Firefox bug: image does not scale down? - html

Is this a bug in firefox?
CSS,
html, body {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0 0;
/*border: 4px solid black;*/
}
.container-fluid {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
display: table;
padding-right: 0;
padding-left: 0;
/*border: 4px solid blue;*/
}
.row-fluid {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
background-color:#990000;
/*border: 4px solid red;*/
}
.img-container {
height: 100vh;
width: 100%;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
}
.img-container img{
max-width:100%;
max-height:100%;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
HTML,
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row-fluid">
<div class="img-container">
<!-- <img src="http://placehold.it/400x450"> -->
<img src="http://placehold.it/2000x450">
<!-- <img src="http://placehold.it/400x480"> -->
</div>
</div>
</div>
Chrome,
The large image will be scaled down to fit the screen width which is what I want.
Firefox,
The image is not scaled down to fit the screen.
Any ideas how I can fix this?
EDIT:
#-moz-document url-prefix() {
.img-container img {
width: 100%;
max-width: -moz-max-content;
}
}

Since you are using CSS table for the layout already, I'm suggesting this approach without flexbox. It works nicely on Chrome and Firefox according to my tests. I added a div around the img.
jsFiddle
body { margin:0; }
.img-container {
display: table;
table-layout: fixed; /*required for responsive width in Firefox*/
width: 100%; /*required for fixed table layout*/
}
.img-container .image {
display: table-cell;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
height: 100vh; /*required for responsive height*/
}
.img-container .image img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
vertical-align: middle; /*remove whitespace*/
}
<div class="img-container">
<div class="image">
<img src="http://placehold.it/400x300">
<!-- <img src="http://placehold.it/2000x450"> -->
<!-- <img src="http://placehold.it/400x480"> -->
</div>
</div>
Alternatively, you can use pseudo element :before or :after + inline block for vertical alignment. No markup change is required.
jsFiddle
body { margin:0; }
.img-container {
width: 100vw; /*required for responsive width in Firefox*/
height: 100vh;
text-align: center;
font-size: 0; /*remove whitespace*/
}
.img-container:after {
content: "";
display: inline-block;
height: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
}
.img-container img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
}
<div class="img-container">
<img src="http://placehold.it/400x300">
<!-- <img src="http://placehold.it/2000x450"> -->
<!-- <img src="http://placehold.it/400x480"> -->
</div>

Yes there is problem in firefox. It will not maintaining aspect ratio. To make it working just add width: 100%; to image will solve issue.
.img-container img {
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
Working Fiddle
Check same type of issue here.
Edit:
To solve issue for all size image use max-width: -moz-max-content;
#-moz-document url-prefix() {
.img-container img { width: 100%; max-width: -moz-max-content; }
}
Updated Fiddle

Based on a bug report (see below), this is a known issue with Firefox. (Although IE11 also fails to scale the image as desired).
This seems to solve the problem in Firefox:
Instead of:
.img-container img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
Try this:
.img-container img {
width: 100%; /* adjusted */
height: auto; /* adjusted */
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
DEMO
Another possible solution involves adding table-layout: fixed to the main container (.container-fluid). This method is detailed in this bug report:
Bug 975632 - max-width: 100%; doesn't work inside tables or display: table

Related

(Simple) max-width: 100% not working for img (on mobile), see code

This, the simplest of codes, doesn't work. Why will it not resize on mobile?
Cheers
I was thinking that it doesn't know what to relate the 100% to (because of the table I use to align it center both vertically and horizontally), still, I cannot get it to work.
(HTML)
html,
body,
#wrapper {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
border: 0;
}
#wrapper td {
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: center;
}
<body>
<table id="wrapper">
<tr>
<td><img src="logo.png" max-width="100%"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
If you are using a table, this responsive css will work
/* full view of browser */
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
/* table full width and no overflow */
#wrapper {
width: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
border-spacing: 0;
border-collapse: collapse;
}
/* table datacell also full width */
#wrapper td {
width: 100%;
padding: 0;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: center;
}
/* image keeps aspect ratio */
#wrapper img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
border: 0;
}
Maybe like this:
div {
display:flex;
height: 100vh;
width: 100vw;
align-items: center;
justify-content:center;
}
div > img {
max-width: 100%;
}
<div>
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/600x400/000/fff.png">
</div>
JSFiddle

Vertically center image when image is higher than container

I have a responsive design with a header image which is placed in a container. The image has width:100%; and height:auto; so it grows as you enlarge the viewport. I don't want to exceed a certain height so the container has a max-height. The image still grows but now the bottom part is cut off now because it aligns to the top of the container.
I would like the image to stay vertically centered in it's container so that parts of the image are cut off at the top and at the bottom. The outcome should look like this:
The header images are uploaded by users so they might have different heights therefore I cannot work with specific pixel-values. Is there a CSS-solution for this or do I have to use JavaScript?
Here is the code:
.wrapper {
width: 90%;
max-width: 600px;
margin: 1em auto;
background-color: #E9ADAD;
}
.container {
text-align: center;
height: auto;
line-height: 200px;
max-height: 200px;
overflow: hidden;
}
img {
width: 100%;
height: auto !important;
vertical-align: middle;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placehold.it/600x300/C00000/FFFFFF&text=Image+vertically+centered">
</div>
</div>
And I prepared a fiddle.
You can use absolute positioning for your image , negative top/bottom values and margin:auto; to verticaly center the image in the container :
.wrapper {
width: 90%;
max-width: 600px;
margin: 1em auto;
background-color: #E9ADAD;
max-height: 200px;
}
.container {
position:relative;
padding-bottom:40%;
overflow: hidden;
}
img {
position:absolute;
top:-50%; bottom:-50%;
margin:auto;
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placehold.it/600x300/C00000/FFFFFF&text=Image+vertically+centered">
</div>
</div>
Not so long ago there was only a javascript way to do this but now we have some css rules: object-fit and object-position
They work just like the background-size rules cover and contain:
.container img{
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
#supports(object-fit: cover){
.container img{
height: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
object-position: center center;
}
}
The problem with this approach is that is very new and doesn't work on ie or Edge yet.
Pen here: http://codepen.io/vandervals/pen/MwKKrm
EDIT: Please, see that you need to declare the width and the height of the image, or it won't work.
.wrapper {
width: 90%;
max-width: 600px;
margin: 1em auto;
}
.container {
height: 200px;
overflow: hidden;
}
.imgWrapper {
position: relative;
width: 200%;
height: 200%;
top: -50%;
left: -50%;
}
img {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
margin: auto;
height: auto;
width: 50%;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="container">
<div class="imgWrapper"><img src="http://placehold.it/600x300"></div>
</div>
</div>
http://jsfiddle.net/ghygpw8t/5/
inspired by: https://css-tricks.com/perfect-full-page-background-image/
Try like this: Demo
If image size is small it will be arranged in vertical middle and if its big, it will fit in box.
CSS:
.wrapper {
width: 90%;
max-width: 600px;
margin: 1em auto;
}
.container {
text-align: center;
line-height: 200px;
overflow: hidden;
background-color:#ccc;
vertical-align:middle;
height: 200px;
border:2px solid green;
display: flex;
width: 100%;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
img {
width: 100%;
max-height: 196px;
border:2px solid red;
vertical-align: middle;
line-height: 196px;
}
Hope this is what you want!
On the element you want centered.
.element {
position: relative;
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%);
}
on its parent.
.parent { transform-style: preserve-3d; }
Use a polyfill to render cross browser styles.

Image does not responsive

Out put
Original Image size : 463px X 339px
I have removed the image due to copy right issues.
HTML
<div class="col-md-4">
<div class="item-block event-details" id="video-container">
<img src="/Resources/images/6b0c5d49-9a76-4a09-afb7-5bfa2ed508f7.jpg" class="img-responsive">
</div>
CSS
.item-block.event-details {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
height: 214px;
}
.item-block {
color: #4b4e4e;
border-radius: 4px;
border: 1px solid #d4d4d4;
box-shadow: 0px 1px 1px #b0b6b6;
position: relative;
margin-bottom: 30px;
}
.img-responsive {
display: block;
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
Question :
Can you tell me why this is happening ? I need to show the whole image on above parent div sizes.But it's not happening.Can you tell me why ?
In other words,image does not fit into the parent div.
If your parent div needs to be that height for some reason, you could set both max-width and max-height to 100%
.img-responsive {
display: block;
margin: 0 auto; /* to center the image horizontally in parent div */
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
I think you should do the opposite in your .img-responsive css class. Let's try that :
.img-responsive {
display: block;
width: 100%;
max-height: auto;
}
Don't need to write
max-width:100%;
If you want image responsive you can write
.img-responsive {
display: block;
width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
if you are using bootstrap then forget about all. you just add the class .img-responsive to img tag.
Demo

Vertical Auto Margin within a Div

I'm now trying another strange and not working thing: the vertical auto alignment of a child div.
I would like the content to be vertically centered within the panel, because the panel have a height in % that fits the window size, it's really important for me to have a strict alignment.
All right, here's my code: JSFiddle
HTML
<div id="panel">
<div id="content">
</div>
</div>
CSS
html, body
{
height: 100%;
background-color: #273034;
margin: 0;
}
#panel
{
height: 100%;
width: 380px;
margin: auto;
background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0.3);
}
#content
{
height: 100px;
width: auto;
background-color: rgba(117,169,56,0.9);
}
Why a so simple thing doesn't work?
Hope someone could help me, I've tried these solutions: margin : auto not working vertically? but it actually didn't make the trick
Here is a simple Solution for vertical aligning, using Pure CSS without fixing any top-margin, top-padding. so its totally responcive.
See this Working Fiddle
HTML: (Same)
<div id="panel">
<div id="content">
</div>
</div>
CSS:
html, body
{
height: 100%;
background-color: #273034;
margin: 0;
}
#panel
{
height: 100%;
width: 380px;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0.3);
}
/*this is new*/
#panel:before
{
content: '';
height: 100%;
margin-left: -5px;
vertical-align: middle;
display: inline-block;
}
#content
{
vertical-align: middle; /*this is new*/
display: inline-block; /*this is new*/
height: 100px;
width: 100%; /*this is new*/
background-color: rgba(117,169,56,0.9);
}

Why is width: 100% not working on div {display: table-cell}?

I'm trying to vertically and horizontally center some content overlaying an image slide (flexslider). There were some similar questions to this one, but I couldn't find a satisfactory solution that applied directly to my specific problem. Because of the limitations of FlexSlider, I cannot use position: absolute; on the img tag in my implementation.
I almost have workaround below working. The only problem is I cannot get the width & height declarations to work on inner-wrapper div with the display: table-cell property.
Is this standard behavior, or am I missing something with my code? If it's standard behavior, what's the best solution to my problem?
HTML
<ul>
<li>
<img src="#">
<div class="outer-wrapper">
<div class="inner-wrapper">
<h1>My Title</h1>
<h5>Subtitle</h5>
</div>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
CSS
html, body {
margin: 0; padding: 0;
width: 100%; height: 100%;
}
ul {
background: #CCC;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
list-style-position: outside;
margin: 0; padding: 0;
}
li {
width: 100%;
display: table;
}
img {
width: 100%;
height: 410px;
}
.outer-wrapper {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
top: 0;
margin: 0; padding: 0;
}
.inner-wrapper {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: center;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
Note: the centered content will be more than 1 element, so I can't use the line-height trick.
jsFiddle.
Putting display:table; inside .outer-wrapper seemed to work...
JSFiddle Link
EDIT: Two Wrappers Using Display Table Cell
I would comment on your answer but i have too little rep :( anyways...
Going off your answer, seems like all you need to do is add display:table; inside .outer-wrapper (Dejavu?), and you can get rid of table-wrapper whole-heartedly.
JSFiddle
But yeah, the position:absolute lets you place the div over the img, I read too quickly and thought that you couldn't use position:absolute at all, but seems like you figured it out already. Props!
I'm not going to post the source code, after all its 99% timshutes's work, so please refer to his answer, or just use my jsfiddle link
Update: One Wrapper Using Flexbox
It's been a while, and all the cool kids are using flexbox:
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; align-items: center;">
stuff to be centered
</div>
Full JSFiddle Solution
Browser Support (source): IE 11+, FireFox 42+, Chrome 46+, Safari 8+, iOS 8.4+ (-webkit- prefix), Android 4.1+ (-webkit- prefix)
CSS Tricks: a Guide to Flexbox
How to Center in CSS: input how you want your content to be centered, and it outputs how to do it in html and css. The future is here!
I figured this one out. I know this will help someone someday.
How to Vertically & Horizontally Center a Div Over a Relatively Positioned Image
The key was a 3rd wrapper. I would vote up any answer that uses less wrappers.
HTML
<div class="wrapper">
<img src="my-slide.jpg">
<div class="outer-wrapper">
<div class="table-wrapper">
<div class="table-cell-wrapper">
<h1>My Title</h1>
<p>Subtitle</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
html, body {
margin: 0; padding: 0;
width: 100%; height: 100%;
}
ul {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
list-style-position: outside;
margin: 0; padding: 0;
}
li {
width: 100%;
display: table;
}
img {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.outer-wrapper {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
margin: 0; padding: 0;
}
.table-wrapper {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
display: table;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: center;
}
.table-cell-wrapper {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: center;
}
You can see the working jsFiddle here.
I discovered that the higher the value of 'width' is, the smaller the box width is made and vice versa. I found this out because I had the same problem earlier. So:
.inner-wrapper {
width: 1%;
}
solves the problem.
Welcome to 2017 these days will using vW and vH do the trick
html, body {
margin: 0; padding: 0;
width: 100%; height: 100%;
}
ul {
background: #CCC;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
list-style-position: outside;
margin: 0; padding: 0;
}
li {
width: 100%;
display: table;
}
img {
width: 100%;
height: 410px;
}
.outer-wrapper {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
top: 0;
margin: 0; padding: 0;
}
.inner-wrapper {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: center;
width: 100vw; /* only change is here "%" to "vw" ! */
height: 100vh; /* only change is here "%" to "vh" ! */
}
<ul>
<li>
<img src="#">
<div class="outer-wrapper">
<div class="inner-wrapper">
<h1>My Title</h1>
<h5>Subtitle</h5>
</div>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
Your 100% means 100% of the viewport, you can fix that using the vw unit besides the % unit at the width. The problem is that 100vw is related to the viewport, besides % is related to parent tag. Do like that:
.table-cell-wrapper {
width: 100vw;
height: 100%;
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: center;
}
How about this? (jsFiddle link)
CSS
ul {
background: #CCC;
height: 1000%;
width: 100%;
list-style-position: outside;
margin: 0; padding: 0;
position: absolute;
}
li {
background-color: #EBEBEB;
border-bottom: 1px solid #CCCCCC;
border-right: 1px solid #CCCCCC;
display: table;
height: 180px;
overflow: hidden;
width: 200px;
}
.divone{
display: table-cell;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
width: 100%;
}
img {
width: 100%;
height: 410px;
}
.wrapper {
position: absolute;
}
Just add min-height:100% and min-width:100% and it will work. I had the same problem. You don't need a 3th wrapper