Say I have a json structure like so:
{
"A":{
"name":"dog",
"foo":"bar",
"array":[
{"name":"one"},
{"name":"two"}
]
},
"B":{
"name":"cat",
"foo":"bar",
"array":[
{"name":"one"},
{"name":"three"}
]
}
}
I want to be able to do two things.
1: Query for any "name":* within "A.array".
2: Query for any "name":"one" within "*.array".
That is, any object within a specific document's array, and any specific object within any document's array.
I hope I have used proper terminology here, I am just starting to familiarize myself with a lot of these concepts. I have tried searching for an answer but am having trouble finding something like my case.
Thanks.
EDIT:
Since I still haven't really made progress towards this, I'll just explain what I'm trying to do: I want to use the "AllSets" dataset (after I trim it down below 16mb) available on mtgjson.com. I am having problems getting mongo to play nicely though.
In an effort to try and learn what's going on, I have downloaded one set: http://mtgjson.com/json/OGW.json.
Here is a photo of its structure laid out:
I am unable to even get mongo to return an object from within the cards array using:
"find({cards: {$elemMatch: {name:"Deceiver of Form"}}})"
"find({"cards.name":"Deceiver of Form"})"
When I run either of the commands above it just returns the entire document to me.
You could use the positional projection $ operator to limit the contents of an array. For example, if you have a single document like below:
{
"block": "Battle for Zendikar",
"booster": "...",
"translations": "...",
"cards": [
{
"name": "Deceiver of Form",
"power": "8"
},
{
"name": "Eldrazi Mimic",
"power": "2"
},
{
"name": "Kozilek, the Great Distortion",
"power": "12"
}
]
}
You can query for a card name matching "Deceiver of Form", and limit fields to return only the matching array card element(s) using:
> db.collection.find({"cards.name":"Deceiver of Form"}, {"cards.$":1})
{
"_id": ObjectId("..."),
"cards": [
{
"name": "Deceiver of Form",
"power": "8"
}
]
}
Having said the above, I think you should re-consider your data model. MongoDB is a document-oriented database. A record in MongoDB is a document, so having a single record in a database does not bring out the potential of the database i.e. similar to storing all data in a single row in a table.
You should try storing the 'cards' into a collection instead. Where each document is a single card, (depending on your use case) you could add a reference to another collection containing the deck information. i.e: block, type, releaseDate, etc. For example:
// a document in cards collection:
{
"name": "Deceiver of Form",
"power": "8",
"deck_id": 1
}
// a document in decks collection:
{
"deck_id": 1,
"releaseDate": "2016-01-22",
"type": "expansion"
}
For different types of data model designs and examples, please see Data Model Design.
Related
The RFC 7396 states:
If the patch is anything other than an object, the result will always be to replace the entire target with the entire patch. Also, it is not possible to patch part of a target that is not an object, such as to replace just some of the values in an array.
For example, if I have this document :
{
"id": 1,
"brand_name": "BMW",
"cars": [{
"id": 2,
"model": "S1",
"cost": 10000
}]
}
It is my understanding I can't partially update the car with the id #2 in order to update the cost for example:
{
"id": 1,
"cars": [{
"id": 2,
"cost": 20000
}]
}
(the idea here is to do not modify the model, just the cost. The ids are present just for the reconciliation)
Is that correct ?
If so, why couldn't we apply this algorithm to deal with lists:
Compare the actual representation of the car list with the patch representation:
If one item is missing in the patch representation => delete it
If one item has been added without reconciliation identifier => add it
If one item is present in both representations => modify it at the object level as a regular PATCH
Is that realistic ?
The way I read the the paragraph you sent, I would say.. no you are not able to do this. My understanding is that RFC 7396 is intended as a very simple no-fuss patch format.
If you want something with more features, consider using RFC 6902 instead.
I currently query this API recursively, and for each instance which I send in a request, I want to check inside the returned json for whether there are any objects within the parameter "causes_virtual". If there is an existing entry inside there, such as in this case: "id": 5408600, I want to print('Contains Entry') but if there is nothing within, I want to print('No Entry'). How can I check causes_virtual for whether or not it contains any additional elements within the curly braces? Currently I am using the method of checking for an empty list:
Either: if len(api_response_article[0]['causes_virtual']) == 0: or if not api_response_article[0]['causes_virtual']:
However, neither of these methods seem to do me any good because it seems to only check for items as if it was a traditional list, but from my understanding, it is a dictionary within a list.
{
"additional_info": "",
"approved_at": null,
"approved_by_id": null,
"causes_virtual": [ # THIS SECTION
{
"id": 5408600,
"models": [
"Potatoes"
],
"principals": "Some irrelevant text",
"title": "We farm potatoes or something"
}
],
"created_at": "2021-03-03T01:13:04.477348+00:00",
"created_by_id": 1019500
}
I suppose what I am looking for is the right if statement for seeing if there is anything inside causes_virtual.
Any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated.
I think the answer to this question is great because it explains a lot about HAL: How to handle nested resources with JSON HAL?
However it does not fully answer the question (at least for me). Assuming we have a /employees resource that returns a list of all employees. I want the employees embedded but just with some basic information (not the full employee). This is OK according to the above answer and the spec. But how would my link look like?
So what would _links look like? Lets simplify the example. Assume there is no paging:
GET /employees
{
"_links": {
"self": { "href": "/employees" },
"employees" { "href": "/employees/{id}", "templated": "true" }
},
"_embedded": {
"employees": [{
"id": "1",
"fullname": "bla bli",
"_links": { ... }
},
{
"id": "2",
"fullname": "djsjsdj",
"_links": { ... }
}]
}
}
Does the templated "emloyees" URL make sense or would this be a case where you would not use any entry in _links? And if the URL is OK: is it necessary that the template parameter (here "id" does match the attribute in the embedded employee objects?
My heuristic is to consider the analogs in HTML - if it's OK for a web page, then it will also be OK for HAL.
"employees" { "href": "/employees/{id}", "templated": "true" }
What's the HTML analog? It's a form with a GET action. Can we have a form with a get action on a web page that also has digests of the information that will be reached via the form? Of course. So it must be fine here.
is it necessary that the template parameter (here "id") does match the attribute in the embedded employee objects?
I don't think it's necessary (the machines don't really care), but it's going to make life easier for the humans, and that alone has value.
Imagine, if you will, reading the documentation of a schema, and discovering that the same semantic concept (an identifier for an employee) has two different names with unrelated spellings. I would guess that would (a) introduce avoidable errors in the documentation when authors get confused about which spelling context they are in and (b) that's the sort of inconsistency that would make me suspicious of the quality of the specification as a whole.
But it's not impossible to have tradeoffs, and other benefits that outweigh these liabilities.
Question
How to use the type "expandable" correctly?
Description
I have a batch that runs every hour and sends some stats to our slack. Each JSON output can be quite large and I'm looking for a way to have it collapsable/expandable.
I was playing with slack's BlockKit Builder in hopes that there was something of the sort, and I came across (when looking at the message errors) that there is a type called expandable.
However, there is no (?) documentation regarding it. The only thing that I know is.
It requires a blocks property
It should be a child of a blocks property
What I've tried
I went on the block builder (demo) and was able to get this to not throw any errors but there was no visual output...
{
"blocks": [
{
"type": "expandable",
"blocks": [
{
"type": "section",
"text": {
"type": "mrkdwn",
"text": "Hello, Assistant to the Regional Manager Dwight! *Michael Scott* wants to know where you'd like to take the Paper Company investors to dinner tonight.\n\n *Please select a restaurant:*"
}
}
]
}
]
}
What I would like:
I would like to have a working collapsable/expandable and understand what the different properties are and how they work.
I'm having trouble working out how to write a bit of XQuery. I have a JSON structure in MarkLogic that looks like:
{
"id": "pres003A10",
"title": "A Course About Something",
"description": "This course teaches people about some things they may not know.",
"author": "A.N. Author",
"updated": "2007-01-19",
"decks": [
{
"id":"really-basic-stuff",
"exclude": ["slide3", "slide12"]
},
{
"id":"cleverer-stuff",
"exclude": []
}
]
}
The exclude array contains the identifiers for slides in decks (presentations are made up of one or more decks of slides). I'm trying to write a piece of code that will look for a slide id in that exclude list and remove it if present or add it if not (a toggle).
I can obtain the array node itself using:
let $exclude := doc('/presentations/presentation.json')/object-node()/decks[id = 'markup-intro']/array-node('exclude')
but I can't for the life of me see how I then update that array to either remove an item or add it. The intention is call a function something like:
local:toggle-slide($presentation) as object-node()
{
(: xdmp:node-update(...) goes here :)
};
So, how do I update that array?
In memory JSON node trees (and XML trees, for that matter) are immutable.
The way to modify a tree is to construct a new tree, copying the nodes that haven't changed and creating the parent node and ancestor node with the changes.
That said, there's an easier way to modify JSON. If you call xdmp:from-json() on the root node, you will get a mutable in-memory map / array structure.
You can then navigate to the array using map:get() on the maps and [ITEM_NUMBER] on the arrays and delete or insert items FOR the appropriate json:array object.
When you're done, call xdmp:to-json() to turn the root map back into a node.
Hoping that helps,
If you need to update the json in the database, you can use xdmp:node-replace. The catch with node-replace is though, that you have to feed it with a named node. To do that, you need to wrap the array-node in an object-node, and then grab the array-node inside the object-node on the fly. Here a working example:
xquery version "1.0-ml";
(: insert test data :)
xdmp:document-insert("/presentations/presentation.json", xdmp:unquote('{
"id": "pres003A10",
"title": "A Course About Something",
"description": "This course teaches people about some things they may not know.",
"author": "A.N. Author",
"updated": "2007-01-19",
"decks": [
{
"id":"markup-intro",
"exclude": ["slide3", "slide12"]
},
{
"id":"cleverer-stuff",
"exclude": []
}
]
}'
))
;
(: node-replace array-node :)
let $exclude := doc('/presentations/presentation.json')/object-node()/decks[id = 'markup-intro']/array-node('exclude')
return xdmp:node-replace($exclude, object-node{
"exclude": array-node{ "other", "slides" }
}/node())
;
(: view if changed :)
doc('/presentations/presentation.json')
Note: consider looking at MarkLogic's Server-side JavaScript (SJS) support. Updating JSON might seem more natural that way, particularly if you need to make multiple changes in one go.
HTH!