can't create a record in a database - mysql

I am using rails version 4.2 and ruby version 2.2.0. I am trying to save a record to lollypops table. No exceptions indicating reasons.
TASK: As soon as a member is created and saved, I want to populate the lollypops table by calling the create_lollypop(#member.id) in members controller's create method like this:
# POST /members
# POST /members.json
def create
#member = Member.create(members_params)
return unless request.post?
#member.save!
self.current_user = #member
c = Country.find(#member.country_id)
#member.update_attributes(
:country_code=>c.code)
create_lollypop(#member.id) #From here I want to create lollypop
MemberMailer.signup_notification(#member).deliver_now
redirect_to(:controller => '/admin/members', :action => 'show',
:id=> #member.id)
flash[:notice] = "Thanks for signing up! Check your email now to
confirm that your email is correct!"
rescue ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid
load_data
render :action => 'new'
end
def create_lollypop(member_id)
#member = Member.find(member_id)
Lollypop.create(
:member_id=>#member.id,
:product_name=>'lollypop',
:product_price=>100,
:email=>#member.email,
:house_flat => #member.house_flat,
:street=>#member.street,
:city_town=>#member.city_town,
:country =>#member.country,
:postcode_index=>#member.postcode_index,
:name=>#member.name)
end
The 'member' is created but the 'lollypops' table is not populated. The associations are:
MEMBER model:
has_one :lollypop, :dependent=>:destroy
LOLLYPOP model
belongs_to :member
If I use generic SQL command then the lollypops table gets populated but I do not want to do that:
def self.create_lollypop(member_id)
member = Member.find(member_id)
ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute("insert into lollypops (member_id,product_name,product_price,email,house_flat,street,city_town,country,postcode_index,name)
values(#{member.id},'lollypop',#{100},'#{member.email}','#{member.house_flat}','#{member.street}','#{member.city_town}','#{member.country_code}','#{member.postcode_index}','#{member.name}')")
end
Any advice would be welcomed. Thank you.

In your create_lollypop(), You are not defining #member.
def create_lollypop(member_id)
#member = Member.find member_id
Lollypop.create!(
:member_id=>#member.id,
:product_name=>'lollypop',
:product_price=>100,
:email=>#member.email,
:house_flat => #member.house_flat,
:street=>#member.street,
:city_town=>#member.city_town,
:country =>#member.country,
:postcode_index=>#member.postcode_index,
:name=>#member.name
)
end
Also use create! so in case any validation failed then it will raise exception. So it will help you sort out issue.

For the moment try to create lollypop using the association method create_lollypop directly in your controller. use this code in you create controller method, note that create_lollypop method will fill (member_id field automatically):
#member = Member.create(members_params)
return unless request.post?
#member.save!
self.current_user = #member
c = Country.find(#member.country_id)
#member.update_attributes(
:country_code=>c.code)
#From here I want to create lollypop
#member.create_lollypop(
:product_name=>'lollypop',
:product_price=>100,
:email=>#member.email,
:house_flat => #member.house_flat,
:street=>#member.street,
:city_town=>#member.city_town,
:country =>#member.country,
:postcode_index=>#member.postcode_index,
:name=>#member.name
)
MemberMailer.signup_notification(#member).deliver_now
redirect_to(:controller => '/admin/members', :action => 'show',
:id=> #member.id)
flash[:notice] = "Thanks for signing up! Check your email now to
confirm that your email is correct!"
rescue ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid
load_data
render :action => 'new'

This is not exactly an answer, more like tips and notes, it's a little long and I hope you don't mind.
return unless request.post?
This is more of a php thing not a rails thing, in rails already the routing is checking this, so you don't need to do this check inside the controller, if it isn't a post it will be routed elsewhere.
#member = Member.create(members_params)
return unless request.post?
#member.save!
Saving after creating is meaningless, because create already saves the data, if you are doing it for the sake of the bang save!, then you could use the create with bang create!, not to mention that you do the redirection check after the member's create, so if this did work, it would leave you with stray members.
c = Country.find(#member.country_id)
#member.update_attributes(:country_code=>c.code)
If you have your assocciations correctly, you don't need to save the code like this, because the member knows that this country_id belongs to a country.
So add this to the member model
class Member < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :lollypop, dependent: :destroy
belongs_to :country
end
This way you could always call #member.country to return the country object, then the code could come from there, like #member.country.code, or you could just write a method to shorten that up
def country_code
country.code
end
this way will get the code through an extra query, but it has an advantage, if you for any reason change a country's code, you don't need to loop on all members who have that country and update their codes too, you could also shorten this up even more using #delegate
#member.save!
#member.update_attributes(:country_code=>c.code)
Here you are updating the attributes of member after saving the member, which is kinda a waste, because you are doing 2 queries for what could be done with 1 query, programmatically it is correct and it will work, but it's bad for scaling, when more users start using your app the database will be more busy and the responses will be slower.
Instead i would recommend to postpone the creation of member till you have all the data you want
#member = Member.new(members_params) # this won't save to the database yet
#memeber.code = Country.find(#member.country_id).code
#member.save
This will only do 1 query at the end when all data is ready to be saved.
redirect_to(:controller => '/admin/members', :action => 'show', :id=> #member.id)
This is ok, but you probably have a better shorter path name in your routes, something like members_admin_path, check your routes name by doing a bin/rake routes in your terminal.
redirect_to members_admin_path(id: #member)
redirect_to ...
flash[:notice] = "message"
I'm not sure this will work, because the redirection needs to be returned, but when you added the flash after it, either the redirection will happen without the flash, or the flash will be set and returned as it's the last statement, but the redirection won't happen, not sure which will happen, to fix it you can simply swap the two statements, create the flash first and then redirect, or use the more convenient way of setting the flash while redirecting, cause that's supported
redirect_to ....., notice: 'my message'
rescue ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid
load_data
render :action => 'new'
This will do the job, but it isn't conventional, people tend to use the soft save and then do an if condition on the return value, either true or false, here's a short layout
# prepare #member's data
if #member.save
# set flash and redirect
else
load_data
render :new
end
The lollypop creation
Now there's a few things about this, first you have the method in the controller, which is bad cause it shouldn't be the controller's concern, the second method the self.create_lollypop is better cause it's created on the model level, but it's a class method, then the better way is creating it as a member method, this way the member who creates the lollypop already knows the data because it's his own self, notice i don't need to call #member because i am already inside member, so simple calls like id, email will return the member's data
# inside member.rb
def create_lollypop
Lollypop.create!(
member_id: id,
product_name: 'lollypop',
product_price: 100,
email: email,
house_flat: house_flat,
street: street,
city_town: city_town,
country: country,
postcode_index: postcode_index,
name: name
)
end
if you want you can also add this as an after create callback
after_create :create_lollypop
ps: This method name will probably conflict with the ActiveRecords create_lollypop method, so maybe you should pick a different name for this method.

As Mohammad had suggested to me, I changed Lollypop.create to Lollypop.create! and
while running my code, one validation error popped up. After correcting it and
altering my code to:
Lollypop.create!(
:member_id=> #member.id,
:product_name=>'lollypop',
:product_price=>100,
:email=>#member.email,
:house_flat => #member.house_flat,
:street=>#member.street,
:city_town=>#member.city_town,
:country =>#member.country_code,
:postcode_index=>#member.postcode_index,
:name=>#member.name
)
The 'lollypops' table got populated.

Related

Using user input to query MySQL database and move to next page or display error

When accessing the first page of our site, users are prompted to enter a "coupon code" to continue to the next page. Coupons can be used multiple times, but must exist in the "code" field of the coupon_codes table.
If the user enters a code that exists in the coupon_codes table, they should automatically be redirected to the next page. If the user enters a code that does not exist in the coupon_codes table, an error should be displayed with the option of trying again.
I'm sure I'm making this more difficult than it needs to be, as I've been working on this on and off for days. I've been able to get it to be what I feel is close, but not quite there. There have been multiple variations and trials, but this is where I'm currently at.
Model (coupon_code):
def self.code(code)
if code
self.exists?(['code = ?', "#{code}"])
##move on to /design
else
##display error
end
end
View (index):
<%= form_tag coupon_code, :method => 'get' do %>
<%= text_field_tag :code, params[:code] %>
<%= submit_tag("Check my coupon", :name => nil) %>
<% end %>
Controller:
def index
#coupon_codes = CouponCode.code(params[:code])
end
The log shows the following (after entering the correct code) before re-rendering the page I'm already on:
CouponCode Exists (0.2ms) SELECT 1 AS one FROM `coupon_codes` WHERE (code = 'correct') LIMIT 1
If I use the rails console, it seems like it should work (assuming I'm using it correctly), I'm just not sure how to go about getting it to move on or display an error.
2.1.1 :001 > code = 'correct'
=> "correct"
2.1.1 :002 > CouponCode.exists?(['code = ?', "#{code}"])
CouponCode Exists (0.2ms) SELECT 1 AS one FROM `coupon_codes` WHERE (code = 'T001') LIMIT 1
D, [2017-08-17T11:08:32.730761 #6788] DEBUG -- : CouponCode Exists (0.2ms) SELECT 1 AS one FROM `coupon_codes` WHERE (code = 'correct') LIMIT 1
=> true
2.1.1 :003 > code = 'wrong'
=> "wrong"
2.1.1 :004 > CouponCode.exists?(['code = ?', "#{code}"])
CouponCode Exists (0.2ms) SELECT 1 AS one FROM `coupon_codes` WHERE (code = 'wjorea') LIMIT 1
D, [2017-08-17T11:09:10.611964 #6788] DEBUG -- : CouponCode Exists (0.2ms) SELECT 1 AS one FROM `coupon_codes` WHERE (code = 'wrong') LIMIT 1
=> false
Again, I'm sure it's something simple and I'm just over thinking it. Sorry if I gave way too much detail... I figured too much is better than not enough. Thank you in advance for any help or direction!
My current code is based off of parts of this Stack Overflow question, if that helps any.
The problem here is the model is not and should not be concerned with controller or view issues. Redirecting to another page is explicitly a controller issue and must be handled directly in the controller.
What you want to do is reduce your model's code to an advisory position, it will advise the controller on how to handle the request. It will not take direct action.
For example:
class CouponCode
def self.code_exists?(code)
self.exists?(code: code)
end
end
Then in the controller:
if (Coupon.code_exists?(params[:code]))
redirect_to(coupon_exists_path(...))
end
Given how simple your check is, though, it's not clear if having such a method in the model is of any use since the alternative is simply:
if (Coupon.exists?(code: params[:code]))
redirect_to(coupon_exists_path(...))
end
That's one character more code on the controller and three lines less on the model.
I'm just not sure how to go about getting it to move on or display an
error.
You need to put that code in the controller. Its the controller's job to handle such things. Also you don't need a model method here. To keep the things straight forward and simple, try the below
def index
if CouponCode.exists?(code: params[:code])
#code for redirect to next page
else
flash.now[:notice] = "Your error message"
end
end

How do you Skip an Object in an ActiveModel Serializer Array?

I have searched through all the active model serializer (v 0.9.0) documentation and SO questions I can find, but can't figure this out.
I have objects which can be marked as "published" or "draft". When they aren't published, only the user who created the object should be able to see it. I can obviously set permissions for "show" in my controller, but I also want to remove these objects from the json my "index" action returns unless it is the correct user. Is there a way to remove this object from the json returned by the serializer completely?
In my activemodel serializer, I am able to user filter(keys) and overloaded attributes to remove the data, as shown using my code below, but I can't just delete the entire object (I'm left having to return an empty {} in my json, trying to return nil breaks the serializer).
I'm probably missing something simple. Any help would be much appreciated!
class CompleteExampleSerializer < ExampleSerializer
attributes :id, :title
has_many :children
def attributes
data = super
(object.published? || object.user == scope || scope.admin?) ? data : {}
end
def filter(keys)
keys = super
(object.published? || object.user == scope || scope.admin?) ? keys : {}
end
end
That looks correct, try returning an array instead of a hash when you dont want any keys. Also, I don't think calling super is necessary b/c the filter takes in the keys.
Also, I don't think defining an attributes method is necessary.
I have chapters that can either be published or unpublished. They're owned by a story so I ended doing something like below.
has_many :unpublished_chapters, -> { where published: false }, :class_name => "Chapter", dependent: :destroy
has_many :published_chapters, -> { where published: true }, :class_name => "Chapter", dependent: :destroy
Inside of my serializer, I choose to include unpublished_chapters only if the current_user is the owner of those chapters. In ams 0.8.0 the syntax is like so.
def include_associations!
include! :published_chapters if ::Authorization::Story.include_published_chapters?(current_user,object,#options)
include! :unpublished_chapters if ::Authorization::Story.include_unpublished_chapters?(current_user,object,#options)
end
In my case, it's not so bad to differentiate the two and it saves me the trouble of dealing with it on the client. Our situations are similar but say you want to get all of the chapters by visiting the chapters index route. This doesn't make much sense in my app but you could go to that controller and render a query on that table.

rails before_action on csv download

I'm using devise to authenticate users. I want them to be able to look at the page without being logged in, but if they wish to download the csv data, they must be logged in. Here's how i've set up the csv download part
respond_to do |format|
format.html{
render :layout => 'indices_show'
}
format.csv{
export_to_csv(idxp)
}
end
and here is the export_to_csv function
def export_to_csv(idxf)
cash = params[:cash]
#title = get_title(#index)
if (cash =='1')
navs = #index.navsc.from(idxf)
r = #index.returnsc.from(idxf)
else
navs = #index.navs.from(idxf)
r = #index.returns.from(idxf)
end
dates = #index.dates.from(idxf)
csv_string = CSV.generate do |csv|
csv << [#title]
csv << ["Date", "Return", "NAV"]
dates.each_with_index do |d, i|
csv << [d,r[i],navs[i]]
end
end
send_data csv_string,
:type => 'text/csv; charset=iso-8859-1; header=present',
:disposition => "attachment; filename ="+ #title +".csv"
end
At the top of this controller, I have,
before_action :authenticate_user!, only:[:export_to_csv]
but it doesn't do anything as the user is still able to download the data without being logged in. I've found a semi work around by doing this,
respond_to do |format|
format.html{
render :layout => 'indices_show'
}
format.csv{
if (user_signed_in?)
export_to_csv(idxp)
else
redirect_to new_user_session_path
end
}
end
The problem here is that once the user logs in, it redirects to the homepage. Is there a way such that when a user clicks the download button, they are forced to sign in, and upon signing in they are redirected back to that page and the data is downloaded? Thanks
The before_action isn't working because export_to_csv is not the method being called as the action - that would normally be the method your routing maps to - i.e. probably the method with your respond_to code in it. Of course, you can split the method into two separate ones and have one for html and one for csv and then have the before_action set up for the csv one. That's perhaps not so nice, especially if it's just two different viewing formats for the same data. If they're not very similar views, perhaps it would be appropriate to separate them. It depends on your app.
Another option is to use your second approach but modify it. Before the redirect_to new_user_session_path, try inserting a call to store_location_for(:user, request.request_uri), or perhaps pass request.original_url. See here for the doc/code:
https://github.com/plataformatec/devise/blob/master/lib/devise/controllers/store_location.rb#L26
You can see that if the stored location is present, it's used in preference to the root path:
https://github.com/plataformatec/devise/blob/master/lib/devise/controllers/helpers.rb#L143
Note that store_location_for seems to be a recent addition to devise. I'm actually using 3.1.x and it doesn't seem to be defined - you'd have to set the user_return_to session variable directly because that's what is checked during signin in 3.1.x.
As Tim said, export_to_csv is not the method being filtered by before_action. It is firing actions based on the controller action methods at the top, and since you are trying to limit access lower down, it has already let the user through.
I'm not sure what the action name is that you are using, so I am going to assume it's show.
You can supply a conditional to your before_action line that may limit what you were hoping for.
before_action :authenticate_user!, only: [:show], if: proc { request.csv? }

Nested strong parameters in rails - AssociationTypeMismatch MYMODEL expected, got ActionController::Parameters()

I'm rendering a model and it's children Books in JSON like so:
{"id":2,"complete":false,"private":false, "books" [{ "id":2,"name":"Some Book"},.....
I then come to update this model by passing the same JSON back to my controller and I get the following error:
ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch (Book (#2245089560) expected, got ActionController::Parameters(#2153445460))
In my controller I'm using the following to update:
#project.update_attributes!(project_params)
private
def project_params
params.permit(:id, { books: [:id] } )
end
No matter which attributes I whitelist in permit I can't seem to save the child model.
Am I missing something obvious?
Update - another example:
Controller:
def create
#model = Model.new(model_params)
end
def model_params
params.fetch(:model, {}).permit(:child_model => [:name, :other])
end
Request:
post 'api.address/model', :model => { :child_model => { :name => "some name" } }
Model:
accepts_nested_attributes_for :child_model
Error:
expected ChildModel, got ActionController::Parameters
Tried this method to no avail: http://www.rubyexperiments.com/using-strong-parameters-with-nested-forms/
Are you using accepts_nested_attributes_for :books on your project model? If so, instead of "books", the key should be "books_attributes".
def project_params
params.permit(:id, :complete, :false, :private, books_attributes: [:id, :name])
end
I'm using Angular.js & Rails & Rails serializer, and this worked for me:
Model:
has_many :features
accepts_nested_attributes_for :features
ModelSerializer:
has_many :features, root: :features_attributes
Controller:
params.permit features_attributes: [:id, :enabled]
AngularJS:
ng-repeat="feature in model.features_attributes track by feature.id
My solution to this using ember.js was setting the books_attributes mannualy.
In controller:
def project_params
params[:project][:books_attributes] = params[:project][:books_or_whatever_name_relationships_have] if params[:project][:books_or_whatever_name_relationships_have]
params.require(:project).permit(:attr1, :attr2,...., books_attributes: [:book_attr1, :book_attr2, ....])
end
So rails checks and filters the nested attributes as it expected them to come
This worked for me. My parent model was an Artist and the child model was a Url.
class ArtistsController < ApplicationController
def update
artist = Artist.find(params[:id].to_i)
artist.update_attributes(artist_params)
render json: artist
end
private
def artist_params
remap_urls(params.permit(:name, :description, urls: [:id, :url, :title, :_destroy]))
end
def remap_urls(hash)
urls = hash[:urls]
return hash unless urls
hash.reject{|k,v| k == 'urls' }.merge(:urls_attributes => urls)
end
end
class Artist < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :urls, dependent: :destroy
accepts_nested_attributes_for :urls, allow_destroy: true
end
class Url < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :artist
end
... and in coffeescript (to handle deletions):
#ArtistCtrl = ($scope, $routeParams, $location, API) ->
$scope.destroyUrls = []
$scope.update = (artist) ->
artist.urls.push({id: id, _destroy: true}) for id in $scope.destroyUrls
artist.$update(redirectToShow, artistError)
$scope.deleteURL = (artist,url) ->
artist.urls.splice(artist.urls.indexOf(url),1)
$scope.destroyUrls.push(url.id)
Something is missing from all of the answers, which is the inputs for fields_for in the form.
The form works if you do this:
f.fields_for #model.submodel do ..
However, the form is sent as model[submodel], but that's what causes the error others have mentioned in their answers. If you try to do model.update(model_params), Rails will raise an error that it's expecting a Submodel type.
To fix this, make sure you follow the :name, value format:
f.fields_for :submodel, #model.submodel do ...
Then in the controller, make sure you put _attributes on your params:
def model_params
params.require(:model).permit(submodel_attributes: [:field])
end
Now the save, update, etc. will work fine.
Wasted several days trying to figure out how to use accepts_nested_attributes with Angular, and the issue is always the same: Rails whitelist will not allow the variables into the params hash. I've tried every single different whitelisting syntax that everyone said on SO and other blogs, tried using :inverse, tried using habtm and mas_many_through, tried manually rolling my own solution but that wont work if the whitelist wont allow params through, tried doing what http://guides.rubyonrails.org says about 'Outside the Scope of Strong Parameters', tried removing whitelisting all together which isnt really an option but it causes other problems anyways. Not sure why rails 4 strong parameter whitelisting wont allow arbitrary data thru, thats a huge problem especially if accepts_nested_attributes doesn't work either.... I guess we are left to just create/delete all associations on a separate page/form/controller and look like an idiot making my end users use several forms/pages to do something that should be easily doable on 1 page with 1 form. Ya know, usually I expect Angular to screw me, but this time Angular worked quite well and it was actually Rails 4 that screwed me twice on 1 issue that should be very straightforward.

Create an elsif statement in Rails API?

I am trying to receive a JSON post to my Rails 3 application. The JSON post is just an email with a subject which will be one of the following:
BACKUP_PASS/VERIFY_PASS
BACKUP_FAIL/VERIFY_FAIL
BACKUP_FAIL/VERIFY_PASS
etc..
I have the following code in my controller:
def backupnotification
email_payload = JSON.parse(params[:payload])
Activity.create(:action => 'failed to backup', :details => email_payload['recipient'], :user_id => '28')
end
I've also added the following to my routes file:
post '/api/activity/backupnotification' => 'activities#backupnotification'
Obviously, this would create a new Activity record regardless of the backup status. What I would like to do is create an activity with an action of failed to backup if the term FAIL appears anywhere in the subject, and successfully backed up if the term FAIL does not exist.
The JSON post (email_payload) includes an attribute called subject. I was wondering if I could do something like this:
if email_payload['subject'] => "FAIL"
...
else
...
end
What would be the best way of doing this?
Assuming you can access your subject in a similar way as your recipient, you can try something like this.
def backupnotification
email_payload = JSON.parse(params[:payload])
if email_payload['subject'].include?('FAIL')
action_message = 'failed to backup'
else
action_message = 'successfully backed up'
end
Activity.create(
:action => action_message,
:details => email_payload['recipient'],
:user_id => '28')
end