Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there any resource of how mysql's source code (https://github.com/mysql/mysql-server) works?
Any flow diagrams related to code's folders and files.
The official docs includes a section called MySQL Internals. There are sections included about navigating the source tree and what is where.
If you can look past his blatant towing of the company line (e.g. his apparent claims that the "real" MySQL will always be better and more awesome than MariaDB or Percona, because... Oracle!) and that he seems to imply that if you make any change to the source, you have to give those changes to Oracle and should probably send them a bunch of money, too... then there is some good material to be found in a book called Expert MySQL, which includes a decent low-level view of how it works and code snippets walking you through some source code tweaks to add new functionality.
But, there is a large amount of in-line documentation embedded in the code itself.
how "source code works"? it is in sources i guess
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_(programming_language)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B
https://www.google.ru/search?q=flow+diagram+mysql&newwindow=1&safe=off&espv=2&biw=1600&bih=852&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0CBsQsARqFQoTCPXHzsTD88cCFcYlcgodYHME-w&dpr=0.9#imgrc=MrlmbXUK6VPJjM%3A
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for an alternatives to yUML, preferably open source.
Sure yUML is great and I really like it, but I would like to be able to extend it.
I'm also interested in other services in the same direction (diagram generation), but I'm not looking for any (UML)desktop tools.
Some suggestions of textual modeling tools. For instance, take a look at PlantUML
Scruffy can draw some yUML diagrams.
Scruffy-Server is a newly made web server frontend for Scruffy which has a rendering and syntax almost identical to yUML.
At the moment it doesn't have the PDF/Json/SVG(or PS) export options, but those might be coming. On the other hand it is very fast and has a lean interface.
PS: I might a little be biased as I made it.
Perhaps take a look at jsUML2. It doesn't provide a textual syntax for specifying diagram - it provides a js-based api instead. However the api is very easy to use and it's open source so extensible. They have a demo app built using it here.
hth.
Some years ago I've developed an open source alternative based on Graphviz.
It's basic and only work for relationship diagrams, but it can be extended.
The output look is very similar to yUML.
Here's the link: http://web.fi.uba.ar/~ssantisi/works/glumly/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm going to start a project for my software engineering course, and I have to do a relatively hard one, something like a browser. Of course I'm not going to build a complete browser from scratch in 4 monthes, but in the first phases I have to give my analyze output to the TA. This includes use case diagrams, sequence diagrams and other UML diagrams.
since I've never done a project like this, I'm looking for diagrams of an open source project which I can get some ideas from them. Where could I find such open source projects that give me these diagrams?
If you just want to learn how the UML of a project is laid out, then one thing you could do is checkout any open source project written C#/Java/VB, import it to this tool called Altova Umodel. They have free trial version but the software itself is sold commercially.
Hope that helps..
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for a Common Lisp implementation I ran across once, sometime in the past year or two. I only remember a few things, and I don't know how to search for it based on these facts, so maybe somebody here can help.
it was open-source, but wasn't one of the big ones (SBCL, CMUCL, MCL, etc.)
it was likely incomplete; it looked almost more like an exercise in writing the simplest possible self-hosted Common Lisp
the main webpage was plain black-on-white, and had 2 columns, where the left column was a link to the source file for a particular area of functionality (loop, format, clos, etc.), and the right column was a link to the tests for that functionality
the source files themselves were pretty-printed for the web, with syntax highlighting that looked kind of like an old Redhat Emacs default config: slate-gray background, etc.
Where can I find this Lisp implementation?
Thanks!
I don't know which one you are referring too, but you can find a list of Common Lisp Implementations here.
Is there any particular reason why this Lisp is grabbing your attention now?
Its hard to pin down, but open-source + minimalistic + incomplete sounds vaugely similar to Paul Graham's Arc programming language.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
Does anyone know of a FOSS alternative to mediawiki?
Specifically I'm looking for the in-built features of granular access control, a hierarchy of pages users can navigate, and more easy to use than mediawiki.
Well, there's Dokuwiki. It's very nice, and it's my Wiki of choice. It is supposed to provide granular access control; I have never really worked with it, however, and my impression is it's not that great (I can be wrong, though, I've never really examined it).
Building hierarchies of pages is easy though, and showing a navigation structure too, using the indexmenu plugin.
I find the setup of a fresh Dokuwiki to be a bit cumbersome at times, but the everyday work is very easy and straightforward. I do not know Mediawiki that well so I can't compare, but if you are looking at Wikis, Dokuwiki is definitely something to look at.
There's also the WikiMatrix, a comprehensive comparison of a huge number of Wikis, incidentally built and run by the author of DokuWiki.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I've seen it used a couple places:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/
http://developer.yahoo.com/flash/astra-flash/classreference/
Is this just a coincidence or is it somewhere I can grab? I'd love to use it for a new project I'm working on.
Thanks!
Take a look at asdoc. It's what the documentation is automatically generated with.
The most used standard for documenting ActionScript is javadoc, which is a pool of tags to comment your code. Theese information is extracted and turned into some sort of documentation, eg html pages.
To extract theese information there is a number of tools available. ASDoc is a command line tool. Another tool is Ortelius, that comes with a simple GUI that might be a little less "scary" for GUI junkies like me.