when clip property of the css then the image is clipped but the problem is, the clipped part of image reserve the space.Is there any way to remove that space after image is clipped.
HTML Code
// image with id: clip2
<img id="clip2" src="image/background_right.png" style="height:100%; width:100%; max-width:350px; float:left;"/>
CSS Code
// code for clipping image
#clip2
{
position: absolute;
clip: rect(0px, 150px,600px,0px);
}
The clip property has been deprecated, so it may never work reliably.
If you could, please add a bit more detail about your intended goals, and maybe a screenshot or a sample of your code so we can show you some alternatives which work with modern standards.
clip (and the more recent clip-path) merely defines a path for clipping, it doesn't change the width/height of the element being clipped.
You can achieve what you want by using a div element with the size you want and set the image as a background image.
#clip2
{
position: absolute;
background-image: url("image/background_right.png");
width: 150px;
height: 600px;
}
<div id="clip2"/>
Related
I'm using a YouTube picture below one for example :
and Bootstrap to display it:
<img src="{{img}}" alt="{{title}}" class="img-circle" width="60px" height="60px">
But the picture is crushed:
Am I missing a bootstrap property ? or a common hack ? Thanks !
Edit :
I finally found a trick to do the job :
<div class="crop">
<img src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/EONhJ9qvCPY/default.jpg" alt="#" >
</div>
And
.crop{
width: 60px;
height: 60px;
overflow:hidden;
position:relative;
border-radius: 50%;
}
.crop img {
position: absolute;
left: -27px;
top: -18px;
}
What do you mean by picture is crushed? You're against the picture being in a circle, or the way it displays in the circle?
I think first of all it's crucial to understand, bootstrap as in whole is a framework containing rules for html, css & javascript. So to answer your question, there is no property/hack orso you're missing.
The reason why it displays like it displays, is because the image does not properly fit into the 60x60 image (or rather the crop of it in the circle) therefore, it crops out the parts that do not fit.
What I'm saying is, although it may not visually look like it, it still takes the 60x60 block and just puts a circle inside it and renders the outskirts transparent. There is virtually no way to avoid this, other than resizing the original picture.
So either
a) Edit the original picture in mspaint/photoshop/gimp whatever so it will fit better inside the circle crop
b) Go inside the bootstrap CSS properties and change the width and height properties of the img. Alternatively set a max-width and max-height for the images so it will not be stuck inside the 60x60 definition.
img {
width: value;
height: value;
}
The reason why you'd want to do it like that, is because in case you will want to use such an image in future, you will not have to specify the width and height properties through HTML code (which is causing you unnecessary displaying issues and code-readability problems to begin with), but it will automatically apply it to every element using the CSS rules.
I'm building this little widget: http://codepen.io/JonnyNineToes/pen/zGYxwV
It's basically an image that you can click, and have extra info about the image "slide out" from behind it.
The problem I'm having is with the clickable/hoverable/interactive area of the widget. Even though I've used border-radius, I'm still getting a square-shaped clickable area around the widget. (Hover your mouse where the corners of the box should be.)
I've determined the source of the problem to be the with the image element itself. If I remove the image element, I no longer have this problem.
I already found this...
Why is the margin space of my image link clickable?
I removed the "display: block;" rule from the class of the image, and I still have the problem with this "ghost area".
I'm not sure what's going on with this element. These are the only styles applied to it (".profile" is the class of the image):
.profile, .description {
position: absolute;
border-radius: 150px;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
}
.profile {
left: 0;
top: 0;
z-index: 2;
}
EDIT: I've also toyed around with "overflow: hidden;" as some Stack Overflow threads suggested, but this hasn't helped either.
EDIT 2: Found these:
Should border-radius clip the content?
How do I prevent an image from overflowing a rounded corner box with CSS3?
CSS3 border-radius clipping issues
A solution that seems to work for Chrome (Firefox 37 seems to work as expected) is to use another element with a background image set. Everything else is the same. Of course you lose the alt attribute. If the image you're using is more than aesthetic, then you should find a way to serve that information another way, or stick to the <img /> tag.
<span style="background: url('http://i.imgur.com/BfLc7dD.jpg')" class="profile">
Codepen Example
I have an image with an original size of 900x300. I have an image container that has a size of 320x180. When I show this, the image looks squezeed. I understand it's because the ratio is not the same. So I am planning to show a zoomed version of it, but with just manipulating it's CSS. Is it possible? Also open to any other ideas that can show this image nicely using CSS tricks without having it looked squished in this box.
Here's a fiddle to play with. I am currently setting the width and height to 100% and hide overflow's.
It's because the ratio of your image is 3:1. You need to make your container size 3:1 as well... if you want your width to be 320px, then you have to set your height to 106px (106.6px to be exact), or something else proportionate to your original image. Here's an updated fiddle.
.boutique-grid .box-container {
position: relative;
height: 106px;
width: 320px;
}
You'll notice it's now proportionate.
If you want a zoomed version then you can use css background property in css. Here is the code if this is what you wanted:
.box-container {
position: relative;
height: 180px;
width: 320px;
background:url("http://cf.shopious.com/images/store_logos/original/9f84c96905ade833f48054cda524c7960dc0f424.png") no-repeat;
background-position:-500px -50px;
}
and remove the img from html.
this gives the effect of zooming
Your Question don't supply that what type of zoom you wants, But I can give you an idea, If you want that the image should be zoom at their place, with the full size then use follwoing CSS with the hover property:-
.boutique-grid .box-container:hover {
position: absolute;
width:900px;
height:300px;
}
See the fiddle here:-http://jsfiddle.net/npsingh/3m9aK/6/show/
Also If you like to provide a zoom with the popup then you can achieve this by following link:-
http://cssdemos.tupence.co.uk/image-popup.htm
If you want to crop the image with the center property and then use in that continer then you should be crop the image with the margin property, by that way you can crop your image with the same aspect ratio. See the post below:-
http://www.squareonemd.co.uk/how-to-crop-an-image-with-a-css-class/
Let me know if it will works...
.box-container img {width:100%;
height:auto;}
Add above code to your css. So that image will not squezeed.
Just remove the image element from the HTML and use background-image in your CSS instead.
Then you can use the cover argument for the background-size. This will take care of zooming the image to fit the box as well as keeping it proportional:
.boutique-grid .box-container {
position: relative;
width: 320px;
height: 180px;
background-image:url(...);
background-size:cover;
background-position:center;
}
MODIFIED FIDDLE HERE
With this approach you won't need to worry about re-calculating the sizes as the browser will do it for you.
Use the background-position to fine-adjust its position.
More details on background-size:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/background-size
I'm certainly no CSS guru, but I am working on a problem where I'd like to make copying of images just slightly more burdensome for users. Sure, they can still easily be retrieved, but this makes it so you can't just drag/drop them on your desktop. Basically, I had a bunch of markup like this:
<img width="400" src="my image.png" class="foo" alt="foo">
Instead, I decided to put this into a background image and change the element to a div:
<div width="400" class="foo">
The problem I have is that the images have a fixed width, but a variable height. This worked excellent when I was using an img tag. It doesn't have the same behavior when I use a div tag. Instead, the CSS is requiring me to force a height property to display anything at all:
This doesn't work
.foo {
display: block;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
width: 400px;
background-image: url(myimage.png);
/* height: 200px; */
}
This sorta does:
.foo {
display: block;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
width: 400px;
background-image: url(myimage.png);
height: 200px;
}
The problem is the height for the images are all variable as I mentioned before. So it tiles over and over if I hard code a size. The container can be a placeholder for well over 5,000 images, so setting it by hand won't do it. If I can get this div to behave exactly like the img tag did, the problem is solved.
If you are just trying to prevent people from clicking and drag/dropping, I would say put each img into it's own div with position: relative. Add another div inside that relative div that has the following style:
div.img_box {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: none;
z-index: 9999; /* or anything higher than your img's z-index */
}
That will cover up the image with a transparent div.
That way the image (which is part of your content) is still syntactically correct in the html.
Everybody is of course correct in saying that they have already downloaded the images to their computers just by visiting the site.
If you're trying to prevent users from reusing your content easily, some good methods are to:
1. Use images with lower resolution to limit reuse potential
2. Watermark your images
3. A combination of both, in an image sprite.
Hacking at it will just be ugly, ineffective, and difficult to maintain.
You are just setting the background of the div, you aren't adding an image to the div. The div can be resized to whatever it won't resize to what it's background image is. Just use the tag.
The only thing you could do with CSS is add a height which would work for all images. So if you're images range from 200-250px in height, set the div to 250px. Otherwise, you'll need javascript or server-side scripting to determine the height of the image and set the the CSS.
I want to display images in a 144px x 144px div element.
Images are always larger than 144px and so I want to zoom scale them. By that I mean that the smallest side will touch the edge of the div, cutting a bit from the other side - the opposite of letterbox.
How can I do this and have it work on older browsers like IE as well?
EDIT:
Changed the image, the first was wrong, sorry.
Resize the image so that inside the div there is no space without image
My first answer addressed intentionally blocking out the part of the image while intentionally keeping the space occupied. If you just want part of the image visible with no space or anything else taken up, the best option will be to use CSS Sprite techniques.
Here's an example:
HTML (copy and paste into your own file for a full test):
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
.clippedImg {
background-image: url("http://www.grinderschool.com/images/top_main.jpg");
background-position: -75px -55px;
height: 100px;
width: 235px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class='clippedImg'> </div>
</body>
</html>
CSS (this is really the key):
.clippedImg {
background-image: url("http://www.grinderschool.com/images/top_main.jpg");
background-position: -75px -55px;
}
You can adjust the position numbers to get exactly the portion and size of the image that you want.
Note also that if you want a black box around this, it's even easier than the other post I made. Just put a parent div around this one:
<div class='blackBox'>
<div class='clippedImg'> </div>
<div>
With a padding and width set to create the black-box effect you want:
.blackBox {
background-color: black;
padding: 0 20px;
width: 235px;
}
Set only the width of the image to 144px in CSS or in the attribute. The height will scale automatically. I'm fairly certain this works as low as IE 6. I'm not certain about anything older than that.
If I read your question right, you aren't trying to resize the image, but rather to actually cut off part of the image. If you just want to resize the image, then follow the other answers about that.
The simplest way I can think of to actually cut off the image this is to add <div class='blockOut'> </div> and then use CSS to place & size the div, make it's color match the background color of your page, and put it in front of the image. Example CSS:
.blockOut {
position: relative;
top: -100px;
left: 100px;
background-color: white;
z-index: 2; //this is the important part for putting this div in front of the other one
}
Edit: Note that since you added an example showing that you want all sides blacked out, this would require separate divs for blacking out the top, each side, and the bottom. Also, if you want part of the image to show through (as it does in your example) you can use CSS transparency options.
div{height:114px;width:114px;overflow:hidden;}
div img{position:relative;left:-100px /*or whatever you want. can change it with js*/;top:-100px;}
that is masking to only show a part of the img, as you say in the title. but in the description says you want to resize the img. decide yuorself
to do what you want with css, you should use max-height:144px;max-width:144px. but ie6 doesn't implements those simple properties, so you'll have to use js