Need to place images kinda like here (for example): http://imgur.com/QpRjvpW
Original pictures of different sizes.
Hover effect - blur and fogging effects and text on the middle of the picture.
Here is what I got for now: JSFiddle
So the question, how correctly position them, so that they occupy the entire width of the screen by 3 in a row, gonna be same size, closely adhering to the upper and lower div and to each other, don't expand within its borders? And the effect of the blur doesn't touch neighboring elements?
Remove class row and col-lg-12,use col-sm-12 like
<div class="col-sm-12">
<div id="work1" class="col-sm-4">
<img class="image" src="http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/03257/POTD-SKY-SQUIRREL_3257854k.jpg">
<p class="text">ONE</p>
</div>
<div id="work2" class="col-sm-4">
<img class="image" src="http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/03235/potd-husky_3235255k.jpg">
<p class="text">TWO</p>
</div>
<div id="work3" class="col-sm-4">
<img class="image" src="http://s.hswstatic.com/gif/dolphin-pictures-1.jpg">
<p class="text">THREE</p>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
works img {
height: 600px;
width: 100%;}
Apply this css, you'll get the look like the example --
.works img{
display:block;
max-width:100%;
}
.works [class^="col-"] {
padding-left:0;
padding-right:0;
}
.works .text{
position:absolute !important;
left: 0;
right: 0;
}
I'm working on a website project where in the header section I have a grid of 6 images (2 rows with 3 images in each). It's not a problem to make them responsive (kinda "liquid") with max-width:100% and height:auto, however this website should be linked with some admin tool in the future, so the end user(s) could upload their own images.
Hence, I need to understand how keep these two rows of images responsive but at the same time give them a fixed height (in this case they should be 220px). When I crop the images and make them all equal in height (using Photoshop), everything works fine, but as soon as I use images with different height values, the grid starts to break. Is there any known workaround for this?
Thanks in advance!
Use percents and #media
Example :
#media only screen and (min-width : 320px) {
img {
width:40%;
height:60%; /*Images should be bigger in small devices*/
}
}
#media only screen and (min-width : 480px) {
img {
width:30%;
height:55%;
}
}
Please Note : The percent is calculated from parent. For example if you put an image in a div with width : 400px and height : 300px, it will show the image with 160px width and 180px height on device with min-height of 320px.
max-height is another choice.
Well, let's see if I understood good enough your question (my bad english, not yours).
If yoy want 2 rows, 220px height each with 3 images each filling the width of the row while keeping the same height as the parent, the problem you may have is that the images will distort to adapt to their responsive parent container.
This may not work for you as even if your images are simillar in aspect ratio (height x width) once the window width is small (responsive) they will get distorted too much.
Here is an example: I've use different sizes images some horizontal and some vertical so it can be easier to understand.
Basic html:
<div class="header">
<div class="row">
<div class="img">
<img src="" />
</div>
<div class="img">
<img src="" />
</div>
<div class="img">
<img src="" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="img">
<img src="" />
</div>
<div class="img">
<img src="" />
</div>
<div class="img">
<img src="" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
Please notice that the row is 240px insteed of 220 just so you can see easily the row (with red background) and I add for the same reason a white border to the image containers.
FIDDLE
The option I would try though is to make the images fit into the container without distortion, they will fit in height OR in width, but of course, they will leave space at the sides if it fit height or on top and bottom if fit in width but at least the images will be always centered in the container:
the green color is the background of the images container:
FIDDLE
There may be better options but without the help of jquery I can't help you more
If your goal is to keep the images (or their container's) height fixed, that will mean that the images will not be stretching or contracting in a fluid way. Given that this concept is contradictory in practice, I will instead show you a 'responsive' solution that comes from making container elements themselves responsive rather than instead of the images.
The case you're referring to (2 rows 3 images) sounds like a great place to implement a cascading images look-and-feel. When the page width shrinks the images will float under each other whereas viceversa when the website width is stretched; this in essence achieves a fluid and responsive functionality without affecting the image heights themselves. The below code should apply the 'building blocks' you'll be needing for in order to achieve this effect... granted there is a lot of custom work you can do here (like using background: cover, instead of img tags as suggested in the comments). Take a look and let me know if this helps you get closer to what you're trying to achieve.
HTML
<div class="wrapper bg-purple center-div">
<div class="img-container left">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200"/>
</div>
<div class="img-container left">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200"/>
</div>
<div class="img-container left">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200"/>
</div>
</div>
<div class="clear-both"></div>
<div class="wrapper bg-cyan center-div">
<div class="img-container left">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200"/>
</div>
<div class="img-container left">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200"/>
</div>
<div class="img-container left">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200"/>
</div>
</div>
CSS
.wrapper {
display: table;
}
.img-container {
height: 50px;
padding: 2px;
}
.center-div {
margin: 0 auto;
}
.left {
float: left;
}
.clear-both {
clear: both;
}
.bg-purple {
background-color: purple;
}
.bg-cyan {
background-color: cyan;
}
#media only screen and (max-width: 450px) {
.left {
clear: both;
}
}
I've the following markup for a page which is mobile ready:
<section>
<div class="cover-section">
<img src="img/central-park.jpg" alt="" style="width:100%" class="hoverZoomLink">
</div>
<div class="logo-section">
<div class="container postLeft hiddenClass visibleClass animated fadeInLeft">
<img src="img/logos/instagram.png" alt="">
</div>
</div>
</section>
The problem is, since I provided width:100% for the imgin the mobile view, the whole image is appeared to be proportionate and as a result, very small. (Since this image is very wide).
Is there any way that I can display the image with a min-height:300px without adding the image as a background and make it as cover ? Because the image is being generated dynamically in which case allocating it to a particular css class wouldn't be easy.
There's no other better way around this:
img{/*but target to specific selector that you need*/
min-height: 300px;
max-width: 100%;
}
This produce the responsive result but when minimum height fits the requirement then this starts stretching.
One better solution is to use image as background and using css like this produce better experience with responsive image:
.cover-section{/*remove img inside this selector to use it as background*/
background: url(image-path.jpg) no-repeat center;
background-size: cover;/*don't forget to use vendor prefixes*/
min-height: 300px;
max-width: 100%;
}
You could always use media queries to handle CSS for mobile devices. Something like follows : (I've moved your img styling to a class 'cover')
.cover {
width:100%;
}
#media screen and (max-width: 500px) {
.cover {
min-height: 300px;
}
}
</style>
<section>
<div class="cover-section">
<img src="img/central-park.jpg" alt="" class="cover hoverZoomLink">
</div>
<div class="logo-section">
<div class="container postLeft hiddenClass visibleClass animated fadeInLeft">
<img src="img/logos/instagram.png" alt="">
</div>
</div>
</section>
Not sure if this is what you want.
I have an image which its size is 1050x700. I would place it in full screen when it is in desktop. the idea would be to place it when is in desktop version under the black bar in this way the image remain almost the same.
here it is the jsfiddle example http://jsfiddle.net/qLdp4czn/1/
in the mobile there is no problem because it fit the device display so it should back normal without placing it under the bar
here is the code:
<div class="container-fluid top-bar">
<div class="row-top">
<div id="central-block" class="text-center">
<p>Title</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="img-background">
<img src="http://ppcdn.500px.org/75961441/84f7332982b9c76296fef33b528c7d6ddd22e5a0/5.jpg" alt="animal" class="img-responsive">
</div>
Put the image as a background-image instead and remove the img element:
.img-background {
background-image:url(http://ppcdn.500px.org/75961441/84f7332982b9c76296fef33b528c7d6ddd22e5a0/5.jpg);
background-repeat:no-repeat;
background-size:100% auto;
position:relative;
width:100%;
height:100%;
}
You might have to set the width and height of the element depending on your other CSS.
I do a catalog using Bootstrap 3. When displayed on tablets, the product images look ugly because of their small size (500x500) and a width of 767 pixels in the browser. I want to put the image in the center of the screen, but for some reason I can not. Who be will help solve the problem?
There is .center-block class in Twitter Bootstrap 3 (Since v3.0.1), so use:
<img src="..." alt="..." class="img-responsive center-block" />
If you're using Bootstrap v3.0.1 or greater, you should use this solution instead. It doesn't override Bootstrap's styles with custom CSS, but instead uses a Bootstrap feature.
My original answer is shown below for posterity
This is a pleasantly easy fix. Because .img-responsive from Bootstrap already sets display: block, you can use margin: 0 auto to center the image:
.product .img-responsive {
margin: 0 auto;
}
Add only the class center-block to an image, this works with Bootstrap 4 as well:
<img src="..." alt="..." class="center-block" />
Note: center-block works even when img-responsive is used
Just use .text-center class if you're using Bootstrap 3.
<div class="text-center">
<img src="..." alt="..."/>
</div>
Note: This doesn't work with img-responsive
This should center the image and make it responsive.
<img src="..." class="img-responsive" style="margin:0 auto;"/>
I would suggest a more "abstract" classification. Add a new class "img-center" which can be used in combination with .img-responsive class:
// Center responsive images
.img-responsive.img-center {
margin: 0 auto;
}
Simply put all the images thumbnails inside a row/col divs like this:
<div class="row text-center">
<div class="col-12">
# your images here...
</div>
</div>
and everything will work fine!
You can use property of d-block here or you can use a parent div with property 'text-center' in bootstrap or 'text-align: center' in css.
Image by default is displayed as inline-block, you need to display it as block in order to center it with .mx-auto. This can be done with built-in .d-block:
<div>
<img class="mx-auto d-block" src="...">
</div>
Or leave it as inline-block and wrapped it in a div with .text-center:
<div class="text-center">
<img src="...">
</div>
You can still work with img-responsive without impacting other images with this style class.
You can precede this tag with the section id/ div id/class to define a order within which this img is nested. This custom img-responsive will work only in that area.
Suppose you have a HTML area defined as:
<section id="work">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<img class="img-responsive" src="some_image.jpg">
</div>
</div>
</section>
Then, your CSS can be:
section#work .img-responsive{
margin: 0 auto;
}
Note: This answer is in relation to the potential impact of altering img-responsive as a whole. Of course, center-block is the simplest solution.
Try this code it will work for small icons too with bootstrap 4 because there is no center-block class is bootstrap 4 so try this method it will be helpful. You can change the position of the image by setting the .col-md-12 to .col-md-8 or .col-md-4, it's upto you.
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12">
<div class="text-xs-center text-lg-center">
<img src="" class="img-thumbnail">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Try this:
.img-responsive{
display: block;
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
margin:0 auto;
}
.Image{
background:#ccc;
padding:30px;
}
<div class="Image">
<img src="http://minisoft.com.bd/uploads/ourteam/rafiq.jpg" class="img-responsive" title="Rafique" alt="Rafique">
</div>
#media (max-width: 767px) {
img {
display: table;
margin: 0 auto;
}
}
To add to the answers already given, having the img-responsive in combination with img-thumbnail will set display: block to display: inline block.
<div class="col-md-12 text-center">
<img class="img-responsive tocenter" />
</div>
.
<style>
.tocenter {
margin:0 auto;
display: inline;
}
</style>
<div class="text-align" style="text-align: center; ">
<img class="img-responsive" style="margin: auto;" alt="" src="images/x.png ?>">
</div>
you can try this.
You can fix it with defining margin:0 auto
or you can use col-md-offset also
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.6/css/bootstrap.min.css">
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.6/js/bootstrap.min.js"></script>
</head>
<style>
.img-responsive{
margin:0 auto;
}
</style>
<body>
<div class="container">
<h2>Image</h2>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12">
<p>The .img-responsive class makes the image scale nicely to the parent element (resize the browser window to see the effect):</p>
<img src="http://www.w3schools.com/bootstrap/cinqueterre.jpg" class="img-responsive" alt="Cinque Terre" width="304" height="236">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The more exact way applied to all Booostrap objects using standard classes only would be to not set top and bottom margins (as image can inherit these from parent), so I am always using:
.text-center .img-responsive {
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
I have also made a Gist for that, so if any changes will apply because of any bugs, update version will be always here:
https://gist.github.com/jdrda/09a38bf152dd6a8aff4151c58679cc66
So far the best solution to accept seems to be <img class="center-block" ... />. But no one has mentioned how center-block works.
Take Bootstrap v3.3.6 for example:
.center-block {
display: block;
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
}
The default value of dispaly for <img> is inline. Value block will display an element as a block element (like <p>). It starts on a new line, and takes up the whole width. In this way, the two margin settings let the image stay in the middle horizontally.
2021.09 from a project:
<div class="d-flex" style="height: 60px; width: 60px;">
<img alt="ddd" src="myurl" class="m-auto"/>
</div>