I have a query like:
select gift.id as giftId, gift.title, count(vouchercode.id) as stock, vouchertemplate.unlimited, gift.voucherTemplate, vouchertemplate.id as voucherId,vouchertemplate.title
from gift
inner join vouchertemplate
left join vouchercode
on gift.voucherTemplate = vouchertemplate.id
on vouchertemplate.id = vouchercode.template
and vouchercode.given = 0
where gift.id in (13,14,15,16)
I find that this does not give me the correct result. It appears on gift.voucherTemplate = vouchertemplate.id does not work as expected. I need it before the left join. So I cannot just put all the join conditions together? I specified the table names and columns to join, so I wonder why the difference?
The below query gives me the correct result.
select gift.id as giftId, gift.title, count(vouchercode.id) as stock, vouchertemplate.unlimited, gift.voucherTemplate, vouchertemplate.id as voucherId,vouchertemplate.title
from gift
inner join vouchertemplate
on gift.voucherTemplate = vouchertemplate.id <<< DIFF HERE
left join vouchercode
on vouchertemplate.id = vouchercode.template
and vouchercode.given = 0
where gift.id in (13,14,15,16)
It doesnt work that way. You need to have condition for each join. you need to specify on which column (or conidtion) your two tables should be joined.
Related
I have a query like below
select
COALESCE(Clinic,'total') as Clinic,
sum(Non_Billable) as Non_Billable,
sum(initial_Non_Billable) as initial_Non_Billable,
sum(Non_Billable)/NULLIF(sum(initial_Non_Billable),0) as Non_Billable_initial_revenue
FROM (
select
businesses.label as Clinic,
sum(CASE
WHEN appointment_types.category IN (
'Others',
'Non-Billable')
and appointment_types.name like '%initial%'
then invoices.net_amount ELSE 0 END)
as Non_Billable,
count(CASE
WHEN appointment_types.category IN (
'Others',
'Non-Billable')
and appointment_types.name like '%initial%'
then appointment_types.name ELSE null END)
as initial_Non_Billable
FROM
individual_appointments
INNER join appointment_types on
appointment_types.id = individual_appointments.appointment_type_id
inner join invoices on
invoices.appointment_id = individual_appointments.id
inner join businesses on
businesses.id = individual_appointments.business_id
group by
businesses.label,
appointment_types.name,
appointment_types.category,
invoices.net_amount
)x
group by
ROLLUP(Clinic);
is it possible for each condition in "case when then" to have a different table?
example: for "Non_Billable" only want from individual_appointment, appointment_types, invoices and businesses table only.
while "initial_Non_Billable" only wants from individual_appointment, appointment_types, and businesses table.
can it be like that?
If possible, how? can anyone give an example?
From what I see, I suppose the problem here is that there can be many invoices per appointment, so when you join invoices you get appointments multifold which also multiplies your counts.
You don't really want to join invoices hence, but invoice sums. I.e. aggregate before joining.
Then, you are only interested in non-billable appointments, so you can put that criteria into your ON clauses and outer join in order to get clinics without such appointments.
select
coalesce(b.label, 'total') as clinic,
coalesce(sum(i.total_net_amount), 0) as initial_non_billable_sum,
count(at.id) as initial_non_billable_count,
avg(i.total_net_amount) as initial_non_billable_average
from businesses b
left join individual_appointments ia on ia.business_id = b.id
left join appointment_types at on at.id = ia.appointment_type_id
and at.category in ('others', 'non-billable')
and at.name like '%initial%'
left join
(
select appointment_id, sum(net_amount) as total_net_amount
from invoices
group by appointment_id
) i on i.appointment_id = ia.id
group by rollup(b.label)
order by b.label nulls last;
I am getting this error message, can someone advise on a solution?
I have looked over this forum and cant find a solution
Dynamic SQL Error
SQL error code = -104
Invalid command
no column name specified for column number 1 in derived table ACCRG
SELECT DISTINCT locationgroup.name AS MainGroup, product.num AS ProductNumber,
product.description AS ProductDescription, uom.code AS UOM, company.name AS company,
sum(((SELECT SUM(productsSold.qtyfulfilled) FROM soitem productsSold WHERE soitem.id = productsSold.id AND productsSold.productid = product.id) * COALESCE(uomconversion.multiply,1)) / COALESCE(uomconversion.factor,1)) AS uomqty
FROM soitem
LEFT OUTER JOIN so ON (so.id = soitem.soid)
LEFT OUTER JOIN product ON (soitem.productid = product.id)
LEFT OUTER JOIN uom ON (product.uomid = uom.id)
LEFT OUTER JOIN locationgroup ON (so.locationgroupid = locationgroup.id)
LEFT OUTER JOIN qbclass ON (qbclass.id = soitem.qbclassid)
LEFT OUTER JOIN customer ON (customer.id = so.customerid)
LEFT JOIN (SELECT max(accountgrouprelation.id) AS relationID, accountgrouprelation.accountid
FROM accountgrouprelation
LEFT JOIN accountGroup ON accountGroupRelation.groupId = accountGroup.id
WHERE UPPER(COALESCE (accountgroup.name, '%')) LIKE UPPER('%')
GROUP BY 2) accrg ON customer.accountid = accrg.accountid
LEFT JOIN accountgrouprelation ON accrg.relationid = accountgrouprelation.id
LEFT OUTER JOIN accountgroup ON (accountgroup.id = accountgrouprelation.groupid)
LEFT OUTER JOIN uomconversion ON ((product.uomid = uomconversion.touomid) AND (soitem.uomid = uomconversion.fromuomid))
JOIN company ON company.id = 1
WHERE soitem.qtyfulfilled > 0
AND soitem.typeid in (10,12,80)
AND locationgroup.id IN (1,2,3,4)
AND qbclass.id LIKE '%'
AND UPPER(so.salesman) LIKE UPPER('%')
AND UPPER(COALESCE (accountgroup.name, '%')) LIKE UPPER('%')
AND soitem.datelastfulfillment BETWEEN '2015-11-30 23:59:59.0' AND '2015-12-31 23:59:59.0'
GROUP BY maingroup, productnumber, productdescription, uom, company
ORDER BY 1,product.num ASCENDING
Believe it or not, I think the error is coming from your ORDER BY statement:
ORDER BY 1,product.num ASCENDING
I don't believe it is legal to ORDER BY a constant number in MySQL. Telling by the error, it appears that MySQL is trying to find a column called 1 in the ACCRG derived table. No such column exists, hence you are getting this error. Instead, why not just ORDER BY the product number?:
ORDER BY product.num ASCENDING
Is there a way that I can combine these two queries:
FIRST QUERY
select top 100
WORK.pzInsKey,
WORK.pyID,
PARTY.MacID,
PARTY.OtherPartyID,
PARTY.CustomerEmail,
ACCOUNT.AccountNumber,
ACCOUNT.AccountName,
ACCOUNT.AdviserCode,
ACCOUNT.AdviserName,
ACCOUNT.DealerCode,
ACCOUNT.DealerName,
ACCOUNT.PrimaryAccount,
ACCOUNT.ProductCategory,
ACCOUNT.ProductCode,
ACCOUNT.ProductDescription,
ACCOUNT.RegisteredState,
DOCUMENT.UDOCID
from
workTable WORK,
partyTable PARTY,
accountTable ACCOUNT,
documentTable DOCUMENT,
notesTable NOTES
where WORK.pzInsKey = PARTY.pxInsIndexedKey
and WORK.pzInsKey = ACCOUNT.pxInsIndexedKey
and WORK.pyID = DOCUMENT.CaseID
and SECOND QUERY
SELECT top 100
BusinessAreaTbl.businessarea,
ProcessTbl.process,
SubProcessTbl.subprocess
FROM workTable WORK
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT Product_ID businessarea_id, Product businessarea from CaseTypesTable) BusinessAreaTbl
ON WORK.RequestBusinessArea#1 = BusinessAreaTbl.businessarea_id
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT Process_ID, Process, Product_ID businessarea_id from CaseTypesTable) ProcessTbl
ON WORK.RequestProcess#1 = ProcessTbl.process_id
AND ProcessTbl.businessarea_id = WORK.RequestBusinessArea#1
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT SubProcess_ID, SubProcess, Product_ID businessarea_id, Process_ID from CaseTypesTable) SubProcessTbl
ON WORK.RequestSubProcess#1 = SubProcessTbl.subprocess_id
AND SubProcessTbl.businessarea_id = WORK.RequestBusinessArea#1
AND SubProcessTbl.process_id = WORK.RequestProcess#1
It's basically two queries which produce separate results, but each query includes data from the workTable. In the 2nd query, the workTable data is derived from the CaseTypesTable.
I essentially just want the businessarea, process, and subprocess fields to be included with the results of the first query.
Thanks in advance for any help.
This should work:
(SELECT top 100
w.pzInsKey,
w.pyID,
p.MacID,
p.OtherPartyID,
p.CustomerEmail,
a.AccountNumber,
a.AccountName,
a.AdviserCode,
a.AdviserName,
a.DealerCode,
a.DealerName,
a.PrimaryAccount,
a.ProductCategory,
a.ProductCode,
a.ProductDescription,
a.RegisteredState,
d.UDOCID
FROM workTable w
LEFT JOIN partyTable p
ON w.pzInsKey = p.pxInsIndexedKey
LEFT JOIN accountTable a
ON w.pzInsKey = a.pxInsIndexedKey
LEFT JOIN documentTable d
ON w.pyID = d.CaseID)
UNION
(SELECT top 100
ba.businessarea,
pr.process,
spr.subprocess
FROM workTable w
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT Product_ID businessarea_id, Product businessarea from CaseTypesTable) BusinessAreaTbl ba
ON w.RequestBusinessArea#1 = ba.businessarea_id
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT Process_ID, Process, Product_ID businessarea_id from CaseTypesTable) ProcessTbl pr
ON w.RequestProcess#1 = pr.process_id
AND pr.businessarea_id = w.RequestBusinessArea#1
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT SubProcess_ID, SubProcess, Product_ID businessarea_id, Process_ID from CaseTypesTable) SubProcessTbl spr
ON w.RequestSubProcess#1 = spr.subprocess_id
AND spr.businessarea_id = w.RequestBusinessArea#1
AND spr.process_id = w.RequestProcess#1))
Use the keyword UNION to combine two or more seperate SELECT statements.
I have the following SQL query
SELECT
DISTINCT
count("SiteTree_Live"."ID")
FROM
"SiteTree_Live"
LEFT JOIN "Page_Live" ON "Page_Live"."ID" = "SiteTree_Live"."ID"
LEFT JOIN "TourPage_Live" ON "TourPage_Live"."ID" = "SiteTree_Live"."ID"
LEFT JOIN "DepartureDate" ON "DepartureDate"."TourID" = "SiteTree_Live"."ID"
WHERE
("SiteTree_Live"."Locale" = 'en_AU')
AND ("SiteTree_Live"."ClassName" IN ('TourPage'))
AND ("DepartureDate"."DepartureDate" LIKE '2012-11%')
but it producing a wrong count as the query result. The total intented result this query is suppose to return should not be more than 245 but currently, its returning more than about "4569" results.
Thats is because of the JOIN on the "DepartureDate" table as the query returns the expected result when i remove the join from the "DepartureDate" table.
What modification do i need to make to my query to count the Macthes between "SiteTree_Live"."ID" and "DepartureDate"."TourID" whiles counting only the "SiteTree_Live"."ID" count excluding the Departure dates?
Any suggestions welcomed :)
THE ANSWER
SELECT
COUNT(DISTINCT SiteTree_Live.ID)
FROM
"SiteTree_Live" LEFT JOIN "Page_Live" ON "Page_Live"."ID" = "SiteTree_Live"."ID"
LEFT JOIN "TourPage_Live" ON "TourPage_Live"."ID" = "SiteTree_Live"."ID"
LEFT JOIN "DepartureDate" ON "DepartureDate"."TourID" = "SiteTree_Live"."ID"
WHERE
("SiteTree_Live"."Locale" = 'en_AU')
AND ("SiteTree_Live"."ClassName" IN ('TourPage'))
AND ("DepartureDate"."DepartureDate" LIKE '2013-03%')
Seems to give me the right result. Thanks for the tip #Michael Berkowski
Minor correction: if DepartureDate is a date-type, then the LIKE '2013-03% will force it to be coerced into a character type (this is a mysql feature) As a result, any indexes on DepartureDate will not be used, IIRC. Better use a plain range-query:
SELECT
COUNT(DISTINCT stl.ID)
FROM
SiteTree_Live stl
LEFT JOIN
DepartureDate dd ON dd.TourID = stl.ID
WHERE
stl.Locale = 'en_AU'
AND stl.ClassName = 'TourPage'
AND dd.DepartureDate >= '2013-03-01'
AND dd.DepartureDate < '2013-04-01'
;
Do this (You have a bunch of unneeded joins)
SELECT
COUNT(DISTINCT SiteTree_Live.ID)
FROM
`SiteTree_Live`
LEFT JOIN
`DepartureDate` ON `DepartureDate`.`TourID` = `SiteTree_Live`.`ID`
WHERE
`SiteTree_Live`.`Locale` = 'en_AU'
AND `SiteTree_Live`.`ClassName` = 'TourPage'
AND `DepartureDate`.`DepartureDate` LIKE '2013-03%'
You could also do a GROUP BY:
SELECT
COUNT(SiteTree_Live.ID)
FROM
`SiteTree_Live`
LEFT JOIN
`DepartureDate` ON `DepartureDate`.`TourID` = `SiteTree_Live`.`ID`
WHERE
`SiteTree_Live`.`Locale` = 'en_AU'
AND `SiteTree_Live`.`ClassName` = 'TourPage'
AND `DepartureDate`.`DepartureDate` LIKE '2013-03%'
GROUP BY
SiteTree_Live.ID
I have a problem with joining some tables, heres my structure:
tbl_imdb:
fldID fldTitle fldImdbID
1 Moviename 0000001
tbl_genres:
fldID fldGenre
1 Action
2 Drama
tbl_genres_rel:
fldID fldMovieID fldGenreID
1 1 1
2 1 2
What I’m trying to do is a query that will find all movies that is both an action movie and drama, is this possible to do without a subquery, if so, how?
What I'm trying right now is:
SELECT tbl_imdb.*
FROM tbl_imdb
LEFT JOIN tbl_imdb_genres_rel ON ( tbl_imdb.fldID = tbl_imdb_genres_rel.fldMovieID )
LEFT JOIN tbl_imdb_genres ON ( tbl_imdb_genres_rel.fldGenreID = tbl_imdb_genres.fldID )
WHERE tbl_imdb_genres.fldGenre = 'Drama'
AND tbl_imdb_genres.fldGenre = 'Action';
But this dosnt work, however it does work if I only keep one of the two WHERE's, but thats not what I want.
Two ways to do it:
1
SELECT tbl_imdb.*
FROM tbl_imdb
INNER JOIN tbl_genres_rel rel_action
ON tbl_imdb.fldID = rel_action.fldMovieID
INNER JOIN tbl_genres genre_action
ON rel_action.fldGenreId = genre_action.fldID
AND 'Action' = genre_action.fldGenre
INNER JOIN tbl_genres_rel rel_drama
ON tbl_imdb.fldID = rel_drama.fldMovieID
INNER JOIN tbl_genres genre_drama
ON rel_drama.fldGenreId = genre_drama.fldID
AND 'Drama' = genre_drama.fldGenre
This method is on the same path as your original solution. 2 differences:
The join should be inner, not left because you're trying to get movies that certainly have the corresponding genre entry
Since you want to find 2 different generes, you'll have to do the join with tbl_genres_rel and tbl_genres twice, once for each particular genre you're interested in.
2
SELECT tbl_imdb.*
FROM tbl_imdb
INNER JOIN tbl_genres_rel
ON tbl_imdb.fldID = tbl_genres_rel.fldMovieID
INNER JOIN tbl_genres
ON tbl_genres_rel.fldGenreId = tbl_genres.fldID
AND tbl_genres.fldGenre IN ('Action', 'Drama')
GROUP BY tbl_imdb.fldID
HAVING COUNT(*) = 2
Again, the basic join plan is the same. Difference here is that we join to the tbl_genres_rel and tbl_genres path just once. This on itself fetches all genres for one film, and then filters for the one's you're interested in. The ones that qualify will now have 2 rows for each distinct value of tbl_imdb.fldId. The GROUP BY aggregates on that, flattening that into one row. By asserting in the HAVING clause that we have exactly 2 rows, we ensure that we keep only those rows that have both the genres.
(Note that this assumes that there is a unique constraint on tbl_genres_rel over {fldMovieID, fldGenreID}. If such a constraint is not present, you should consider adding it.)
LEFT JOIN is not applicable in your case because records should exist on both tables. And you need to count the instances of the movie
SELECT *
FROM tbl_imdb a
INNER JOIN tbl_genres_rel b
on a.fldID = fldMovieID
INNER JOIN tbl_genres c
on c.fldGenreID = b.fldID
WHERE c.fldGenre IN ('Drama', 'Action')
GROUP BY a.Moviename
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1