Before anyone says, I have searched through for a suitable answer for my issue but cannot find anything specific enough so I thought I'd ask it.
Basically I am trying to select a bunch of data for a report of people who have made loan applications to a website, but there are two different types: unsecured and guarantee. I need to place an IFNULL statement in the WHERE clause so that I ONLY use that clause if a certain other field isn't null.
Here is my statement:
SELECT
la.`lms_loan_application_id`,
la.`created`,
la.`updated`,
la.`loan_amount`,
la.`loan_term`,
la.`loan_document_fee`,
la.`broker_reference`,
la.`broker_sub_reference`,
laa.`first_name`,
laa.`surname`,
laa.`dob`,
laa.`email`,
laa.`mobile_number`,
laaAd.`address_postcode`,
lag.`first_name`,
lag.`surname`,
lag.`dob`,
lag.`email`,
lag.`mobile_number`,
lagAd.`address_postcode`,
lagAd.`housing_status`
FROM
loan_application AS la
JOIN
loan_application_applicant AS laa ON la.`id` = laa.`loan_application`
LEFT JOIN
loan_application_guarantor AS lag ON la.`id` = lag.`loan_application`
JOIN
loan_application_address AS laaAd ON laaAd.`loan_application_applicant` = laa.`id`
LEFT JOIN
loan_application_address AS lagAd ON lagAd.`loan_application_guarantor` = lag.`id`
WHERE
la.`status` = 'signature_given'
AND ! IFNULL(lag.`first_name`,
lag.`status` = 'signature_given')
AND laa.`status` = 'signature_given'
AND ! IFNULL(lag.`first_name`,
lagAd.`current_address` = 1)
AND laaAd.`current_address` = 1
ORDER BY la.`updated` DESC
LIMIT 10000
As you can see, I have attempted to use the IFNULLs (although in a negated way, which I assume works?) but all I get is duplicate row results and not the result set I really want.
Basically, I need to use the where clause "lag.status = 'signature_given" and "lagAd.current_address = 1" ONLY if the lag.first_name field is NOT null (i.e. there is a guarantor name) otherwise the status won't exist, and therefore the results of unsecured loans will not show. Hope I'm explaining this well enough!
In summary, I need to show all loan information, unsecured and guaranteed, and use a negated IFNULL in order to determine when the WHERE clause is to be taken into consideration.
Any help appreciated!
Thank you in advance
Michael
From this MySQLTutorial article:
Notice that you should avoid using the IFNULL function in the WHERE clause, because it degrades the performance of the query. If you want to check if a value is NULL or not, you can use IS NULL or IS NOT NULL in the WHERE clause.
Here is a WHERE clause which implements your logic correctly using IS NULL and IS NOT NULL instead of IFNULL:
WHERE la.`status` = 'signature_given' AND
(lag.`first_name` IS NULL OR
(lag.`first_name` IS NOT NULL AND lag.`status` = 'signature_given')) AND
laa.`status` = 'signature_given' AND
(lag.`first_name` IS NULL OR
(lag.`first_name` IS NOT NULL AND lagAd.`current_address` = 1)) AND
laaAd.`current_address` = 1
Related
I have two tables, one is for news and the other one is for comments and I want to get the count of the comments whose status has been set as approved.
SELECT
ccc_news . *,
count(if(ccc_news_comments.id = 'approved', ccc_news_comments.id, 0)) AS comments
FROM
ccc_news
LEFT JOIN
ccc_news_comments
ON ccc_news_comments.news_id = ccc_news.news_id
WHERE
`ccc_news`.`category` = 'news_layer2'
AND `ccc_news`.`status` = 'Active'
GROUP BY
ccc_news.news_id
ORDER BY
ccc_news.set_order ASC
LIMIT 20
But the problem with this query is that the minimum value that is fetched for the comments column is 1 whether there is any comment existent corresponding to that news or not.
Any help would be highly appreciable.
Use sum() in place of count()
Try below:
SELECT
ccc_news . * ,
SUM(if(ccc_news_comments.id = 'approved', 1, 0)) AS comments
FROM
ccc_news
LEFT JOIN
ccc_news_comments
ON
ccc_news_comments.news_id = ccc_news.news_id
WHERE
`ccc_news`.`category` = 'news_layer2'
AND `ccc_news`.`status` = 'Active'
GROUP BY
ccc_news.news_id
ORDER BY
ccc_news.set_order ASC
LIMIT 20
Better still (or shorter anyway):
SUM(ccc_news_comments.id = 'approved')
This works since the Boolean type in MySQL is represented as INT 0 and 1, just like in C. (May not be portable across DB systems though.)
As for COALESCE() as mentioned in other answers, many language APIs automatically convert NULL to '' when fetching the value. For example with PHP's mysqli interface it would be safe to run your query without COALESCE().
This should work:
count(if(ccc_news_comments.id = 'approved', ccc_news_comments.id, NULL))
count() only check if the value exists or not. 0 is equivalent to an existent value, so it counts one more, while NULL is like a non-existent value, so is not counted.
Replace this line:
count(if(ccc_news_comments.id = 'approved', ccc_news_comments.id, 0)) AS comments
With this one:
coalesce(sum(ccc_news_comments.id = 'approved'), 0) comments
count(ccc_news_comments.id = 'approved' or null)
More concise
I'm trying to inherit value from previous row (based on correct subscription_id + checking for IS NULL subscription_status), but something goes wrong and I get incorrect value.
Take a look at screenshot.
If I'm not mistaken it also called last non-null puzzle, but examples of possible solution for other DB provide window function with IGNORE NULLS.
But, I'm using MySQL 8.x and it doesn't support this function.
I'm sorry, but SQL fiddle doesn't provide correct text-value for variables in my code :(
https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/wHanqoSCHKJHus5u6BU4DB/4
Or, you can see mistakes here:
SET #history_subscription_status = NULL;
SET #history_subscription_id = 0;
SELECT
c.date,
c.user_id,
c.subscription_id,
sd.subscription_status,
(#history_subscription_id := c.subscription_id) as 'historical_sub_id',
(#history_subscription_status := CASE
WHEN #history_subscription_id = c.subscription_id AND sd.subscription_status IS NULL
THEN #history_subscription_status
ELSE
sd.subscription_status
END
) as 'historical'
FROM
calendar c
LEFT JOIN
subscription_data sd ON sd.date = c.date AND sd.user_id = c.user_id AND sd.subscription_id = c.subscription_id
ORDER BY
c.user_id,
c.subscription_id,
c.date
I expect to get results for this query in this way:
IMPORTANT: I'm going to use this code for a lot of data (about 1 mln rows), so it very important for me to avoid additional select or subquery that can slow down the execution of the query.
I have problem with receiving rows if id from one table dont match second one.
If zamowienia.id_telefon is null or dont match i dont recive whole row.
I want to instead get column crm2018.telefon.numer with "0" or null value. Please help :)
I tried something like that but its obvious syntax eror:
SELECT
crm2018.zamowienia.*,
crm2018.telefon.numer
FROM
crm2018.zamowienia
JOIN crm2018.telefon
WHERE
if (zamowienia.id_telfon != "0") zamowienia.id_telefon = telefon.id_telefon else crm2018.telefon.numer as "0"
Here's working code but with missing rows.
SELECT
crm2018.zamowienia.*,
crm2018.telefon.numer
FROM
crm2018.zamowienia
JOIN crm2018.telefon
WHERE
zamowienia.id_telefon = telefon.id_telefon
Just use LEFT JOIN instead of (INNER) JOIN.
Accordingly, you need to move the join condition from the WHERE clause to the ON clause of the join, to avoid filtering out unmatched records. Please note that as it is, your query has a JOIN without ON clause : this is a syntax error in all SQL dialects.
Finally, I would recommend using table aliases in the query : this makes it easier to read and to maintain.
SELECT
z.*,
t.numer
FROM
crm2018.zamowienia AS z
LEFT JOIN crm2018.telefon AS t
ON z.id_telefon = t.id_telefon
When no record is available in crm2018.telefon for the given crm2018.zamowienia, the record will still be displayed, with all columns coming from crm2018.telefon showing NULL values.
If needed, you can turn NULL values to 0 with the COALESCE() function, like :
COALESCE(t.numer, 0)
I have a search page that has multiple fields that are used to create a refined search. Every field is optional. I'm trying to start crafting my sql query so that it will work given the proper variables but I'm having trouble.
Here is the SQL query I currently have:
SELECT
indicator.indid,
indicator.indicator,
indtype.indtype,
provider.provider,
report.report,
actor.actor
FROM
actor,
indicator,
indtype,
report,
provider
WHERE
indicator.indtypeid = indtype.indtypeid
AND indicator.actorid = actor.actorid
AND indicator.reportid = report.reportid
AND report.providerid = provider.providerid
AND indicator.indicator LIKE '%$indicator%'
AND indicator.indtypeid = $indtypeid;
Whenever I provide an indicator and an indtypeid, the search works just fine. However, when I leave the indtypeid field blank, and have the variable set to * (as its default value), the query returns no results. I've tried playing with the query manually and it doesn't seem to like the * or a % sign. Basically, if only an indicator is specified and no indtypeid is specified, I want to return all indicators for all indtypeids.
I'm sure I'm missing something minor, but I would appreciate any assistance that could be provided. I may be going about this all wrong in the first place.
Try this instead:
SELECT i.indid, i.indicator, it.indtype,
p.provider, r.report, a.actor
FROM actor a
INNER JOIN indicator i ON a.actorid = i.actorid
INNER JOIN indtype it ON i.indtypeid = it.indtypeid
INNER JOIN report r ON i.reportid = r.reportid
INNER JOIN provider p ON r.providerid = p.providerid
WHERE 1 = 1
AND ($indicator IS NULL OR i.indicator LIKE '%$indicator%')
AND ($indtypeid IS NULL OR i.indtypeid = $indtypeid);
So if you pass a $indicator = NULL, then the first condition AND ($indicator IS NULL OR i.indicator LIKE '%$indicator%') will be ignored since it will resolve to True, and the same thing for the second condition.
I've removed other Where condition and replace them with JOINs, and for WHERE 1 = 1 to make the query work fine in case you pass the two variables $indicator and $indtypeid with NULL values for each, in this case it will return all results since 1 = 1 always true.
I'm using this kind of queries with different parameters :
EXPLAIN SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE `ilan_genel`.`id` , `ilan_genel`.`durum` , `ilan_genel`.`kategori` , `ilan_genel`.`tip` , `ilan_genel`.`ozellik` , `ilan_genel`.`m2` , `ilan_genel`.`fiyat` , `ilan_genel`.`baslik` , `ilan_genel`.`ilce` , `ilan_genel`.`parabirimi` , `ilan_genel`.`tarih` , `kgsim_mahalleler`.`isim` AS mahalle, `kgsim_ilceler`.`isim` AS ilce, (
SELECT `ilanresimler`.`resimlink`
FROM `ilanresimler`
WHERE `ilanresimler`.`ilanid` = `ilan_genel`.`id`
LIMIT 1
) AS resim
FROM (
`ilan_genel`
)
LEFT JOIN `kgsim_ilceler` ON `kgsim_ilceler`.`id` = `ilan_genel`.`ilce`
LEFT JOIN `kgsim_mahalleler` ON `kgsim_mahalleler`.`id` = `ilan_genel`.`mahalle`
WHERE `ilan_genel`.`ilce` = '703'
AND `ilan_genel`.`durum` = '1'
AND `ilan_genel`.`kategori` = '1'
AND `ilan_genel`.`tip` = '9'
ORDER BY `ilan_genel`.`id` DESC
LIMIT 225 , 15
and this is what i get in explain section:
these are the indexes that i already tried to use:
any help will be deeply appreciated what kind of index will be the best option or should i use another table structure ?
You should first simplify your query to understand your problem better. As it appears your problem is constrained to the ilan_gen1 table, the following query would also show you the same symptoms.:
SELECT * from ilan_gene1 WHERE `ilan_genel`.`ilce` = '703'
AND `ilan_genel`.`durum` = '1'
AND `ilan_genel`.`kategori` = '1'
AND `ilan_genel`.`tip` = '9'
So the first thing to do is check that this is the case. If so, the simpler question is simply why does this query require a file sort on 3661 rows. Now the 'hepsi' index sort order is:
ilce->mahelle->durum->kategori->tip->ozelik
I've written it that way to emphasise that it is first sorted on 'ilce', then 'mahelle', then 'durum', etc. Note that your query does not specify the 'mahelle' value. So the best the index can do is lookup on 'ilce'. Now I don't know the heuristics of your data, but the next logical step in debugging this would be:
SELECT * from ilan_gene1 WHERE `ilan_genel`.`ilce` = '703'`
Does this return 3661 rows?
If so, you should be able to see what is happening. The database is using the hepsi index, to the best of it's ability, getting 3661 rows back then sorting those rows in order to eliminate values according to the other criteria (i.e. 'durum', 'kategori', 'tip').
The key point here is that if data is sorted by A, B, C in that order and B is not specified, then the best logical thing that can be done is: first a look up on A then a filter on the remaining values against C. In this case, that filter is performed via a file sort.
Possible solutions
Supply 'mahelle' (B) in your query.
Add a new index on 'ilan_gene1' that doesn't require 'mahelle', i.e. A->C->D...
Another tip
In case I have misdiagnosed your problem (easy to do when I don't have your system to test against), the important thing here is the approach to solving the problem. In particular, how to break a complicated query into a simpler query that produces the same behaviour, until you get to a very simple SELECT statement that demonstrates the problem. At this point, the answer is usually much clearer.