Firefox stretching an element centered with Flexbox - html

I'm trying to center an element (im my case an image) with arbitrary size inside a box. Everything works fine in Webkit browsers, but Firefox stretches images that are longer than they are wide.
To illustrate the problem, I create 3 div as boxes, each of containing a differently sized image. The boxes are all set to a fixed width and height, and a couple of flexbox rules are applied to center the image both vertically and horizontally.
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.box {
display: flex;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
float: left;
margin-right: 50px;
}
.box img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
<div class="box">
<img src="http://dummyimage.com/150x150/eeeeee.png">
</div>
<div class="box">
<img src="http://dummyimage.com/300x150/eeeeee.png">
</div>
<div class="box">
<img src="http://dummyimage.com/150x300/eeeeee.png">
</div>
The img should be shrunk such that they exactly fill the box (either horizontally or vertically, which ever side is longer), but preserving the aspect ratio. This is exactly what happens in Webkit browsers. However, Firefox just stretches the one image that is longer than high in vertical direction. How can I make Firefox behave the same way as all the Webkit browsers?

Using "object-fit: contain" for the images seems to do the trick :)
.box img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
object-fit: contain;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/xjwguxs6/

Setting flex-basis: 100% fixes the issue as it sets the initial main size of the flex item. If the flex-direction is reversed i.e. column, you will need to use flex-basis: 100% on nth-child(3)
.box:nth-child(2) img {
flex-basis: 100%;
}
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.box {
display: flex;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
float: left;
margin-right: 50px;
}
.box img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
.box:nth-child(2) img {
flex-basis: 100%;
}
<div class="box">
<img src="http://dummyimage.com/150x150/eeeeee.png">
</div>
<div class="box">
<img src="http://dummyimage.com/300x150/eeeeee.png">
</div>
<div class="box">
<img src="http://dummyimage.com/150x300/eeeeee.png">
</div>

Related

How can I use "object-fit: contain" in CSS and still have a border radius on the image?

I'm trying to show an image in a "lightbox" style so that it will fill the available area on screen, in this case 90% of the width of the page and 70% of the height.
Using object-fit: contain; seems to be the de facto way to do that but it's not quite working with border-radius. Is it possible to use object-fit on an <img> and still have the border radius applied as intended?
You'll need to resize your browser window to see what happens when you run the below snippet. I've got the same code running in JSFiddle, as per the below video.
div {
margin: auto;
width: 90vw;
height: 70vh;
background-color: DeepSkyBlue;
}
img {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
object-fit: contain;
border-radius: 50px;
background-color: Crimson;
}
<div>
<img src="https://images.freeimages.com/images/large-previews/773/koldalen-4-1384902.jpg">
</div>
Contain isn't really helping here.
Instead, set the max width and height of the img to 100%. The system will fit it in either totally top to bottom or side to side, but the img element will have whatever dimensions it needs so the border radius will work on it OK.
To center the img, if that is what you want, you can display: flex the parent div and justify/align items to the center.
div {
margin: auto auto;
width: 90vw;
height: 70vh;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
background-color: DeepSkyBlue;
}
img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
border-radius: 50px;
background-color: Crimson;
}
<div>
<img src="https://images.freeimages.com/images/large-previews/773/koldalen-4-1384902.jpg">
</div>
As commented, setting max-width and max-height seems to be what you need or expect:
div {
margin: auto;
width: 90vw;
height: 70vh;
display:grid;
background-color: DeepSkyBlue;
}
img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
margin:auto;/* x,y center if inside a grid or flex box */
object-fit: contain;/* useless by now, img should keep its ratio */
border-radius: 50px;
border-radius: calc( 5vw + 5vh); /* will scale, maybe you find this usefull */
background-color: Crimson;
}
<div>
<img src="https://images.freeimages.com/images/large-previews/773/koldalen-4-1384902.jpg">
</div>
Use object-fit: cover; instead of contain

Stretch display flex or table inner divs along parent with centered texts

I'd like to create a responsive page with a fixed html structure so I can just adjust the css. I would like to create rows with vertically and horizontally centered texts. The divs should fully stretch across the parent div.
My HTML...
<body>
<div class="parent">
<div class="d1">
one
</div>
<div class="d2">
two
</div>
<div class="d3">
three
</div>
</div>
</body>
My CSS...
body {
background-color: lightyellow;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
margin: 0px;
}
.parent {
background-color: lightblue;
height: 100%;
}
.d1, .d2, .d3 {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
text-align: center;
height: 100px;
}
.d2 {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
However here I am setting d1, d2 and d3 to the height of 100px and not 100% of the parent div. Example here: https://jsfiddle.net/bLf2sxq0/
My second idea was to use display: table for the parent which results in table-rows for the childs but then I end up with the same stretching issue plus the texts are not vertically centered. Here the css would be like this ...
body {
background-color: lightyellow;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
margin: 0px;
}
.parent {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
display: table;
background-color: lightblue;
}
.d1, .d2, .d3 {
text-align: center;
height: 100px;
}
.d2 {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
Example here: https://jsfiddle.net/qmbzkwr2/
Is there a way to stretch the divs vertically along the parent and keep the texts centered vertically and horizontally within the divs? So I would not have width 100px but something like calc(100%/3) or any other solution to do this? Or maybe by using the flex grow option? Easiest way would do it :)
Thanks for any help!
You're on the right track. Use flexbox to stretch and fill items vertically and evenly. Remember to set parent containers (e.g. body, html) to height: 100%.
From here, if you want control over some items, use flex on any individual item, like flex: 1 1 300px on class .d2 for example.
Codepen
body, html {
height: 100%;
}
.parent {
background-color: lightblue;
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.d1, .d2, .d3 {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
flex: 1;
}
.d2 {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="d1">
<div class="d11">
one
</div>
</div>
<div class="d2">
two
</div>
<div class="d3">
three
</div>
</div>

Responsive image not filling DIV when shrinking viewport

I have a 2 column layout in which one column contains an image and the other column contains space for text, buttons etc.
Problem
The problem that I am having is with the image column specifically. When the image column is scaled at larger viewports, it works great and scales exactly as planned. Both the columns adjust at the same height and all items scale properly. However, as the window gets smaller, the image keeps getting smaller as well. The two columns are no longer even and the background of the image column begins to show. I think this is happening because the image is trying to keep the same aspect ratio.
Intention
The intention is that as the viewport scales down, The respective columns also scale down while keeping their same width ratio and the height of the two columns should always match.
Tried / Failed Solutions
height: 100% on the img attribute - this results in the columns not scaling properly.
Using the picture element instead of the img tag
using object-fit of cover and fill on the image.
Here is a code snippet and a JSFiddle
http://jsfiddle.net/CztS6/37/
.flex-container {
width: 100%;
min-height: 300px;
margin: 0 auto;
display: flex;
}
.full-width-four {
width: calc(33.3333333333%);
float: left;
margin-left: 0;
background: #dbdfe5;
flex: 1;
}
.recruitment{
display: block;
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
}
.full-width-eight{
width: calc(66.6666666667%);
float: left;
margin-left: 0;
background: #b4bac0;
flex: 2;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="full-width-four">
<img class="recruitment" src="http://via.placeholder.com/570x415">
</div>
<div class="full-width-eight">Column 2</div>
</div>
Here is my solution, Is this what your are looking for?
I commented min-height: 300px; for flex-container
I also added width:100%; to the image
.flex-container {
width: 100%;
/* min-height: 300px; */
margin: 0 auto;
display: flex;
}
.full-width-four {
width: calc(33.3333333333%);
float: left;
margin-left: 0;
background: #dbdfe5;
flex: 1;
}
.recruitment{
display: block;
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
width:100%;
}
.full-width-eight{
width: calc(66.6666666667%);
float: left;
margin-left: 0;
background: #b4bac0;
flex: 2;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="full-width-four">
<img class="recruitment" src="http://via.placeholder.com/570x415">
</div>
<div class="full-width-eight">Column 2</div>
</div>

Vertically center element without it becoming inaccessible offscreen

I'm trying to center an element in the middle of the page. I can center it just fine, but if I resize the page vertically until the view height is smaller than the centered element, the element goes offscreen vertically without a scrollbar. You can see a demonstration of the issue here:
http://codepen.io/mse/pen/BWayXV
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
.outer {
text-align: center;
position: relative;
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%);
}
.inner {
display: inline-block;
width: 400px;
height: 800px;
background: grey;
}
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner"></div>
</div>
I should mention that I have tried a couple of other methods of vertical centering, including flexbox, and I'm still running into the same issue. Is there a way to solve this problem with this method of vertical centering, or is there at least a vertical centering method that does not have this issue?
Try this
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
.outer {
display:flex;
justify-content:center;
align-items:center;
}
.inner {
background: #ccc;
width: 400px;
height: 600px
}
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner"> I'm a block-level element centered vertically within my parent.</div>
</div>
More info: https://css-tricks.com/centering-css-complete-guide/
CSS VH center generator: http://howtocenterincss.com/
This should work
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100vh;
}
.outer {
height: 100%;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
}
.inner {
width: 400px;
height: 800px;
background: grey;
}
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner"></div>
</div>
You can try to limit the size of your inner element. If you define size by a fixed px amount it will start scrolling as soon as the screen becomes smaller than that px amount. If you are ok with changing the height of the inner element you could use vh or you can implement #media queries to decrease the size on smaller screens. Here#s an example:
.inner { height: 100vh; /* 100 view height percentage*/}
Note: The viewport-percentage lengths are relative to the size of the initial containing block and affected by the presence of scrollbars on the viewport.

How to enforce the height of inner div to be equal to the height of the parent div, if the parent div has "min-height"?

Why in the following example the height of the inner div is not like wrapper's div ?
Live demo here.
HTML:
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="inner">Hello</div>
<div class="inner">Peace</div>
</div>
CSS:
.wrapper {
background-color: #000;
min-height: 100px;
}
.inner {
display: inline-block;
background-color: #777;
height: 100%;
}
If I change min-height: 100px; to height: 100px;, then it looks OK. But, in my case, I need min-height.
Some properties in CSS inherit the value of the parent automatically, some don't. Minimum height must be explicitly stated when you want it to inherit the parent's value:
min-height: inherit;
I believe this is the output you want: http://jsfiddle.net/xhp7x/
.wrapper {
display: table;
background-color: #000;
height: 100px;
width: 100%;
}
.wrapper2 {
height: 100%;
display: table-row
}
.inner {
height: 100%;
display: inline-block;
background-color: #777;
margin-right: 10px;
vertical-align: top;
}
Had to add a second DIV wrapper2.
Tested on chrome and firefox.
You want to specify both, CSS height is not the same as min-height. You want to specify both height and min-height.
height = When used as a %, this is a percent of the window height
min-height = as you drag the window smaller, the DIV with a % height will continue to reduce until it hits the min-height
max-height = as you drag the window larger, the DIV with a % height will continue to increase until it hits the max-height
http://jsfiddle.net/gpeKW/2/ I've added a sample here with borders.
Slight change to the answer from your comment, you are pretty much correct from your original CSS.
The below HTML will have a minimum div height of 100px. As the size of the inner DIV increases, the wrapper will automatically expand. I have demonstrated this by adding a style attribute to the first inner class.
<html>
<head>
<title>Untitled Page</title>
<style type="text/css">
.wrapper
{
background-color: #000;
min-height:100px;
}
.inner
{
display: inline-block;
background-color: #777;
height: 100%;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="inner" style="height:200px">test</div>
<div class="inner">Peace</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
I know one way to set the div child height the same as its parent div height is to use relative for the parent and absolute position for the child.
.wrapper {
background-color: #000;
min-height: 100px;
position: relative;
}
.inner {
display: inline-block;
background-color: #777;
position: absolute;
height: 100%;
}
But this way will cause some problem, you have to adjust the child element so that it will be displayed properly
P/s: Why don't you set it to the same height as its parent height? I mean, 100% is not x%... just thinking..
Anyway, happy coding ;)
I certainly joined answers and the result using 'min-height' for the -main HTML tag- (class = "main-page-container"):
HTML:
<div id="divMainContent">
<!-- before or after you can use multiples divs or containers HTML elements-->
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<main class="main-page-container">
<div class="wrapper">
1
<div class="wrapper2">
2
<div class="child">3</div>
</div>
</div>
</main>
<!-- before or after you can use multiples divs or containers HTML elements-->
<div class="footer-page-container bg-danger" > more relevant info</div>
</div>
CSS:
/*#region ---- app component containers ---- */
#divMainContent {
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
/*optional: max width for screens with high resolution*/
max-width: 1280px;
margin:0 auto;
}
.main-page-container {
display: inline-table;
height: 70%;
min-height: 70%;
width: 100%;
}
.footer-page-container{
flex:1; /* important in order to cover the rest of height */
/* this is just for your internal html tags
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: space-between; */
}
/*#endregion ---- app component containers ---- */
.wrapper {
background: blue;
max-width: 1280px;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100%;
}
.wrapper2 {
width: 90%;
margin: auto;
background: pink;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
gap: 20px;
height: 90%;
}
.child {
min-height: 100px;
min-width: 300px;
background: orange;
position: relative;
width: 33%;
}