myappI have to reply with a file in cakePHP3 and in a particular case, it seems that I have a problem, maybe of header.
I want to send an APK (Android package) file.
So if I directly access to the file online, there is no problem but I want to send it from my controller and the file seems to not be considered as a 'raw' apk file.
Here is my code:
public function getmyappapk()
{
$this->request->allowMethod([
'get'
]);
$this->response->type('application/apk');
$this->response->file(WWW_ROOT . DS. 'tmp' .DS. 'app-release.apk',
['download' => true, 'name' => 'MyApp.apk']);
return $this->response;
}
so as I said, if I access to www.mywebsite.com/tmp/app-release.apk, from my smartphone, it downloads it and I can install it.
But if I access to www.mywebsite.com/mycontroller/getmyappapk, it downloads the file and then, tells me that it's impossible to open it.
The type 'application/apk' seems to be ok because if I enter the url in a browser it tells me to record the file recognised as 'android packet'.
But something is certainly missing here.
What is the problem?
Related
'urlManagerBackend' => [
'class' => 'yii\web\urlManager',
'baseUrl' => 'http://backend.test',
'enablePrettyUrl' => true,
'showScriptName' => true,
],
then I want to display the image saved under uploads directory
<img src="<?= Yii::$app->urlManagerBackend->baseUrl; ?>/uploads/logo.jpg>
the problem is this url must not be hardcode like this:
'baseUrl' => 'http://backend.test',
The only way how to dynamically determine the domain of the other application (for example the backend from your frontend) would be by parsing the web server's configuration files.
The domain for current application (the one you can get with Url::base(true)) is determined from the request headers or variables set by web server. But those are available only for current application, not for any other application even if they are part of same project.
If you want to parse web server's configuration files than you will have to face three major challenges:
Different web servers have different syntax for configuration files.
Configuration files might be located anywhere.
You might not have access rights to read the configuration files.
So it might be better to try to think about some workaround instead of insisting on determining the domain dynamically.
Make a deploy script that would ask for the backend domain. The one who will be deploying your application on production servers will know the domain for the backend application and can enter it during deployment process. The deploy script will then set the entered backend domain in your configuration files.
Make a page in backend that must be visited before accessing the frontend application. You can determine the domain for backend when the page in backend is visited then set that domain in frontend configuration files. If the frontend is accessed before the domain for backend is set you will only display the notice that the backend page must be accessed first.
In the config folder there should be a file called params.php. If you have something like this
<?php
return [
'adminEmail' => 'admin#example.com',
'baseUrl' => 'http://backend.test',
];
You can use it in your code like this
<img src="<?= Yii::$app->params['baseUrl']; ?>/uploads/logo.jpg>
Then when you move to live, you just need to edit the params.php file.
Too long comment so I need to put it here.
But I'm just wondering in which case that makes sense, except if you are creating web applications, sites, ..., through your application, which I doubt you do.
You know your local domain (use local environment and put urls).
You will know your dev domain (use dev environment and put urls).
You will know your production domain (use prod environment and put urls).
You can also have multiple applications inside yii2 project, so for example,
10 applications across 3 envs, that is 30 urls which you will enter in you configs.
Can you please tell me, how you will access your app if url is dynamically determined -> without using anything else except Yii?
What is your step? You are typing in your browser what? Then we can proceed. Maybe we misunderstand each other.
urlManagerBackend' => [
'class' => 'yii\web\urlManager',
'baseUrl' => 'http://backend.test',
'enablePrettyUrl' => true,
'showScriptName' => true,
]
If you are wondering you can also have multiple urlManagerBackend components across Yii2 environments. Just like with params. Add it on multiple corresponding places at config. So in specific environment you place at same file only key => values which you need to override.
You could simply use Assets and Aliases for this:
If you have a backup/web/uploads/ folder in which you save images uploaded via your backend and you'd like to display those images on your frontend.
Create a new asset file in your frontend/assets/, let's call it BackendAsset.php:
<?php
namespace frontend\assets;
use yii\web\AssetBundle;
class BackendAsset extends AssetBundle {
public $sourcePath = '#backend/web/uploads';
}
where $sourcePath is the backend-folder (source) you'd like to access on the frontend. The #backend alias is predefined in the advanced template, so we'll use it.
Now in our view we can simply use the BackendAsset:
<?php
use frontend\assets\BackendAsset;
$backend = BackendAsset::register($this);
?>
and now we can easily display a file, let's say backend/web/uploads/somefile.jpg:
<img src="<?= $backend->baseUrl . '/somefile.jpg' ?>" >
NOTE: Using the asset in this way copies all the files from the backend/web/uploads to an asset folder in the frontend. To prevent that, you can tell your application not to copy the files, but to link to them (creating SymLinks) instead, unsing linkAssets (yii2 docu):
In your app configuration (in this case frontend/config/main.php), set the linkAssets parameter to TRUE:
'components' => [
'assetManager' => [
'linkAssets' => true,
]
]
I solve this problem by saving the full url in the database.
What about putting a reverseproxy (e.g. nginx) in front of the frontend-server?
Could be configured like:
http://frontend/backend/* -> forwards everyhing to the backend service, the rest will still go to the frontend server.
The configuration (in this case the location of the backend server) of this reverseproxy can be changed any time (also after deployment).
Could that be a viable scenario?
I am trying to implement Push Notifications on my website (using Pushpad). Therefore I created a "manifest.json" with following content:
{
"gcm_sender_id": "my_gcm_sender_id",
"gcm_user_visible_only": true
}
of course I created a valid GCM-Account and have a sender id
I put the manifest.json into my root directory and I also added this line to my index.php:
<link rel="manifest" href="/manifest.json">
Using Firefox everything works fine and I can send and receive push notifications (so I think the manifest-include works fine), but Chrome won't work...
The console shows following error:
Uncaught (in promise) DOMException: Registration failed - manifest empty or missing
I searched Google for a long time and tried everything I found, but nothing works.
What I tried:
created the manifest.json with "Editor" and saved it as type All Types (so no hidden .txt-file) and also with UTF-8-Encoding.
restarted Chrome
cleared Chrome's cache, history, etc.
I really hope somebody can help me.
For me it was a redirect. The manifest.json must return a 200 status code (must be directly available from the server), without any redirects.
You can check the response via
wget --max-redirect=0 https://example.com/manifest.json
or
curl https://example.com/manifest.json
I faced same issue,added manifest file right after head tag . which worked for me.Cheers!
This may be an issue with your Service Worker scope. I ran into a similar problem when I rearranged my files/directories. Make sure your sw.js is on the same level as your manifest.json, otherwise the service worker won't be able to find your manifest. Try putting them both in the root of your directory. Optionally, you can specify the scope of your service worker by adding it to serviceWorker.register():
if ('serviceWorker' in navigator) {
navigator.serviceWorker.register('/sw-test/sw.js', {scope: '/sw-test/'})
.then(function(reg) {
// registration worked
console.log('Registration succeeded. Scope is ' + reg.scope);
}).catch(function(error) {
// registration failed
console.log('Registration failed with ' + error);
});
}
Read more here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Service_Worker_API/Using_Service_Workers
Was wondering if your "manifest.json" is public accessible ?
If not maybe you can try to set it public accessible to see if that helps or not.
And it seems that the current chrome, when getting the "manifest.json" won't supply the cookies.
Because I didn't find an answer anywhere out there in the WWW, but managed to get it working after some time I want to provide my solution/answer for other users, who probably have the same problem:
In the file where I inlcuded the Pushpad files I wrote some PHP-Code before the <head>-Tag to include some files, e.g. for database connection. After I moved the PHP-Code below the <head>-Tag everything worked fine.
There seem to be three ways to fix this bug:
a) No redirects for "manifest.json" file.
b) Put a link to this file at the top of the tag.
c) Be sure, that there is no other manifest file before this one, cause it seems that web push script will try to import the first one and return an error due to the wrong data.
I have tried all three and finally forced Chrome to behave.
Adding the following block fixed this for me:
self.addEventListener('push', (event) => {
const title = 'Get Started With Workbox';
const options = {
body: event.data.text()
};
event.waitUntil(self.registration.showNotification(title, options));
});
I'm currently developing my first Chrome app that we'll be used as a Kiosk app later.
I'm trying to read a file at the startup of the app, that file is a config file (.json). It contains values that will be passed inside a URL once the app has launched (ie: www.google.com/key=keyValueInTheJsonFile).
I used https://developer.chrome.com/apps/fileSystem (the method "chooseEntry" especially) to be able to read a file, but in my case I would like to directly specify the path/name of the file and not ask the user to select a file. Like that I can pass the values to the redirected URL at the startup.
Any idea of how I could possibly do that?
Thanks!
If your file is in the package you can read it using simple XHR or Fetch.
You can't use web filesystem since it has different purpose and Chrome filesystem (user's FS) won't work here either since it needs a user interaction.
Use function getURL to get a full URL to the resource and then make XHR call:
var rUrl = chrome.runtime.getURL('file.json');
fetch(rUrl).then((response) => {
return response.json();
})
.then((fileContent) => {
// the content
})
.catch((cause) => console.log(cause));
After turning on Google Drive API access from the management console and getting my Client ID keys, I followed the sample code (using Python 2.7) and I am able to insert a folder, set the appropriate permissions (type=anyone,role=reader), and insert a text/html type file into the new folder.
However the JSON file resource objects I receive from executing insert on the drive service have no 'webViewLink' field! There are 'webContentLink' and 'selfLink' fields but 'webViewLink', which is necessary for static HTML publishing, seems to be missing.
Most perplexing. If this feature hasn't been turned on yet or if I need to configure my account settings to allow HTML publishing please let me know. Any other help would be most appreciated ;)
The webViewLink property is only returned for public folders, and not the single files inside such folders. You can use that as the base url to construct links to your files.
The WebViewLink file property can be retrieved by doing something like this:
$file = $service->files->get($file_id, array('fields' => 'webViewLink'));
$web_link_view = $file->getWebViewLink();
OR
$sheetsList = $drive_service->files->listFiles([
'fields' => 'files(id, name, webViewLink, webContentLink)',
]);
$web_link_view = $sheetsList->current()->getWebViewLink();
Pay attention that you should load the file specifying which fields you wanna bring with it (In this case, webViewLink). If you don't do that, only id and name will be available.
If you also need to configure file permissions, you can do something like:
$permissions = new \Google_Service_Drive_Permission();
$permissions->setRole('writer');
$permissions->setType('anyone');
$drive_service->permissions->create($file_id, $permissions);
Possible values for setRole() and setType() can be found here: https://developers.google.com/drive/api/v3/reference/permissions/create
I'm trying to upload images generated in my Flash application to an album on Facebook. This was working earlier in the year, but revisiting the code I now get the following OAuthException:
(#324) Requires upload file
I am using the most recent version of the ActionSccript Facebook API. The setup works like this:
First I do the authentication check with PHP to ensure users have granted permission before having to wait for the Flash to load. I'm requesting the publish_stream and user_photos permissions. The access token comes back correctly.
Once the user is authenticated the Flash is loaded and performs its own initialisation, passing fileUpload=true as part of the init object:
var initObject:Object = {
channelUrl : "myChannelURL.html",
fileUpload : true
}
Facebook.init(
'myAppID',
myCallbackFunction,
initObject,
myAccessToken
);
This seems to work as expected, the callback receives the uid of the current user.
At the end of my application I POST a Bitmap object to a predetermined album:
Facebook.api(
albumID+"/photos",
onImagePost,
{
message:"",
image:new Bitmap(myBitmapData),
fileName:''
},
URLRequestMethod.POST
);
At this point Facebook returns a 400 response:
"error": {
"message": "(#324) Requires upload file",
"type": "OAuthException"
}
What more do I need to do to ensure that this permission is being included?
It turns out that this was not a permissions error at all. Since I last deployed this code Facebook have tightened up their restrictions a bit, and the fileName parameter passed as part of the api call can no longer be an empty string. Simply passing any old text as a file name fixes the problem.
Facebook.api(
albumID+"/photos",
onImagePost,
{
message:"",
image:new Bitmap(myBitmapData),
fileName:'FILE' // required to be non-empty
},
URLRequestMethod.POST
);
Im not sure if this is a solution that can be translated into the Actionscript SDK... But, with the PHP SDK there is a method inside the facebook SDK that is called setFileUploadSupport - try looking in the code for a place to set that parameter to true.