There are many examples of doing this in axml, but I would like to have a complete binding using code behind. To be honest, I would like to have NO axml, but seems like creating all the controls programmatically is a nightmare.
I first tried the suggestions at:
MvxListView create binding for template layout from code
I have my list binding from code-behind, and I get six rows (so source binding is working); but the cells itself does not bind.
Then at the following url:
Odd issue with MvvmCross, MvxListViewItem on Android
Stuart has the following comment: Have looked through. In this case, I don't think you want to use DelayBind. DelayBind is used to delay the binding action until next time the DataContext is set. In Android's MvxAdapter/MvxListItemView case, the DataContext is passed in the ctor - so DataContext isn't set again until the cell is reused. (This is different to iOS MvxTableDataSource).
So in essence, the only example I see shows DelayBind, which shouldn't work.
Can someone please show me some examples... thanks in advance.
Added reply to Comments:
Cheesebaron, first of all, a huge thank you and respect for all your contributions;
Now, why not use axml? Well, as programmers, we all have our own preferences and way of doing stuff - I guess I am old school where we didn't have any gui designer (not really true).
Real reasons:
Common Style: I have a setup where Core has all the style details, including what all the colors would be. My idea is, each platform would get the style details from core and update accordingly. It's easy for me to create controls with the correct style this way.
Copy-Paste across platform (which then I can even have as linked files if I wanted). For example, I have a login screen with web-like verification, where a red error text appears under a control; overall on that screen I have around 10 items that needs binding. I have already got iOS version working - so starting on Droid, I copied the whole binding section from ios, and it worked perfectly. So, the whole binding, I can make it same across all platform... Any possible error in my way will stop at building, which I think is a major advantage over axml binding. Even the control creation is extremely similar, where I have helpers with same method name.
Ofcourse I understand all the additional layout that has to be handled; to be honest, it's not that bad if one really think it through; I have created a StackPanel for Droid which is based on WP - that internally handles all the layouts for child views; so for LinearLayout, all I do is setup some custom parameters, and let my panel deal with it. Relative is a different story; so far, I have only one screen that's relative, and I can even make it Linear to reduce my additional layout code.
So, from my humble point of view, for my style, code-behind creation allows me to completely copy all my bindings (I do have some custom binding factories to allow that), copy all my control create lines; then only adding those controls to the view is the only part that is different (then again, droid and WP are almost identical). So there is no way I can miss something on one platform and all are forced to be the same. It also allows me to change all the styles for every platform just by changing the core. Finally, any binding error is detected during compile - and I love that.
My original question wasn't about NOT using axml... it was on how to use MvxListView where all the binding is done in code-behind; as I have explained, I got the list binding, but not the item/cell binding working.
Thanks again in advance.
Here is part of my LoginScreen from droid; I think it's acceptable amount of code for being without axml file.
//======================================================================================================
// create and add all controls
//======================================================================================================
var usernameEntry = ControlHelper.GetUITextFieldCustom(this, "Username.", maxLength: 20);
var usernameError = AddErrorLabel<UserAuthorization, string>(vm => ViewModel.Authorization.Username);
var passwordEntry = ControlHelper.GetUITextFieldCustom(this, "Password.", maxLength: 40, secureTextEntry: true);
var passwordError = AddErrorLabel<UserAuthorization, string>(vm => ViewModel.Authorization.Password);
var loginButton = ControlHelper.GetUIButtonMain(this);
var rememberMe = new UISwitch(this);
var joinLink = ControlHelper.GetUIButtonHyperLink(this, textAlignment: UITextAlignment.Center);
var copyRightText = ControlHelper.GetUILabel(this, textAlignment: UITextAlignment.Center);
var copyRightSite = ControlHelper.GetUIButtonHyperLink(this, textAlignment: UITextAlignment.Center);
var layout = new StackPanel(this, Orientation.Vertical)
{
Spacing = 15,
SubViews = new View[]
{
ControlHelper.GetUIImageView(this, Resource.Drawable.logo),
usernameEntry,
usernameError,
passwordEntry,
passwordError,
loginButton,
rememberMe,
joinLink,
ControlHelper.GetSpacer(this, ViewGroup.LayoutParams.MatchParent, weight: 2),
copyRightText,
copyRightSite
}
};
I just came across a similar situation myself using Mvx4.
The first link you mentioned had it almost correct AND when you combine it from Staurts comment in the second link and just remove the surrounding DelayBind call, everything should work out ok -
public class CustomListItemView
: MvxListItemView
{
public MvxListItemView(Context context,
IMvxLayoutInflater layoutInflater,
object dataContext,
int templateId)
: base(context, layoutInflater, dataContext, templateId)
{
var control = this.FindViewById<TextView>(Resource.Id.list_complex_title);
var set = this.CreateBindingSet<CustomListViewItem, YourThing>();
set.Bind(control).To(vm => vm.Title);
set.Apply();
}
}
p.s. I have asked for an Edit to the original link to help others.
Related
In Polymer 1.x I was used to write a templatize code like this:
renderTemplate(query, properties) {
let element = this.shadowRoot.querySelector(query);
this.templatize(element);
var instance = this.stamp(properties);
return instance;
}
which worked well. But in Polymer 2.x there is a new error message A <template> can only be templatized once. Well it doesn't make sense, because I have 1 template which I want to redistribute multiple times with different properties.
I am giving here an example of how is my code
I have #template1 and #template2
I want to render #template1 then #template2 then #template1.
In steps how I render templates:
1) templatize #template1
2) stamp properties
3) templatize #template2
4) stamp properties
5 a) templatize #template1 => ERROR
5 b) skip templatize and stamp properties => #template2 is rendered....
How am i able to make this possible? calling stamp() after rendering #template2 will result in another #template2 render. I want #template1, but I can't templatize #template1 because it has been already templatized. And stamp is always "binded" to last templatized element.
Am I doing something wrong? I do really hate Polymer because of it's bad documentation and hard to google something usefull
I found a workaround which is propably not the best solution but it works. I tried to search in source code for some solutions but there wasn't anything usefull except the one property called __templatizeOwner. This property is set to all templatized elements. Removing this property from an element is the way.
renderTemplate(query, properties) {
let element = this.shadowRoot.querySelector(query);
if(element.__templatizeOwner) {
element.__templatizeOwner = null;
}
this.templatize(element);
var instance = this.stamp(properties);
return instance;
}
I am not sure what side effects this might have (more memory usage or something) but this is the only way I was able to find out.
MMVMCross
Android
Windows 8
We had a View, call it FruitView displaying a ViewModel called FruitViewModel. The FruitViewModel can display lists of a particular type of fruit.
This all worked fine.
For a couple of reasons we created AppleViewModel and PearViewModel that inherit from FruitViewModel. They do not do anything, all calls are made to the base viewmodel.
I want to register the FruitView as the View for AppleViewModel and PearViewModel when I try and navigate to them using MvxNavigatingObject.ShowViewModel.
I cannot see how to override the default linking of Views to ViewModels. I read one post that suggested overriding GetViewModelViewLookup in the Setup class but that does not seem to exist. I also looked at CustomPresenters but that did not look like the right approach.
Anyone else done this?
Thanks
Pat
After spotting this question How to navigate to a ViewModel that extends an abstract class? (not one of the suggesting when i was posting) I found InitializeViewLookup that can be overridden in each platform's Setup.cs. I am augmenting the current mappings rather than replacing so have called base.InitializeViewLookup first.
protected override void InitializeViewLookup()
{
base.InitializeViewLookup();
var viewModelViewLookup = new Dictionary<Type, Type>()
{
{ typeof(AppleViewModel), typeof(FruitView) },
{ typeof(PearViewModel), typeof(FruitView) }
};
var container = Mvx.Resolve<IMvxViewsContainer>();
container.AddAll(viewModelViewLookup);
}
Thanks
Pat
Introduce the Problem
I would like to profoundly modify the layout of the Orchard CMS Tags list.
Here is an example page with Shape Tracing enabled.
The only alternate that it suggests for the List shape is ~/Themes/TheThemeMachine/Views/List.cshtml, because the page is rendering the default List shape. I would like to have other alternates that are specific to the page.
After reading Orchard list customization, I have been able to implement the default List.cshtml in razor. What I would like to do, though, is to add another alternate, such as ~/Themes/TheThemeMachine/Views/Parts.Tags.List.cshtml instead of implementing the default List.cshtml template.
The problem seems to be that the page is rendering the generic List shape.
In contrast, the blog post list page is rendering a Parts_Blogs_BlogPost_List shape, which means that a ~/Themes/TheThemeMachine/Views/Parts.Blogs.BlogPost.List.cshtml is available.
Search and Research
All quotes below are from the Orchard list customization blog post, which explains how to add a list item alternate (whereas I would like to add a list alternate).
What we really want is an alternate template... aptly called Shape
Alternates... [so] enable Shape Tracing... and select a post in the list...
[you will see that] we already have some possible alternates.
My example page also has some possible alternates for the List Content. Cool.
we need to somehow get into list rendering... [t]he default is defined
in code... [which] can be override by a new [cshtml] template in our
theme.
Okay. That makes sense. We can override the list rendering.
As Shape Tracing can show, we can override the list rendering for a
blog by creating a Parts.Blog.BlogPost.List.cshtml template.
This works for alog but not for the blog Tag page (example page). You see, the blog displays a **Parts_Blogs_BlogPost_List shape and suggests an appropriate alternate but the blog tags page displays the default List shape with no alternates other than List.cshtml.
Blog Page with alternates galore
Blog Tags Page with one alternate List.cshtml
So, I created a List.cshtml not a Parts.Blog.BlogPost.List.cshtml template, and save it in my theme's Views directory. (One problem here is that, once we get it working, we will b overriding the default List rendering.)
Then I add the Razor code (copy and pasted from Bertrand's post) to override the default rendering for Lists. When I refresh the site, the browser renders a blank page. It isn't working. Here's the code:
This Does NOT Work in List.cshtml
#using Orchard.DisplayManagement.Shapes;
#{
var list = Model.ContentItems;
var items = list.Items;
var count = items.Count;
var listTag = Tag(list, "ul");
listTag.AddCssClass("content-items");
listTag.AddCssClass("blog-posts");
var index = 0;
}
#listTag.StartElement
#foreach (var item in items) {
var itemTag = Tag(item, "li");
if (index == 0) {
itemTag.AddCssClass("first");
}
else if (index == count - 1) {
itemTag.AddCssClass("last");
}
#itemTag.StartElement
#Display(item)
#itemTag.EndElement
++index;
}
#listTag.EndElement
As a trouble shooting step, I replace the List.cshtml with <p>Hello world.</p>. Orchard renders the markup as expected. So, something is incompatible between the Razor code from Bertrand's blog and the Tags List.
To find out what exactly is incompatible, I try Betrand's code one line at time to see where it breaks (yup, VS would be better than WM here). At each change, I restart WebMatrix and view the results. This is the minimal code that breaks it.
The Culprit
#using Orchard.DisplayManagement.Shapes;
#{
var list = Model.ContentItems;
var items = list.Items;
}
list.Items isn't appropriate here. So I comment it out again and run the <p>Hello World</p> version again. Also, Shape Tracing reveals that on my Tags/tagname page, the Content Zone is now rendering the List twice. Is that normal?
As another step, I replace Model.ContentItems just with Model. It works. It seems that, to override the List.cshtml template, we cannot use the ContentItems property of Model. Here is the new, working code:
This Does Work in List.cshtml
#using Orchard.DisplayManagement.Shapes;
#{
//var list = Model.ContentItems;
//var items = list.Items;
var items = Model.Items;
var count = items.Count;
//var listTag = Tag(list, "ul");
var listTag = Tag(Model, "ul");
listTag.AddCssClass("content-items");
listTag.AddCssClass("blog-posts");
var index = 0;
}
#listTag.StartElement
#foreach (var item in items) {
var itemTag = Tag(item, "li");
if (index == 0) {
itemTag.AddCssClass("first");
}
else if (index == count - 1) {
itemTag.AddCssClass("last");
}
#itemTag.StartElement
#Display(item)
#itemTag.EndElement
++index;
}
#listTag.EndElement
Onward through the article.
So far so good, we have effectively taken over the rendering of the
list, but the actual HTML [will] be... identical to what we had before
[except for] the implementation.
Okay. I'm following. We want to modify the rendering not just re-implement it.
Alternates are a collection of strings that describe additional shape
names for the current shape... in the Metadata.Alternates property of any shape.
Gotcha. Now, why doesn't the Tags/tagname page show an alternate other than just List.cshtml for the rendering of the List shape?
All we need to do is add to this list [of alternates]... [and make sure] to respect the lifecycle...
Great. Maybe we can we add another alternate for the List shape on the Tags/tagname page. But, doing that is different from what Betrand is explaining. While Betrand's blog post is excellent, it is explaining how to add an alternate for an item, whereas I would like to add an alternate for the list.
The List.cshtml template is where I would add an alternate for a List Item as follows:
ShapeMetadata metadata = item.Metadata;
string alternate = metadata.Type + "_" +
metadata.DisplayType + "__" +
item.ContentItem.ContentType +
"_First";
metadata.OnDisplaying(ctx => {
metadata.Alternates.Add(alternate);
});
So that...
[t]he list of alternates from Shape Tracing now contains a new item.
Where and how, though, would I add an alternate for the List shape? Bertrand has recommended to check out the Shape Table Providers blog post for this. The quotes below are from that post.
But what if you want to change another shape template for specific
pages, for example the main Content shape on the home page?
This looks like a fit, because my example is the main List shape on the tags page. To do this we...
... handle an event that is triggered every time a shape named "Content"
[in our case "List"] is about to be displayed. [It] is implemented in a shape table provider which is where you do all shape related site-wide operations.
Great! Here is my implementation for adding another template for the main List shape.
TheThemeMachine > ListShapeProvider.cs
namespace Themes.TheThemeMachine
{
using Orchard.DisplayManagement.Descriptors;
public class ListShapeProvider : IShapeTableProvider
{
public void Discover(ShapeTableBuilder builder)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debugger.Break(); // break not hit
builder.Describe("List").OnDisplaying(displaying => {
// do stuff to the shape
displaying.ShapeMetadata.Alternates.Add("Tags__List");
});
}
}
}
The above builds and runs but does not hit the breakpoint nor add an alternate for the List shape on the /tags page. So I looked into the Orchard.Azure.MediaServices module and its CloudVideoPlayerShape which implements IShapeTableProvider. Its breakpoint does get hit. How is my code for ListShapeProvider fundamentally different than the code for the CloudVideoPlayerShape?
Also, I installed the Orchard.Themes.CustomLayoutMachine.1.0.nupkg as suggested in Bertrand's blog post. It unfortunately no longer contains an implementation of IShapeTableProvider.
I have also looked at this szmyd post, which does not explain where to put the IShapeTableProvider code.
Further, I installed the Contoso theme from the Orchard Gallery. It works and builds after adding a reference to Microsoft.CSharp. It also includes an implementation of the IShapeTableProvider. Hooray! Comparing its ContentShapeProvider with my ListShapeProvider reveals a subtle but important difference:
Contoso.csproj
<ItemGroup>
<Compile Include="Code\ContentShapeProvider.cs" />
</ItemGroup>
My implementation didn't include the .cs file in the compilation, because my theme has neither a .csproj nor a App_Code folder. So, I recreated my theme with the following code generation:
orchard.exe
feature enable Orchard.CodeGeneration
codegen theme My.FirstTheme /CreateProject:true
theme enable My.FirstTheme
feature enable Orchard.DesignerTools
When adding the ListShapeProvider.cs file, Visual Studio automatically added a ItemGroup/Compile entry for the file, which included the code in compilation. Hooray!
These two posts will help.
Shape Shifting
List Customization
Here are steps of my own minimum solution.
Download and unzip Orchard.Source.1.8.zip.
Open "\Downloads\Orchard.Source.1.8\src\Orchard.sln" in Visual Studio.
Build the solution to create orchard.exe.
Generate a new theme with orchard.exe. Use CreateProject:true because you will need a csproj to include your .cs file.
orchard.exe
setup /SiteName:SITE /AdminUsername:ME /AdminPassword:PWD /DatabaseProvider:SqlCe
feature enable Orchard.CodeGeneration
codegen theme My.FirstTheme /CreateProject:true
theme enable My.FirstTheme
In VS, add a ListShapeProvier.cs file to the root (or any folder) in your theme.
Add the following code to ListShapeProvider.cs.
namespace My.FirstTheme
{
using Orchard.DisplayManagement.Descriptors;
public class ListShapeProvider : IShapeTableProvider
{
public void Discover(ShapeTableBuilder builder)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debugger.Break();
// implementation here
}
}
}
Build the solution.
Run Orchard.Web.
Visual Studio will break at System.Diagnostics.Debugger.Break(). If it doesn't, go to the Orchard Dashboard and make My.FirstTheme the Current Theme.
Now read Shape Shifting to implement public void Discover(ShapeTableBuilder builder).
This post should give you a full response: http://weblogs.asp.net/bleroy/archive/2011/05/23/orchard-list-customization-first-item-template.aspx
Okay when I was going through different resources on Flashpunk I found three ways of adding entities to the world:
add(new Entity(10, 10));
//***************
var _entity:Entity;
//In constructor:
_entity = new Entity(10,10);
add(_entity);
//***************
FP.world.add(new Entity(10,10));
So my question is which one should I use and when.
Thank you.
add(new Entity(10, 10));
This will only work in whichever context add() is defined. I haven't used this specific library, but assuming that will be in a class called something similar to World and anything that inherits from it.
var entity:Entity = new Entity(10, 10);
add(entity);
This just breaks up the first example into two lines. It will also let you refer to that specific Entity before and after adding it to the world, whereas in the other example you have no way to reference the Entity you added.
FP.world.add(new Entity(10,10));
Here I'm assuming there's a class FP with the static property world representing a current relevant instance of the World. It does the same thing as the first example except that you can do this in any context. I would avoid using this; you'll find yourself using it as an excuse to add things to the world from unexpected locations in your code, leading to reduced code readability, frustration and a much harder debugging experience.
My preference is example 2. It's more readable, it suggests that you're using add within an appropriate context, and it lets you make changes to the Entity that you create:
var entity:Entity = new Entity();
entity.property = newValue;
add(entity);
I'm getting my feet wet with AS3, Flixel and component/entity systems (yes, all at the same time), and my entities (which subclass FlxSprite) aren't being added correctly (i.e., not at all). I've just spent a good two hours nailing down the offending line. If I remove it, the rest of the game chugs along happily.
What's wrong with this code?
public function addComponent(c:Component):void
{
var type:String = Object(c).constructor.toString();
FlxG.log("type=" + type);
this._components[type] = c; // The evil line
FlxG.log("now type=" + _components[type]);
c.setData(this);
}
components is an Object field being used as a map/dictionary. type gets set to [class PlayerComponent]. Based on googling, this is valid and should work as intended.
Based on the output from the console, it's just bailing after that line--not crashing entirely. What's going on? More details gladly offered upon request.
I'm not certain about Component - not my forte - but I do know that FlxGroup and its children (which include FlxState) have a method called add() which adds children to them.
So if you have an FlxSprite, the correct way (in flixel) to add it to the chain of things to update/draw is to use that; you can add it directly to your state or to a group that is a child of the state.
Function docs: http://flixel.org/docs/org/flixel/FlxGroup.html#add()