Comrades, I have had issues implementing yii2 basic but I'm yet to give up. I have successfully installed yii2, activated pretty url and created the .htaccess file in the root folder. The Home, About, Contact and Login urlswork fine.
i. I have created a new model, InstTypes with the CRUD. Why does http://localhost:8081/we#ss/instTypes/create return Not Found (#404)?
ii. I have also created a module instClients. I can access the index action in the DefaultControler. I have a model Insts with its CRUD under this modules. Why does http://localhost:8081/we#ss/instClients/insts/create return Not Found (#404)?
I tend to think that this could be due to the removal of the import and autoload from the config.
Could someone demonstrate how they've created a new model and CRUD and successfully accessed its actions?
Thanks in advance
I have created a new model, InstTypes with the CRUD. Why does
http://localhost:8081/we#ss/instTypes/create return Not Found (#404)?
You cannot access a model directly, the only way to interact with a model is via a controller which will intern interact with the model and the view. By initializing the model $model = new YourModelNmae(); or by rendering a view.
From your URL
http://localhost:8081/we#ss/instTypes/create
InstType should be your controller while create is an action under InstType
Using Yii2 Gii tool to generate a CRUD do the following : -
Generate your model
Generate your CRUD
go to
http://localhost:8081/we#ss/yourController/YourActionOnYourController
Refer to this youtube link for more detail https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6B52-li6IgU
Happy coding :)
Just to add to the other answers, your url isn't working because it's camelCase. You need to make it hyphenated, so
http://localhost:8081/we#ss/instTypes/create
will become
http://localhost:8081/we#ss/inst-types/create
You're getting the 404 because you're trying to access instTypes, it should be inst-types.
this solved my problem. I needed to add the controllers to the controller map.
Related
I build a web app using sails.js and I have few questions about the design of the app:
Should I create controllers for each page, component, or model? I saw in the documentation and at some tutorials that they create controllers for each model. That looks nice but if I have a complex page/component and I want to create view with multi models (and data) it doesn't help me.
Where should I put the business logic part of a component or feature? I read about Serivce but I'm not sure that this is the right place.
To sum up, I saw that in sails the code is arranged like the models (you have model, controller and view for each model) but what if I want to arrange it by features or components or pages?
Thanks!
Basically you should have Controller for each Model (but if you don't need specific controller and it would be empty you don't need to create it). It's just a good practice to have a Controller for each Model.
If you use some part of code in many places and it is not connected with one specified Model it should be Service (like sending emails, notifications, logging, images processing). Read about DRY
Controller should be as simple as possible. It should contain call of Model and Service and callback with rendering output. All business logic should be in Models.
I created some additional 'helper' Models for more complex Models like Users or so to make Classes bit shorter.
To sum up. Core of your application is Model. It's not only responsible for database layer, bur also business layer of your app. Later there is Controller. It gets data from Model and it passes it to Views which is responsible for presentation of data taken from Model.
Answer to First
Sails is for REST API it has nothing to do with view.
you just need to know what MVC is and what REST is....
In one Controller you can invoke multiple models or one model can be invoked in multiple controllers.
In one page you can fetch data from two different API's which may be from different controller or Even they can be of different server.
for Example:
In the page you are getting data directly from ellasticsearchAPI(say esAPI1)
You are getting data from sails API(sAPI1).
You are getting data from other sails API(sAPI2).
Answer to Second
For neatness you should try to keep controller as clean as possible. So for the same sailsJS provide you services. Where you can write Common functionalities which are to be used in multiple controllers.
See the codes for example
Codes
here is the controller:
//TestController
module.exports = {
action1:function(req,res){
Model1.find().exec(function(err,data1){
if(err)
return res.negotiate(err);
res.ok(data1);
});
},
action2:function(req,res){
Model2.find().exec(function(err,data1){
if(err)
return res.negotiate(err);
res.ok(data2);
});
},
action3:function(req,res){
var hash=SomeService.getMeHashCode(req.query.text)
res.ok({hashedData:hash});
}
};
And this is service.
//SomeService.js
module.exports = {
getMeHashCode:function(strinToBeHashed){
var hash=doSomeThingToHash(strinToBeHashed);
return hash;
}
};
I have created a new solution for my MvvmCross app that supported Windows Store and I want to support UWP on Windows 10. I have moved over the PCL successfully, but I am having problems getting the basic UWP app working using a sample provided by MS (NavigationMenu) which uses the SplitView and the AppShell pattern they are recommending for the new navigation/command model. I referenced a helpful blog post (http://stephanvs.com/implementing-a-multi-region-presenter-for-windows-10-uwp-and-mvvmcross/), which gave me some guidance on how to integrate mvvmcross into the AppShell, but startup is failing because the AppShell does not have a valid Frame defined. Frame is a read-only property, and I have been unable to see where this is being set up.
I am using the standard AppShell implementation from the NavigationMenu with the following changes as recommended in the blog post:
public sealed partial class AppShell : MvxWindowsPage // was Page
public Frame AppFrame { get { return this.Frame; } } // was this.frame
Except for code after the error, there are no differences in the setup. In looking at the MvxWindowsPage implementation, there doesn't seem to be anything special as it still invokes the Page initialization. Is there something obvious I am missing?
So the link to the blogpost is correct, in other words you'll need to use MultiRegions from MvvmCross to get this working.
But what the blogpost doesn't show is a complete working version...
I've added one on my github here:
https://github.com/Depechie/MvvmCrossUWPSplitView
Some pointers to take away, like I said in the comments.
Your view where the SplitView will be present, needs to have a property to return a valid Frame to look for while injecting new views. This can be returned like this return (Frame)this.WrappedFrame.UnderlyingControl; found in the code here https://github.com/Depechie/MvvmCrossUWPSplitView/blob/master/MvvmCrossUWP.Win/Views/FirstView.xaml.cs#L13
Than all views you want to load up in the SplitView will need to reference to the region you defined in that SplitView, in my case I named it FrameContent as seen here https://github.com/Depechie/MvvmCrossUWPSplitView/blob/master/MvvmCrossUWP.Win/Views/FirstView.xaml#L48
So use that name for the region attribute in all to be loaded views like so [MvxRegion("FrameContent")] example here https://github.com/Depechie/MvvmCrossUWPSplitView/blob/master/MvvmCrossUWP.Win/Views/SecondView.xaml.cs#L7
I see what you're trying to do with the SplitView template that's provided by Microsoft. There is however a mismatch between things managed by MvvmCross and UWP.
By default MvvmCross maps ViewModels to Views based on naming conventions. What you are trying to do is use a view 'AppShell' (which is derived of Windows.UI.Xaml.Controls.Page) that doesn't adhere to the default MvvmCross convention.
The way I choose to implement this SplitView (Hamburger) functionality is by deleting the provided AppShell class entirely. I then created a new view named HomeView (since I have a ViewModel with the name HomeViewModel) and added the SplitView control there as described in the post you mentioned above.
For completeness I've created a Gist with the App.xaml.cs and HomeView.xaml as you requested. You can find them here: https://gist.github.com/Stephanvs/7bb2cdc9dbf15cb7a90f
I have done a RegisterAppStart<FirstViewModel>() in the Core App.cs, now I navigate to FirstViewModel, then SecondViewModel and finally ThirdViewModel using ShowViewModel(),
Is there a way I want to navigate to the viewmodel which has been registered using RegisterAppStart<>(), I mean is this persisted or saved somewhere during run?
All I want is to get this value at runtime.
If you want to use a singleton instance of a view model then you can do this using a custom view model locator - see the wiki - https://github.com/MvvmCross/MvvmCross/wiki/Customising-using-App-and-Setup - "overriding view model location and construction"
I'm After several days learning angularJS through converting my standart JS app to a ng one.
I was wondering about this simple scenario:
I have a global function called fb_connect(),
it can be used from any page (or any controller if you like) to make a facebook-based login.
This function makes a simple http call and receives a JSON object contain data to move on (display a pop up, login, etc...)
I read that I can define a Factory or a Service for my app and use it in any controller, which works fine.
So, I created a fb_connect factory function.
The problem is that now, in every page (every controller), I have to define that fb_connect in the constructor of every controller - for example :
function welcome($scope,fb_connect){});
What is the proper way to do this kind of actions using Angular without having to define these functions each and every time in every controller?
Thanks
Setting up factories and services is all part of the dependency injection system of Angular. Using that system is great when you need to create things that depend on other injected things. It's a big tree of dependencies. It's also nice for creating singletons, such that everywhere in your code end up using the same instance of some object.
It sounds to me like neither of these benefits apply in your case. I'd suggest just not using Angular's DI for it. You have some function defined globally, just call it directly and skip the DI. There's nothing wrong with that.
Of course you say it makes an Ajax call, so doesn't depend on the Angular $http service?
Your two options are:
Declare the function on the $rootScope
Inject it as a service
My advice is to go with making it a service. The whole purpose of services is explained in the Angular.js docs, just like this quote:
Angular services are singletons that carry out specific tasks common to web apps... To use an Angular service, you identify it as a dependency for the dependent (a controller, or another service) that depends on the service.
As you mentioned in your question, you'd prefer to not define the service in every controller you wish to use it in. With $rootScope you'll be injecting that also in every controller. So really it's a question of which you prefer, although to answer your question, the proper way of using a factory or service is to inject it into the controller you wish to use it in.
You can always put it in the $rootScope
myApp.run(function($rootScope, fb_connect){
$rootScope.welcome = function(){
};
});
This might seem obvious but I've had this error when trying to use LINQ to SQL with my business logic in a separate class library project.
I've created the DBML in a class library, with all my business logic and custom controls in this project. I'd referenced the class library from my web project and attempted to use it directly from the web project.
The error indicated the login failed for my user name. My user name and password were correct, but the fix was to copy my connection string to the correct location. I've learned the issue from another site and thought I would make a note here.
Error:
Login failed for user 'username'
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException
The LINQ designer ads the connection string to the app.config of the class library, but the web site needed to see it in the web.config of the web project. Once copied across all was well.
you can pass in a connection or connection string to the data context as well.