I have used this format
MediaPlayer player = new MediaPlayer();
It showing a error "cannot declare a variable of static type 'microsoft.xna.framework.media player'".
How to solve this ?
MediaPlayer is static class. You can't create instance of static class. You can use method of MediaPlayer, in this way:
MediaPlayer.Play(song);
Related
I have a TActor class and a function to_bytes() inside it that should compress it to a bytes array as in this example: http://jacksondunstan.com/articles/1642
public function to_bytes():ByteArray
{
registerClassAlias("TActor",TActor);
var bytes:ByteArray=new ByteArray();
bytes.writeObject(this as TActor);
bytes.position=0;
trace(bytes.readObject());
bytes.position=0;
trace(bytes.readObject() as TActor);
return bytes;
}
However, the first trace prints undefined and the second one null instead of [object TActor].
What do I do wrong?
It's important to note that the this keyword returns the current instance of the object. What you are currently doing is attempting to pass the this instance to writeObject, which will only work if there is an instance of TActor instantiated. So it would work in this scenario:
In some class where you instantiate TActor:
var tactor:TActor = new TActor();
tactor.to_bytes();
Then it should serialize correctly.
Also as we discovered in the comments, TActor is of type MovieClip, currently you cannot use writeObject() on Objects of type MovieClip. More specifically any object that is a dynamic class cannot be used in writeObject. Changing it to Sprite solved this particular case.
Can I create an instance of a class from AS3 just knowing it's name? I mean string representation, like FlagFrance
Create instances of classes dynamically by name. To do this following code can be used:
//cc() is called upon creationComplete
private var forCompiler:FlagFrance; //REQUIRED! (but otherwise not used)
private function cc():void
{
var obj:Object = createInstance("flash.display.Sprite");
}
public function createInstance(className:String):Object
{
var myClass:Class = getDefinitionByName(className) as Class;
var instance:Object = new myClass();
return instance;
}
The docs for getDefinitionByName say:
"Returns a reference to the class object of the class specified by the name parameter."
The above code we needed to specify the return value as a Class? This is because getDefinitionByName can also return a Function (e.g. flash.utils.getTimer - a package level function that isn't in any class). As the return type can be either a Function or a Class the Flex team specified the return type to be Object and you are expected to perform a cast as necessary.
The above code closely mimics the example given in the docs, but in one way it is a bad example because everything will work fine for flash.display.Sprite, but try to do the same thing with a custom class and you will probably end up with the following error:
ReferenceError: Error #1065: Variable [name of your class] is not defined.
The reason for the error is that you must have a reference to your class in your code - e.g. you need to create a variable and specify it's type like so:
private var forCompiler:SomeClass;
Without doing this your class will not be compiled in to the .swf at compile time. The compiler only includes classes which are actually used (and not just imported). It does so in order to optimise the size of the .swf. So the need to declare a variable should not really be considered an oversight or bug, although it does feel hackish to declare a variable that you don't directly use.
Yes, use getDefinitionByName:
import flash.utils.getDefinitionByName;
var FlagFranceClass:Class = getDefinitionByName("FlagFrance");
var o:* = new FlagFranceClass();
I am converting all embed statements in my site with lazy loading. The code which was previously like this:
[Embed(source="/newswf.swf", symbol="kungfu")]
public static var Kungfu:Class;
has now been converted to this form:
private var _loader:Loader = new Loader();
public static var abcd:Class = null;
_loader.contentLoaderInfo.addEventListener(Event.COMPLETE,onLoadComplete);
_loader.contentLoaderInfo.addEventListener(ProgressEvent.PROGRESS,onProgressHandler);
_loader.load(new URLRequest("newswf.swf"));
private function onLoadComplete(evt:*):void
{
abcd = evt.target.applicationDomain.getDefinition("kungfu") as Class;
dispatchEvent(new MyEvent(MyEvent.LOADING_DONE));
}
The functions which make use of abcd will be called on recieving MyEvent.LOADING_DONE event.
Now, my problem is, when a class makes use of symbol and has a class definition, I am not able to implement it using the above method because the constructor will be called immediately and won't listen to the onLoadComplete event listener.
[Embed(source="/newswf.swf", symbol="judo")]
public class Judo extends MovieClip
{
public function Judo()
{
super(...);
}
}
When i put the code in the constructor in a separate function and calling it in onLoadComplete method, I get an error because super method had initially been used in the constructor and it cannot be used outside of a constructor.
Can someone tell me a way to do lazy loading in this case?
Thanks in advance :)
I'm not sure if it is possible to extend the class definition after loading because I've never tried, but have you tried simply casting the loaded object and then not calling super() again? That is, inside the loader function type:
obj:Judo = Judo(LoaderInfo(e.target).content)
This article may be helpful: http://www.parorrey.com/blog/flash-development/as3-loading-external-swf-into-movieclip-using-loader-class-in-flash-actionscript3/
That said, I probably wouldn't structure the code in this way and just avoid the situation you're describing with a different structure. Like, one approach would be instead of making the loaded object into a Judo object I would initialize a separate Judo object and then pass it the loaded object. The old "has-a" vs. "is-a" distinction.
Another approach that accomplishes the same thing would be for the containing class to not do the loading and simply create a new Judo object, passing the filename into the constructor. Then the Judo object does the loading.
i have to read the current class name inside a static method. For non-static method it's easy i just call getQualifiedClassName(this) but inside a static method this is off course invalid. Any idea ?
Thanks
You can use getQualifiedClassName(prototype.constructor)
in the class' static method
You don't have a direct way of doing this. If is just inside one class that you need this, you can try to add a static member holding a reference to the class.
static private const CLASS:Object = YourReflectedClass;
then, just use that in your static method:
protected static function doReflection(): void {
var className:String = getQualifiedClassName(CLASS);
}
It would be helpful to know more about the use and the setup.
I am using as3. Just a simple question.
If I created a static method. say I decide to call on other methods within that static method. Do those methods I call on need to be static as well? what If I used some of the properties. Not to store data permanently, but just within that process. Do those properties need to be static ??
Yes. If anything is called static that means that it is related not to the current instance of the class but to the whole class therefore it must act instance-independent, e.g. use other static fields and methods if needed.
No, they do not. You can use any type of variable/method from within a static method, including, of course, local variables. However, there is no concept of "this" in a static method, since the method is not being executed on an instance, but on the class itself. Therefor, the following (inside a class declaration) is illegal:
public var myInstanceVariable : int;
public static function myStaticMethod() : void
{
// Illegal:
myInstanceVariable = 1;
// Illegal (same as above, "this" is implicit):
this.myInstanceVariebl = 1;
// This however is legal (local variable):
var localVal : int = 1;
}
The references to myInstanceVariable above are illegal because that variable is an instance variable, which is not accessible to the static method. Because static methods are not executed on an instance in the first place, the "this" special variable is not valid.
If you wanted to, you could keep a static reference to an instance, and execute methods on said instance. That's the key idea behind the common singleton pattern.
private static var _INSTANCE : MyClass;
public static function myStaticFunction() : void
{
_INSTANCE.doSomething();
}
Here, the _INSTANCE variable can be referenced from the static method, because the variable itself is declared as static.
To avoid confusion, there are actually answers to both the questions you asked:
Do method calls within a static method need to be static? Li0liQ answered this.
Do variables used within a static method need to be static? richardolsson answered this.
To summarize, within a static method, you can only access static variables and methods EXCEPT if you define local variables within the scope of the static method.
private var instanceVar : MyClass;
private static var staticVar : MyClass;
public static function myStaticFunction() : void
{
// Illegal, instance variable
instanceVar = new MyClass( 1 );
// Illegal, method on instance variable
instanceVar.someMethod();
// Legal, scoped local variable
localVar : MyClass = new MyClass( 1 );
// Legal, method on scoped local variable
localVar.someMethod();
// Legal, static variable
staticVar = new MyClass ( 1 );
// Legal, method on static variable
staticVar.someMethod();
}
It makes sense if you think about it a little, but it's not an entirely clear concept at first.