Is it possible to increase velocity dynamically for Actor in LibGDX? e.g. move actor from point A to point B with pre-defined time but dynamically and linearly increasing it's velocity?
I couldn't find any good LibGDX interpolation for that purpose
The Universal Tween Engine may be what you want, if it's just for a visual effect.
If it's for a game object though, like a rocket or something, then either increase the velocity a little bit each frame, or (better) use Box2D which is built into libgdx.
Related
I'm trying to make a 2D game in Java, and I'm using Libgdx. But, I don't know how to change the animation and velocity in water, for instance, changing the movement from walking to swimming.
Can anyone help me with the code and methods please?
Assuming that you use rectangular areas for your water and your sprites, you might want to look at checking if a rectangle (your water) contains another rectangle (your sprite). If you use non-rectangle shapes, you should find the appropriate methods to check if the hitbox of your sprite is inside your water.
If your water contains your sprite, you can handle (update, render, etc.) it differently.
This visualization is created using Away3D (Flash):
www.guardian.co.uk/world/interactive/2011/mar/22/middle-east-protest-interactive-timeline
Would it be possible to create something of the same quality (re. interaction, animation, performance, pixel-perfection etc.) using WebGL?
Bonus: How would one set up the basic scene? (without interaction and animation)
Yes, it would be. The scene is not complex at all, so it would have good performance. Interaction, yes, depends how you implement it, but if you are doing project with, for example, Three.js it wouldn't be a problem. Pixel perfection, obviously, yes.
In the scene, you could have curved plane, with texture that is changing UVs of vertices when you use 'navigate'. Pins could be done with particle, or better, simple quads with transparent textures. To have pixel-precise pin picking, you could depth-test pins on ray trace, or use pin-shaped geometry with shader, which probably the best solution.
So, basic scene - curved plane with per-vertex-changing-UV, pin-shaped and texture pins.
Alternatively, you could do exactly the same thing with 2D canvas. All elements are just drawn and scaled, text would be much simpler, and picking would be with 2d calculations.
Hope this helps.
I am creating a bejeweled style game using flash builder for the web and I am wondering if it would be best (higher framerates, less render intensive, fast on all types of computers) to use the native rendering of actionscript 3 (display lists) or the gpu rendering of the Starling 2D Framework? My reasoning for wanting to use the native flash rendering is because from my research I understand that flash will utilize redraw regions and only redraw portions of the stage that need to be updated whereas starling will re-render the entire stage every frame. In a bejeweled style game there are many static objects and fewer dynamic objects so generally the entire stage does not need to be redrawn every frame, only small portions of the stage. Would it be better for performance to stick with the native rendering calls of actionscript 3 or would it be wiser to use the starling framework to utilize the gpu to accelerate the rendering? Any perspective would be much appreciated. Thanks.
Starling will be faster if you are using images, particularly on mobile.
The static regions can either be rendered as a single Sprite, or you can flatten it at runtime to improve the performance.
If you are drawing, in Starling you'll need to draw to a bitmap and then use that as a Sprite. You'll get better performance if everything is in the same sprite sheet, however.
While it's true that Starling draws every frame, it's a different sort of operation. Here's what actually happens:
1) The textures (images) being used by the app are uploaded to the GPU. This is done once.
2) Each frame, Starling tells the GPU "render this texture at this position with this scale and rotation". This is called a "draw call" but it's extremely fast. The slick thing with Starling is that it can batch these draw calls under certain circumstances to get serious speed improvements.
So yes, everything is "redrawn" each frame, but the GPU's hardware acceleration is used.
On mobile, Starling (or similar) is really the only way to do something at 60fps.
I have a spinning sphere, built using the away3D engine, it is wrapped in a bitmap. I need to be able to check the color value of the pixels in the sphere, however BitmapData only plots the 2D image, not the 3D sphere. So, the values become wrong. If I try to apply it to the sphere I get nasty errors. I have literally been stuck on this for days. How can I do this?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Try View3D.renderer.queueSnapshot()
But if you pull whole scene snapshot from GPU each frame it will kill performance. So if you need only one pixel you better query it perpixel. And if you need this to do some 2D graphics or user interface you better use Starling because it is GPU side framework so you wont need to pull data back to CPU. Here is integration tutorial.
I'm trying to create a multi-level dungeon adventure in Flash CS4. The layout is an instance created of a symbol called Level, within the symbol are multiple wall subsymbols (wall), instances of Wall. There is a collision routine to stop the player walking through the walls, called from Wall.As.
Level is drawn about the centre point (0,0).
When I create an instance on the stage of Level (level), the collision tester is using the xy coordinates for the walls drawn about 0,0, not the "real" xy where it's appearing on the stage.
So what I need to know, is how to "update" the xy for each wall subsymbol with the live stage information, overriding the XYs drawn in the parent. It has to be updated unfortunately (I can't keep it static), as the levels are big so have to scroll.
Thanks for your advice.
With all due respect forget your approach, you're reinventing the wheel for nothing and probably to end up getting worse performance. What you need is pixel-perfect collision detection and probably including basic physics so already we're talking a huge amount of work. If you want to build levels in a design way for a game, use this, it'll blow your mind how awesome/easy/cool this is:
http://www.gotoandlearn.com/play.php?id=135
Its always a guess when trying to answer questions like this, as there are a lot of unknowns. That being said, in programming, there are always more than a few ways to solve a problem. Examine your collision detection routine - if you worked with hitTestPoint, and the point that was being tested (mouseX,Y or your main actor) with localToGlobal, you likely wouldn't need to test for the x,y variables of your collision objects. Read up on those two subjects and this question might be rendered moot.
At any rate, you could update relative coordinates in your Wall.as instance by leveraging globlaToLocal:
public function get curLoc():Point
{
return globalToLocal(new Point(this.x, this.y));
}
and retrieve them from your parent class as a point you can then test against:
trace(_wall.curLoc);
Hope that helps
I suppose you could accomplish what you're trying to do by manipulating the transform property of the wall symbols, but honestly I would concur with Ascension Systems and just abandon your collision testing routine for something different.
You may not need to go all out with a physics engine for your game, in which case just use hitTestObject to do the collision detection.