I have some divs that appear when you hover an image. However, I want to have a transition rather than the images appearing so abruptly. I'm trying to avoid javascript if possible.
img {
display: none
}
p.one:hover + img {
display: block;
}
p.two:hover img {
display: block;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/nmeyf03r/56/
Transitions don't work with display: none. You can't fade in an element that's been removed from the page. Similarly, you can't fade out a display: block element. With display, the element is either in or out.
However, you can still transition your divs with CSS using the visibility, opacity and height properties.
HTML
<p class="one">HOVER OVER ME - IMG IS SIBLING</p>
<img src="http://www.placecage.com/100/100">
<p class="two">HOVER OVER ME -IMG IS CHILD</p>
<img src="http://www.placecage.com/100/100">
CSS
img {
visibility: hidden;
opacity: 0;
height: 0;
transition: height .5s linear, opacity .5s linear;
}
p.one:hover + img {
visibility: visible;
opacity: 1;
height: 100px;
transition-delay: 0s;
}
p.two:hover + img {
visibility: visible;
opacity: 1;
height: 100px;
transition-delay: 0s;
}
Here's your demo, updated with the code above:
http://jsfiddle.net/nmeyf03r/58/
Related
I use this hover-effect, where everything but the hovered Element fades out, you can see it in the snippet below.
Its working in Firefox (Version 66.0.3 ) but not in Chrome (Version 73.0.3683.103). I also tried Microsoft Edge, it works there aswell.
I tried adding "-webkit-" because I read, that this could fix the problem, but it didn´t.
Anybody an idea how to achieve this hover-effect in Chrome?
.links{
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 20px;
}
/* Hover Effect */
.hover {
visibility: hidden;
}
.hover > * {
visibility: visible;
transition: opacity 100ms linear 100ms;
}
.hover:hover > * {
opacity: 0.3;
}
.hover > *:hover {
opacity: 1;
transition-delay: 0ms, 0ms;
}
EDIT:
It works in Chrome, if I remove the links (in my case references to other pages of the website).
Working in Chrome:
.links {
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 20px;
}
/* Hover Effect */
.hover {
visibility: hidden;
}
.hover>* {
visibility: visible;
transition: opacity 100ms linear 100ms;
}
.hover:hover>* {
opacity: 0.3;
}
.hover>*:hover {
opacity: 1;
transition-delay: 0ms, 0ms;
}
<div class="links">
<div class="hover">
<div class="linkNav">1</div>
<div class="linkNav">2</div>
<div class="linkNav">3</div>
</div>
</div>
Not Working in Chrome:
.links {
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 20px;
}
/* Hover Effect */
.hover {
visibility: hidden;
}
.hover>* {
visibility: visible;
transition: opacity 100ms linear 100ms;
}
.hover:hover>* {
opacity: 0.3;
}
.hover>*:hover {
opacity: 1;
transition-delay: 0ms, 0ms;
}
<div class="links">
<div class="hover">
<a href="1.html">
<div class="linkNav">1</div>
</a>
<a href="2.html">
<div class="linkNav">2</div>
</a>
<a href="3.html">
<div class="linkNav">3</div>
</a>
</div>
</div>
(N.b. I have updated this answer after noting the problem with the HTML).
I simplified your CSS to try and isolate the problem (I removed the visibility properties that aren't doing anything as well as the > * selectors)
It's unsurprising there is unpredictable behaviour in this case because strictly speaking you shouldn't be putting a block level element such as <div> inside an <a> element.
It seems that, in this case of malformed HTML, Chrome won't recognise the opacity value of the anchor (<a>) tag unless I do something like set it to display: block or display:inline-block. FireFox, Edge and IE do recognise the opacity regardless.
The best solution would be to fix your HTML so that the block level elements wrap the inline elements properly.
.links {
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 20px;
}
.hover:hover a {
opacity: 0.3;
}
.hover a:hover {
opacity: 1;
}
<div class="links hover">
<div class="linkNav">1</div>
<div class="linkNav">2</div>
<div class="linkNav">3</div>
</div>
I would recommend fixing it like this but if for some reason you can't fix the HTM a workaround is to set the display property on your anchor tags. Like so:
.links {
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 20px;
}
.links a {
display:block;
}
.hover:hover a {
opacity: 0.3;
}
.hover a:hover {
opacity: 1;
}
<div class="links hover">
<div class="linkNav">1</div>
<div class="linkNav">2</div>
<div class="linkNav">3</div>
</div>
Or else an alternative solution is you could simply target an alternative element, such as the inner div instead of the a tag.
JSFiddle links for the different workaround solutions and the original CVE that demonstrates the issue (useful for testing in different browsers):
Solution by setting display block
Solution by changing selector to target inner div
Original CVE which works in most browsers but not Chrome
I have corrected the code
the problem here was in the ordering you were adding HTML
The a tag has div inside it and class on that which the selector on hover was unable to reach to.
Now see, it works fine.
This is it I guess.
Hope it solves your problem.
.links {
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 20px;
}
/* Hover Effect */
.hover {
visibility: hidden;
}
.hover>* {
visibility: visible;
transition: opacity 100ms linear 100ms;
}
.hover:hover>* {
opacity: 0.3;
}
.hover>*:hover {
opacity: 1;
transition-delay: 0ms, 0ms;
}
<div class="links">
<div class="hover">
1
2
3
</div>
</div>
I'm very new to web dev right now, and I'm currently trying to make an image fade into color upon hovering over it. This is what I've got right now:
html:
<body>
<img src=imgmonochrome.jpg id=img1>
</body>
css:
#img1 {
position: top right;
height:49%;
width:49%;
transition: content 0.5s ease;
}
#img1:hover {
transition: content 0.5s;
content: url('imgcolor.jpg');
}
The image will switch, but will not fade in.
I've looked all over for answers on this, but I can't find any that use just HTML and CSS (cause I'm illiterate in javascript/jQuery ((but going to learn very soon for this very reason)))
Help would be appreciated.
YES, this is possible... But not in the traditional sense.
In order to accomplish this, you'll need to forgo <img />, and instead make use of two images presented with content: url() in :before and :after pseudo-classes. Set the :before to be your starting image, and :after to be your target image. Then set the opacity of :after to 0 by default, and set the two pseudo-elements to sit on top of one another. Finally, set a :hover rule for both :before and :after which toggles their opacity, and use transition: opacity to control the fade.
This can be seen in the following:
* {
margin: 0;
}
.image:before {
content: url("https://via.placeholder.com/150/FF0000/00FFFF");
transition: opacity 0.5s ease;
-webkit-transition: opacity 0.5s ease;
}
.image:after {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
opacity: 0;
content: url("https://via.placeholder.com/150/00FFFF/FF0000");
transition: opacity 0.5s ease;
-webkit-transition: opacity 0.5s ease;
}
.image:hover:after {
opacity: 1;
}
.image:hover:before {
opacity: 0;
}
<div class="image"></div>
Remove content from the transition and use img tag to set image
<img src="imgmonochrome.jpg" id="img1">
#img1 {
position: top right;
height:49%;
width:49%;
transition: 0.5s ease;
}
#img1:hover {
opacity: 0.3;
background: url(imgcolor.jpg);
}
Alternatively,
<img src="imgcolor.jpg" id="img1">
#img1 {
filter: gray;
-webkit-filter: grayscale(1);
-webkit-transition: all .5s ease-in-out;
}
#img1:hover {
filter: none;
-webkit-filter: grayscale(0);
}
I have a basic setup. When I increase the height, I get a smooth increase. When decreased, I should get a smooth decrease but instead a sharp decrease.
<div className="foo <!-- -->">Hey</div>
You may have noticed className and <!-- -->, I'm using react. <!-- --> gets replaced with the class to decrease the height.
// SCSS
.foo {
height 400px;
// background props
transition: all 250ms ease-out
}
.foo.decreaseClass {
height: 40px;
transition: all 250ms ease-in
}
When the new class is attached, the div becomes
<div className="foo decreaseClass">Hey</div>
How to get both transitions down/up?
It's because you're not properly closing the height declaration in .foo. You're using a comma instead of a semi-colon, rendering both height and transition declarations invalid. Also note the same declaration should contain a colon between the style property name and its value (height: 400px;).
Therefore, your element only has defined height and transition only when having both classes.
See it working:
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function(event) {
event.target.classList.toggle('decreaseClass')
})
.foo {
height: 200px;
transition: all 250ms ease-out;
border: 1px solid
}
.foo.decreaseClass {
height: 40px;
transition-timing-function: ease-in
}
<div class="foo">Hey</div>
Use CSS #keyframe animation and alternate properties. infinite is added just for demo purposes. Instead of height I added transform:scaleY(1) to (10).
Demo
body {
overflow: hidden
}
.test {
width: 200px;
margin: 10px;
background: red;
font-size: 32px;
text-align: center;
color: white
}
.B {
height: 40px;
animation: animB 1s alternate infinite;
transform-origin: top;
}
#keyframes animB {
0% {
transform: scaleY(1);
}
100% {
transform: scaleY(10);
}
}
<div class='test B'>TEST</div>
CODE SAMPLE HERE: http://codepen.io/colbisaurusrex/pen/YZdKyO?editors=1100
First problem:
I am trying to smoothly expand and compress a div (class: event) on hover. It expands smoothly, but it snaps back quickly when user is no longer hovering on div. I'd like to transition back at the same ease as it expands
Second problem:
Simultaneously, I'd like to reveal an inner, hidden child(class: hidden) when I hover over its parent(class: event). Ideally, I'd like to reveal it when the parent is fully expanded. And ease it back to hidden as the parent compresses. Right now, it is revealed immediately, before the parent div is fully expanded. I have tried to add a delay.
Basically, there is a beginning and ending transition that exact mirrors of each other. I'd like to do this with no Javascript
Bonus Question: If the entire transition was set off by a button click(say the Show Details button), do I have to use JS? Is there a way to do this with CSS only?
/* This is the CSS I am working with */
.event {
margin-top: 2%;
width: 960px;
border-color:#496DD9;
border-style: dotted;
font-size: 0.5em;
height: 250px;
transform: height 300ms ease-out;
}
.event:hover {
height: 300px;
transition: height 500ms ease-in;
}
.event:hover .hidden {
display: block;
transition: display 300ms ease-in 1s;
}
.hidden {
font-size: 30px;
display: none;
}
/* End of css */
problem 1: transform should be transition
.event {
margin-top: 2%;
width: 960px;
border-color:#496DD9;
border-style: dotted;
font-size: 0.5em;
height: 250px;
transform: height 300ms ease-out; // change this to transition
}
Problem 2: try using opacity instead of display:
.event:hover .hidden {
/* display: block; */
/* transition: display 500ms ease-in 1s; */
-webkit-transition: opacity 2s ease-in-out;
opacity: 1;
}
.hidden {
font-size: 30px;
/* display: none; */
opacity: 0;
}
demo: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/NpeWZz?editors=1100
I have a blockquote like this:
<blockquote class="spoiler">Soopah sekkrit!</blockquote>
I want to make it hidden, only showing it if the user hovers over it. I'm doing it now with JS:
blockquote.addEventListener('mouseover', function() {
this.style.height = this.offsetHeight + 'px';
this.dataset.contents = this.innerHTML;
this.innerHTML = '';
});
blockquote.addEventListener('mouseout', function() {
this.style.height = '';
this.innerHTML = this.dataset.contents;
});
Is there a better way to do this, with CSS?
It has to keep its background-color, size, and work for contents with custom colors. If possible, I'd also like to animate it so the contents fade in gradually.
Here's something very similar to what I use in SOUP:
.spoiler, .spoiler > * { transition: color 0.5s, opacity 0.5s }
.spoiler:not(:hover) { color: transparent }
.spoiler:not(:hover) > * { opacity: 0 }
/* fix weird transitions on Chrome: */
blockquote, blockquote > *:not(a) { color: black }
.spoiler, .spoiler > * { transition: color 0.5s, opacity 0.5s }
.spoiler:not(:hover) { color: transparent }
.spoiler:not(:hover) > * { opacity: 0 }
/* fix weird transitions on Chrome: */
blockquote, blockquote > *:not(a) { color: black }
/* some basic bg styles for demonstration purposes */
blockquote { background: #fed; margin: 1em 0; padding: 8px; border-left: 2px solid #cba }
code { background: #ccc; padding: 2px }
img { vertical-align: middle }
<blockquote class="spoiler">
Soopah sekkrit text with <code>code</code> and links and <img src="//sstatic.net/stackexchange/img/logos/so/so-logo-med.png" width="100" /> images!
<p>You can also have paragraphs in here.</p>
<ul><li>And lists too!</li></ul>
<blockquote class="spoiler">Even nested spoilers work!</blockquote>
</blockquote>
This is somewhat simpler than your own solution, and works for arbitrary content including images and even nested spoilers! (See demo snippet above.)
Alas, this method seems to suffer from weird transition effects on Chrome if any of the child elements of the spoiler have color: inherit. (Basically, what's happening is that these elements will have both their text color set to transparent and their opacity set to 0. Because opacities combine multiplicatively, the combined transition will thus appear slower — halfway through the fade-in, when the element itself is at 50% opacity, the text in it is at 50% × 50% = 25% opacity.) I've added an extra CSS rule to the example above to fix this, but it does make things a bit complicated.
What I actually do in SOUP is slightly different. I wrap the contents of each spoiler in an extra inner <div>, which lets me simplify the CSS further to just:
.spoiler > div { opacity: 0; transition: opacity 0.5s }
.spoiler:hover > div { opacity: 1 }
.spoiler > div { opacity: 0; transition: opacity 0.5s }
.spoiler:hover > div { opacity: 1 }
/* some basic bg styles for demonstration purposes */
blockquote { background: #fed; margin: 1em 0; padding: 8px; border-left: 2px solid #cba }
code { background: #ccc; padding: 2px }
img { vertical-align: middle }
<blockquote class="spoiler"><div>
Soopah sekkrit text with <code>code</code> and links and <img src="//sstatic.net/stackexchange/img/logos/so/so-logo-med.png" width="100" /> images!
<p>You can also have paragraphs in here.</p>
<ul><li>And lists too!</li></ul>
<blockquote class="spoiler"><div>Even nested spoilers work!</div></blockquote>
<div></blockquote>
The main advantages of this method are simplicity and robustness: I don't have to use :not() selectors, improving compatibility with older browsers, and the transition styles can't conflict with other transitions possibly defined on the elements inside the spoiler. This method also doesn't suffer from the color transition weirdness on Chrome described above, since it only uses opacity transitions.
Overall, this is the method I recommend. The disadvantage, of course, is that you need to include the extra <div>s in your HTML.
Ps. Please consider also providing some way to make the spoilers permanently visible, especially for touch screen users who may find it very hard to "hover" the cursor over an element. A simple solution is to use a JavaScript click event handler to toggle the spoiler class, e.g. like this (using jQuery):
$('.spoiler').on( 'click', function (e) {
$(this).toggleClass('spoiler');
e.stopPropagation();
} );
$('.spoiler').on( 'click', function (e) {
$(this).toggleClass('spoiler');
e.stopPropagation();
} );
.spoiler > div { opacity: 0; transition: opacity 0.5s }
.spoiler:hover > div { opacity: 1 }
/* some basic bg styles for demonstration purposes */
blockquote { background: #fed; margin: 1em 0; padding: 8px; border-left: 2px solid #cba }
code { background: #ccc; padding: 2px }
img { vertical-align: middle }
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<blockquote class="spoiler"><div>
Soopah sekkrit text with <code>code</code> and links and <img src="//sstatic.net/stackexchange/img/logos/so/so-logo-med.png" width="100" /> images!
<p>You can also have paragraphs in here.</p>
<ul><li>And lists too!</li></ul>
<blockquote class="spoiler"><div>Even nested spoilers work!</div></blockquote>
<div></blockquote>
or, if you'd prefer to use delegated event handling (so that you don't have to keep adding new click handlers every time you load new content that includes spoilers via Ajax):
$(document).on( 'click', '.spoiler, .spoiler-off', function (e) {
$(this).toggleClass('spoiler').toggleClass('spoiler-off');
e.stopPropagation();
} );
$(document).on( 'click', '.spoiler, .spoiler-off', function (e) {
$(this).toggleClass('spoiler').toggleClass('spoiler-off');
e.stopPropagation();
} );
.spoiler > div { opacity: 0; transition: opacity 0.5s }
.spoiler:hover > div { opacity: 1 }
/* some basic bg styles for demonstration purposes */
blockquote { background: #fed; margin: 1em 0; padding: 8px; border-left: 2px solid #cba }
code { background: #ccc; padding: 2px }
img { vertical-align: middle }
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<blockquote class="spoiler"><div>
Soopah sekkrit text with <code>code</code> and links and <img src="//sstatic.net/stackexchange/img/logos/so/so-logo-med.png" width="100" /> images!
<p>You can also have paragraphs in here.</p>
<ul><li>And lists too!</li></ul>
<blockquote class="spoiler"><div>Even nested spoilers work!</div></blockquote>
<div></blockquote>
(These should work with either of the CSS variants shown above.)
Yes, this is possible with CSS. Essentially, you want to make all of the contents be invisible. In CSS, this means transparent.
First use the hover pseudo-class inside the not pseudo-class:
.spoiler:not(:hover)
But we also need to select all the child elements of the hovered spoiler, to set their colors and backgrounds:
.spoiler:not(:hover) *
And we set both the color and background (only for the child elements) to transparent to make them invisible to the user. All together:
.spoiler:not(:hover), .spoiler:not(:hover) * { color: transparent }
.spoiler:not(:hover) * { background: transparent }
code { padding: 2px; background: #bbb }
a { color: #00f }
Hover: <blockquote class="spoiler">Some stuff <a>and a colored link</a> <code>and some code!</code></blockquote>
We can also add a transition to make it smoother:
.spoiler { transition: color 0.5s } /* we have to put this outside the :hover to make it work fading both in and out */
.spoiler:not(:hover), .spoiler:not(:hover) * { color: transparent }
.spoiler * { transition: color 0.5s, background 0.5s }
.spoiler:not(:hover) * { background: transparent }
code { padding: 2px; background: #bbb; color: #000 } /* add color to prevent double transition */
a { color: #00f }
Hover: <blockquote class="spoiler">Some stuff <a>and a colored link</a> <code>and some code!</code></blockquote>
To make it obvious to the user that the blockquote is hoverable, you can add some text with the ::after pseudo-element to be shown when the blockquote isn't hovered:
.spoiler { transition: color 0.5s; position: relative } /* relative position for positioning the pseudo-element */
.spoiler:not(:hover), .spoiler:not(:hover) * { color: transparent }
.spoiler * { transition: color 0.5s, background 0.5s }
.spoiler:not(:hover) * { background: transparent }
.spoiler::after {
content: 'hover to view spoiler';
position: absolute;
top: 0; left: 0;
color: transparent;
}
.spoiler:not(:hover)::after {
color: #666;
transition: color 0.3s 0.3s; /* delayed transition to keep the text from overlapping */
}
code { padding: 2px; background: #bbb; color: #000 }
a { color: #00f }
<blockquote class="spoiler">
Some stuff <a>and a colored link</a> <code>and some code!</code>
<blockquote class="spoiler">Nesting bonus!</blockquote>
</blockquote>
For stuff like images, svgs (tho inline SVG can be very granularly controlled), canvases, and all that fancy stuff, instead of color you'd have to use opacity. We can make it work with these by adding this:
.spoiler img { transition: opacity 0.5s, background 0.5s }
.spoiler:not(:hover) img { opacity: 0 }
Here's a strategy that works pretty well, looks nice, and has pretty clean transitions
.spoiler {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
cursor: help;
}
.spoiler::before {
content: 'psst\02026'; /* … */
position: absolute;
left: -2px;
top: -2px;
right: -2px;
bottom: -2px;
border-radius: 1px;
font-size: .9rem;
color: #e6578c;
background: #ffe5e5;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
text-align: center;
opacity: 1;
transition: opacity 0.7s ease, transform 0.3s ease; /* hide faster than reveal */
}
.spoiler:hover::before {
opacity: 0;
transform: translateY(-50%)rotateX(80deg);
transition: opacity 1.0s ease, transform 0.5s ease; /* slower reveal */
}
If you style the parent block with opacity: 0 without hover, then you can't add any styles to illustrate what part of the page the user should be hovering over.
Instead, if we add a ::before element that covers up the child content, then we can fade it out on hover and still provide a visual indication of where to go.
Demo in Stack Snippets
.spoiler {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
cursor: help;
}
.spoiler::before {
content: 'psst\02026'; /* … */
position: absolute;
left: -2px;
top: -2px;
right: -2px;
bottom: -2px;
border-radius: 1px;
font-size: .9rem;
color: #e6578c;
background: #ffe5e5;
text-align: center;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
opacity: 1;
transition: opacity 0.7s ease, transform 0.3s ease; /* hide faster than reveal */
}
.spoiler:hover::before {
opacity: 0;
transform: translateY(-50%)rotateX(80deg);
transition: opacity 1.0s ease, transform 0.5s ease; /* slower reveal */
}
/* demo styles */
blockquote {
margin: 0
}
<p>
Inline Spoiler <span class="spoiler" > Word </span>
</p>
<p class="spoiler">
Paragraph Text Block of a Spoiler
</p>
<blockquote class="spoiler">
Block quote spoiler with super long text that wraps and wraps and wraps some more.
Block quote spoiler with super long text that wraps and wraps and wraps some more.
Block quote spoiler with super long text that wraps and wraps and wraps some more.
</blockquote>