Get all rows who have no associated data - mysql

Campaign have attributes :start_date,:end_date
Invoice have attributes :start_date,:end_date
campaign.rb
has_many:invoices
invoice.rb
belongs_to:campaign'
I want to get all campaigns who have no invoices and whose end_date is less than current date.
I tried like this
Campaign.includes(:invoices).where("compaigns.end_date > ? ",Date.today, :invoices => { :campaign_id => nil } ).count
How I do this?

I think you're almost there. The example given doesn't work because it mixes the string and hash forms of where. Try splitting the conditions into two where calls:
Campaign.includes(:invoices).
where("campaigns.end_date > ? ",Date.today).
where(invoices: {campaign_id: nil}).count

Related

Cannot order by two fields using django filter in graphene-django

I am using DjangoFilterConnectionField in my project like this:
all_sessions = DjangoFilterConnectionField(SessionNode, filterset_class=AgendaFilter)
SessionNode is created based on Session model in my Django application. Now, I would like to be able to order these sessions by two fields: start_date and start_time.
To achieve that I've created the following filter:
class AgendaFilter(FilterSet):
class Meta:
model = Session
exclude = []
order_by = OrderingFilter(
fields=(
("start_date", "start_date"),
("start_time", "start_time")
)
)
When I filter sessions by only one field using orderBy , the query results are ordered correctly as expected. When I try to use both fields in the filter (shown below), the results returned are not ordered according to either of them:
{
allSessions(orderBy: "[start_date, start_time]") {
edges {
node {
id
startDate
startTime
}
}
}
}
I've tried different ways of passing the two fields to orderBy, but none of them worked for me. How can I correctly order by start_date and then by start_time in one query? According to the graphene documentation, this is possible:
Ordering
You can use OrderFilter to define how you want your returned results to be ordered.
Extend the tuple of fields if you want to order by more than one field.
Is this is a bug in graphene or am I doing something wrong?

How sort json array multiple times in swift

I am trying to sort an array by a few values, not just one but three I can sort it like this
mysocialArray.sort({$0["date"] > $1["date"]})
This works fine, but i can find any where how to then sort it again so i get them sorted on time and another sort. SO should sort three times. When i just add another sort it is not taking the date into account.
The sorted json output will then be loaded in arrays as strings to display on the viewcontroller
How should I solve this?
thanks
Given your requirements of "This way the latest post that not yet have been read are at the top", looks like you are looking to sort by multiple criteria. I typed this in the dark so you may have to adjust it to fit your case:
mySocialArray.sort {
// First sort by read status. Assuming read is of type Bool
let (read1, read2) = ($0["read"] ? 1 : 0, $1["read"] ? 1 : 0)
if read1 != read2 {
return read1 > read2
}
// Then short by date. I assume date is of type NSDate
let (date1, date2) = ($0["date"], $1["date"])
if date1.timeIntervalSince1970 != date2.timeIntervalSince1970 {
return date1 > date2
}
// And lastly sort by time
return $0["time"] > $1["time"]
}

Limiting and sorting by different properties on couchbase

Given a JSON document on couchbase, for example, a milestone collections, which is similar to this:
{
"milestoneDate" : /Date(1335191824495+0100)/,
"companyId" : 43,
"ownerUserId": 475,
"participants" : [
{
"userId": 2,
"docId" : "132546"
},
{
"userId": 67,
"docId" : "153"
}
]
}
If I were to select all the milestones of the company 43 and want to order them by latest first.. my view on couchbase would be something similar to this:
function (doc, meta) {
if(doc.companyId && doc.milestoneDate)
{
//key made up of date particles + company id
var eventKey = dateToArray(new Date(parseInt(doc.milestoneDate.substr(6))));
eventKey.push(doc.companyId);
emit(eventKey, null);
}
}
I do get both dates and the company Id on rest urls.. however, being quite new to couchbase, I am unable to work out how to restrict the view to return only milestones of company 43
The return key is similar to this:
"key":[2013,6,19,16,11,25,14]
where the last element (14) is the company id.. which is quite obviously wrong.
The query parameters that I have tried are:
&descending=true&startkey=[{},43]
&descending=true&startkey=[{},43]&endKey=[{},43]
tried adding companyId to value but couldn't restrict return results by value.
And according to couchbase documentation I need the date parts in the beginning to sort them. How do I restrict them by company id now, please?
thanks.
Put the company id at the start of the array, and because you'll be limiting by company id, couchbase sorts by company id and then by date array so you will be only ever getting the one company's milestone documents
I'd modify the view to emit
emit([doc.copmanyId, eventKey], null);
and then you can query the view with
&descending=true&startkey=[43,{}]
This was what worked for me previously..
I went back and tried it with end key and this seems to work - restricts and orders as required:
&descending=true&startkey=[43,{}]&endkey=[42,{}]
or
&descending=true&startkey=[43,{}]&endkey=[43,{}]&inclusive_end=true
either specify the next incremented/decremented value (based on descending flag) with end key, or use the same endkey as startkey and set inclusiveEnd to true
Both of these options should work fine. (I only tested the one with endkey=42 but they should both work)

Couchbase Multiple Keys

I presume a simple question. I have the following data.
I want to search for all rows where the ID is > 2 but < 8 and the Price is > 30
I have used various versions of: startkey=["2", null] or even something like startkey=["2", "30"] just for testing.
It only ever seems to run both conditions on the first row. So if I do: startkey=["2", "30"] then I get back:
{"id":"3","key":["3","30"],"value":null},
{"id":"4","key":["4","30"],"value":null},
{"id":"5","key":["5","20"],"value":null},
{"id":"6","key":["6","60"],"value":null},
{"id":"8","key":["8","60"],"value":null}
Why is row 5 there?
I am starting to get the view that I need to handle this in the code (.net) and make multiple calls somehow... I can't seem to find anything on this that works....
Note: I have tried doing say a loop with for (i = 0; i < doc.ID.length; i++) and then using doc.ID[i] but it never returns anything....
Currently I just have
function (doc, meta) {
emit([doc.ID, doc.Price ],null);
}
Essentially I want to have a search where there are 5 input keys that a user has. So do I need to make 5 calls and then keep taking data from the previous output as the source for the next???
Other references I have looked at include: the manual
Thanks in advance,
Kindest Regards
Robin
This is a common misconception, with a compound array index key, it's still treated as a string, therefore the index key [2,10] is actually "[2,10]", and the index key [5,20], is actually "[5,20]".
So the reason that startkey=["2", "30"]shows the {"id":"5","key":["5","20"],"value":null}, row is because as a string it is > startkey.
Likewise, the Query startkey=[2,10]&endkey=[5,10] returns
{"total_rows":7,"rows":[
{"id":"2","key":[2,20],"value":null},
{"id":"3","key":[3,30],"value":null},
{"id":"4","key":[4,30],"value":null}
]
}
because startkey="[2,10]" < "[2,20]" && "[4,30]" < "[5,10]"=endkey, but "[5,20]" is not within that string Range.
Range Queries with startkey and endkey
startkey => endkey is a Range query using strcmp(), the group and group level is based on the string, where the comma is separating string tokens.
A Good Reference Link (since Couchbase Views work much like Apache CouchDB Views (inspired by them))
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/View_collation#Collation_Specification
Spatial View/Query
To achieve the result you are trying for, you could also write a Spatial View to have multi-dimensional Queries, numeric only. While you might not initially think of it
function (doc, meta) {
emit({
type: "Point",
coordinates: [doc.ID, doc.Price]
}, meta.id);
}
The Query would be a Bounding Box Query:
&bbox=2,0,8,30
{"total_rows":0,"rows":[
{"id":"2","bbox":[2,20,2,20],"geometry":{"type":"Point","coordinates":[2,20]},"value":"2"},
{"id":"3","bbox":[3,30,3,30],"geometry":{"type":"Point","coordinates":[3,30]},"value":"3"},
{"id":"4","bbox":[4,30,4,30],"geometry":{"type":"Point","coordinates":[4,30]},"value":"4"},
{"id":"5","bbox":[5,20,5,20],"geometry":{"type":"Point","coordinates":[5,20]},"value":"5"}
]
}
Another Query:
&bbox=2,30,8,30
{"total_rows":0,"rows":[
{"id":"3","bbox":[3,30,3,30],"geometry":{"type":"Point","coordinates":[3,30]},"value":"3"},
{"id":"4","bbox":[4,30,4,30],"geometry":{"type":"Point","coordinates":[4,30]},"value":"4"}
]
}

MySQL: Merging different entities in one Query

I basically have three different classes of items that I want to show on a users wall: ratings, comments, and updates. This three are completey different entities, but because they all can appear on a users wall, I just call them "wallitem". The all have a timestamp property, which represents the date they were created.
I want to enable users to page through the wallitems, ordered by the timestamp. For example: last 10 wallitems. Or wallitems 20 to 30. Is there an MySQL Query that gives me the last 10 "wallitems", even though all different entities have different columns?
I could imagine, getting a list of items back, where each item has all the properties of all different entities, an additional property defining the type (for example "rating"), if it is in fact a rating, all other properties are just null. I would love to use such a dicationary in my php code:
foreach ($wallItemArray as $item) {
if ($item['type'] == "rating") {
$rating = $item; // use it as normal "rating"-entity
} else if ($item['type'] == "comment") {
$comment = $item; // use it as normal "comment"
}
// and so on for all different entities that could represent a wallitem in this context
}
Something like
SELECT 'rating' AS type, value AS r_val, NULL AS c_val
FROM Rating
UNION
SELECT 'comment' AS type, NULL AS r_val, comment_text AS c_val
FROM Comment
would get you started