So the subject is a bit lengthy. Anyway, what I'm basically doing is trying to get a unit be a specific height (366px to be exact), but I want that height to scale DOWN if the resolution drops, thus the "min-height: 366px" is naturally out because of that.
I did come up with a rather crummy solution where I inserted an image that's that height, but the image itself is 366 pixels tall and 100% transparent. That was the only way I could really get the container be the right height.
I need this height because the container will then contain more images within it that scale. These images are absolutely positioned within the container and are on top of my invisible image.
So is there any way to have a "min-width" that then scales as size goes down or am I out of luck?
Thanks a lot.
Em.... what about max-width 366px? that should work and.. did You use (it is probably not same as this)
Related
Probably a simple fix here, but I have 3x images in line I want to stretch across the browser window, no matter what resolution.
I've messed around with percentages in CSS but I can only seem to control one object.
My guess is to possibly create an individual div for each image, then assign each div a percentage of the screen, so 1/3 of the screen's width is reserved for each image - this will then stretch / re-size depending on resolution.
Can anyone help point me in the right direction? Not sure if I'm thinking too much into this.
Cheers!
Just add:
width: 33.3%;
To your:
img.selector1 {}
Images displayed in goolge images end squarely at the right hand side of the page regardless of image dimensions or screen size. I was thinking that perhaps it is possible to add some sort of dynamic padding to make images fit squarely into a div? If anyone has any suggestions on how to do this it would be greatly appreciated!
Define the height of each row and the minimum and maximum width you want.
Calculate the width of your image if you scale it to the given height.
If the calculated width lies between the minimum and maximum width, scale it to this size.
If the width is smaller, scale the image so it has the minimum width, and crop it so it has the proper height.
If the width is bigger then the maximum, scale it this way and crop it, so it has the right width.
In order to make all the images fit the row perfectly, you might need to adjust the minimum and maximum width. Especially images which need to be cropped anyway can be used to adjust the length of the row.
You can achieve this using CSS (& JavaScript) or by doing it on the server side. If your page width is dynamic, you have to rely on CSS/JavaScript though.
This is more of a general question; but I notice on some webistes (including stackoverflow) That when content is off the screen and the user has to scroll to the right background images/color stop at 100% of the screen view. Does anyone have a better idea how to fix this.... other than setting max and min widths?
here is a google doc of two different websites to explain what I am talking about.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/133Uek4Fd3G3eB6Zz4CNomPGzARevCUg4fAV4Xhvin-o/edit?usp=sharing
Josh C's response is spot on. If the elements that have background colours had min-widths that matched the content width (980px in stackoverflow's case) then the issue would be resolved. This is not only the easiest way, but probably the best practice)
Your alternative, if you don't want to set max and min values to your elements that use percentages, would be to not set fixed widths on elements (in the case of stack overflow, it's content width is fixed at 980px, and most everything else is fluid).
If content and it's children used max-width instead of width this problem would disappear.
Alternately, as lookingGlass points out, more fluid responsiveness.
Add breakpoints so that when your window size is below/above your ideal the site adapts.
Is it possible to make an element behave/sized like the background-size:contain? For reference, here's a page demonstrating background-size:contain (try resizing your browser window and see what the background image does).
That is, I want to make an element with constrained aspect ratio, with width and height such that either width or height will be 100% of the window width (and the other will be whatever is necessary to preserve ratio and keep the entire element visible in the window without scrollbars)?
For example, suppose I want an element to have a ratio of 16:9. If someone's browser window is super wide and not very tall, then I want my element's height to be 100% and the width would be less (whatever is necessary to keep the element's ratio 16:9). If someone's browser window is really tall and not very wide, then the width would be be 100% and the height would be less (again, whatever is necessary to preserve that element's target ratio).
I'm thinking the only way to do this is with javascript. Is there some magical CSS way to accomplish this that I don't know about?
I guess you want to have a liquid template view.
Checkout this example if it suits your need
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/articles/liquid/liquid-sample1/
Thanks.
If I have an image combined with a style:
<img class="test" src="testimage.jpg" />
img.test { width: 50%;}
The image resizes to 50% the width of the box containing it, as well as resizing vertically, maintaining the aspect ratio.
This seems to require the enclosing DIV to be set to a particular width and height value. But if you want the enclosing DIV to resize automatically as the browser is dragged smaller or larger, wouldn't this be a problem?
I've clarified my answer to your original question. Go take a look and see if it clears things up. More or less, if you want the image to resize with the window you can't set the DIV to a fixed width and height. The DIV must have a % width and height also.
You'll need to manually specify the width and height properties to get the image to keep its dimensions. This wouldn't be too difficult if you're using server-side coding (PHP/ASP).
Another way to do it would be to use JavaScript to calculate and resize the image dynamically.
No, the image will still be 50% of the div, and if the div is a proportion of the page, that doesn't matter.
Its all proportions: The enclosing div might be 2/3 of the whole window, and the image will wil 1/2 of that. It all gets calculated before its displayed, just a bunch of number crunching. ;D