I am integrating usaepay with my magento store, order is placed using usaepay in sandbox mode. But it is not searching in sandbox search feature of usaepay.
You should confirm if there is any USAepay success page in the extension. There may have chances that your card details was not verified and your magneto could not understand the error hence by passed the response and order was placed.
Related
I want to integrate cybersource as a HOP i.e. the user will be redirected to the service provider to complete the payment. I am not able to find proper APIs for generating the hosted order pay for redirecting the user. Have gone through a documentation of Cybersource:
https://developer.cybersource.com/library/documentation/dev_guides/Secure_Acceptance_Checkout_API/Secure_Acceptance_Checkout_API.pdf
But it doesn't seems to be helpful. Can anyone help me with this.
a better way to do this is through java script redirect. You don't have
to use the gateway to host anything.
This method is completely PCI compliant in that it will keep you out of scope.
You generate the payment page from your web site and use a java script to
redirect PAN data to the payment server.
I don't know if Cyber Source supports this. This is the same pattern that is
used by wallet payments. Your Direct debit payments can use the same method even though PCI requirements do not apply there ( yet ).
If you want a sample java script to do this let me know
I'm new to iOS development and I'm trying to make an app that tracks my student loans. I would like to have the app simply display a balance found on the loan's website and build on that behavior. I've got my app to open up safari to the website but I'd like more of a web-crawling behavior so it's done in the background. This web-crawler needs to be able to login to the website and then find a field with the loan balance value..
I've looked up several ways on how to do this but I can't get any of them to work with my novice level of experience with swift. If anyone has a recommendation and a direction to go with this, that would be great.
Thanks in advance!
I've written an app to get my uni's schedules, payment records, and grades by bypassing the login and gain access to API used by the website.
The step you could take are probably very similar to mine
Find out how the website authenticate its users (could be by cookie, session id's etc) You need to have some knowledge on web too. You can use the network tab on Chrome/Brave/Safari or any other browser to see what the website is doing when you click on 'login' for example. You could use Charles too, 30 days of trial should be enough.
After authentication succeed, track what API route the website use to get the datas to html. See what information you need to access the API route. Postman would be very handy to see the JSON response by the API.
To parse the response, you can use URLSession or networking library like Alamofire to get the job done.
If you want to see how I did it, here's the GitHub repo.
I'm trying to integrate LinkedIn API v2 to the app I'm developing for my client and I need help with it. Basically, I need to allow users to fetch some of their LinkedIn profile data and save it to the platform. As I understood, the first version of the API will no longer be supported. https://developer.linkedin.com/docs
So, the problem is that the default field set I was able to retrieve is extremely limited. And it seems like I should apply for the Developer Program here to gain additional API access
https://business.linkedin.com/marketing-solutions/marketing-partners/become-a-partner/marketing-developer-program
I already submitted the application but haven't yet received any response. The frustrating part is that I'm not even sure if this is what I should do to get access.
Here's what I already discovered
Here it's said that the partner's program isn't available
https://www.linkedin.com/help/linkedin/answer/97491
Here it sends me to the partner program
https://developer.linkedin.com/support/faq
Should I choose marketing? https://developer.linkedin.com/partner-programs
I suppose so because other options seem to be irrelevant. So I already applied here
https://business.linkedin.com/marketing-solutions/marketing-partners/become-a-partner/marketing-developer-program
But still no answer
Here are the developers facing the same issues with no answer as well
https://www.linkedin.com/help/linkedin/forum/question/712591
https://www.linkedin.com/help/linkedin/forum/question/711176
https://www.linkedin.com/help/linkedin/forum/question/711027
Here seems to be the answer to a similar question but still, no specific link or steps to apply for a partner's program
LinkedIn API V2 - Can't get summary, skills and headline
Here they also tell about some partner's program but again without specifics
Linkedin oauth2 r_liteprofile not being returned from api
Here in the official doc, it's also said that I should apply to the program (which I did)
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/linkedin/consumer/integrations/self-serve/migration-faq?context=linkedin/consumer/context
I applied on the 23rd of January and I'm still waiting for the approval without even knowing if this program will give me the API access I need
So I need to know one of the following
If my application will be approved it'll give me the extended access to the API v2 (r_fullprofile permission)
If the application I submitted isn't enough what else should I do in order to get the extended access to the API v2 (r_fullprofile permission)
It feels to be a simple process and I don't really understand why it has to involve the Marketing Developer Program when I only need to access some of the fields. I'm sure there is a reason for that. Could anybody from support provide some steps that I or my client should take on order to get the API access?
I already created the app as a developer here and successfully tested it
https://www.linkedin.com/developers/apps
So, just to be clear, the problem is not in something not working technically. It's just that I receive a very limited set of field of a user's profile and I need to expand it
I'm currently trying to develop a Chrome extension which can receive notifications using GCM. When the extension is first installed, I register it using chrome.gcm.register(['my_sender_id'], function(registration_id) { console.log(registration_id); });.
I would like to send push messages to everyone who has the extension installed. However, the problem is that GCM requires you to specify the registration ID's of everyone you want to send the message to; you can't just send it to everyone who's connected to the sender ID.
While it would be possible to push the registration ID to a database when the extension is installed, and then consult this database each time I want to send a message, this solution seems sub-optimal (also from a security point of view, since the pushing of the registration ID would be done client-side).
However, Google introduced a solution for this a few years ago: topics. It's possible to simply register each device to a 'global' topic (for example) and when you then want to send a message, you only have to specify the 'global' topic as the receiver. However, I can't find how this registration process is done for Chrome extensions. I've looked everywhere, but it seems like Chrome's GCM module doesn't support this yet. Am I correct in this and if so, is there an alternative way to pull this off?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
If you call chrome.instanceID.getToken and then use the InstanceID API from your server to subscribe to a topic, it seems to work, but then the chrome extension doesn't get messages when you push to that topic, so I'm not sure if Google just needs to enable something on their side to make it work. But this is the closest I could get to it in any case.
firebaser here
Thanks for the great feedback. There is no way at the moment to subscribe to a topic from a browser. We're aware that having such an API would simplify the development model. We'd love to add this to Firebase, but as usual can't make any promises or commitments.
I'm facing an issue with an application I'm developing using Google Drive.
I have a Google group with some users inside, and I share a collection with this group.
When I try to find this collection using Google Drive API (files().list()), as one of the users of this group, the collection shows up properly.
However, if I add another user to the group (either using API or Google CPanel), and try to find the collection using Google Drive API as this user, the collection doesn't show up, as if the user is not able to see it even though he is in a group allowed to see the collection.
If I manually open once the collection through my browser, then the collection is showing through Drive API.
Is this a normal behaviour ? In my use case I cannot expect from the users to open in their browser each and every collection shared with them in order for the application to work.
Any insight?
I opened a Google Support case about this and apparently this behavior is "expected". Here are some excerpts from my exchange with "Angel" from
Google Enterprise Support (typos corrected and emphasis mine):
After reviewing the stackoverflow question, we need to clarify to you that the behavior shown is expected. When adding a user to a group, this group must be added again for any files that it has been shared with.
and
All information previously provided is from internal documentation for Drive UI; however the functionality is the same for SDK, therefore, group must be deleted and added back to the list of users that have access to files/folders after adding a new member.
So, there you have it. Not sure if #Burcu will ever come back and confirm.
<EDIT> It gets worse. According to this Google document, groups with more than 200 members will never see files shared with them, even if you delete and add the group back. </EDIT>
Useless post-answer rant follows:
This behavior, even if it is "expected" by Google, does not seem to be properly documented, and it is neither expected nor usable by clients of the service. How are we supposed to know when a user has been added to a group that has items shared with it? Are we supposed to constantly monitor group memberships as well as maintain a list of all things shared with the group and then *re*share them with the group when the membership changes, just to get consistent behavior? It makes me wonder why Google doesn't already do this on the back end; it can't be that expensive to register a list of callbacks with a group that are triggered upon membership changes. And the requirement that we actually unshare is even more bizarre, since it necessitates a short period of time during which nobody in the group can access the resource.