How can I get courseName = 'Music' with the latest date?
courseName | dateOfEnrollment
----------------|-----------------------
Music | 2016-07-24
Art | 2016-07-01
Art | 2016-07-23
Music | 2016-07-25
As I tried with the statement below
SELECT courseName, dateOfEnrollment FROM MyDatabase.dbo.courseEnrollment WHERE courseName = 'Music' AND GETDATE() >= MAX(dateOfEnrollment)
it returns error:
An aggregate may not appear in the WHERE clause unless it is in a subquery contained in a HAVING clause or a select list, and the column being aggregated is an outer reference.
My ultimate goal is to put that statement in an IF statement, if it is not null, then I will insert new data into the table.
Update (My answer):
This is working for me:
IF EXISTS (SELECT TOP 1 courseName, dateOfEnrollment FROM courseEnrollment WHERE courseName = 'Music' ORDER BY dateOfEnrollment DESC)
*Insert data into the table*
ELSE
*No need to insert*
SELECT
courseName,
dateOfEnrollment
FROM
MyDatabase.dbo.courseEnrollment
WHERE
courseName = 'Music'
ORDER BY
dateOfEnrollment
LIMIT 1
That's how your query should look like, but assuming your main goal - you only need to check is there any 'Music' row, you should not be interested in dateOfEnrollment column at all. Am i right or missed something?
So your final query (to insert a row depending on a condition) will be:
INSERT INTO courseEnrollment
SELECT 'Music', CURDATE() FROM courseEnrollment
WHERE courseName = 'Music';
You can give it a try:
SELECT
CE.*
FROM courseEnrollment CE
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT
courseName,
MAX(dateOfEnrollment) max_enrollment_date
FROM courseEnrollment
WHERE courseName ='Music'
) t
ON CE.courseName = t.courseName AND CE.dateOfEnrollment = t.max_enrollment_date;
Note: The output of this query might contain more than one entries if multiple entries under Music course have the latest date.
TEST:
CREATE TABLE courseEnrollment (
courseName VARCHAR (100),
dateOfEnrollment date
);
INSERT INTO courseEnrollment (
courseName,
dateOfEnrollment
)
VALUES
('Music', '2016-07-24'),
('Art', '2016-07-01'),
('Art', '2016-07-23'),
('Music', '2016-07-25');
Running the above query on these given data you will get an output like below:
Output:
courseName dateOfEnrollment
Music 2016-07-25
EDIT:
WORKING DEMO
SELECT DISTINCT field1, field2, field3, ......
FROM table;
I am trying to accomplish the following SQL statement, but I want it to return all columns.
Is this possible?
Something like this:
SELECT DISTINCT field1, *
FROM table;
You're looking for a group by:
select *
from table
group by field1
Which can occasionally be written with a distinct on statement:
select distinct on field1 *
from table
On most platforms, however, neither of the above will work because the behavior on the other columns is unspecified. (The first works in MySQL, if that's what you're using.)
You could fetch the distinct fields and stick to picking a single arbitrary row each time.
On some platforms (e.g. PostgreSQL, Oracle, T-SQL) this can be done directly using window functions:
select *
from (
select *,
row_number() over (partition by field1 order by field2) as row_number
from table
) as rows
where row_number = 1
On others (MySQL, SQLite), you'll need to write subqueries that will make you join the entire table with itself (example), so not recommended.
From the phrasing of your question, I understand that you want to select the distinct values for a given field and for each such value to have all the other column values in the same row listed. Most DBMSs will not allow this with neither DISTINCT nor GROUP BY, because the result is not determined.
Think of it like this: if your field1 occurs more than once, what value of field2 will be listed (given that you have the same value for field1 in two rows but two distinct values of field2 in those two rows).
You can however use aggregate functions (explicitely for every field that you want to be shown) and using a GROUP BY instead of DISTINCT:
SELECT field1, MAX(field2), COUNT(field3), SUM(field4), ....
FROM table GROUP BY field1
If I understood your problem correctly, it's similar to one I just had. You want to be able limit the usability of DISTINCT to a specified field, rather than applying it to all the data.
If you use GROUP BY without an aggregate function, which ever field you GROUP BY will be your DISTINCT filed.
If you make your query:
SELECT * from table GROUP BY field1;
It will show all your results based on a single instance of field1.
For example, if you have a table with name, address and city. A single person has multiple addresses recorded, but you just want a single address for the person, you can query as follows:
SELECT * FROM persons GROUP BY name;
The result will be that only one instance of that name will appear with its address, and the other one will be omitted from the resulting table. Caution: if your fileds have atomic values such as firstName, lastName you want to group by both.
SELECT * FROM persons GROUP BY lastName, firstName;
because if two people have the same last name and you only group by lastName, one of those persons will be omitted from the results. You need to keep those things into consideration. Hope this helps.
That's a really good question. I have read some useful answers here already, but probably I can add a more precise explanation.
Reducing the number of query results with a GROUP BY statement is easy as long as you don't query additional information. Let's assume you got the following table 'locations'.
--country-- --city--
France Lyon
Poland Krakow
France Paris
France Marseille
Italy Milano
Now the query
SELECT country FROM locations
GROUP BY country
will result in:
--country--
France
Poland
Italy
However, the following query
SELECT country, city FROM locations
GROUP BY country
...throws an error in MS SQL, because how could your computer know which of the three French cities "Lyon", "Paris" or "Marseille" you want to read in the field to the right of "France"?
In order to correct the second query, you must add this information. One way to do this is to use the functions MAX() or MIN(), selecting the biggest or smallest value among all candidates. MAX() and MIN() are not only applicable to numeric values, but also compare the alphabetical order of string values.
SELECT country, MAX(city) FROM locations
GROUP BY country
will result in:
--country-- --city--
France Paris
Poland Krakow
Italy Milano
or:
SELECT country, MIN(city) FROM locations
GROUP BY country
will result in:
--country-- --city--
France Lyon
Poland Krakow
Italy Milano
These functions are a good solution as long as you are fine with selecting your value from the either ends of the alphabetical (or numeric) order. But what if this is not the case? Let us assume that you need a value with a certain characteristic, e.g. starting with the letter 'M'. Now things get complicated.
The only solution I could find so far is to put your whole query into a subquery, and to construct the additional column outside of it by hands:
SELECT
countrylist.*,
(SELECT TOP 1 city
FROM locations
WHERE
country = countrylist.country
AND city like 'M%'
)
FROM
(SELECT country FROM locations
GROUP BY country) countrylist
will result in:
--country-- --city--
France Marseille
Poland NULL
Italy Milano
SELECT c2.field1 ,
field2
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT
field1
FROM dbo.TABLE AS C
) AS c1
JOIN dbo.TABLE AS c2 ON c1.field1 = c2.field1
Great question #aryaxt -- you can tell it was a great question because you asked it 5 years ago and I stumbled upon it today trying to find the answer!
I just tried to edit the accepted answer to include this, but in case my edit does not make it in:
If your table was not that large, and assuming your primary key was an auto-incrementing integer you could do something like this:
SELECT
table.*
FROM table
--be able to take out dupes later
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT field, MAX(id) as id
FROM table
GROUP BY field
) as noDupes on noDupes.id = table.id
WHERE
//this will result in only the last instance being seen
noDupes.id is not NULL
Try
SELECT table.* FROM table
WHERE otherField = 'otherValue'
GROUP BY table.fieldWantedToBeDistinct
limit x
You can do it with a WITH clause.
For example:
WITH c AS (SELECT DISTINCT a, b, c FROM tableName)
SELECT * FROM tableName r, c WHERE c.rowid=r.rowid AND c.a=r.a AND c.b=r.b AND c.c=r.c
This also allows you to select only the rows selected in the WITH clauses query.
For SQL Server you can use the dense_rank and additional windowing functions to get all rows AND columns with duplicated values on specified columns. Here is an example...
with t as (
select col1 = 'a', col2 = 'b', col3 = 'c', other = 'r1' union all
select col1 = 'c', col2 = 'b', col3 = 'a', other = 'r2' union all
select col1 = 'a', col2 = 'b', col3 = 'c', other = 'r3' union all
select col1 = 'a', col2 = 'b', col3 = 'c', other = 'r4' union all
select col1 = 'c', col2 = 'b', col3 = 'a', other = 'r5' union all
select col1 = 'a', col2 = 'a', col3 = 'a', other = 'r6'
), tdr as (
select
*,
total_dr_rows = count(*) over(partition by dr)
from (
select
*,
dr = dense_rank() over(order by col1, col2, col3),
dr_rn = row_number() over(partition by col1, col2, col3 order by other)
from
t
) x
)
select * from tdr where total_dr_rows > 1
This is taking a row count for each distinct combination of col1, col2, and col3.
select min(table.id), table.column1
from table
group by table.column1
SELECT *
FROM tblname
GROUP BY duplicate_values
ORDER BY ex.VISITED_ON DESC
LIMIT 0 , 30
in ORDER BY i have just put example here, you can also add ID field in this
Found this elsewhere here but this is a simple solution that works:
WITH cte AS /* Declaring a new table named 'cte' to be a clone of your table */
(SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY val1 DESC) AS rn
FROM MyTable /* Selecting only unique values based on the "id" field */
)
SELECT * /* Here you can specify several columns to retrieve */
FROM cte
WHERE rn = 1
In this way can get 2 unique column with 1 query only
select Distinct col1,col2 from '{path}' group by col1,col2
you can increase your columns if need
Add GROUP BY to field you want to check for duplicates
your query may look like
SELECT field1, field2, field3, ...... FROM table GROUP BY field1
field1 will be checked to exclude duplicate records
or you may query like
SELECT * FROM table GROUP BY field1
duplicate records of field1 are excluded from SELECT
Just include all of your fields in the GROUP BY clause.
It can be done by inner query
$query = "SELECT *
FROM (SELECT field
FROM table
ORDER BY id DESC) as rows
GROUP BY field";
SELECT * from table where field in (SELECT distinct field from table)
SELECT DISTINCT FIELD1, FIELD2, FIELD3 FROM TABLE1 works if the values of all three columns are unique in the table.
If, for example, you have multiple identical values for first name, but the last name and other information in the selected columns is different, the record will be included in the result set.
I would suggest using
SELECT * from table where field1 in
(
select distinct field1 from table
)
this way if you have the same value in field1 across multiple rows, all the records will be returned.
here is the query
select emp1.EmployeeId as empss, EmployeeName, DepartmentId, IsActive, CreatedDate, Address, salary
FROM employee as emp1
where 4=(select count(emp.EmployeeId) as con from employee as emp where emp.EmployeeId < emp1.EmployeeId);
here is the table name employee where i am getting the number 5 row without limit,for writing this query i took some help over net but my question is how does the select statments work ??
1) does it select the column first then filter the where clause ?
2) does it filter the where clause then select column ??
please explain
thanks so much in advance
In MySQL Where conditions (filtration) executes before select columns. Following is the order of execution for various clauses present in a SELECT statement
FROM (including joins)
WHERE
SELECT (select columns)
GROUP BY
ORDER BY
LIMIT
Can validated by following SQL
SELECT 1 as cnt FROM employee WHERE cnt = 1;
This statement will throw error as the cnt is defined in the SELECT clause which executes after the WHERE but following SQL
SELECT 1 as cnt FROM employee GROUP BY cnt;
will work.
select * from employee;
this would return all rows from the table 'employee'
select id from employee;
this would return all rows but only the id column from the table 'employee'
select id, name from employee where id in (1,2);
this would return only matching rows for employee.id in (1,2) and the columns would be id and name
The 'from' will direct the db to goto that table and the conditions would filter out the needed rows - reducing scope further by traversing through and only printing the asked-for columns
MODE is the value that occurs the MOST times in the data, there can be ONE MODE or MANY MODES
here's some values in two tables (sqlFiddle)
create table t100(id int auto_increment primary key, value int);
create table t200(id int auto_increment primary key, value int);
insert into t100(value) values (1),
(2),(2),(2),
(3),(3),
(4);
insert into t200(value) values (1),
(2),(2),(2),
(3),(3),
(4),(4),(4);
right now, to get the MODE(S) returned as comma separated list, I run the below query for table t100
SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(value) as modes,occurs
FROM
(SELECT value,occurs FROM
(SELECT value,count(*) as occurs
FROM
T100
GROUP BY value)T1,
(SELECT max(occurs) as maxoccurs FROM
(SELECT value,count(*) as occurs
FROM
T100
GROUP BY value)T2
)T3
WHERE T1.occurs = T3.maxoccurs)T4
GROUP BY occurs;
and the below query for table t200 (same query just with table name changed) I have 2 tables in this example because to show that it works for cases where there's 1 MODE and where there are multiple MODES.
SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(value) as modes,occurs
FROM
(SELECT value,occurs FROM
(SELECT value,count(*) as occurs
FROM
T200
GROUP BY value)T1,
(SELECT max(occurs) as maxoccurs FROM
(SELECT value,count(*) as occurs
FROM
T200
GROUP BY value)T2
)T3
WHERE T1.occurs = T3.maxoccurs)T4
GROUP BY occurs;
My question is "Is there a simpler way?"
I was thinking like using HAVING count(*) = max(count(*)) or something similar to get rid of the extra join but couldn't get HAVING to return the result i wanted.
UPDATED:
as suggested by #zneak, I can simplify T3 like below:
SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(value) as modes,occurs
FROM
(SELECT value,occurs FROM
(SELECT value,count(*) as occurs
FROM
T200
GROUP BY value)T1,
(SELECT count(*) as maxoccurs
FROM
T200
GROUP BY value
ORDER BY count(*) DESC
LIMIT 1
)T3
WHERE T1.occurs = T3.maxoccurs)T4
GROUP BY occurs;
Now is there a way to get ride of T3 altogether?
I tried this but it returns no rows for some reason
SELECT value,occurs FROM
(SELECT value,count(*) as occurs
FROM t200
GROUP BY `value`)T1
HAVING occurs=max(occurs)
basically I am wondering if there's a way to do it such that I only need to specify t100 or t200 once.
UPDATED: i found a way to specify t100 or t200 only once by adding a variable to set my own maxoccurs like below
SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(CASE WHEN occurs=#maxoccurs THEN value ELSE NULL END) as modes
FROM
(SELECT value,occurs,#maxoccurs:=GREATEST(#maxoccurs,occurs) as maxoccurs
FROM (SELECT value,count(*) as occurs
FROM t200
GROUP BY `value`)T1,(SELECT #maxoccurs:=0)mo
)T2
You are very close with the last query. The following finds one mode:
SELECT value, occurs
FROM (SELECT value,count(*) as occurs
FROM t200
GROUP BY `value`
LIMIT 1
) T1
I think your question was about multiple modes, though:
SELECT value, occurs
FROM (SELECT value, count(*) as occurs
FROM t200
GROUP BY `value`
) T1
WHERE occurs = (select max(occurs)
from (select `value`, count(*) as occurs
from t200
group by `value`
) t
);
EDIT:
This is much easier in almost any other database. MySQL supports neither with nor window/analytic functions.
Your query (shown below) does not do what you think it is doing:
SELECT value, occurs
FROM (SELECT value, count(*) as occurs
FROM t200
GROUP BY `value`
) T1
HAVING occurs = max(occurs) ;
The final having clause refers to the variable occurs but does use max(occurs). Because of the use of max(occurs) this is an aggregation query that returns one row, summarizing all rows from the subquery.
The variable occurs is not using for grouping. So, what value does MySQL use? It uses an arbitrary value from one of the rows in the subquery. This arbitrary value might match, or it might not. But, the value only comes from one row. There is no iteration over it.
I realize this is a very old question but in looking for the best way to find the MODE in a MySQL table, I came up with this:
SELECT [column name], count(*) as [ccount] FROM [table] WHERE [field] = [item] GROUP BY [column name] ORDER BY [ccount] DESC LIMIT 1 ;
In my actual situation, I had a log with recorded events in it. I wanted to know during which period (1, 2 or 3 as recorded in my log) the specific event occurred the most number of times. (Eg, the MODE of "period" column of the table for that specific event
My table looked like this (abridged):
EVENT_TYPE | PERIOD
-------------------------
1 | 3
1 | 3
1 | 3
1 | 2
2 | 1
2 | 1
2 | 1
2 | 3
Using the query:
SELECT event_type, period, count(*) as pcount FROM proto_log WHERE event_type = 1 GROUP BY period ORDER BY pcount DESC LIMIT 1 ;
I get the result:
> EVENT_TYPE | PERIOD | PCOUNT
> --------------------------------------
1 | 3 | 3
Using this result, the period column ($result['period'] for example) should contain the MODE for that query and of course pcount contains the actual count.
If you wanted to get multiple modes, I suppse you could keep adding other criteria to your WHERE clause using ORs:
SELECT event_type, period, count(*) as pcount FROM proto_log WHERE event_type = 1 ***OR event_type = 2*** GROUP BY period ORDER BY pcount DESC LIMIT 2 ;
The multiple ORs should give you the additional results and the LIMIT increase will add the additional MODES to the results. (Otherwise it will still only show the top 1 result)
Results:
EVENT_TYPE | PERIOD | PCOUNT
--------------------------------------
1 | 3 | 3
2 | 1 | 3
I am not 100% sure this is doing exactly what I think it is doing, or if it will work in all situations, so please let me know if I am on or off track here.
let's say I have the following Table:
ID, Name
1, John
2, Jim
3, Steve
4, Tom
I run the following query
SELECT Id FROM Table WHERE NAME IN ('John', 'Jim', 'Bill');
I want to get something like:
ID
1
2
NULL or 0
Is it possible?
How about this?
SELECT Id FROM Table WHERE NAME IN ('John', 'Jim', 'Bill')
UNION
SELECT null;
Start by creating a subquery of names you're looking for, then left join the subquery to your table:
SELECT myTable.ID
FROM (
SELECT 'John' AS Name
UNION SELECT 'Jim'
UNION SELECT 'Bill'
) NameList
LEFT JOIN myTable ON NameList.Name = myTable.Name
This will return null for each name that isn't found. To return a zero instead, just start the query with SELECT COALESCE(myTable.ID, 0) instead of SELECT myTable.ID.
There's a SQL Fiddle here.
The question is a bit confusing. "IN" is a valid operator in SQL and it means a match with any of the values (see here ):
SELECT Id FROM Table WHERE NAME IN ('John', 'Jim', 'Bill');
Is the same as:
SELECT Id FROM Table WHERE NAME = 'John' OR NAME = 'Jim' OR NAME = 'Bill';
In your answer you seem to want the replies for each of the values, in order. This is accomplished by joining the results with UNION ALL (only UNION eliminates duplicates and can change the order):
SELECT max(Id) FROM Table WHERE NAME = 'John' UNION ALL
SELECT max(Id) FROM Table WHERE NAME = 'Jim' UNION ALL
SELECT max(Id) FROM Table WHERE NAME = 'Bill';
The above will return 1 Id (the max) if there are matches and NULL if there are none (e.g. for Bill). Note that in general you can have more than one row matching some of the names in your list, I used "max" to select one, you may be better of in keeping the loop on the values outside the query or in using the (ID, Name) table in a join with other tables in your database, instead of making the list of ID and then using it.