I'm working with a codebase where there is a list of articles rendered inside a section element that is wrapped by a link, like this:
<a href="link/to/article">
<section>
<h2>Article title</h2>
<img src="path/to/article/img">
<p>Short description</p>
</section>
</a>
The content inside the section tag is the title, the image and a short description. All the article previews are rendered like this in a tabular/grid-like layout. When a section is clicked, the whole contents of the article are rendered in a new page.
The reason for this is that the whole section area should be clickable. Since this markup doesn't seem too semantic for me, I was wondering if this code is correct, and if it is not, is there a better approach to make a whole section clickable?
What you've done is fine and correct and works well. The W3C even states:
The a element may be wrapped around entire paragraphs, lists, tables,
and so forth, even entire sections, so long as there is no interactive
content within (e.g. buttons or other links).
They include an example similar to yours.
You can use JQuery as such to achieve that.....No need using the link tag
<section id="clickable_section">
<h2>article title</h2>
<img src="article/img">
<p>Short description</p>
</section>
<script>
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#clickable_section").click(function() {
//Do something....
//Continue doing something,like redirecting the user to the new page
});
});
</script>
Having an anchor work like that is pretty kludgey. Might be better to do something like this:
html:
<section data-link="https://www.google.com">
<h2>article title</h2>
<img src="path/to/article/img">
<p>Short description</p>
</section>
css:
section {
cursor: pointer;
}
javascript (jQuery):
$('section').on('click', function(e){
e.preventDefault();
window.location.href=$(this).data('link');
})
Related
This Question was conceived when studying the answer to StackOverflow question #37370944.
In my database, I have html markup, for which I'd like to give my html-agnostic web-app users to have a tool to edit it in a browser. This is referential materials, mostly notes and source citations. For this purpose I use an html form generated by the server side, and a JavaScript widget, i.e. ContentTools, which, on form submit-button click event, collects a string of resulting html markup from the edited region and sets it as value on the designated form field.
The problem is that, as I discovered, ContentTools doesn't allow editing of the nested markup, e.g. inside html block elements, i.e. <div>, <section>, <article>, <aside>, etc., out of the box or at all (I do not know). To demonstrate this, I modified a forked JSFiddle example provided by the StackOverflow question #37370944 mentioned above. So, please take a look at this fiddle.
There are three link-buttons described in the markup:
The first one is a stand-alone <a> which is as an immediate child of the wrapper div holding the edited region content (<div data-name="main-content" data-editable="">).
The second link-button is placed inside a nested <div> with set attribute data-ce-tag="text" to presumably enable recognition of the content as editable text.
The third link-button is placed inside <p> tag which is as an immediate child of the wrapper div.
All three link-buttons wrapper-elements (<a>, <div> and <p>) have special css class "js-has-anchor" to enable change of the tools on the tool panel via the "focus" event bound to the editor Root.
It turns out, the "focus" event is only triggered for <p> (case 3) elements in the document, not for <div> (case 2) or <a> (case 1). As a result, only for the 3rd link-button a set of panel tools is updated. Moreover, the <div> and <a> elements cannot be edited.
The html markup in my database is mostly a mess, previously edited in CKEditor in some cases, or entered directly by hand. I'd like to make all available content to be readily recognized by ContentTools as editable (not "static") including nested structures similar to the one in the sample below. The main idea of the provided html sample is that it's a nested structure (not just a list of <hN>, <p> and <img> elements as in the edited page__content region from the ContentTools demo), every <section> consists only of <article> elements, and each article consists of a header(<hN>) and either another section, or a wrapping <div> holding all the content of this article.
And I'd like this structure not to be broken if it is already in place, and ideally enforced if it is not there yet.
But all this is a single region which is persisted in one text field of my database (no separate regions are possible).
<h1>Section 1 heading</h1>
<section class="mb-5">
<article>
<h2>Sub-Section 1.1 heading</h2>
<section class="mb-3">
<article>
<h3>Chapter 1.1.1 heading</h3>
<div>
<p>Some text</p>
<figure>
<img src="pic.jpg" alt="Some text" style="width:100%">
<figcaption>Fig.1 - Picture Caption</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Some other text</p>
</div>
</article>
<article>
<h3>Chapter 1.1.2 heading</h3>
<p>Some text</p>
<figure>
<img src="another_pic.jpg" alt="Some other text" style="width:100%">
<figcaption>Fig.2 - picture caption</figcaption>
</figure>
</article>
</section>
</article>
<article>
<h2>Sub-Section 1.2 heading</h2>
<section class="mb-3">
<article>
<h3>Chapter 1.2.1 heading</h3>
<div>
<p>Some text</p>
<p>Some other text</p>
</div>
</article>
<article>
<h3>Chapter 1.2.2 heading</h3>
<p>Some text</p>
</article>
</section>
</article>
</section>
So, is it at all possible with ContentTools, and I'd appreciate an example with "customized" tool panel content from the JSFiddle to work for all link-buttons (and all of them be editable), not only for the one wrapped in the <p> tag.
I'm trying to write a semantic HTML and also trying to use class names based on BEM methodology.
Before I start the project with completely wrong structure, I just wanted to double check with you if this is right, what I'm doing:
<main>
<article class="card card--light">
<section class="card__wrapper">
<div class="card__image">
an image
</div>
<div class="card__name">
a name
</div>
<div class="card__button">
<button>Click Me</button>
</div>
</section>
</article>
</main>
Is it ok that all sections go inside an article?
Am I doing maybe too many divs?
It's often a good choice to use an <article> tag for card.
There is one error, the HTML5 tag <article> is already creating a section of the page. So there is no meaning of having a <section> as only child. This <section> means "I'm a section of the article", but that's not really the case here. So you should use a simple <div> instead of a <section>.
Globally, be careful with too much HTML5 semantic elements. Using an extra <div> has no bad consequences, this is not true for "sectioning content" tags (<article>, <section>, <nav> and <aside>). For example screen reader will notifiy the visitor for each new section.
Here is my code:
<html>
<head>
<style>
div p h1 {
background-color: red;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div>
<p><h1>hello2</h1></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
I think thats why:
The <p> tag can only contain inline elements. The header tags are block-level elements, and cannot go inside <p> tags even when you style them to display inline.
This is basic HTML (or any other markup language). You should separate the paragraph, <p></p> from the heading, <h1></h1> element.
If you want to put a sub heading below your main heading, I suggest you do something like
<div>
<h1>Main heading</h1>
<h2>Smaller heading</h2>
<p>Some information or a quote</p>
</div>
It's important to CLOSE the html elements before creating new ones. Unless it's a div, span or section which is meant for gathering topically similar elements.
A lot more could be said, but I suggest you get ahead and read more about HTML and markup language. A good place to start is http://www.w3schools.com/html/html_basic.asp and http://www.w3schools.com/html/html_elements.asp …
If you specifically wonder what elements can be nested inside a paragraph check out the answer on this question: List of HTML5 elements that can be nested inside P element?
Having a H1 element inside a p element is invalid mark-up. When the browser encounters this mark-up, it tries to fix it automatically by moving the H1 outside of the p. Once this has occurred, the selector no longer matches anything.
Use the W3C markup validator to ensure the validity of your document
<div>
<h1>hello2</h1>
<p>im the best</p>
</div>
Because your header is like the title of an article - you don't put the title in a paragraph. Using the <p> tags, you're just writing the content for the article, so you wont be able to style a header tag in a p tag as you will most likely be styling your header and content differently
If you are having issue with HTML Structure See the Lynda HTML5 course really worth Your Time It Clarifies how to structure your document. Along with reasons why. You will have a better understanding of What is Style and what is structure which most people struggle with I would include myself.
Also has links to the official web standards "World Wide Web Consortium", Yes I know it's a paid for service but it help me avoid or understand why HTML and CSS react the way it does when you move element in to invalid place.
Understand that h1-h6 Tag are not meant for styling as I previously thought from my earlier days in HTML. Yes we used them because it seemed to make since or easyer to target with CSS. But the h1-h6 are more to structure of importance off the section or content on the page. I would use a div if it's or a span or Bold tag.
Great resource is developer.mozilla.org
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/HTML/Introduction_to_HTML/Document_and_website_structure
Here is a good example: Of structure from the link above!
<body>
<!-- Main header used across all the pages website -->
<header>
<h1>Header</h1>
</header>
<nav>
<ul>
<li>Home</li>
</ul>
<form>
<input type="search" name="q" placeholder="Search query">
<input type="submit" value="Go!">
</form>
</nav>
<!-- Here is our page's main content -->
<main>
<!-- It contains an article -->
<article>
<!-----------***** As you can see the h1-h6 is for structure not style****** -->
<h2>Article heading Rank2</h2>
<p>This is Paragraph</p>
<h3>subsection Rank3</h3>
<p>This is Paragraph </p>
<p>This is Paragraph </p>
<h4>Another subsection Ranked</h4>
<p>This is Paragraph </p>
<h3>Another subsection Ranked</h3>
<p>This is Paragraph </p>
<p>This is Paragraph </p>
</article>
<aside>
<h2>Related</h2>
<ul>
<li>beside the seaside</li>
<li>beside the sea</li>
</ul>
</aside>
</main>
<!-- main footer that is used across all the pages of site -->
<footer>
<p>©Copyright 2050 by nobody. All rights reversed.</p>
</footer>
But really Check out the Lynda HTML 5 Essentials Tutorials!
When a document it's structured correctly it's readable and more applications and devices. Like Readers.
I'm building a template for listings in which 90% of the text is the same, and just the item title and description is different. I don't want to have to mess with or edit the text that is the same in each one but at some point it references in the title which is different.
Is there anyway in just HTML5 or CSS3 that I could pull the title used previously to dynamically fill the content out? Almost as if it was a variable?
Eg...
Title Here (to be used again)
Unique description here
Content Thats Always The Same
You are looking at Title Here etc etc etc.
No Javascript or other languages please - at if can't be done in a hacky way with CSS3 or HTML5 at worst the most basic javascript available, but mostly javascript is blocked on the site i'm coding for.
If we're to do it with very simple Javascript here is example code from project...
<div class="content-inner block4 s-text" style="margin-top:-25px">
<h3>Title of Item.</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This is all about the item etc etc etc</p>
<div id="WhatsIncludedBlock">
<div class="content-inner block4 s-text">
<h3>What's Included?</h3>
<p class="para">
<ul><a style="text-decoration: none; cursor: default;"><img style="padding-right: 7px; vertical-align:-1%;" src="http://images.com/bullet2.png" width="10px" height="10px" float="left" alt="bullet point" class="hover"></a>Brand new "Title of Item" direct from supplier.</ul>
Where "Title of Item" in the second block should be automatically pulled in from the H3 tag (which is unique, not all H3 tags will be the same obviously, we'd need to add whatever variable tags required here to make it copy later on)
As others have said, not possible with HTML5 or CSS3 unfortunately, so I ended up using limited javascript which should pass.
<script language="javascript">
var title1
title1 = 'Title of Item';
</script>
Called with
<p><script>document.write (title1);</script></p>
Where needed.
In modern browsers you can. But there will be drawback: it would be impossible to seclect or copy substituted text. See browser support of css variable on caniuse. Currently it is supported in FF 31+, Chrome 49+, Safari 9.1+/9.3+. No any support in IE, Edge 13- and Opera 12.
Anyway, I see no reasons to refuse using some templating engine like doT.
h3::after {
content: var(--title);
}
<section style="--title: 'First title'">
<!-- This following content is equal for all sections -->
<h3></h3>
<p>Anything here</p>
</section>
<section style="--title: 'The second one'">
<!-- This following content is equal for all sections -->
<h3></h3>
<p>Anything here</p>
</section>
<section style="--title: 'And the last'">
<!-- This following content is equal for all sections -->
<h3></h3>
<p>Anything here</p>
</section>
Is the structure below correct or is the section tag not needed?
For SEO, assuming the relevant keywords are the page title not the site title, is the structure bellow the best optomisation? Thanks
<header>
<h1>Site Title</h1>
</header>
<section>
<h1>Page Title</h1>
<p>Page Content Here</p>
</section>
Don't abuse the usage of section and article tags using them for structure, instead keep using divs.
In html5, when using headings and sections, you must check that each section has its own title. You can use the outliner to see how is the structure.
http://gsnedders.html5.org/outliner/
According to your case you'll notice that the Site Title has still more relevancy than the Page Title. That's okay. But better use a div for dividing the header from the content.
// Reply 12/03/01
You can try using some weird position absolute to achieve your goal:
First of all, the section must have a heading, if not it will be null.
<header>
<h1 id="position-me-in-section">Page Title h1</h1>
</header>
<div id="content">
<section>
<h6 id="position-me-in-header">Site Title h6</h6>
<p>Page Content Here</p>
</section>
</div>
This is how I would do it. The <article> tag links the related content together, you can also have multiple articles on one page etc
<header>Site Title</header>
<article>
<header>Page Title</header>
<p>Page Content Here</p>
<footer>Page Footer</footer>
</article>
<footer>Site Footer</footer>
Really depends on how or if you plan to componetize and/or syndicate your content and then it's however it suites you best. There are no "issues" with how you have it now other than you only want to use a single "H1" per document. On the flip side - the "H2", "H3" etc can be used multiple times with no negative SEO.
The html5doctor link about section shared is a good resource but also consider these:
http://html5doctor.com/the-article-element/
http://www.impressivewebs.com/html5-section/
http://webdesign.about.com/od/html5tags/a/when-to-use-section-element.htm