Bootstrap CSS to set groups of grid rows to 100% height [duplicate] - html

This is basically what I want to achieve:
I want the total page to be 100% height, but when I put the sidebar and body at 100%, the page adds the 40px from the navbar, so I get a scrollbar even when there shouldn't be one.
I got it fixed by using tables, but I'm sure there must be an easier way
<body>
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="navbar"></div>
<div class="sidebar"></div>
<div class="body"></div>
</div>
</body>
and css what I've got so far:
body, html, .container-fluid, .sidebar, .body {
height: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
}
.navbar {
height: 40px;
position: relative;
}

You'll have to subtract the height of the navbar from the 100%. There are several solutions, many of which will include JavaScript but you won't need that.
1: box-sizing
Give the navbar an absolute position. Then you have the issue of the content of the other elements disappearing below it.
Then comes the next trick: add a top-padding the size of the navbar.
And the last trick: add box-sizing: border-box; to the .sidebar and .body. For better browser support you also need -moz- and -webkit- prefixes like so: -moz-box-sizing:
Example: Fiddle to box-sizing
2: Actually subtract.
use .body, .sidebar{ height: calc(100% - 40px);
Browser support is very minimal for this from what I know less than for box-sizing, so I would recommend the first solution.
Calc explained on css-tricks
3: Flexbox(added anno 2015)
You should now probably go with using calc when you know the height but an awesome replacement for using tables is flexbox. This is really my saviour for complex designs in responsive websites. By using one of the best features - flex-shrink: 0 - on the header you can force other elements into adjusting themselves to fill the rest of the container.
An old answer is probably not the best place to write down an extensive guide on flexbox so, again, a great link to css-tricks

Probably because it is adding the default margin from the navbar. Try this:
.navbar {
height: 40px;
position: relative;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
Also, try changing the min to max height:
max-height: 100% !important;

I change a litle your code by adding a container around your side bar and body class:
Here is the RESULT
Css:
body, html, .container-fluid, .sidebar, .body {
height: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
}
#container{
width:100%;
height:100%;
}
.sidebar{
background-color: green;
width:10%;
float:left;
height:100%;
}
.body{
background-color: orange;
float:left;
width:90%;
height:100%;
}
.navbar {
height: 40px;
position: relative;
background-color: yellow;
width:100%;
}
HTML
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="navbar">
navbar
</div>
<div id="container">
<div class="sidebar">
sidebar
</div>
<div class="body">
body
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>

Related

how to make one element follow another elements size

like let's say you have an image
<img class="testImage" src="test.png"/>
then there's also a section supposed to always follow the height of the image.
I know these examples below would never work, but just to give an idea, if something like this is possible?
height: .testImage;
height: calc(0 + .testImage);
The reaosn I wanna do this is because I am working on something in wordpress where I've put in an image and then there's some content next to it. https://i.gyazo.com/d85b9d8a5384829589b715c2c36fb059.png This looks fine when the screen width is normal. However, when it becomes smaller then the image becomes smaller as well, because it's responsive. The content does not become smaller though. https://i.gyazo.com/0af7d841c695912cda3bd266174238e1.png
For it to match the image 100% I would have to figure out exactly how the image is styled for every screen size. So I am wondering if I can just get the content block to follow the images height?
You should use flex property for this. In this example image width is fixed but you can also put it in % or em
*{
box-sizing: border-box;
}
body, html{
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
.container{
width: 100%;
display:flex;
flex-direction:row;
}
.container img{
display:block;
margin: 0 auto;
width:200px;
flex-shrink:0;
}
.icontainer
{
margin:0;
background-color:red;
border: 0.2em solid black;
flex-shrink:0;
flex-grow:1;
}
<div class="container">
<img src="http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium-large-5/sunflower-abstract-by-nature-square-lee-craig.jpg"/>
<div class="icontainer">
<p>content</p>
</div>
</div>
Use same css class to both images
img 1
img 2
.imageClass{
height: 100px;
}
<img class="imageClass" src="https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/bd/8c/24/bd8c241fb4c6b19a48668ae993cd0a34.jpg" >
<img class="imageClass" src="https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTrgEmBoOkIN4gekFDarSmiHlv83AK_7UuQW9SDBJYUM-qhb9AK" >

Create three divs such that the top and bottom ones have fixed height, and the middle one has dynamic height?

I want to create three, stacked divs. The top and the bottom ones will be of fixed height, whereas the one in the middle will have a dynamic height that expands to fill the remaining space:
I've tried numerous things, such as setting the height to auto. I do have a solution, but it involves JavaScript (i.e., calculating the remaining height) but I was wondering if there was a pure CSS solution.
There's a CSS solution, but it won't work in older browsers. You need to use the calc "function" that is new to CSS, combined with height: 100%. If you've never used height: 100% before, you know that every parent element of the one you want to be 100% tall must also be set to height:100%. calc can take a percentage value and subtract pixels from it, so you just need to set it to be 100% minus however tall the top and bottom divs are.
Supported by: IE9+, Firefox 4+, Chrome 19+, Safari 6+
http://caniuse.com/calc
HTML
<div id='top'></div>
<div id='mid'></div>
<div id='bot'></div>
CSS
html, body
{
height: 100%;
}
#top, #bot
{
height: 50px;
background: red;
}
#mid
{
height: calc(100% - 100px);
}
FIDDLE: http://jsfiddle.net/jakelauer/9cYUB/
One solution is to do it with position absolute.
The downside of this approach is that if the total height of surrounding is smaller then the sum of the fixed heights the container will not be visible anymore.
Another thing to be noted is that this is probably a bad solution if you want to target mobile devices. It always depends on the exact situation if this solution is suitable.
If i remember right you will only have problems with IE 6 (on desktop) which does not support the top bottom combination for the position absolute.
HTML
<div class="header"></div>
<div class="container"></div>
<div class="footer"></div>
CSS
.header, .container, .footer{
position: absolute;
outline: 1px solid black;
}
.header {
left: 0px;
top: 0px;
right : 0px;
height: 50px;
}
.container {
left: 0px;
top: 50px;
right : 0px;
bottom: 50px;
}
.footer {
left: 0px;
bottom: 0px;
right : 0px;
height: 50px;
}
JSFiddle
You can do it with a HTML table if you need older browser support, or if you need to support IE8+ or higher you could use the CSS table layout.
Here's a jsFiddle using CSS table layout.
HTML
<div>
<div>
<div>Fixed Height</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Variable Height</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>Fixed Height</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
html, body {
height:100%;
width: 100%;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
text-align: center;
font-size: 20pt;
font-family: Verdana;
}
body > div {
display:table;
width: 100%;
height:100%;
}
body > div > div {
display: table-row;
}
body > div > div > div {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
}
body > div > div:nth-child(odd) {
background: grey;
color: #FFF;
height: 100px;
}
body > div > div:nth-child(even) {
height:100%;
width:100%;
}
body > div > div:nth-child(even) >div {
height:100%;
width:100%;
overflow:hidden;
}
If i understand you request you need to use wrap div: http://www.cssstickyfooter.com/using-sticky-footer-code.html

div does not get centered using margin: auto in IE9

I am trying to get a centered in the space that is left empty by a sidebar. This is how I'd like it to look like:
I actually managed to make this work OK for most browsers using margin: auto for the div in question, while setting overflow: hidden:
Fiddle here
CSS
#header {
height: 50px;
background: #224444;
color: #fff;
}
#container div {
padding: 1em;
}
#content {
max-width: 400px;
margin: auto;
background: #ddd;
height: 300px;
overflow: hidden;
}
#sidebar {
float: right;
width: 200px;
background: #aaa;
height: 300px;
}
HTML
<div id="container">
<div id="header">
PAGE HEADER
</div>
<div id="sidebar">
Sidebar
</div>
<div id="content">
Centered Content
(Works everywhere but on IE9)
</div>
</div>
However, it does not work with IE9. It is strange as IE8 works OK!
I am running out of ideas, so I thought that maybe someone knows what is going on? The trick seems to work perfectly everywhere else.
NOTE: Please note that the content div should be flexible as it is in the demo. As the available space decreases, it should change size and squeeze in.
Isolate the centering from the floating
This affects IE9/10.
It works fine if the floated element is removed, or if width is used instead of max-width. The presence of floated content, combined with the use of margin:auto and max-width instead of width, appears to be confusing IE9+.
To fix this, put the centered content in a wrapper div, so that the centering of the content can be separated from the floating of the sidebar. In other words, too much is happening layout-wise in a single div, more than IE9+ can handle. So split up the #content div into two separate divs.
#header {
height: 50px;
padding: 1em;
background: #224444;
color: #fff;
}
#content-wrapper {
overflow: hidden;
}
#content {
max-width: 400px;
margin: auto;
padding: 1em;
background: #ddd;
height: 300px;
}
#sidebar {
float: right;
width: 200px;
padding: 1em;
background: #aaa;
height: 300px;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="header">
PAGE HEADER
</div>
<div id="sidebar">
Sidebar
</div>
<div id="content-wrapper">
<div id="content">
Centered Content
</div>
</div>
</div>
This tested fine in IE7/8/9/10. On a side note, because a wrapper div was added, the padding: 1em; now has to be added to each element individually.
IE is notorious for not working without proper doctypes.
Try adding the HTML5 one
<!DOCTYPE html>
Floats are a tricky business. Strictly speaking, they're only supposed to affect the inline content that flows around them, so margins acts like the floats aren't even there.
Try this instead:
#container {text-align:center}
#content {display:inline-block;text-align:left}
This should make the content box act like an inline element, and therefore appear centered in the space.
As far as I remeber I've always problems with margin:0 auto because I didn't specify width property.
So everytime you want use margin:auto you propably should write this:
#content {
max-width: 400px;
margin: auto;
background: #ddd;
height: 300px;
overflow: hidden;
width:500px;
}
or in percentage:
#content {
max-width: 400px;
margin: auto;
background: #ddd;
height: 300px;
overflow: hidden;
width:30%;
}
EDIT
If you want to create flexible layout please take a look to bootstrap and fluid grids.

Converting to tableless layout

I'm currently using 1 table to align 2 main portions of the site. It's causing problems for me now, so I'd like to use pure CSS.
I have a 205px wide navbar column on the left. Occupying the rest of the space on the right, I'd like to have a container (So on the right side of the screen, taking up screen width - 200 pixels) This container would not have a fixed height, but I want its top to be aligned with the top of the navbar.
Here's a demo of what I currently have .
I would like the solution to be similar to that, but not use tables, and have the top of the container aligned with the top of the sidebar.
I've made several attempts at doing this (before I started using the table, and after) but none of them even remotely worked. I've come here as a last resort, so I hope that someone could help.
Fiddle
.container{height: 100%; border: 1px solid #0f0; display: table;}
#sidebar{
width:40%; height: 100%; display: table-cell; background: #ccc;
}
#sidebar2{
width:60%; height: 100%; display: table-cell; background: #f00;
}
body, html {
height:100%;
}
HTML
<div class="container">
<div id="sidebar">links and whatnot go here</div>
<div id="sidebar2">this is the container (but its top is not aligned with the sidebar as I would like)</div>
</div>
Note: table-cell property is supported by supports IE8+
EDIT:
If you can't use table-cell then you have to use some jquery to calculate height. Check this Fiddle
I would do something like this:
. HTML:
<div id="container">
<aside id="sidebar">Links and whatnot</aside>
<section id="content">Content and whatnot</section>
</div>
. CSS:
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
div#container {
height: 100%;
}
aside#sidebar {
background-color: #f00;
width: 205px;
min-height: 100%;
float: left;
}
section#content {
background-color: #0f0;
min-height: 100%;
}
You can see it working in this fiddle.

Div Expand to Visually Fill Vertical Space

I have a page that has a header, content, and footer. The header and footer are of fixed height, and I'd like the content to adjust its height so that it fits dynamically between the header and footer. I am planning to put a background-image in my content, so it is critical that it actually fills the rest of the unoccupied vertical space.
I used the Sticky Footer approach to ensure that the footer remains on the bottom of the page. This however does not make the content span the entire height of the remaining space.
I have tried several solutions which involved me adding height:100%, height:auto; position:relative but it did not work.
html,
body {
height: 100%;
background-color: yellow;
}
header {
width: 100%;
height: 150px;
background-color: blue;
}
header nav ul li {
display: inline;
padding: 0 30px 0 0;
float: left;
}
#wrapper {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 0 -30px 0;
/* the bottom margin is the negative value of the footer's height */
position: relative;
}
#wrapper #content {
background-color: pink;
width: 400px;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 0 -30px 100px;
padding: 25px 30px 25px 30px;
}
footer {
margin: -30px 0 0 0;
width: 100%;
height: 30px;
background-color: green;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<header>
<div id="logo"></div>
<nav>
<ul>
<li>About</li>
<li>Menu</li>
<li>Specials</li>
</ul>
</nav>
</header>
<div id="content">
content
<br>goes
<br>here
</div>
</div>
<footer>footer</footer>
The trick about height:100% is that it requires all of the parent containers to be have their heights set as well. Here's an html example
<html>
<body>
<div id="container">
</div>
</body>
</html>
in order for the container div with a height set to 100% to expand dynamically to the height of the window you need to make sure that the body and html elements have their heights set to 100% as well. so...
html
{
height: 100%;
}
body
{
height: 100%;
}
#container
{
height: 100%;
}
would give you a container that expands to fit your window. then if you need to have footer or header that floats above this window you can do so with z indexing. This is the only solution I've found that fills the vertical height dynamically.
I'm providing a slightly more general solution so it is more useful for others reading this answer and wondering how to apply it to their site.
Assuming you have three divs:
<div id='header'></div>
<div id='contents'></div>
<div id='footer'></div>
where #header is fixed and may have variable height, #contents should consume all remaining vertical space and #footer is fixed and may have variable height you can do:
/* Note you could add a container div instead of using the body */
body {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
#header {
flex: none;
}
#contents {
flex: 1;
height: 100%;
overflow-y: scroll;
}
#footer {
flex: none;
}
Note that this will allow the contents to scroll vertically to show it's whole contents.
You can read more about display:flex here.
Try changing your css to this:
html,
body {
height: 100%;
background-color: yellow;
}
header {
width: 100%;
height: 150px;
background-color: blue;
}
header nav ul li {
display: inline;
padding: 0 30px 0 0;
float: left;
}
#wrapper {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 0 -30px 0;
/* the bottom margin is the negative value of the footer's height */
position: relative;
}
#content {
background-color: pink;
width: 400px;
padding: 25px 30px 25px 30px;
position: absolute;
bottom: 30px;
top: 150px;
margin-left: 100px;
}
footer {
margin: -30px 0 0 0;
width: 100%;
height: 30px;
background-color: green;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<header>
<div id="logo"></div>
<nav>
<ul>
<li>About</li>
<li>Menu</li>
<li>Specials</li>
</ul>
</nav>
</header>
<div id="content">
content
<br>goes
<br>here
</div>
</div>
<footer>footer</footer>
You probably don't want to be setting the width, padding, margins, ect. of the wrapper. Also, with absolute positioning you can pull the bottom and top of the content to where you want them.
Here's what you are after, I think.
I spend several hours trying to figure this out too and finally have a robust solution without hacks. However, it requires CSS3, which requires a modern browser to support it. So, if this constraint works for you, then I have a real solution for you that works.
http://jsfiddle.net/u9xh4z74/
Copy this code into your own file if you need proof, as the JSFiddle will not actually render the flexbox correctly as embedded code.
Basically, you need to
- set the target container to 100% height, which you seem to already know
- the parent container you set display: flex and flex-direction: vertical (you'll see in the JSFiddle I've also included the alternate styles that do the same thing but are needed for cross browser support)
- you can let the header and footer be their natural heights and dont need to specify anything in that regard
- in the container you want to fill up the remaining space, set flex: 1. You're set! You'll see it works exactly as you semantically have intended. Also in the JSFiddle, I included overflow: auto to demonstrate that if you have even more text than the screen can handle, scrolling works as you would want it to.
<div style="display:flex; flex-direction:vertical;">
...header(s)...
<div style="flex: 1; overflow: auto;">
As much content as you want.
</div>
...footer(s)...
</div>
As a side note, I pursued the option of trying to do this same thing using display: table. It works just fine as well, except that overflowed content does not work as you would expect, instead overflowed content simply expands the container to the size of the content, which I'm pretty sure is not what you want. Enjoy!
Use display:table and display:table-row
Set height:0 for normal divs and height:auto for div that should fill vertical space. Insert a div with {height:100%; overflow-y:auto} into the vertical filler to if the containers height shouldn't expand beyond its preset height.
Behold the power of display:table!
<div style="height:300px;">
<div style="display:table; height:100%; width:100%;border: 1px solid blue;">
<div style="display: table-row; height:0; padding:2px; background-color:yellow;">
Hello
</div>
<div style="display: table-row; height:auto; padding:2px; background-color:green;">
<div style="height:100%; overflow: auto;">
<div style="height: 500px"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: table-row; height:0; padding:2px; background-color:yellow;">
Gbai
</div>
</div>
</div>
There is no 100% height from 100% continer height exactly. You can't solve it this way. Likewise while using mix of height + margin + padding. This is way straight to hell. I suggest you to take a look for tutorials which are sloving this page layout.