I wanted to write junit for below method "createEmailTripEvent()", So i was trying to mock EmailTrip interface by using EasyMock but couldn't able to proceed.
Is it possible to use EasyMock for mocking interface or we need to go for Mockito only ?
If Mockito is the only option, then anybody can explain me how we can use ?
Please refer below class & Interface
private EmailTrip emailTrip;
public ModelAndView createEmailTripEvent (HttpServletRequest request,
HttpServletResponse response) throws Exception {
emailTrip.createEmailTripEvent(Code, emailRequest);
//Need to write junit for above method
}
public interface EmailTrip {
void createEmailTripEvent(String code, TripEmailRequest request)
throws Exception;
}
public class EmailTripImpl implements EmailTrip { }
You should include the following dependency to your maven pom (if not using maven, urgently consider doing so...). Otherwise include the EasyMock dependency to your class path.
<dependency>
<groupId>org.easymock</groupId>
<artifactId>easymock</artifactId>
<version>3.3.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
After that you should be able to create your test class.
import static org.easymock.EasyMock.*;
import org.easymock.*;
import org.junit.Rule;
import org.junit.Test;
public class MyTinyTest extends EasyMockSupport {
#Rule
public EasyMockRule rule = new EasyMockRule(this);
#Mock
private EmailTrip emailTrip;
#TestSubject
private final ServletClass servlet = new ServletClass(emailTrip);
#Test
public void testCreateEmailTripEvent() {
// you should know how to create an email request instance!
EmailTripRequest emailRequest = createRequest();
// tell EasyMock what behavior is expected...
emailTrip.createEmailTripEvent("code", emailRequest);
// start testing...
replayAll();
// excute method to test...
ModelAndView result = servlet.createEmailTripEvent(servletRequest, servletResponse);
// verify if expected behavior occured.
verifyAll();
// check other assertions concerning the method result...
}
}
Related
Hi I'm new to Quarkus and I've one Quarkus app which has one filter, from filter I'm calling static method I want to mock that static method call. How can I do that?
#Provider
public class AuthFilter implements ContainerRequestFilter{
#Context
HttpServerRequest request;
public void filter(ContainerRequestContext context) {
if (isPermittedPath()) {
return;
}
String company = Util.getCompany(request.host());
//some code here
}
}
I want to mock call of Util.getCompany(request.host()) method.
I'm following this document to write test cases https://quarkus.io/guides/getting-started-testing
I am trying to use PowerMockito to test a save method by verifying an internal audit() method call.
This internal call is made by auditor object which is being instantiated in an init() method of the class. As it is not injected I will not be able to mock it directly. When I used Mockito to verify it always said "There were zero interaction with the mock".
Question:How exactly do I test the save feature? Kindly help!
public class DaoImpl implements Dao{
private Auditor auditor;
#InjectValue
private ObjectLoader loader;
#InjectValue
private ConfigurationProvider confProvider;
#PostConstruct
public void init() {
//Mock this object instantiation and verify audit is called once
auditor = new SyncAuditor(confProvider.getClientConfiguration(), new EventRegProvider());
}
#Override
public void save(final AuditEvt auditEvt) {
final AuditedEvent auditedEvent = builder.build();
auditor.audit(auditedEvent);
}
Test :
#RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
#PrepareForTest({ DaoImplTest.class })
#PowerMockIgnore("javax.management.*")
public class DaoImplTest extends PowerMockito {
#InjectMocks
private DaoImpl dataAccess;
#Mock
private SynchAuditor auditorMock;
#Before
public void setUp() throws Exception {
loader = ObjectLoader.init("JUNIT");
loader.bind(ConfigurationProvider.class, configurationProviderMock);
dataAccess = loader.newInstance(DaoImpl.class);
}
#After
public void tearDown() {
loader.release(dataAccess);
ConnectionMgr.disconnect("JUNIT");
}
#Test
public void testSaveAuditEvent() throws Exception {
PowerMockito.whenNew(SynchAuditor.class).
withArguments(Matchers.any(ClientConfiguration.class), Matchers.any(EventRegProvider.class)).thenReturn(this.auditorMock);
final AuditEvent event = AuditEvent.from(null, "principal", UUID.randomUUID().toString(), "randomText",
new AuditEvtDefn((long) 522, "234242", "234242fdgd", true), SUCCESS, null, new GregorianCalendar());
dataAccess.save(event);
Mockito.verify(auditorMock, times(1)).audit(Matchers.any(AuditedEvent.class));
}
Even PowerMockito.verifyNew says there were zero interaction
PowerMockito.verifyNew(SynchronousAuditor.class,times(1)).withArguments(Matchers.any(AuditorClientConfiguration.class),Matchers.any(EventRegistrationProvider.class));
So, I figured out that java reflection will help in such a situation. You will have to get hold onto the real object and then set mocked object to it.
final Field privateAuditorField = DaoImpl.class.getDeclaredField("auditor");
privateAuditorField.setAccessible(true);
privateAuditorField.set(dataAccess, auditorMock);
Now verify will run sucessfully.
Mockito.verify(auditorMock, Mockito.times(1)).audit(Matchers.any(AuditedEvent.class));
I have multiple #Test method in a class while running the paxexam it fails with the below Exception
java.lang.Exception: No runnable methods
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.validateInstanceMethods(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:169)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.collectInitializationErrors(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:104)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.validate(ParentRunner.java:355)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.<init>(ParentRunner.java:76)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.<init>(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
at org.ops4j.pax.exam.invoker.junit.internal.ContainerTestRunner.<init>(ContainerTestRunner.java:54)
at org.ops4j.pax.exam.invoker.junit.internal.ContainerTestRunnerBuilder.runnerForClass(ContainerTestRunnerBuilder.java:48)
at org.junit.runners.model.RunnerBuilder.safeRunnerForClass(RunnerBuilder.java:59)
at org.ops4j.pax.exam.invoker.junit.internal.ContainerTestRunnerClassRequest.getRunner(ContainerTestRunnerClassRequest.java:61)
at org.junit.internal.requests.FilterRequest.getRunner(FilterRequest.java:31)
at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:138)
The below is the pax exam code. When i run this code i get an exception. Adding one more point if i change this annotation #ExamReactorStrategy(PerClass.class) to #ExamReactorStrategy(PerMethod.class) this will work the problem is test container restarts after every method
#RunWith(PaxExam.class)
#ExamReactorStrategy(PerClass.class)
public class Integration5TestCases {
private static Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(IntegrationTestCases.class);
#Inject
private BundleContext bc;
#Inject
protected FeaturesService featuresService;
/**
* To make sure the tests run only when the boot features are fully
* installed
*/
#Inject
BootFinished bootFinished;
#Configuration
public static Option[] configuration() throws Exception {
MavenUrlReference oracleLib = maven()
.groupId("com.oracle")
.artifactId("ojdbc6")
.version("11.2.0")
.type("jar");
MavenUrlReference dbHandler = maven().groupId("Oracle")
.artifactId("DBHandler")
.versionAsInProject()
.type("xml")
.classifier("features");
return new Option[] {
returnNewKarafInstance(),
systemProperty(PaxExamConstants.ORCALESYSPROPNAME).value(dbHandler.getURL()),
KarafDistributionOption.debugConfiguration("8898", true),
bootClasspathLibrary(oracleLib),
configureConsole().ignoreLocalConsole(),
logLevel(LogLevel.INFO),
keepRuntimeFolder(),
};
}
private static KarafDistributionBaseConfigurationOption returnNewKarafInstance(){
return karafDistributionConfiguration().frameworkUrl(maven().groupId("org.apache.karaf").artifactId("apache-karaf")
.type("zip").versionAsInProject())
.unpackDirectory(new File("target/paxexam/unpack/"))
.useDeployFolder(false);
}
#Inject
SessionFactory commandProcessor;
#Test
public void test1() throws Exception {
System.out.println("sd");
}
#Test
public void test2() throws Exception {
System.out.println("sd");
}
}
This was happening because junit lib was initialized twice inside the karaf container. Thanks for the help guys.
I am using PowerMocking for JUNIT and Iam new to PowerMock.
I want to mock one class which is non static.
The class scenario goes as follows.
public class Export extends MyUtil implements ExportFormatting<DeptSummaryByDCDTO, LmReportsInputDTO>{
public String createPDF(List<DeptSummaryByDCDTO> summaryDtoList, LmReportsInputDTO inputDto){
}
public String createPDF(Map<String, DeptSummaryByDCDTO> paramMap,
LmReportsInputDTO paramK) {
}
}
The calling class is as follows.
public static Response getMultiplePackSku{
filePath = new Export(inputDto).createPDF(resultList,null);
}
The Question is,
I am trying to test the above class using powermock.
Can anybody tell how to mock the line filePath.....
You need to first mock the constructor and return an Export mock. On the returned mock you need to record the call to createPDF. The tricky part is the constructor mocking. I'll give you an example, hopefully you'll get all of it:
#RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class) // This annotation is for using PowerMock
#PrepareForTest(Export.class) // This annotation is for mocking the Export constructor
public class MyTests {
private mockExport;
#Before
public void setUp () {
// Create the mock
mockExport = PowerMock.createMock(Export.class)
}
#Test
public void testWithConstructor() {
SomeDtoClass inputDto = PowerMock.createMock(SomeDtoClass.class);
PowerMock.expectNew(Export.class, inputDto).andReturn(mockExport);
PowerMock.replay(mockExport, Export.class);
expect(mockExport.createPDF(resultList, null);
// Run the tested method.
}
}
Here is a description of how to mock a constructor call: MockConstructor
The title pretty much says it all. I would like to set up a traditional JUnit test to mock a controller's dependencies and run tests against actions.
I've found that I can achieve my goal like this:
public class AccountsControllerTest {
private controllers.Accounts accountsController;
#Test
public void test() {
running(fakeApplication(), new Runnable() {
public void run() {
accountsController = new controllers.Accounts();
accountsController.setAccountsWorkflow(mock(workflow.Accounts.class));
}
});
}
}
The obvious problem here is that I'm instantiating my class under test and injecting mock dependencies from the test method itself, when I should be doing that in the setup() method. It seems that the setup() method is useless if I'm going to test my controller in a traditional way.
Of course I can test controllers the way Play recommends, but my application is dependent on an external SOAP web service, so I need unit tests to show that our code is working when their servers are down.
So, what's the best way to unit test a Play controller using mocks while still taking advantage of setup() and teardown() methods?
Edit
I realize I'm assuming some knowledge here, so for those who are unaware, controller instantiation in a unit test must be wrapped in a running() function or Play! will throw a runtime exception saying that no application has been started.
You could accomplish this using Mockito and Play's FakeApplication and setting the static Http.Context variable.
This way you can write the test like all other JUnit test.
Example:
...
import static play.test.Helpers.status;
import play.test.FakeApplication;
import play.test.Helpers;
import play.mvc.Http;
import play.mvc.Result;
...
#RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class ApplicationTest {
public static FakeApplication app;
#Mock
private Http.Request request;
#BeforeClass
public static void startApp() {
app = Helpers.fakeApplication();
Helpers.start(app);
}
#Before
public void setUp() throws Exception {
Map<String, String> flashData = Collections.emptyMap();
Http.Context context = new Http.Context(request, flashData, flashData);
Http.Context.current.set(context);
}
#Test
public void testIndex() {
final Result result = Application.index();
assertEquals(play.mvc.Http.Status.OK, status(result));
}
#AfterClass
public static void stopApp() {
Helpers.stop(app);
}