What is the difference between action and target of post? - html

I looked for attribute of form on W3S - HTML Forms page and I saw that, there are two similar attributes, at least I suppose that. I don't understand differences between them. So I want to ask, What is the difference between action and target of post?

action is where the data is sent, target is which window (or tab, frame, iframe) to use for the request. If action is omitted, it assumed to be the current page (the same URL). If target is omitted, it is assumed to be the same window (or tab).
Using target="_blank" always opens in a new window (or tab, frame, iframe). You can use a name for the window so that all links/forms with target="karl" would always open in the same window or tab.
This is the actual (current) HTML5 standard information on the form element: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-html5-20141028/forms.html#the-form-element

Related

Why would links in an object or iframe (I've tried both) start opening in a new window

I'm working on an application that has many links. They all open in the same window, until today. All of a sudden, in all browsers I'm testing in, 3 links in an iframe or object (I've tried both) start opening in a new window. I can't seem to stop this.
An object example follows. The dolnks program generates 3 simple links like the one following the object example and these links open in a new window.
<OBJECT ID='fixed' DATA='dolnks.cgi?str=$params' TARGET='dynamic' NORESIZE></OBJECT>
darea.cgi?str=$dogstr
Can someone help me understand this and how to get these links to open in the same window.
All links that now open in the same window or should be opening in the same window are from
the same domain.
I now have to close the link instead of using the back button.
Thanks,
craigt
I imagine it's because of your TARGET attribute, although it's not using one of the special target values:
target
Where to display the linked URL, as the name for a browsing context (a tab, window, or ). The following keywords have special meanings for where to load the URL:
_self: the current browsing context. (Default)
_blank: usually a new tab, but users can configure browsers to open a new window instead.
_parent: the parent browsing context of the current one. If no parent, behaves as _self.
_top: the topmost browsing context (the "highest" context that’s an ancestor of the current one). If no ancestors, behaves as _self.
From the MDN Docs: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/a#attributes
Note though that the docs for object do not list a target attribute, so that behavior is apparently undefined, and probably varies depending on the browser, and the plugin displaying the object.
Check to see if it's the items with a target attribute (case does not matter) that are working "wrong", and see if removing that attribute fixes it. If that's not it, next check to see if there are javascript being loaded. Try turning javascript off (hopefully the relevant links are not generated with javascript) and see if that fixes the behavior. If turning javascript off is too heavy handed, you can use the javascript console to see what listeners are attached to the links.

Is it more accessible to use a <button> or <a> to open/close a modal? [duplicate]

This question already has an answer here:
Why are buttons discouraged from navigation?
(1 answer)
Closed last year.
The community reviewed whether to reopen this question last year and left it closed:
Original close reason(s) were not resolved
From my understanding, buttons are used to carry out functions and links are used to navigate the user to a different page. But what is best practice in terms of opening and closing a modal?
<a id="testModal" href="#">Open Modal</a>
or
<button id="testModal">Open Modal</button>
<button>
Change the <a href="#"> to a <button> and put your event handler on it.
Some more context on which elements belongs where....
Does the Control Take Me to Another Page? Use an Anchor
If, when clicked, tapped, or activated by keyboard or voice (or insert novel interaction method here), the user is whisked to another URL (including an anchor on the same page), then use <a href="[URL]">. Make sure you use the href attribute and that it has a real URL, not a “#” (otherwise you’re probably relying on JavaScript, which is not at all necessary for a hyperlink). If an href points to just a “#”, then you’re probably doing it wrong. If it points to a named anchor as part of your progressive enhancement efforts, then that’s totally valid.
Does the Control Change Something on the Current Page? Use a Button
If, when activated, the user is not moved from the page (or to an anchor within the page), but instead is presented with a new view (message boxes, changes in layout, etc.), then use a <button>. While you could use an<input type="button">, it’s more likely you’ll get into conflicts with pre-existing styles and subsequent developers (like me).
Does the Control Submit Form Fields? Use a Submit
If, when activated, information the user has entered (either by manually typing or by choosing items on the screen) is being sent back to the server, then use an <input type="submit">. This has better live within a <form>. If you need more styling control or have to embed more than just a simple text string, use a <button type="submit"> instead.
Keyboard Considerations
Think of keyboard users for a moment. A hyperlink can be fired by pressing the enter key. But a true button can be fired by pressing the enter key or the space bar. When a hyperlink has focus and the user presses the space bar, the page will scroll one screenful. If there isn’t more to scroll then the user just experiences nothing. Given a set of interface elements that look the same, if some work with a space bar and some don’t, you can’t expect users to have much confidence in how the page behaves.
I think it’s also worth mentioning that events triggered by a space bar only fire when the key is released, whereas using the Enter key will fire the event as soon as you press the key down (prior to releasing it).
I think there are two possible cases.
Your content is only visually hidden in page or visible in page (can be read by screen readers) and can be hash linked, then an anchor tag might be appropriate (this case is not so common, eg: use case is if you are highlighting a paragraph or image on the page as a modal).
In almost all other cases, your modal is loaded on the same page and is in no way navigated using a url link (except through ajax for accessing data possibly, which doesn't count). Hence it is a custom functionality and a button is the appropriate choice.
Sort of by definition, a dialog is something that will pop up over the current window. You're not really leaving the window, it's just temporarily unavailable. Once you're done with the dialog, you typically go back to the window. So in that respect, you don't want to use a link because you're not going to another page. You're doing some action on the current page. Use a button.
When using a screen reader, I will often bring up the list of links (Ins+F7 in JAWS) to see what pages I can link to. I'll also bring up a list of buttons (Ctrl+Ins+B) to see what actions are available on the page. I would expect the action to bring up a modal dialog to be in my button list.

HTML links with target

I asked this previously in another place and got no useful replies.
One of the possible uses of the "target" attribute on an HTML link is to specify a named window, like:
Click here
Presumably the reason for naming a target, as opposed to just using "_blank", is that you want to be able to reference that SAME window for other links. For example, say you have a main page that you want to always remain in view, which has links to several help pages, and you want all of those help pages to open in a specific secondary window. So clicking the first help link opens the secondary window, clicking a second help link replaces the contents of the secondary window with a different help page, clicking the third help link replaces the contents of that secondary window again, etc.
But the existing browsers (Firefox, Chrome, etc.) do not do this. If you use a target attribute on your links with a specific (identical) window name, clicking those links opens a new, separate window with each click, even though the target name is the same. In other words, it behaves exactly as if you used target="_blank".
Why is this? What is the point of having the ability to name target windows if naming a window acts exactly the same as using target="_blank" ?
And is there any way to make a link actually use an existing window that has been opened with the same name instead of opening yet another window?
Have you tried it using Javascript?
//You keep a reference to the window
var mySpecialWindow = undefined;
function openInSameWindow(url)
{
//First time opening
if ( typeof( mySpecialWindow ) === "undefined" )
{
mySpecialWindow = window.open(
url,
"mySpecialWindow",
"width=300, height=250"
);
}
//Use existing popup window/tab
else mySpecialWindow.location.href = url;
return false;
}
//html
first link
second link
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/a
This attribute specifies where to display the linked resource. In HTML4, this is the name of, or a keyword for, a frame. In HTML5, it is a name of, or keyword for, a browsing context (for example, tab, window, or inline frame). The following keywords have special meanings:
_self: Load the response into the same HTML4 frame (or HTML5 browsing context) as the current one. This value is the default if the attribute is not specified.
_blank: Load the response into a new unnamed HTML4 window or HTML5 browsing context.
_parent: Load the response into the HTML4 frameset parent of the current frame or HTML5 parent browsing context of the current one. If there is no parent, this option behaves the same way as _self.
_top: In HTML4: Load the response into the full, original window, canceling all other frames. In HTML5: Load the response into the top-level browsing context (that is, the browsing context that is an ancestor of the current one, and has no parent). If there is no parent, this option behaves the same way as _self.
Attribute "target" allows to load documents into particular frame/iframe on the page. It is far from windows in these "tab days" but rather about views - containers of [sub]documents.

Html: open the page in a new window. target="_blanck" - is that a typo?

I have found (with a letter c)
target="_blanck"
instead of expected
target="_blank"
in a project written by someone else.
It works and opens a link in a new window.
Is that a typo or am I missing something?
The target attribute refers to where the contents of the link will be loaded in your browser. The browser will put the contents of the page inside the window/frame with that name, as long as it's not one of the special values _blank, _self, _top or _parent. See the Frame target references section in the w3 spec.
Except for the reserved names listed below, frame target names
(%FrameTarget; in the DTD) must begin with an alphabetic character
(a-zA-Z). User agents should ignore all other target names.
The following target names are reserved and have special meanings.
_blank The user agent should load the designated document in a new, unnamed window.
_self The user agent should load the document in the same frame as the element that refers to this target.
_parent The user agent should load the document into the immediate FRAMESET parent of the current frame. This value is equivalent to _self if the current frame has no parent.
_top The user agent should load the document into the full, original window (thus canceling all other frames). This value is equivalent to _self if the current frame has no parent.
So, if the link is supposed to always open a new window, it should be _blank. If there are several links with the same target=_blanck, it might be like this on purpose if they're supposed to always replace the contents of the same window.
See this fiddle:
This opens SO always in a new window
This opens google in a given window
This opens SO in the same given window
Yes its a typo
target="_blank"
Will open in a new window
target="_blanck"
Will open in a tab named blanck, if there is not a tab named blanck it will open a new one.
My guess is if you click that link it will open in a new window, click it again and it will reload the same tab it opened previously
The correct way is:
Home
The main method to give hyperlink in HTML is,
CLick Here ...
where is HTML tag and href and target is attribute. If you write target="_blanck" its means that you have an HTML page named _blanck and its gives you error.

Can a browser window/tab target be (re)named?

I'd like a hyperlink on a page to open its site's landing page, in a new tab if it's not already open, or, if it is already open to have the browser switch to that tab.
My idea for this was to use the target attribute but the problem is that the tab for the landing page doesn't have a name that I can refer to.
So my question is, can a tab be named by the page loaded in it so that it can be referred to by the target attribute?
In general, no.
However, if you open a child "window" with JavaScript, you can retain a handle to that window and modify things that way.
In general, browsers control the behavior of how a link opens. Some default to open in the same viewport, others default to a new tab, and still others default to a new window entirely.
The best thing to do, however, is to not try to control this and instead allow the browser (and more importantly, the user) to decide how the clicked link should be opened. This allows your power users to control how they use your site, and at the same time keeps the behavior of the browser consistent for your users, which is a critical component in keeping your users happy.