void {
stage.removeEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_MOVE,mousemove);
}
function resumeMouseMove():void {
stage.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_MOVE,mousemove);
}
I also added a bounds parameter to the function. This is useful if you never want the edges of you content to be visible within the mask. So if you could use it by passing the bounds of your mask to the function:
scaleAroundMouse(imgLoader, 1, myMask.getBounds(this));
This example uses zoom effect classes that may help achieve the zoom effect you are looking for http://graphics-geek.blogspot.com/2010/06/video-image-zoom-effect-in-flex-4.html.
var mat:Matrix=new Matrix();
mat.translate(-p.x,-p.y);
mat.scale(desiredScale,desiredScale);
mat.translate(p.x,p.y);
yourObject.transform.matrix=mat;
That is taken from a question I posted about a month ago. You can see it here. While I didn't end up going with that specific snippet (I actually went with a modified version of the script LondongDrugs_MediaServ posted), it will work and is much easier to understand and implement.

Does Canvas redraw itself every time anything changes?

I have done some research on how canvas works. It is supposed to be "immediate mode" means that it does not remember what its drawing looks like, only the bitmap remains everytime anything changes.
This seems to suggest that canvas does not redraw itself on change.
However, when I tested canvas on iPad (basically I keep drawing parallel lines on the canvas), the frame rate degrades rapidly when there are more lines on the canvas. Lines are drawn more slowly and in a more jumpy way.
Does this mean canvas actually have to draw the whole thing on change? Or there is other reason for this change in performance?
The HTML canvas remembers the final state of pixels after each stroke/fill call is made. It never redraws itself. (The web browser may need to re-blit portions of the final image to the screen, for example if another HTML object is moved over the canvas and then away again, but this is not the same as re-issuing the drawing commands.
The context always remembers its current state, including any path that you have been accumulating. It is probable that you are (accidentally) not clearing your path between 'refreshes', and so on the first frame you are drawing one line, on the second frame two lines, on the third frame three lines, and so forth. (Are you calling ctx.closePath() and ctx.beginPath()? Are you clearing the canvas between drawings?)
Here's an example showing that the canvas does not redraw itself. Even at tens of thousands of lines I see the same frame rate as with hundreds of lines (capped at 200fps on Chrome, ~240fps on Firefox 8.0, when drawing 10 lines per frame).
var lastFrame = new Date, avgFrameMS=5, lines=0;
function drawLine(){
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(Math.random()*w,Math.random()*h);
ctx.lineTo(Math.random()*w,Math.random()*h);
ctx.closePath();
ctx.stroke();
var now = new Date;
var frameTime = now - lastFrame;
avgFrameMS += (frameTime-avgFrameMS)/20;
lastFrame = now;
setTimeout(drawLine,1);
lines++;
}
drawLine();
// Show the stats infrequently
setInterval(function(){
fps.innerHTML = (1000/avgFrameMS).toFixed(1);
l.innerHTML = lines;
},1000);
Seen in action: http://phrogz.net/tmp/canvas_refresh_rate.html
For more feedback on what your code is actually doing versus what you suspect it is doing, share your test case with us.
Adding this answer to be more general.
It really depends on what the change is. If the change is simply to add another path to the previously drawn context, then the canvas does not have to be redrawn. Simply add the new path to the present context state. The previously selected answer reflects this with an excellent demo found here.
However, if the change is to translate or "move" an already drawn path to another part of the canvas, then yes, the whole canvas has to be redrawn. Imagine the same demo linked above accumulating lines while also rotating about the center of the canvas. For every rotation, the canvas would have to be redrawn, with all previously drawn lines redrawn at the new angle. This concept of redrawing on translation is fairly self-evident, as the canvas has no method of deleting from the present context. For simple translations, like a dot moving across the canvas, one could draw over the dot's present location and redraw the new dot at the new, translated location, all on the same context. This may or may not be more operationally complex than just redrawing the whole canvas with the new, translated dot, depending on how complex the previously drawn objects are.
Another demo to demonstrate this concept is when rendering an oscilloscope trace via the canvas. The below code implements a FIFO data structure as the oscilloscope's data, and then plots it on the canvas. Like a typical oscilloscope, once the trace spans the width of the canvas, the trace must translate left to make room for new data points on the right. To do this, the canvas must be redrawn every time a new data point is added.
function rand_int(min, max) {
min = Math.ceil(min);
max = Math.floor(max);
return Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min + 1) + min); //The maximum is inclusive and the minimum is inclusive
}
function Deque(max_len) {
this.max_len = max_len;
this.length = 0;
this.first = null;
this.last = null;
}
Deque.prototype.Node = function(val, next, prev) {
this.val = val;
this.next = next;
this.prev = prev;
};
Deque.prototype.push = function(val) {
if (this.length == this.max_len) {
this.pop();
}
const node_to_push = new this.Node(val, null, this.last);
if (this.last) {
this.last.next = node_to_push;
} else {
this.first = node_to_push;
}
this.last = node_to_push;
this.length++;
};
Deque.prototype.pop = function() {
if (this.length) {
let val = this.first.val;
this.first = this.first.next;
if (this.first) {
this.first.prev = null;
} else {
this.last = null;
}
this.length--;
return val;
} else {
return null;
}
};
Deque.prototype.to_string = function() {
if (this.length) {
var str = "[";
var present_node = this.first;
while (present_node) {
if (present_node.next) {
str += `${present_node.val}, `;
} else {
str += `${present_node.val}`
}
present_node = present_node.next;
}
str += "]";
return str
} else {
return "[]";
}
};
Deque.prototype.plot = function(canvas) {
const w = canvas.width;
const h = canvas.height;
const ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, w, h);
//Draw vertical gridlines
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.setLineDash([2]);
ctx.strokeStyle = "rgb(124, 124, 124)";
for (var i = 1; i < 9; i++) {
ctx.moveTo(i * w / 9, 0);
ctx.lineTo(i * w / 9, h);
}
//Draw horizontal gridlines
for (var i = 1; i < 10; i++) {
ctx.moveTo(0, i * h / 10);
ctx.lineTo(w, i * h / 10);
}
ctx.stroke();
ctx.closePath();
if (this.length) {
var present_node = this.first;
var x = 0;
ctx.setLineDash([]);
ctx.strokeStyle = "rgb(255, 51, 51)";
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(x, h - present_node.val * (h / 10));
while (present_node) {
ctx.lineTo(x * w / 9, h - present_node.val * (h / 10));
x++;
present_node = present_node.next;
}
ctx.stroke();
ctx.closePath();
}
};
const canvas = document.getElementById("canvas");
const deque_contents = document.getElementById("deque_contents");
const button = document.getElementById("push_to_deque");
const min = 0;
const max = 9;
const max_len = 10;
var deque = new Deque(max_len);
deque.plot(canvas);
button.addEventListener("click", function() {
push_to_deque();
});
function push_to_deque() {
deque.push(rand_int(0, 9));
deque_contents.innerHTML = deque.to_string();
deque.plot(canvas);
}
body {
font-family: Arial;
}
.centered {
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
text-align: center;
}
<div class="centered">
<p>Implementation of a FIFO deque data structure in JavaScript to mimic oscilloscope functionality. Push the button to push random values to the deque object. After the maximum length is reached, the first item pushed in is popped out to make room for the next value. The values are plotted in the canvas. The canvas must be redrawn to translate the data, making room for the new data.
</p>
<div>
<button type="button" id="push_to_deque">push</button>
</div>
<div>
<h1 id="deque_contents">[]</h1>
</div>
<div>
<canvas id="canvas" width="800" height="500" style="border:2px solid #D3D3D3; margin: 10px;">
</canvas>
</div>
</div>

Insane Graphics.lineStyle behavior

I'd like some help with a little project of mine.
Background:
i have a little hierarchy of Sprite derived classes (5 levels starting from the one, that is the root application class in Flex Builder). Width and Height properties are overriden so that my class always remembers it's requested size (not just bounding size around content) and also those properties explicitly set scaleX and scaleY to 1, so that no scaling would ever be involved. After storing those values, draw() method is called to redraw content.
Drawing:
Drawing is very straight forward. Only the deepest object (at 1-indexed level 5) draws something into this.graphics object like this:
var gr:Graphics = this.graphics;
gr.clear();
gr.lineStyle(0, this.borderColor, 1, true, LineScaleMode.NONE);
gr.beginFill(0x0000CC);
gr.drawRoundRectComplex(0, 0, this.width, this.height, 10, 10, 0, 0);
gr.endFill();
Further on:
There is also MouseEvent.MOUSE_WHEEL event attached to the parent of the object that draws. What handler does is simply resizes that drawing object.
Problem:
Screenshot
When resizing sometimes that hairline border line with LineScaleMode.NONE set gains thickness (quite often even >10 px) + it quite often leaves a trail of itself (as seen in the picture above and below blue box (notice that box itself has one px black border)). When i set lineStile thickness to NaN or alpha to 0, that trail is no more happening.
I've been coming back to this problem and dropping it for some other stuff for over a week now.
Any ideas anyone?
P.S. Grey background is that of Flash Player itself, not my own choise.. :D
As requested, a bit more:
Application is supposed to be a calendar-timeline with a zooming "feature" (project for a course at university). Thus i have these functions that have something to do with resizing:
public function performZoom():void
{
// Calculate new width:
var newDayWidth:Number = view.width / 7 * this.calModel.zoom;
if (newDayWidth < 1)
{
newDayWidth = 1;
}
var newWidth:int = int(newDayWidth * timeline.totalDays);
// Calculate day element Height/Width ratio:
var headerHeight:Number = this.timeline.headerAllDay;
var proportion:Number = 0;
if (this.view.width != 0 && this.view.height != 0)
{
proportion = 1 / (this.view.width / 7) * (this.view.height - this.timeline.headerAllDay);
}
// Calculate new height:
var newHeight:int = int(newDayWidth * proportion + this.timeline.headerAllDay);
// Calculate mouse position scale on X axis:
var xScale:Number = 0;
if (this.timeline.width != 0)
{
xScale = newWidth / this.timeline.width;
}
// Calculate mouse position scale on Y axis:
var yScale:Number = 0;
if (this.timeline.height - this.timeline.headerAllDay != 0)
{
yScale = (newHeight - this.timeline.headerAllDay) / (this.timeline.height - this.timeline.headerAllDay);
}
this.timeline.beginUpdate();
// Resize the timeline
this.timeline.resizeElement(newWidth, newHeight);
this.timeline.endUpdate();
// Move timeline:
this.centerElement(xScale, yScale);
// Reset timeline local mouse position:
this.centerMouse();
}
public function resizeElement(widthValue:Number, heightValue:Number):void
{
var prevWidth:Number = this.myWidth;
var prevHeight:Number = this.myHeight;
if (widthValue != prevWidth || heightValue != prevHeight)
{
super.width = widthValue;
super.height = heightValue;
this.scaleX = 1.0;
this.scaleY = 1.0;
this.myHeight = heightValue;
this.myWidth = widthValue;
if (!this.docking)
{
this.origHeight = heightValue;
this.origWidth = widthValue;
}
this.updateAnchorMargins();
onResizeInternal(prevWidth, prevHeight, widthValue, heightValue);
}
}
Yes. I know.. a lot of core, and a lot of properties, but in fact most of the stuff has been disabled at the end and the situation is as described at the top.
this didn't work:
gr.lineStyle(); // Reset line style
Can we see your resizing code?
Also try clearing your line style as well as your fill:
gr.lineStyle(0, this.borderColor, 1, true, LineScaleMode.NONE);
gr.beginFill(0x0000CC);
gr.drawRoundRectComplex(0, 0, this.width, this.height, 10, 10, 0, 0);
gr.endFill();
gr.lineStyle();//<---- add this line
I don't know whether it's flash bug or what it is, but i finally found the solution.
The thing is that in my case when resizing in a nutshell you get like this:
this.width = this.stage.stageWidth / 7 * 365;
When i switch to maximized window this.width gains value 86k+. When i added this piece of code to draw horizontal line, it fixed itself:
var recWidth:Number = this.width;
var i:int;
var newEnd:Number = 0;
for (i = 1; newEnd < recWidth; i++)
{
newEnd = 100 * i;
if (newEnd > recWidth)
{
newEnd = recWidth;
}
gr.lineTo(newEnd, 0);
}
I don't know what is going on.. This is inconvenient...