i have this two table:
id | name
1 | Mike
2 | Jack
id | id_client | title | due_date | sort
1 | 1 | Xxxx | 2016-01-22 | 0
2 | 1 | Xxxx | 2016-01-24 | 1
3 | 2 | Xxxx | 2016-01-28 | 0
I need to order the first by date, and the second by sort. I have try this but not work:
->createQueryBuilder()
->select("a.*","b.*")
->from("table_a", "a")
->leftJoin("a", "table_b", "b", "a.id = b.id_client")
->addOrderBy('b.due_date', 'ASC')
->addOrderBy('b.sort', 'ASC')
Any help?
According to your example code you're trying to sort by 'due_date' from table B but the column's actually named 'date'. You don't say exactly what issue(s) you're having but I would start by resolving that mismatch - best to rename the column as 'date' is a reserved word in mySQL and using it may be an issue in itself.
Related
i have a table like this with a var char field reference_number
actually i need to get the max of number in that field
<<student>>
|`id` | `reference_number`(varchar(25))
--------------------------
| 1 | L250
| 2 | SP521
| 3 | S120
| 4 | SP500
| 5 | S122
the desired result is 521 because if we are avoiding the non numeric value then it will come like this
|`id` | `reference_number`
--------------------------
| 1 | 250
| 2 | 521
| 3 | 120
| 4 | 500
| 5 | 122
how to get the the value 521 from the table
I assume you have extracted 'reference_number' as shown in the second snippet from the first snippet. if so, try :::
select max(cast (reference_number as int)) from student
In order to get the number 521 (and all the numbers from the reference_number column) you could try:
SELECT *
FROM yourtable
WHERE reference_number REGEXP '^[0-9]+$';
And then you can add an order by statement.
I have a table with this sort of data:
+------------+----------+----------+
| Unique ID | Name | Class |
+------------+----------+----------+
| 1 | Name 1 | Class A |
| 2 | Name 2 | "" |
| 3 | Name 3 | Class C |
| 4 | Name 1 | "" |
| 5 | Name 4 | "" |
| 6 | Name 4 | "" |
+------------+----------+----------+
I am trying to do something I thought was simple, but i did not find so.
I am trying to "extract" only the lines with an empty string value in 'Class' for a group of equal names.
So in this case I would get this result :
+------------+----------+--------+
| Unique ID | Name | Class |
+------------+----------+--------+
| 2 | Name 2 | "" |
| 5 | Name 4 | "" |
+------------+----------+--------+
So not Name 1 because even though there is a line with "" there is another line with 'Class A'.
I thought a UNION would do the job but I am not gettgin anything because I think unions are for two tables but the problem here is I have the data in the same table.
Thank you for your help
Access syntax may be a bit different but this returns what you want in Oracle:
SELECT distinct Name, Class FROM table1 Where Name NOT in (select name from table1 where class is not null)
A Union melds two result sets, whether or not they come from the same table is irrelevant. What you want to do is omit from the result set the rows with the same name AND class is not null. Not having your query to expand on or change is a problem, but if you add a clause that says something like where "name not in (select name from table where class is not null);", that may do it.
Hello i want to split a resulting column in multiple columns just like on the link. But number of columns are not specific ;
Example
COL1 | OTHER COLUMNS
----------------------------------------
this,will,split | some value
also,this | some value
this,is,four,columns | some value
I want make this something like that ;
COL1 | COL2 | COL3 | COL4 | OTHER
----------------------------------------
this | will | split| NULL | some value
also | this | NULL | NULL | some value
this | is | four | columns| some value
edit
it looks like similar that question but not:
Can you split/explode a field in a MySQL query?
I want results in 1 row, I dont want something like that;
RESULT
-----
this
will
split
...
on that question you can see there is specific number of cols. bu i dont. :(
How to split a resulting column in multiple columns
I think you can create one relational table and add multiple entry in relational table, hear you don't need to think about column, you have to add entry in row.
eg.
Table 1:
ID | COL1 | OTHER COLUMNS
----------------------------------------
1 |this,will,split | some value
2 |also,this | some value
3 |this,is,four,columns | some value
Table2
ID | Table1_id | value
-------------------------
1 | 1 | this
2 | 1 | will
3 | 1 | split
4 | 2 | also
5 | 2 | this
6 | 3 | this
6 | 3 | is
6 | 3 | four
6 | 3 | columns
Please check this, i think fix your problem.
Suppose you have a table
id | title
-----------
1 | ali
2 | Ali
3 | alireza
Now I want you to say a command word "ali" check the field's title.
And the output of the table was a table that all records should be returned in the table.
Now the results should be like.
id | title | diff
---------------------
1 | ali | 100
2 | Ali | 97
3 | alireza | 50
Important: only use commands Sql
Here you go:
select id, title,
case title
when 'ali' then 100
when 'Ali' then 97
when 'alireza' then 50
end case diff
from mytable;
I have table:
+----+--------+----------+
| id | doc_id | next_req |
+----+--------+----------+
| 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 | 1 | 0 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 |
+----+--------+----------+
id - auto incerement primary key.
nex_req - represent an order of records. (next_req = id of record)
How can I build a SQL query get records in this order:
+----+--------+----------+
| id | doc_id | next_req |
+----+--------+----------+
| 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 | 1 | 0 |
+----+--------+----------+
Explains:
record1 with id=1 and next_req=4 means: next must be record4 with id=4 and next_req=2
record4 with id=5 and next_req=2 means: next must be record2 with id=2 and next_req=3
record2 with id=2 and next_req=3 means: next must be record3 with id=1 and next_req=0
record3 with id=3 and next_req=0: means that this is a last record
I need to store an order of records in table. It's important fo me.
If you can, change your table format. Rather than naming the next record, mark the records in order so you can use a natural SQL sort:
+----+--------+------+
| id | doc_id | sort |
+----+--------+------+
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 | 1 | 4 |
+----+--------+------+
Then you can even cluster-index on doc_id,sort for if you need to for performance issues. And honestly, if you need to re-order rows, it is not any more work than a linked-list like you were working with.
Am able to give you a solution in Oracle,
select id,doc_id,next_req from table2
start with id =
(select id from table2 where rowid=(select min(rowid) from table2))
connect by prior next_req=id
fiddle_demo
I'd suggest to modify your table and add another column OrderNumber, so eventually it would be easy to order by this column.
Though there may be problems with this approach:
1) You have existing table and need to set OrderNumber column values. I guess this part is easy. You can simply set initial zero values and add a CURSOR for example moving through your records and incrementing your order number value.
2) When new row appears in your table, you have to modify your OrderNumber, but here it depends on your particular situation. If you only need to add items to the end of the list then you can set your new value as MAX + 1. In another situation you may try writing TRIGGER on inserting new items and calling similar steps to point 1). This may cause very bad hit on performance, so you have to carefully investigate your architecture and maybe modify this unusual construction.