I have an issue understanding the process in consuming REST api services with SWIFT, seems like i'm missing something simple, but yet important here.
this is the singleton DataManager class, I'm using to consume API with loadNews() method, as you can see it's simple, request method, getter and initializer that will load the data.
for loadNews() I use Alamofire to handle request, and SwiftyJSON to parse the response.
class DataManager{
static let shared = DataManager()
private var data:JSON = JSON()
private init(){
print("testprint1 \(self.data.count)")
loadNews() { response in
self.data = response
print("initprint \(self.data.count)")
print(self.data["response"]["results"].count)
print(self.data["response"]["results"][0]["id"].stringValue)
}
print("testprint2 \(self.data.count)")
}
func getNews() -> JSON {
return data
}
func loadNews(completion: #escaping (JSON) -> ()){
Alamofire.request("...")
.responseJSON{ response in
guard response.result.isSuccess,
let value = response.result.value else {
print("Error: \(String(describing: response.result.error))")
completion([])
return
}
let json = JSON(value)
completion(json)
}
}
}
issue that i'm facing is when i try to call the DataManager() instance in my ViewController, I'm not able to read data in the controller for some reason, here is the controller code (relevant one):
class SecondViewController: UITableViewController {
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
let data1 = DataManager.shared.getNews()
print("qa \(data1.count)")
}
...
}
now what bothers me is - logic behind this should be simple, let data1 = DataManager.shared.getNews() - if i'm not wrong will (should) execute the following flow:
init()->loadNews()->getNews()
initialize method will call loadNews, loadNews will fetch data from API, fill the data array, and getNews is supposed to return the filled data array, but that flow doesn't seem correct then
console output
console output text
testprint1 0
testprint2 0
qa 0
initprint 1
50
commentisfree/2019/dec/07/lost-my-faith-in-tech-evangelism-john-naughton
so it seems like both prints within init() get executed before loadNews() method that is between them, as well as "qa0" print that is printing the size of the array in the ViewController.
now my question is, does anyone see a mistake here, is this happening because of long network query, or am I just missing something, because it seems to me that data is properly loaded and parsed, which is seen in last 2 lines of output, but i can't get it where i need it, like it dissapears. is my logic here wrong? if someone could help I would really appreciate it.
The Alamofire process works asynchronously, but you don't consider it, that's the mistake.
Change the code to
class DataManager{
static let shared = DataManager()
func loadNews(completion: #escaping (JSON) -> ()){
Alamofire.request("...")
.responseJSON{ response in
guard response.result.isSuccess,
let value = response.result.value else {
print("Error:", response.result.error)
completion([])
return
}
let json = JSON(value)
completion(json)
}
}
}
class SecondViewController: UITableViewController {
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
DataManager.shared.loadNews() { response in
print("initprint \(response.count)")
print(response["response"]["results"].count)
print(response["response"]["results"][0]["id"].stringValue)
}
}
...
}
You have to get the data from the completion handler in SecondViewController
I'm a beginner at Swift so let me know if this doesn't quite make sense, but i have a JSON file that i can access in swift and parse into an array, from there i can get a string from the array and store it in a var. I want to be able to access this variable globally but i'm not sure how to do it.
With the help of another user "rmaddy". I have this code:
struct Games: Decodable {
let videoLink: String
}
class BroadService {
static let sharedInstance = BroadService()
func fetchBroadcasts(completion: #escaping ([Games]?) -> ()) {
let jsonUrlString = "LINK IS HERE."
guard let url = URL(string: jsonUrlString) else {
completion(nil)
return
}
URLSession.shared.dataTask(with: url) { (data, response, err) in
guard let data = data else {
completion(nil)
return
}
do {
let games = try JSONDecoder().decode([Games].self, from: data)
completion(games)
} catch let jsonErr {
print("Error deserializing json:", jsonErr)
completion(nil)
}
}.resume()
}
}
I can then access it in another class from here:
BroadService.sharedInstance.fetchBroadcasts { (games) in
if let games = games {
let game = games[indexPath]
let videoLink = game.videoLink
}
I want to be able to access the contents of "videoLink" globally, without having to use "BroadService.sharedInstance.fetchBroadcasts { (games) in" how would i go about doing this
You shouldn't use global variables, I don't think that's recommended in any language.
Now here you have what looks like a Singleton class (BroadService), that's good because it's a nice solution for what you're looking for.
Next all you need to do is add a property to that class. Let's say videoLink is a string, you can add a string property to BroadService, for example storedVideoLink as an optional String, and the next time you need to obtain that value after you have already fetched it, you can access it like so: BroadService.sharedInstance.storedVideoLink.
One more thing, to have BroadService work properly as a singleton, you should make its init private.
To sum up, here's what I'm suggesting:
class BroadService {
static let sharedInstance = BroadService()
var storedVideoLink: String?
private init() {} // to ensure only this class can init itself
func fetchBroadcasts(completion: #escaping ([Games]?) -> ()) {
// your code here
}
}
// somewhere else in your code:
BroadService.sharedInstance.fetchBroadcasts { (games) in
if let games = games {
let game = games[indexPath]
let videoLink = game.videoLink
BroadService.sharedInstance.storedVideoLink = videoLink
}
}
// now you can access it from anywhere as
// BroadService.sharedInstance.storedVideoLink
This way it all stays cohesive in the same class. You can even add a getter method for storedVideoLink so you don't have to access it directly, and in this method you could state that if the string is nil then you fetch the data, store the link to the string, and then return the string.
You could create a file with a struct called something like Global and create a static var and set that inside your completion block once you have fetched the games.
Here is an example.
struct Global {
static var games:[Any]? = nil
static func setGames(games:[Any]) {
Global.games = games
}
}
Then you fetch the data once upon load of the app or somewhere before you use the Global and set that property:
URLSession.shared.dataTask(with: url) { (data, response, err) in
guard let data = data else {
completion(nil)
return
}
do {
let games = try JSONDecoder().decode([Games].self, from: data)
Global.setGames(games: games)
completion(games)
} catch let jsonErr {
print("Error deserializing json:", jsonErr)
completion(nil)
}
}.resume()
Please note that this will make the Global.games accessible from everywhere but it will also not be a constant so you should be careful not to override it.
This way Global.games will be accessible from anywhere.
I've searched for how to do this but something just isn't making sense for me and I can't do it. All I need to do is get data out of my json session (if thats what you call it). I started programming about 3 weeks ago so I need lay mans terms please. I realize this is probably going to get marked as a duplicate but most of the answers on this / related topics are for other languages and I barely understand swift so they don't help me much.
I've spent hours trying to find the answer and since I'm new I don't know if what I'm searching for is even the right thing to be searching for. I've also tried reading the iOS developer library but either I don't understand what it's telling me or I haven't found the right section because I still can't figure this out. Please try to explain this instead of sending me to read other resources.
here is my function
func parseData() {
let urlString = "http://heroesjson.com/heroes.json"
let session = NSURLSession.sharedSession()
let url = NSURL(string: urlString)!
session.dataTaskWithURL(url) { (data: NSData?, response:NSURLResponse?, error: NSError?) -> Void in
guard let responseData = data else { return }
var json: [[String: AnyObject]]!
do {
json = try NSJSONSerialization.JSONObjectWithData(responseData, options: NSJSONReadingOptions.AllowFragments) as! [[String: AnyObject]]
}
catch {
//handle error
}
var arrayToReturn = [Hero]()
for element in json {
let hero = Hero(fromDictionary: element as! [String: AnyObject])
arrayToReturn.append(hero)
}
}.resume()//Closes Session.dataTaskWithURL
} //Closes parseData()
the goal is to get the json variable in my do statement so I can parse it outside of the function or get my "arrayToReturn" so I can save it to a global variable that I use.
If I understand correctly I can't just assign the value (arrayToReturn) to my global variable (heroes) because this is an asynchronous request so it just returns nil because the command is called before the request is finished. I think I have to use a completion handler or callback function. I don't really understand the difference between them and don't understand how or where to implement them.
Also, I don't understand this code very much either, I just know it's necessary to get what I want.
session.dataTaskWithURL(url) { (data: NSData?, response:NSURLResponse?, error: NSError?) -> Void in
"(data: NSData?, response:NSURLResponse?, error: NSError?)" looks like parameters but they don't seem to be attached to a function so that doesn't make sense to me
"-> Void" Doesn't make sense to me because -> means return whatever follows, but void indicates to me that its returning nothing, so why not just leave it out all together?
"-> Void in" What what is the significance of in here? what does it mean / signal?
Go and read about Swift Closures. To use a value outside of it, you'd need to pass it to another closure.
func parseData(callback: (heroes: [Hero]) -> Void) {
let urlString = "http://heroesjson.com/heroes.json"
let session = NSURLSession.sharedSession()
let url = NSURL(string: urlString)!
session.dataTaskWithURL(url) { (data: NSData?, response:NSURLResponse?, error: NSError?) -> Void in
guard let responseData = data else { return }
var json: [[String: AnyObject]]!
do {
json = try NSJSONSerialization.JSONObjectWithData(responseData, options: NSJSONReadingOptions.AllowFragments) as! [[String: AnyObject]]
}
catch {
//handle error
}
var arrayToReturn = [Hero]()
for element in json {
let hero = Hero(fromDictionary: element as! [String: AnyObject])
arrayToReturn.append(hero)
}
callback(heroes: arrayToReturn)
}.resume()//Closes Session.dataTaskWithURL
} //Closes parseData()
And you'd call it:
parseData { heroes in
// do something with the array
}
i tried to save data from an API in my app.
But somehow it fails:
func getApiData() -> NSArray {
let ApiManager = RestApiManager(apiUrl:"http://localhost/api/", apiUsername:"user", apiPassword:"password", apiRequestedResource:"resource")
ApiManager.collectDataFromApi() { responseObject, error in
return responseObject! // Asynchronous data!! :/
}
}
My manager:
func collectDataFromApi(completionHandler: (responseObject: NSDictionary?, error: NSError?) -> ()) {
prepareHttpRequest(completionHandler)
}
func prepareHttpRequest(completionHandler: (responseObject: NSDictionary?, error: NSError?) -> ()) {
Alamofire.request(.GET, "\(self.apiUrl + self.apiRequestedResource)")
.authenticate(user: self.apiUsername, password: self.apiPassword)
.responseJSON { request, response, responseObject, error in
completionHandler(responseObject: responseObject as? NSDictionary, error: error)
}
}
Retrieving data works great!
When i print "responseObject" instead of returning it, it works.
But how to save it...
Anybody knows how i could save my asyncronous retrieved data, so i can work with it?
Greetings and thanks
Your getApiData function cannot return the API data, because when the function returns, the data is not ready yet. This is a concept at the heart of asynchronous programming. Your function starts the network operation and then returns so that program execution can continue while your network operation is working on a different thread.
Instead of returning a value from your getApiData function, you could consider passing a completion handler, like the other asynchronous functions in your example are doing. It would look something like this:
func getApiData(completion: (responseObject: NSDictionary?, error: NSError?) -> ()) {
let ApiManager = RestApiManager(apiUrl:"http://localhost/api/", apiUsername:"user", apiPassword:"password", apiRequestedResource:"resource")
ApiManager.collectDataFromApi() { responseObject, error in
completion(responseObject, error)
}
}
Whatever work you want to do to the data when it is ready, that goes in the completion handler. Instead of using it like this (like I think you might be trying to do):
let data = getApiData()
processData(data)
updateUserInterfaceWithData(data)
you would use it like this:
getApiData() { responseObject, error in
let data = responseObject!
processData(data)
updateUserInterfaceWithData(data)
}
Of course you would want to check for errors and unwrap the optional data in a safe way, but this is the general structure that you want, I think.
I haven't read too much into Swift but one thing I noticed is that there are no exceptions.
So how do they do error handling in Swift? Has anyone found anything related to error-handling?
Swift 2 & 3
Things have changed a bit in Swift 2, as there is a new error-handling mechanism, that is somewhat more similar to exceptions but different in detail.
1. Indicating error possibility
If function/method wants to indicate that it may throw an error, it should contain throws keyword like this
func summonDefaultDragon() throws -> Dragon
Note: there is no specification for type of error the function actually can throw. This declaration simply states that the function can throw an instance of any type implementing ErrorType or is not throwing at all.
2. Invoking function that may throw errors
In order to invoke function you need to use try keyword, like this
try summonDefaultDragon()
this line should normally be present do-catch block like this
do {
let dragon = try summonDefaultDragon()
} catch DragonError.dragonIsMissing {
// Some specific-case error-handling
} catch DragonError.notEnoughMana(let manaRequired) {
// Other specific-case error-handlng
} catch {
// Catch all error-handling
}
Note: catch clause use all the powerful features of Swift pattern matching so you are very flexible here.
You may decided to propagate the error, if your are calling a throwing function from a function that is itself marked with throws keyword:
func fulfill(quest: Quest) throws {
let dragon = try summonDefaultDragon()
quest.ride(dragon)
}
Alternatively, you can call throwing function using try?:
let dragonOrNil = try? summonDefaultDragon()
This way you either get the return value or nil, if any error occurred. Using this way you do not get the error object.
Which means that you can also combine try? with useful statements like:
if let dragon = try? summonDefaultDragon()
or
guard let dragon = try? summonDefaultDragon() else { ... }
Finally, you can decide that you know that error will not actually occur (e.g. because you have already checked are prerequisites) and use try! keyword:
let dragon = try! summonDefaultDragon()
If the function actually throws an error, then you'll get a runtime error in your application and the application will terminate.
3. Throwing an error
In order to throw an error you use throw keyword like this
throw DragonError.dragonIsMissing
You can throw anything that conforms to ErrorType protocol. For starters NSError conforms to this protocol but you probably would like to go with enum-based ErrorType which enables you to group multiple related errors, potentially with additional pieces of data, like this
enum DragonError: ErrorType {
case dragonIsMissing
case notEnoughMana(requiredMana: Int)
...
}
Main differences between new Swift 2 & 3 error mechanism and Java/C#/C++ style exceptions are follows:
Syntax is a bit different: do-catch + try + defer vs traditional try-catch-finally syntax.
Exception handling usually incurs much higher execution time in exception path than in success path. This is not the case with Swift 2.0 errors, where success path and error path cost roughly the same.
All error throwing code must be declared, while exceptions might have been thrown from anywhere. All errors are "checked exceptions" in Java nomenclature. However, in contrast to Java, you do not specify potentially thrown errors.
Swift exceptions are not compatible with ObjC exceptions. Your do-catch block will not catch any NSException, and vice versa, for that you must use ObjC.
Swift exceptions are compatible with Cocoa NSError method conventions of returning either false (for Bool returning functions) or nil (for AnyObject returning functions) and passing NSErrorPointer with error details.
As an extra syntatic-sugar to ease error handling, there are two more concepts
deferred actions (using defer keyword) which let you achieve the same effect as finally blocks in Java/C#/etc
guard statement (using guard keyword) which let you write little less if/else code than in normal error checking/signaling code.
Swift 1
Runtime errors:
As Leandros suggests for handling runtime errors (like network connectivity problems, parsing data, opening file, etc) you should use NSError like you did in ObjC, because the Foundation, AppKit, UIKit, etc report their errors in this way. So it's more framework thing than language thing.
Another frequent pattern that is being used are separator success/failure blocks like in AFNetworking:
var sessionManager = AFHTTPSessionManager(baseURL: NSURL(string: "yavin4.yavin.planets"))
sessionManager.HEAD("/api/destoryDeathStar", parameters: xwingSquad,
success: { (NSURLSessionDataTask) -> Void in
println("Success")
},
failure:{ (NSURLSessionDataTask, NSError) -> Void in
println("Failure")
})
Still the failure block frequently received NSError instance, describing the error.
Programmer errors:
For programmer errors (like out of bounds access of array element, invalid arguments passed to a function call, etc) you used exceptions in ObjC. Swift language does not seem to have any language support for exceptions (like throw, catch, etc keyword). However, as documentation suggests it is running on the same runtime as ObjC, and therefore you are still able to throw NSExceptions like this:
NSException(name: "SomeName", reason: "SomeReason", userInfo: nil).raise()
You just cannot catch them in pure Swift, although you may opt for catching exceptions in ObjC code.
The questions is whether you should throw exceptions for programmer errors, or rather use assertions as Apple suggests in the language guide.
Update June 9th 2015 - Very important
Swift 2.0 comes with try, throw, and catch keywords and the most exciting is:
Swift automatically translates Objective-C methods that produce errors into methods that throw an error according to Swift's native error handling functionality.
Note: Methods that consume errors, such as delegate methods or methods
that take a completion handler with an NSError object argument, do not
become methods that throw when imported by Swift.
Excerpt From: Apple Inc. “Using Swift with Cocoa and Objective-C (Swift 2 Prerelease).” iBooks.
Example: (from the book)
NSFileManager *fileManager = [NSFileManager defaultManager];
NSURL *URL = [NSURL fileURLWithPath:#"/path/to/file"];
NSError *error = nil;
BOOL success = [fileManager removeItemAtURL:URL error:&error];
if (!success && error){
NSLog(#"Error: %#", error.domain);
}
The equivalent in swift will be:
let fileManager = NSFileManager.defaultManager()
let URL = NSURL.fileURLWithPath("path/to/file")
do {
try fileManager.removeItemAtURL(URL)
} catch let error as NSError {
print ("Error: \(error.domain)")
}
Throwing an Error:
*errorPtr = [NSError errorWithDomain:NSURLErrorDomain code:NSURLErrorCannotOpenFile userInfo: nil]
Will be automatically propagated to the caller:
throw NSError(domain: NSURLErrorDomain, code: NSURLErrorCannotOpenFile, userInfo: nil)
From Apple books, The Swift Programming Language it's seems errors should be handle using enum.
Here is an example from the book.
enum ServerResponse {
case Result(String, String)
case Error(String)
}
let success = ServerResponse.Result("6:00 am", "8:09 pm")
let failure = ServerResponse.Error("Out of cheese.")
switch success {
case let .Result(sunrise, sunset):
let serverResponse = "Sunrise is at \(sunrise) and sunset is at \(sunset)."
case let .Error(error):
let serverResponse = "Failure... \(error)"
}
From: Apple Inc. “The Swift Programming Language.” iBooks. https://itun.es/br/jEUH0.l
Update
From Apple news books, "Using Swift with Cocoa and Objective-C". Runtime exceptions not occur using swift languages, so that's why you don't have try-catch. Instead you use Optional Chaining.
Here is a stretch from the book:
For example, in the code listing below, the first and second lines are
not executed because the length property and the characterAtIndex:
method do not exist on an NSDate object. The myLength constant is
inferred to be an optional Int, and is set to nil. You can also use an
if–let statement to conditionally unwrap the result of a method that
the object may not respond to, as shown on line three
let myLength = myObject.length?
let myChar = myObject.characterAtIndex?(5)
if let fifthCharacter = myObject.characterAtIndex(5) {
println("Found \(fifthCharacter) at index 5")
}
Excerpt From: Apple Inc. “Using Swift with Cocoa and Objective-C.” iBooks. https://itun.es/br/1u3-0.l
And the books also encourage you to use cocoa error pattern from Objective-C (NSError Object)
Error reporting in Swift follows the same pattern it does in
Objective-C, with the added benefit of offering optional return
values. In the simplest case, you return a Bool value from the
function to indicate whether or not it succeeded. When you need to
report the reason for the error, you can add to the function an
NSError out parameter of type NSErrorPointer. This type is roughly
equivalent to Objective-C’s NSError **, with additional memory safety
and optional typing. You can use the prefix & operator to pass in a
reference to an optional NSError type as an NSErrorPointer object, as
shown in the code listing below.
var writeError : NSError?
let written = myString.writeToFile(path, atomically: false,
encoding: NSUTF8StringEncoding,
error: &writeError)
if !written {
if let error = writeError {
println("write failure: \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
}
Excerpt From: Apple Inc. “Using Swift with Cocoa and Objective-C.” iBooks. https://itun.es/br/1u3-0.l
There are no Exceptions in Swift, similar to Objective-C's approach.
In development, you can use assert to catch any errors which might appear, and need to be fixed before going to production.
The classic NSError approach isn't altered, you send an NSErrorPointer, which gets populated.
Brief example:
var error: NSError?
var contents = NSFileManager.defaultManager().contentsOfDirectoryAtPath("/Users/leandros", error: &error)
if let error = error {
println("An error occurred \(error)")
} else {
println("Contents: \(contents)")
}
The recommended 'Swift Way' is:
func write(path: String)(#error: NSErrorPointer) -> Bool { // Useful to curry error parameter for retrying (see below)!
return "Hello!".writeToFile(path, atomically: false, encoding: NSUTF8StringEncoding, error: error)
}
var writeError: NSError?
let written = write("~/Error1")(error: &writeError)
if !written {
println("write failure 1: \(writeError!.localizedDescription)")
// assert(false) // Terminate program
}
However I prefer try/catch as I find it easier to follow because it moves the error handling to a separate block at the end, this arrangement is sometimes called "Golden Path". Lucky you can do this with closures:
TryBool {
write("~/Error2")(error: $0) // The code to try
}.catch {
println("write failure 2: \($0!.localizedDescription)") // Report failure
// assert(false) // Terminate program
}
Also it is easy to add a retry facility:
TryBool {
write("~/Error3")(error: $0) // The code to try
}.retry {
println("write failure 3 on try \($1 + 1): \($0!.localizedDescription)")
return write("~/Error3r") // The code to retry
}.catch {
println("write failure 3 catch: \($0!.localizedDescription)") // Report failure
// assert(false) // Terminate program
}
The listing for TryBool is:
class TryBool {
typealias Tryee = NSErrorPointer -> Bool
typealias Catchee = NSError? -> ()
typealias Retryee = (NSError?, UInt) -> Tryee
private var tryee: Tryee
private var retries: UInt = 0
private var retryee: Retryee?
init(tryee: Tryee) {
self.tryee = tryee
}
func retry(retries: UInt, retryee: Retryee) -> Self {
self.retries = retries
self.retryee = retryee
return self
}
func retry(retryee: Retryee) -> Self {
return self.retry(1, retryee)
}
func retry(retries: UInt) -> Self {
// For some reason you can't write the body as "return retry(1, nil)", the compiler doesn't like the nil
self.retries = retries
retryee = nil
return self
}
func retry() -> Self {
return retry(1)
}
func catch(catchee: Catchee) {
var error: NSError?
for numRetries in 0...retries { // First try is retry 0
error = nil
let result = tryee(&error)
if result {
return
} else if numRetries != retries {
if let r = retryee {
tryee = r(error, numRetries)
}
}
}
catchee(error)
}
}
You can write a similar class for testing an Optional returned value instead of Bool value:
class TryOptional<T> {
typealias Tryee = NSErrorPointer -> T?
typealias Catchee = NSError? -> T
typealias Retryee = (NSError?, UInt) -> Tryee
private var tryee: Tryee
private var retries: UInt = 0
private var retryee: Retryee?
init(tryee: Tryee) {
self.tryee = tryee
}
func retry(retries: UInt, retryee: Retryee) -> Self {
self.retries = retries
self.retryee = retryee
return self
}
func retry(retryee: Retryee) -> Self {
return retry(1, retryee)
}
func retry(retries: UInt) -> Self {
// For some reason you can't write the body as "return retry(1, nil)", the compiler doesn't like the nil
self.retries = retries
retryee = nil
return self
}
func retry() -> Self {
return retry(1)
}
func catch(catchee: Catchee) -> T {
var error: NSError?
for numRetries in 0...retries {
error = nil
let result = tryee(&error)
if let r = result {
return r
} else if numRetries != retries {
if let r = retryee {
tryee = r(error, numRetries)
}
}
}
return catchee(error)
}
}
The TryOptional version enforces a non-Optional return type that makes subsequent programming easier, e.g. 'Swift Way:
struct FailableInitializer {
init?(_ id: Int, error: NSErrorPointer) {
// Always fails in example
if error != nil {
error.memory = NSError(domain: "", code: id, userInfo: [:])
}
return nil
}
private init() {
// Empty in example
}
static let fallback = FailableInitializer()
}
func failableInitializer(id: Int)(#error: NSErrorPointer) -> FailableInitializer? { // Curry for retry
return FailableInitializer(id, error: error)
}
var failError: NSError?
var failure1Temp = failableInitializer(1)(error: &failError)
if failure1Temp == nil {
println("failableInitializer failure code: \(failError!.code)")
failure1Temp = FailableInitializer.fallback
}
let failure1 = failure1Temp! // Unwrap
Using TryOptional:
let failure2 = TryOptional {
failableInitializer(2)(error: $0)
}.catch {
println("failableInitializer failure code: \($0!.code)")
return FailableInitializer.fallback
}
let failure3 = TryOptional {
failableInitializer(3)(error: $0)
}.retry {
println("failableInitializer failure, on try \($1 + 1), code: \($0!.code)")
return failableInitializer(31)
}.catch {
println("failableInitializer failure code: \($0!.code)")
return FailableInitializer.fallback
}
Note auto-unwrapping.
Edit: Although this answer works, it is little more than Objective-C transliterated into Swift. It has been made obsolete by changes in Swift 2.0. Guilherme Torres Castro's answer above is a very good introduction to the preferred way of handling errors in Swift. VOS
It took a bit of figuring it out but I think I've sussed it. It seems ugly though. Nothing more than a thin skin over the Objective-C version.
Calling a function with an NSError parameter...
var fooError : NSError ? = nil
let someObject = foo(aParam, error:&fooError)
// Check something was returned and look for an error if it wasn't.
if !someObject {
if let error = fooError {
// Handle error
NSLog("This happened: \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
} else {
// Handle success
}`
Writing the function that takes an error parameter...
func foo(param:ParamObject, error: NSErrorPointer) -> SomeObject {
// Do stuff...
if somethingBadHasHappened {
if error {
error.memory = NSError(domain: domain, code: code, userInfo: [:])
}
return nil
}
// Do more stuff...
}
Basic wrapper around objective C that gives you the try catch feature.
https://github.com/williamFalcon/SwiftTryCatch
Use like:
SwiftTryCatch.try({ () -> Void in
//try something
}, catch: { (error) -> Void in
//handle error
}, finally: { () -> Void in
//close resources
})
As Guilherme Torres Castro said, in Swift 2.0, try, catch, do can be used in the programming.
For example, In CoreData fetch data method, instead of put &error as a parameter into the managedContext.executeFetchRequest(fetchRequest, error: &error), now we only need to use use managedContext.executeFetchRequest(fetchRequest) and then handle the error with try, catch (Apple Document Link)
do {
let fetchedResults = try managedContext.executeFetchRequest(fetchRequest) as? [NSManagedObject]
if let results = fetchedResults{
people = results
}
} catch {
print("Could not fetch")
}
If you have already download the xcode7 Beta. Try to search throwing errors in Documentations and API Reference and choose the first showing result, it gives a basic idea what can be done for this new syntax. However, fully documentation is not post for many APIs yet.
More fancy Error Handling techniques can be found in
What's New in Swift (2015 Session 106 28m30s)
This is an update answer for swift 2.0. I am looking forward feature rich Error handling model like in java. Finally, they announced the good news. here
Error handling model: The new error handling model in Swift 2.0 will
instantly feel natural, with familiar try, throw, and catch keywords.
Best of all, it was designed to work perfectly with the Apple SDKs and
NSError. In fact, NSError conforms to a Swift’s ErrorType. You’ll
definitely want to watch the WWDC session on What’s New in Swift to
hear more about it.
e.g :
func loadData() throws { }
func test() {
do {
try loadData()
} catch {
print(error)
}}
Starting with Swift 2, as others have already mentioned, error handling is best accomplished through the use of do/try/catch and ErrorType enums. This works quite well for synchronous methods, but a little cleverness is required for asynchronous error handling.
This article has a great approach to this problem:
https://jeremywsherman.com/blog/2015/06/17/using-swift-throws-with-completion-callbacks/
To summarize:
// create a typealias used in completion blocks, for cleaner code
typealias LoadDataResult = () throws -> NSData
// notice the reference to the typealias in the completionHandler
func loadData(someID: String, completionHandler: LoadDataResult -> Void)
{
completionHandler()
}
then, the call to the above method would be as follows:
self.loadData("someString",
completionHandler:
{ result: LoadDataResult in
do
{
let data = try result()
// success - go ahead and work with the data
}
catch
{
// failure - look at the error code and handle accordingly
}
})
This seems a bit cleaner than having a separate errorHandler callback passed to the asynchronous function, which was how this would be handled prior to Swift 2.
Error handling is a new feature of Swift 2.0. It uses the try, throw and catch keywords.
See the Apple Swift 2.0 announcement on the official Apple Swift blog
Nice and simple lib to handle exception:
TryCatchFinally-Swift
Like a few others it wraps around the objective C exception features.
Use it like this:
try {
println(" try")
}.catch { e in
println(" catch")
}.finally {
println(" finally")
}
enum CheckValidAge : Error{
case overrage
case underage
}
func checkValidAgeForGovernmentJob(age:Int)throws -> Bool{
if age < 18{
throw CheckValidAge.underage
}else if age > 25{
throw CheckValidAge.overrage
}else{
return true
}
}
do {
try checkValidAgeForGovernmentJob(age: 26)
print("You are valid for government job ")
}catch CheckValidAge.underage{
print("You are underage for government job ")
}catch CheckValidAge.overrage{
print("You are overrage for government job ")
}
Change age in try checkValidAgeForGovernmentJob(age: 26)
Out Put
You are overrage for government job
What I have seen is that because of the nature of the device you don't want to be throwing a bunch of cryptic error handling messages at the user. That is why most functions return optional values then you just code to ignore the optional. If a function comes back nil meaning it failed you can pop a message or whatever.