I've read a lot of StackOverflow answers and other pages talking about how to do letter spacing in Canvas. One of the more useful ones was Letter spacing in canvas element
As that other question said, 'I've got this canvas element that I'm drawing text to. I want to set the letter spacing similar to the CSS letter-spacing attribute. By that I mean increasing the amount of pixels between letters when a string is drawn.' Note that letter spacing is sometimes, and incorrectly, referred to as kerning.
I notice that the general approach seems to be to output the string on a letter by letter basis, using measureText(letter) to get the letter's width and then adding additional spacing. The problem with this is it doesn't take into account letter kerning pairs and the like. See the above link for an example of this and related comments.
Seems to me that the way to do it, for a line spacing of 'spacing', would be to do something like:
Start at position (X, Y).
Measure wAll, the width of the entire string using measureText()
Remove the first character from the string
Print the first character at position (X, Y) using fillText()
Measure wShorter, the width of the resulting shorter string using measureText().
Subtract the width of the shorter string from the width of the entire string, giving the kerned width of the character, wChar = wAll - wShorter
Increment X by wChar + spacing
wAll = wShorter
Repeat from step 3
Would this not take into account kerning? Am I missing something? Does measureText() add a load of padding that varies depending on the outermost character, or something, and if it does, would not fillText() use the same system to output the character, negating that issue? Someone in the link above mentioned 'pixel-aligned font hinting' but I don't see how that applies here. Can anyone advise either generally or specifically if this will work or if there are problems with it?
EDIT: This is not a duplicate of the other question - which it links to and refers to. The question is NOT about how to do 'letter spacing in canvas', per the proposed duplicate; this is proposing a possible solution (which as far as I know was not suggested by anyone else) to that and other questions, and asking if anyone can see or knows of any issues with that proposed solution - i.e. it's asking about the proposed solution and its points, including details of measureText(), fillText() and 'pixel-aligned font hinting'.
Well, I've written the code, based on the pseudocode above, and done a few comparisons by screenshotting and eyeballing it for differences (zoomed, using straight lines from eg clip boxes to compare X position and width for each character). Looks exactly the same for me, with spacing set at 0.
Here's the HTML:
<canvas id="Test1" width="800px" height="200px"><p>Your browser does not support canvas.</p></canvas>
Here's the code:
this.fillTextWithSpacing = function(context, text, x, y, spacing)
{
//Start at position (X, Y).
//Measure wAll, the width of the entire string using measureText()
wAll = context.measureText(text).width;
do
{
//Remove the first character from the string
char = text.substr(0, 1);
text = text.substr(1);
//Print the first character at position (X, Y) using fillText()
context.fillText(char, x, y);
//Measure wShorter, the width of the resulting shorter string using measureText().
if (text == "")
wShorter = 0;
else
wShorter = context.measureText(text).width;
//Subtract the width of the shorter string from the width of the entire string, giving the kerned width of the character, wChar = wAll - wShorter
wChar = wAll - wShorter;
//Increment X by wChar + spacing
x += wChar + spacing;
//wAll = wShorter
wAll = wShorter;
//Repeat from step 3
} while (text != "");
}
Code for demo/eyeball test:
element1 = document.getElementById("Test1");
textContext1 = element1.getContext('2d');
textContext1.font = "72px Verdana, sans-serif";
textContext1.textAlign = "left";
textContext1.textBaseline = "top";
textContext1.fillStyle = "#000000";
text = "Welcome to go WAVE";
this.fillTextWithSpacing(textContext1, text, 0, 0, 0);
textContext1.fillText(text, 0, 100);
Ideally I'd throw multiple random strings at it and do a pixel by pixel comparison. I'm also not sure how good Verdana's default kerning is, though I understand it's better than Arial - suggestions on other fonts to try gratefully accepted.
So... so far it looks good. In fact it looks perfect.
Still hoping that someone will point out any flaws in the process.
In the meantime I will put this here for others to see if they are looking for a solution on this.
My answer got deleted.
So, I'm using chrome and here is my complete code.
second_image = $('#block_id').first();
canvas = document.getElementById('canvas');
canvas.style.letterSpacing = '2px';
ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
canvas.crossOrigin = "Anonymous";
canvasDraw = function(text, font_size, font_style, fill_or_stroke){
canvas.width = second_image.width();
canvas.height = second_image.height();
ctx.clearRect(0,0,canvas.width,canvas.height);
ctx.drawImage(second_image.get(0), 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
//refill text
ctx.font = font_size +'px '+ font_style + ',Symbola';
$test = ctx.font;
ctx.textAlign = "center";
if(fill_or_stroke){
ctx.fillStyle = "#d2b76d";
ctx.strokeStyle = "#9d8a5e";
ctx.strokeText(text,canvas.width*$left,canvas.height*$top);
ctx.fillText(text,canvas.width*$left,canvas.height*$top);
}
else{
ctx.strokeStyle = "#888888";
ctx.strokeText(text,canvas.width*$left,canvas.height*$top);
}
};
And you don't need to use this function this.fillTextWithSpacing. I didn't use and it worked like a charm)
Related
So this one is a little hard to explain. I have a custom Text class that automatically resizes and sets the width of the text when you change its value. I then take that Text and draw it on a Bitmap to scale it up to make the text look pixelated.
I have a property called maxWidth that allows you to restrict the width of the text if you want it to maintain a certain width. By default the maxWidth is the width of the text's parent so that it doesn't get cut off or expand the parent's boundaries unexpectedly.
So unfortunately when I draw the text it sometimes gets cut off on the right side. Now I've checked all the values and the width and textWidth are showing up as within their maxWidth values, but when I take a look myself through screenshots I see the text is actually about 3 pixels wider than it should be.
Here's an image to better explain what I mean:
I turned on borders so you can easily see what I mean. The word "and" on the first line gets drawn outside its border. Here is the line of code that handles resizing text when you change its bounds.
override protected function checkResize(value:String):void {
var bufferWidth:uint = Math.floor(Number(defaultTextFormat.size) / bufferDivisor) + bufferMin;
var maxWidth:Number = this.maxWidth;
x = y = 0;
if (parent is Stage) {
var stageParent:Stage = Stage(parent);
super.width = stageParent.stageWidth;
super.height = stageParent.stageHeight;
if (maxWidth == 0) maxWidth = stageParent.stageWidth;
}
else {
super.width = parent.width;
super.height = parent.height;
if (maxWidth == 0) maxWidth = parent.width;
}
maxWidth = maxWidth / scale;
text = value;
if (textWidth + bufferWidth <= maxWidth) super.width = textWidth + bufferWidth;
else super.width = maxWidth;
super.height = textHeight + 4;
if (textSnapshot) updateSnapshot();
if (alignRelation) Align.alignTo(textSprite, alignRelation, alignDirection, alignXOffset, alignYOffest);
}
And for this text specifically the width value states it's 512, which is correct since that's the maxWidth. However if you notice the top line in the text, it goes beyond the 512 width border, it actually goes all the way to 515 even though it says its width is 512. Even more bizarre is the textWidth states it's 510.4 even though the first line goes well beyond that amount. I just want to know if I'm doing anything wrong or if there's a way to get a true textWidth value.
This seems to be related to embedding fonts, at least it was when I had the same problem. A workaround is to set the right margin of the text field, like so
var tf:TextFormat = new TextFormat();
tf.rightMargin = 10; // or whatever fixes your problem, e.g. relate it to font size
textField.setTextFormat(tf);
I am doing a little scratch/reveal game based on the AlphaMaskFilter example:
http://createjs.com/demos/easeljs/AlphaMaskReveal.html
I want to detect that the the mask is completely gone, or use a threshold (90% scratched for example).
I read the doc on AlphaMaskFilter, shape and graphics objects and im not really sure how to achieve this.
Im not even sure i Have acess to the pixel information and check the alpha channel to detect it, but even so, I wonder if I will performance issue.
any help is welcome, thanks.
**** EDIT **** ADD TO THE ACCEPTED ANSWER ****
So, I was able to have the pct of transparency using the AlphaMapFilter (thanks Lanny).
The AlphaMapFilter offer you a mapping to the alpha channel of all the pixels.
Here is a little sample code that worked for me:
// mShapeToScratch is a createjs Shape. like in the http://createjs.com/demos/easeljs/AlphaMaskReveal.html example
var alphaMaskFilter = new createjs.AlphaMapFilter(mShapeToScratch.cacheCanvas);
var canvas = alphaMaskFilter.alphaMap;
var ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
var imgData = ctx.getImageData(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
var alphaData = imgData.data;
var pixelTotal = rect.h*rect.w;
var transparentPixel = 0;
// rect.h is the height of the image and rect.w is the width not shown in the example
for (var y = 0; y < rect.h; ++y)
{
for (var x=0; x < rect.w; ++x)
{
var pixelIdx = (y*rect.w + x);
if(alphaData[pixelIdx] > 128) // transparent will be 255.
{
transparentPixel++;
}
}
console.log("transparent % = " + transparentPixel/pixelTotal);
This example checks all the pixels, but it's pretty easy to check one every X pixels to speeds up checks as Lanny suggested.
The alpha mask uses canvas composite operation, and not pixel access, so without some completely custom approach, there isn't a great way to do this.
Iterating pixels (check out AlphaMapFilter as an example) would work - but could be fairly slow. Maybe checking every 4th, 10th, or 25th pixel would speed it up.
Cheers.
I want to draw text on a canvas in the inverse color of the background (to make sure the text is readible no matter the background color). I believe in oldskool bitblt-ing, this was an XOR operation.
How to do this?
Update: most of the newer browsers now support the blending mode "difference" which can achieve the same result.
context.globalCompositeOperation = "difference";
Updated demo.
Old answer:
One should think that the XOR mode for composition would do this, but unfortunately canvas' XOR only XORs the alpha bits.
By applying the following code we can however receive a result such as this:
You can make an extension to the canvas like this:
CanvasRenderingContext2D.prototype.fillInversedText =
function(txt, x, y) {
//code - see below
}
Now you can call it on the context as the normal fillText, but with a slight change:
ctx.fillInversedText(txt, x, y);
For this to work we do the following first - measure text. Currently we can only calculate width of text and then assume the height. This may or may not work well as fonts can be very tall and so forth. Luckily this will change in the future, but for now:
var tw = this.measureText(txt).width;
var th = parseInt(ctx.font, '10');
th = (th === 0) ? 10 : th; //assume default if no font and size is set
Next thing we need to do is to setup an off-screen canvas to draw the text we want ot invert:
var co = document.createElement('canvas');
co.width = tw;
co.height = th;
Then draw the actual text. Color does not matter as we are only interested in the alpha channel for this canvas:
var octx = co.getContext('2d');
octx.font = this.font;
octx.textBaseline = 'top';
octx.fillText(txt, 0, 0);
Then we extract the pixel buffers for the area we want to draw the inverted text as well as all the pixels for the off-screen canvas which now contains our text:
var ddata = this.getImageData(x, y, tw, th);
var sdata = octx.getImageData(0, 0, tw, th);
var dd = ddata.data; //cache for increased speed
var ds = sdata.data;
var len = ds.length;
And then we invert each pixel where alpha channel for pixel is greater than 0.
for (var i = 0; i < len; i += 4) {
if (ds[i + 3] > 0) {
dd[i] = 255 - dd[i];
dd[i + 1] = 255 - dd[i + 1];
dd[i + 2] = 255 - dd[i + 2];
}
}
Finally put back the inverted image:
this.putImageData(ddata, x, y);
This may seem as a lot of operations, but it goes pretty fast.
Demo (warning if you are sensitive to flicker)
(the psychedelic background is just to have some variations as fiddle needs external images and most are prevented by CORS when we use pixel manipulation).
I've removed my old answer, as it did not solve the question. As of recently, there are new globalCompositeOperations that do all kinds of great things. I've created an example that shows how to obtain inverted text. In case that link breaks, the method is essentially this:
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "difference";
ctx.fillStyle = "white";
//draw inverted things here
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/CanvasRenderingContext2D/globalCompositeOperation
I have faced quite bizarre issue lately, please take a look at the code snippet below
<canvas id="cancan" width="320", height="480">One color image</canvas>
<script type="text/javascript">
function imageLoaded(ev) {
element = document.getElementById("cancan");
c = element.getContext("2d");
im = ev.target; // the image, assumed to be 200x200
// read the width and height of the canvas
width = element.width;
height = element.height;
// stamp the image on the left of the canvas:
c.drawImage(im, 0, 0);
// get all canvas pixel data
imageData = c.getImageData(0, 0, width, height);
console.log(imageData.data[0] + " " + imageData.data[1] + " " + imageData.data[2]);
// output is "243 52 47"
// matlab and c# output is: "237 36 27"
}
im = new Image();
im.onload = imageLoaded;
im.src = "imgtest1.jpg"; // image is 320x480
</script>
imgtest1.jpg used in this example is constant - each pixel is (237,36,27). Pixel color returned by getImageData() differs - it is brighter then what is returned from - for example - matlab - any ideas what could be the reason ?
Lightness or Brightness or Intensity can be computed as (R+G+B)/3 (see HSI color code). After your sample code result, it is obvious that your output-image is a little bit bright than the original one because your R-G-B values are higher than the original ones (from Matlab or C++).
The question must be "Why your code computes higher values?". I don't know, but you could re-scale the values in order to have the same brightness.
I'm learning ActionScript/Flash. I love to play with text, and have done a lot of that kind of thing with the superb Java2D API.
One of the things I like to know is "where, exactly, are you drawing that glyph?" The TextField class provides the methods getBounds and getCharBoundaries, but these methods return rectangles that extend far beyond the actual bounds of the whole text object or the individual character, respectively.
var b:Sprite = new Sprite();
b.graphics.lineStyle(1,0xFF0000);
var r:Rectangle = text.getCharBoundaries(4);
r.offset(text.x, text.y);
b.graphics.drawRect(r.x,r.y,r.width,r.height);
addChild(b);
b = new Sprite();
b.graphics.lineStyle(1,0x00FF00);
r = text.getBounds(this);
b.graphics.drawRect(r.x,r.y,r.width,r.height);
addChild(b);
Is there any way to get more precise information about the actual visual bounds of text glyphs in ActionScript?
Richard is on the right track, but BitmapData.getColorBounds() is much faster and accurate... I've used it a couple of times, and optimized for your specific needs its not as slow as one might think.
Cory's suggestion of using flash.text.engine is probably the "correct" way to go, but I warn you that flash.text.engine is VERY (very!) hard to use compared to TextField.
Not reasonably possible in Flash 9 -- Richard's answer is a clever work-around, though probably completely unsuitable for production code (as he mentions) :)
If you have access to Flash 10, check out the new text engine classes, particularly TextLine.
I'm afraid all the methods that are available on TextField are supposed to do what you have already found them to do. Unless performance is key in your application (i.e. unless you intend to do this very often) maybe one option would be to draw the text field to a BitmapData, and find the topmost, leftmost, et c colored pixels within the bounding box retrieved by getCharBoundaries()?
var i : int;
var rect : Rectangle;
var top_left : Point;
var btm_right : Point;
var bmp : BitmapData = new BitmapData(tf.width, tf.height, false, 0xffffff);
bmp.draw(tf);
rect = tf.getCharBoundaries(4);
top_left = new Point(Infinity, Infinity);
btm_right = new Point(-Infinity, -Infinity);
for (i=rect.x; i<rect.right; i++) {
var j : int;
for (j=rect.y; j<rect.bottom; j++) {
var px : uint = bmp.getPixel(i, j);
// Check if pixel is black, i.e. belongs to glyph, and if so, whether it
// extends the previous bounds
if (px == 0) {
top_left.x = Math.min(top_left.x, i);
top_left.y = Math.min(top_left.y, j);
btm_right.x = Math.max(btm_right.x, i);
btm_right.y = Math.max(btm_right.y, j);
}
}
}
var actualRect : Rectangle = new Rectangle(top_left.x, top_left.y);
actualRect.width = btm_right.x - top_left.x;
actualRect.height = btm_right.y - top_left.y;
This code should loop through all the pixels that were deemed part of the glyph rectangle by getCharBoundaries(). If a pixel is not black, it gets discarded. If black, the code checks whether the pixels extends further up, down, right or left than any pixel that has previuosly been checked in the loop.
Obviously, this is not optimal code, with nested loops and unnecessary point objects. Hopefully though, the code is readable enough, and you are able to make out the parts that can most easily be optimized.
You might also want to introduce some threshold value instead of ignoring any pixel that is not pitch black.