I have this code
<div class="mix category-1">
<a href="img/holder-01-large.png" class="photo">
<img src="img/holder-01-small.png alt="Ram - Srbija" class="img-small-1"></a>
Primer montaze
<a class="popup-youtube" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz1kDQEHJaU">Video primer</a>
</div>
I want to replace this holder-01-small.png when hover over it with image with same dimensions. Is that possible by not touching this HTML code, just using CSS?
Yes it's possible, but not using the approach you have presented.
Instead, create a div (using an img tag here would mean we would need a transparent image to act as a placeholder, whereas a div will just work)
<div class="image"></div>
And in css try something like the below, you will need to specify a height and a width as the div will technically be empty, otherwise it will just collapse on itself.
.image {
background-image: url("path-to-file");
height: xx;
width: yy;
}
.image:hover {
background-image: url("path-to-different-file");
}
This div will then change it's background image.
It's possibly using this HTML, yes. (As long as you insert the missing quote after the src, that is!)
a.photo:hover img {
display: none
}
a.photo:hover::after {
content: url(http://lorempixel.com/100/100);
}
<div class="mix category-1">
<a href="img/holder-01-large.png" class="photo">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/g/100/100" alt="Ram - Srbija" class="img-small-1" />
</a>
Primer montaze
<a class="popup-youtube" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz1kDQEHJaU">Video primer</a>
</div>
Note that I changed the HTML to point to another image on the web in order to show something here in the snippet; hope you don't consider that to be cheating!
if you can place a div instead of an imgtag, you can add the background-imgproperty in css and then a hover. Something like this:
.img-small-1{
background-img: url('..img/holder-01-small.png');
width: 'your image's width';
height: 'your image's height';
}
.img-small-1:hover {
background-img: url('..img/myOtherImage.png');
}
Related
I don't know if this is possible or not, but any help would be very appreciated.
I have this code in my HTML:
<img src="mountains.jpeg" class="green inline-image" data-caption="A picture of mountains!">
where data-caption is a custom attribute.
I want to do something like this.
As you can see, the data-caption has to be in a small box right under the image, with the exact width as the image. I don't know if this is possible or not, so can you recommend an alternative way if not?
I tried doing something like this:
<img src="mountains.jpeg" class="green inline-image">
<div class="photo-caption">
A picture of mountains!
</div>
CSS:
.inline-image {
width:30%;
}
.photo-caption {
width:30%;
background-color:blue;
}
This works, but I'd prefer to not have to make a new <div> for every caption. I'd rather have it in the <img> tag.
Thank you very much!
Yeah it's possible using css content but problem in your case is you are using it on an img element which won't work on some browsers.
A different approach I would suggest is to insert your img element inside a div and have that custom attribute in there.
html:
<div class="img-block" data-caption="A picture of mountains!">
<img src="mountains.jpeg" class="green inline-image" >
</div>
css
.img-block:after {
content: attr(data-caption);
}
Reference
I want to use the above image in a img class to put underneath the photos. That have that class. See the markup example below.
<img class="img-shadow" src="image.jpg">
or may be like this
<div class="img-shadow">
<img src="image.jpg">
</div>
How would the css look?
HTML:
<div class="img-shadow">
<img src="image.jpg">
</div>
CSS:
.img-shadow{
background:url(your image URL) no-repeat center bottom;
padding-bottom:20px;
text-align:center;
}
Adjust the padding on the bottom of the div to increase or decrease the distance between the bottom of the image and the shadow.
Just as another option, instead of using an image for your shadow, you can use CSS3 shadow property to achieve something similar.
In the fiddle, I show the same image using the class and not using the class: JS Fiddle
.img-shadow {
box-shadow: 0px 2px 10px #000;
width: 200px;
}
If what you said in the question is what you really want to do, You can simply put the shadow image below the other image using an <img> tag like
<div>
<img src="https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSyLdxqT0UBb31xeB4yMfUjCqKld2q9FqpUMZEIvq175_4-MgAPUA"/> //Your image
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/ZLAht.png"/> // Your shadow image
</div>
and position them accordingly using css..
check this fiddle
Note:there might be better ways for creating a shadow below an image, just answering the question in a straight forward manner..
I have the following setup
<div id="outerDiv" style="width:100%;">
<div id="innerDiv">
<center>
<a href="http:/..." title="..">
<img src="http://...jpg" width="800" height="xxx" alt="..">
</a>
</center>
</div>
<div>
The width of the outerDiv can change based on browser view-port. Is there a way to restrict the width on the innerDiv just by using a style attribute, such that it overrides the included image width (800 in this example). Currently the image spans beyond the viewport and I would like the div/browser to shrink the image to the inner-div-size.
Am looking for something like:
<div id="outerDiv" style="width:100%;">
<div id="innerDiv" style="attribute:xxx;" or something similar>
<center>
<a href="http:/..." title="..">
<img src="http://...jpg" width="800" height="xxx" alt="..">
</a>
</center>
</div>
<div>
Please note that : the innerDiv is rendering 'variable' data coming from a stored parameter for instance. I only have control on the style on the innerDiv to make sure that things like 'center' or 'width' on the innerHtml does not go beyond what the outerDiv is setting. I have tried to use 'max-width' on the outer-div, but that didn't seem to work (I am not an expert on html/css - so I could have done it incorrectly).
Many thanks for all your help !
max-width property can help you.
Remove width attribute from img tag and write additional css code:
<style>
#innerDiv { text-align: center; width: 800px; }
#innerDiv a > img { display: inline-block; max-width: 100%; }
</style>
ComFreak has the complete answer.
Remove the center tag and instead add some css. Also add an id to that image if you want to target only that image specifically as far as its size.
#innerDiv {
max-width:800px;
margin:0 auto;}
img {/*use 'img#idOfimage' instead of 'img' if you end up adding an id to image */
width:100%;
height:0 auto;}
This should take care of it. You can put the css in a style tag in the header or better yet in a separate css file.
Don't use center tag. It defentinatly is outdated. Instead use margin: 0 auto; That will center the content. And use the max-width property for the innerDiv id. This is a great reference source. http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_dim_max-width.asp
How can I place only an image in a div as background image, and add url link to it.
Currenty I'm doing it this way:
<div class="image"><img src="books.png" alt="Test" /></div>
I want to do something like following, but its not working (the image does not appear).
<div class="image"><span class="books"></span></div>
Thanks.
Place the background image in the <a> tag if you want it clickable.
your css:
.image a { display: block;
background: url('image.jpg') no-repeat;
height: 50px; /* obviously use the same dimensions as your image */
width: 50px; /* obviously use the same dimensions as your image */
}
<div class="image"> </div>
or better yet, get rid of the div entirely, and just apply the image class directly to a:
<a class="image" href="example.com"> </a>
It's likely it's because the div is empty. Try something like:
<div class="image"><span class="books"> </span></div>
If it's still not showing, set the "image" class to have a background color too, so that you can see how big the div 'thinks' it is.
If you want an image to be in the background you need to set, the style property "z-index:-1", that way, the image will be in the back of the other elements in the same content div
Does it have to be a DIV?
I am writing the style inside you can use it in css file
<a class="image" style="display:block; width: (image-width); height: (image-height); background: url(image-link)"></a>
this will work...
you can use it like this if you need div..
<div class="image" style="width: (image-width); height: (image-height); background: url(image-link)"></div>
Implementing a "play video" function on a web site. Each video content item can have a different image. Each of these images will have the same width, but potentially differing heights (they are resized on upload to maintain aspect ratio to meet standard width requirements).
The plan was to display another transparent "play button" image over top of the content image using markup like this:
<div class="media">
<a class="videoLink" href="#" style="background-image: url(http://cloud.github.com/downloads/malsup/cycle/beach2.jpg);" >
<img src="PlayButton.png" alt="Click to Play" height="200" width="300" />
</a>
</div>
This is very similar to how channel 9 does it on their home page. This, however, appears to assume any image is of standard height and width. Are there alternative ways of tackling this?
Forgot to mention originally. We have a predefined width that things will fit into, however, each image may have a different height. For example, the same markup needs to be used to support the following images:
W x H
400 x 200
400 X 300
400 X 400
The Play button needs to be centered in each image.
Instead of the inner element being an <img>, you could make it a <div>, styled with the playbutton as the background image, positioned in the center.
<div class="media">
<a class="videoLink" href="#" style="background-image: url(http://cloud.github.com/downloads/malsup/cycle/beach2.jpg);" >
<div style='background:url(PlayButton.png) center center;' alt="Click to Play" height="200" width="300" />
</a>
</div>
You'll still need to know the size of the thumbnail image, as you'll still need to supply height and width for the div - since you're displaying the thumbnail as a background image, you won't be able to have the box scale to the right size automatically. But at least now your code can set the values for height and width without worrying about the shape of the play button getting distorted.
(note: the play button as a background image should probably be in a separate stylesheet rather than being declared inline as per my example; I did it like that to demonstrate how it differs from your original code, rather than to show best practice)
Need some your CSS to make sure things work, but this may help you:
.media {
display: table;
}
.media img {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
display: block;
margin: 0 auto;
}
If not, please add you CSS so I can Fiddle it and make it happen.
I'd do it like this.
<div class="media">
<a class="videoLink" href="#"></a>
<img class="thumbnail" src="http://cloud.github.com/downloads/malsup/cycle/beach2.jpg"/>
</div>
Separate the thumbnail image from the link. We want the link to appear on top of the image, and the image to stretch the height of the <div class="media">.
The CSS:
.media {
position: relative;
}
.videoLink {
display: block;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background-image: url(PlayButton.png);
background-position: center center;
position: absolute;
z-index: 2;
}