I'm working on a Play application and need to generate links in a mixed Scala-HTML view that call controller actions. I found this question from a couple years ago that's similar to my situation, but the provided answers don't work for me.
The elements are generated in a loop so I can't manually insert the argument to the controller action, but nothing I've tried has worked. This is the line I have now:
ID: #{var fhirID = <processing for ID>; <a href='#routes.Users.fhirUserDetails(fhirID)'>fhirID</a>}
The accepted answer to the question I linked earlier effectively uses this structure too:
<a href='#routes.Application.show("some")'>My link with some string</a>
My issue here is twofold:
1) How can I have the variable fhirID passed to the controller action? My generated link simply has the text "fhirID" instead of what's generated by the first part of the statement.
2) Is the #routes.Users syntax correct? When I click the generated link, it literally attempts to render a page at /myapp/#routes.Users.fhirUserDetails(fhirID)
I realize I'm probably missing something very basic here- thanks for any advice!
The problem seems to be not the #routes syntax (which you have completely correct) but rather a case of the Twirl engine not seeing where code ends and HTML begins (or something like that anyway...)
The line you've included, which has both a var and a semicolon, made me suspect this, and I've been able to reproduce the problem when I use that style.
My recommendation is to use the #defining helper rather than var to get a scoped variable for use in your links, as follows:
ID: #defining(<processing for ID>) { fhirID =>
<a href='#routes.Users.fhirUserDetails(fhirID)'>fhirID</a>
}
You can nest #defining blocks as deeply as you like if necessary, although it's probably better to make a call out to a reusable block if there's a lot of logic. I think this style makes for more-readable templates and also somehow looks more like "real Scala" :-)
Related
My extension renders additional links on a page (that is adds some <a href='...'>...</a> to the page text (in HtmlPageLinkRendererEnd hook)).
See small arrows in https://withoutvowels.org/wiki/Tanakh:Genesis_1:1 for an example. The arrows are automatically added by my extension (sorry, at the time of writing this the source code is not yet released).
The problem is that red/blue ("new") status is not updated for links which I add.
Please explain how to make Wikipedia to update color of my links as appropriate together with regular [[...]] MediaWiki links.
My current workaround is to run php maintenance/update.php. It is a very bad workaround. How to do it better?
Normally you'd use LinkRenderer to create the links and LinkBatch to make the page existence check efficient (you don't want a separate SQL query for each link). You can't really do that in HtmlPageLinkRendererEnd since you only learn about the links one by one.
The way the parser deals with this is that it replaces links with a placeholder and collects them in a list, then after parsing is mostly done it looks them all up at once and then switches the placeholders with the rendered links. You can probably hook into somthing that happens between the two (e.g. ParserAfterParse), get the list of links from the parser and use them to build a list of your own links.
With valuable help of Wikitech-l mailing list, I found a solution.
The solution is to use ParserAfterTidy hook.
public static function onParserAfterTidy( &$parser, &$text ) {
# ...
$parserOutput = $parser->getOutput();
foreach($parserOutput->getLinks() as ...) {
# ...
$parserOutput->addLink( Title::newFromDBkey(...) );
}
}
I was wondering if there is a way to upload images in rails 4 not using erb. I have my html code in quotations in my model (so that i can use it as a default for when creating a page). SO I cant put erb in the quotes, cuz if i do it'll come out as the erb code and not the actual view. (i.e. the upload image form. itll come out as the actual f.image_tag instead of the actual upload button).
So I am just seeing if there another way i could implement image uploading into the quotations that wont require erb. But, uses Rails 4.
If you have plain HTML code inside the string, and just want it to be displayed, you need to call .html_safe in your view, like:
'<div id="foo">bar</div>'.html_safe()
Note that normally is a bad practice: that doesn't mean it is always bad, but it means that it is always an attention point to make sure it is the best way to do it.
If you want to do image upload without using form.image_tag, you can just put that in your view and see the generated code (Ctrl+U in Chrome), that, in this case, will be something like:
<input type="file" id="something" />
And add that to the string. Probably some finer validation and options are added too via JS, that would be a pain to add this way - one way to be to add a script tag to the html with the code.
If, however, your string already contains code like this, and you are asking way it is not working, then you need to add an eval to the caller, e.g.:
eval('form.image_tag :image')
Not that this is an even worse smell, and it should be avoided at all costs.
Maybe it would be better to add some flags in your section.rb model, and then use that in a helper or in the view render the html; for example, a has_upload? field, and then you can do something like this:
if #section.has_upload?
form.image_tag :imagem
end
Kind of a strange one, but in my views I have a tick (✔) and a cross (×) used as links (in lieu of images). Is there any way of finding these elements and testing them using RSpec and Capybara-webkit, or should I try and target say the title attribute instead and ignore this route?
My test in question looks like this:
context "casting a vote", js: true do
before do
sign_in user
click_link '✔'
sleep 0.2
end
it { should have_content("Vote cast!") }
end
The failure message I get is (predictably):
Failure/Error: click_link "raw('✔')"
Capybara::ElementNotFound:
Unable to find link "raw('✔')"
Thanks in advance for your help.
Capybara doesn't see the HTML, it runs thru the DOM, which then sees the actual values those things encode. You must send the raw code as a UTF-{8,16} string containing the code point itself.
Most languages would present an HTML '✔' as "\u10004", so try that.
Is there a way in Rails to escape code inserted in a textarea? If I post rails code at this point, there are some symbols that conflict with html (<< for instance) that don't render. Any thoughts on how to avoid this? In fact in some things I test, I make a post and it doesn't show up at all when I try to render it. I assume this is because of some conflict with the code I am posting.
You can possibly call a javascript function on window.onload/$(document).ready, that will remmove the html specific special character
I have what I feel is a very simple question about Umbraco, but one that has as of yet no apparent answer.
I have a razor template, standard stuff, with # displaying variables and some inline C# code.
At one point in the template I use:
#Umbraco.RenderMacro("myCustomMacro");
no problems there, everything works as expected.
Now, this macro is inserted on every page (it's in the master template) but I have a page property that allows the content authors to turn it on and off via a check box in the page properties, again so far so good everything works perfectly.
However I now find that for a certain "document type" this component MUST be displayed, so I've been trying to find a way to perform that check.
Now in my mind, this should be as simple as doing something like this:
#{
if(CurrentPage.documentType == "someDocTypeAliasHere")
{
//Render the macro
}
else
{
// Render the macro only if the tick box is checked
}
}
as I say, this is (or I believe it should be anyway) a very simple operation, but one that so far does not seem to have a result.
What Have I tried so far?
Well apart from reading every page on our-umbraco that mentions anything to do with razor & the #CurrentPage variable, Iv'e been through the razor properties cheat sheet, and tried what would appear to be the most common properties including (In no specific order):
#CurrentPage.NodeTypeAlias
#CurrentPage.NodeType
#CurrentPage.ContentType
#CurrentPage.DocumentType
and various letter case combinations of those, plus some others that looked like they might fit the bill.
Consistently the properties either don't exist or are empty so have no useable information in them to help determine the result.
So now after a couple of days of going round in circles, and not getting anywhere I find myself here..
(Please note: this is not a search the XSLT question, or iterate a child collection or anything like that, so any requests to post XSLT, Macros, Page templates or anything like that will be refused, all I need to do is find a way to determine the Document Type of the current page being rendered.)
Cheers
Shawty
PS: Forgot to mention, I'm using
umbraco v 4.11.8 (Assembly version: 1.0.4869.17899)
Just in case anyone asks.
In Umbraco 7 use currentPageNode.DocumentTypeAlias
In Umbraco 7.1 I use: #if (#CurrentPage.DocumentTypeAlias == "NewsItem")
think you do actually need to create a node each time when you are on the page to access the pages properties like nodetypealias and stuff, try this i have the same kind of functionality on my site, http://rdmonline.co.uk/ but in the side menu where depending on the page/section it shows a diff menu links.
#{
var currentPageID = Model.Id;
var currentPageNode = Library.NodeById(currentPageID);
if (currentPageNode.NodeTypeAlias == "someDocTypeAliasHere")
{
//Render the macro
}
else
{
// Render the macro only if the tick box is checked
}
}
Let me know if this works for you.
This is a bit unrelated to this post, but searching Google brought me to this post, so I thought I'd share in case anoyne else is dealing with this issue: In Umbraco 7, to get all content in the site for a specific type:
var articles = CurrentPage.AncestorOrSelf(1).Descendants()
.Where("DocumentTypeAlias == \"BlogPost\"").OrderBy("CreateDate desc");
If your razor view inherits from Umbraco.Web.Mvc.UmbracoViewPage, you could also use UmbracoHelper:
#if (UmbracoHelper.AssignedContentItem.DocumentTypeAlias.Equals("NewsItem")) { ... }
Querying for a specific DocumentType is also easy:
UmbracoHelper.AssignedContentItem.Descendants("NewsItem")
This code will recursively return the list of IPublishedContent nodes.
If you wish to use this list with your specific DocumentType information, these items would have to be mapped to the specific type. Other than that, IPublishedContent gives you the basic information for the nodes.
I've later saw that you have been using an older version of Umbraco. :)
This implementation is only for v7.