Below is the document on which I am working:
{
"id": "idgwSRWDUJjQH",
"rev": "15-13d1d4545cd601560000000000000000",
"expiration": 0,
"flags": 0
}
{
"geminiType": "storegroup",
"_class": "web.model.StoreGroup",
"order": "10",
"childId": [
],
"name": "aaa",
"parent": "root",
"userGroupId": [
],
"type": "Folder",
"storeId": [
]
}
I am trying to sort based on name as below
function (doc, meta) {
if(doc.geminiType == "storegroup") {
emit(doc.name, [ meta.id,doc.name, doc.parent, doc.type]);
}
}
This I have created permanent view in couchbase console. I am fetching the document from my jave code using couchbase client as below:
View storeGrpView = cc.getView(RRConsts.STORE_GROUP_VIEW_DESIGN_DOC, RRConsts.STORE_GROUP_VIEW);
Query getAllstoreGrpQuery = new Query();
getAllstoreGrpQuery.setIncludeDocs(true);
getAllstoreGrpQuery.setStale(Stale.FALSE);
ViewResponse result = cc.query(storeGrpView, getAllstoreGrpQuery);
logger.info("getAllstoreGrpQuery resultset: " + result.toString());
for(ViewRow row : result) {
logger.info("store group :"+row.getDocument().toString());
}
}
Here I am getting the result in order of meta.id of the doc but i was expecting the result set to be in order of doc.name. Please let me know where I am doing wrong.
I got the solution to above issue. Actually if I used below two get method instead of row.getDocument() to fetch data, I am getting data in sorted order as expected.
row.getkey()
row.getvalue()
Related
Please find the attached Groovy code which I am using to get the particular filed from the response body.
Query 1 :
It is retrieving the results when the I am using the correct Index value like if the data.RenewalDetails[o], will give output as Value 1 and if the data.RenewalDetails[1], output as Value 2.
But in my real case, I will never know about number of blocks in the response, so I want to get all the values that are satisficing the condition, I tried data.RenewalDetails[*] but it is not working. Can you please help ?
Query 2:
Apart from the above condition, I want to add one more filter, where "FamilyCode": "PREMIUM" in the Itemdetails, Can you help on the same ?
def BoundId = new groovy.json.JsonSlurper().parseText('{"data":{"RenewalDetails":[{"ExpiryDetails":{"duration":"xxxxx","destination":"LHR","from":"AUH","value":2,"segments":[{"valudeid":"xxx-xx6262-xxxyyy-1111-11-11-1111"}]},"Itemdetails":[{"BoundId":"Value1","isexpired":true,"FamilyCode":"PREMIUM","availabilityDetails":[{"travelID":"AAA-AB1234-AAABBB-2022-11-10-1111","quota":"X","scale":"XXX","class":"X"}]}]},{"ExpiryDetails":{"duration":"xxxxx","destination":"LHR","from":"AUH","value":2,"segments":[{"valudeid":"xxx-xx6262-xxxyyy-1111-11-11-1111"}]},"Itemdetails":[{"BoundId":"Value2","isexpired":true,"FamilyCode":"PREMIUM","availabilityDetails":[{"travelID":"AAA-AB1234-AAABBB-2022-11-10-1111","quota":"X","scale":"XXX","class":"X"}]}]}]},"warnings":[{"code":"xxxx","detail":"xxxxxxxx","title":"xxxxxxxx"}]}')
.data.RenewalDetails[0].Itemdetails.find { itemDetail ->
itemDetail.availabilityDetails[0].travelID.length() == 33
}?.BoundId
println "Hello " + BoundId
Something like this:
def txt = '''\
{
"data": {
"RenewalDetails": [
{
"ExpiryDetails": {
"duration": "xxxxx",
"destination": "LHR",
"from": "AUH",
"value": 2,
"segments": [
{
"valudeid": "xxx-xx6262-xxxyyy-1111-11-11-1111"
}
]
},
"Itemdetails": [
{
"BoundId": "Value1",
"isexpired": true,
"FamilyCode": "PREMIUM",
"availabilityDetails": [
{
"travelID": "AAA-AB1234-AAABBB-2022-11-10-1111",
"quota": "X",
"scale": "XXX",
"class": "X"
}
]
}
]
},
{
"ExpiryDetails": {
"duration": "xxxxx",
"destination": "LHR",
"from": "AUH",
"value": 2,
"segments": [
{
"valudeid": "xxx-xx6262-xxxyyy-1111-11-11-1111"
}
]
},
"Itemdetails": [
{
"BoundId": "Value2",
"isexpired": true,
"FamilyCode": "PREMIUM",
"availabilityDetails": [
{
"travelID": "AAA-AB1234-AAABBB-2022-11-10-1111",
"quota": "X",
"scale": "XXX",
"class": "X"
}
]
}
]
}
]
},
"warnings": [
{
"code": "xxxx",
"detail": "xxxxxxxx",
"title": "xxxxxxxx"
}
]
}'''
def json = new groovy.json.JsonSlurper().parseText txt
List<String> BoundIds = json.data.RenewalDetails.Itemdetails*.find { itemDetail ->
itemDetail.availabilityDetails[0].travelID.size() == 33 && itemDetail.FamilyCode == 'PREMIUM'
}?.BoundId
assert BoundIds.toString() == '[Value1, Value2]'
Note, that you will get the BoundIds as a List
If you amend your code like this:
def json = new groovy.json.JsonSlurper().parse(prev.getResponseData()
you would be able to access the number of returned items as:
def size = json.data.RenewalDetails.size()
as RenewalDetails represents a List
Just add as many queries you want using Groovy's && operator:
find { itemDetail ->
itemDetail.availabilityDetails[0].travelID.length() == 33 &&
itemDetail.FamilyCode.equals('PREMIUM')
}
More information:
Apache Groovy - Parsing and producing JSON
Apache Groovy: What Is Groovy Used For?
I have trouble taking data from an API set. The body if viewed in Postman / Insomnia is as follows
{
"responses": {
"log": [
{
"id": 123,
"date": "2022-01-01T01:12:12.000Z",
"type": "online",
"details": [{
"detailId": "123-1",
"note": "success",
}]
},
{
"id": 124,
"date": "2022-01-01T01:12:12.000Z",
"type": "offline",
"details": [{
"detailId": "123-2",
"note": "failed",
}]
}
]
}
}
I want to take all data from log, as well from details. I used
adapt(item: any) {
return {
id: item.id,
date: item.date,
details: {
detailId: item.details.detailId,
note: item.details.note,
},
};
}
this returns id and date just fine. I also have a query to filter it based on type (online or offline), basically adding &type= into the API. It works for the online, but it returns detailId is undefined for offline (I used the same body, adapter and API minus the query for both data)
details is an array of object if you want to adapt it you need to do it iteratively.
adapt(item: any) {
const details = item.details.map(d => {detailId: d.id, note: d.note, …});
return {
id: item.id,
date: item.date,
details
};
}
Found the answer, apparently to make sure that I can get every value is to add ? after the [0], so it should be
details: {
detailId: item.details[0]?.detailId,
note: item.details[0]?.note,
},
I have following code in terraform state file( pasted just part of state file which I consider relevant for this question), which is result of running terraform code pasted below as well:
"mode": "managed",
"type": "azurerm_vpn_gateway",
"name": "azure_vpngw",
"provider": "provider[\"registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/azurerm\"].azure_clusters",
"instances": [
{
"schema_version": 0,
"attributes": {
"bgp_settings": [
{
"asn": 65515,
"bgp_peering_address": "",
"instance_0_bgp_peering_address": [
{
"custom_ips": [
"169.254.21.1"
],
"default_ips": [
"10.255.176.12"
],
"ip_configuration_id": "Instance0",
"tunnel_ips": [
"10.255.176.4",
"20.184.79.231"
]
Relevant terraform code:
resource "azurerm_vpn_gateway" "azure_vpngw" {
provider = azurerm.azure_clusters
name = "azure_vpngw"
location = azurerm_resource_group.azure_networking.location
resource_group_name = azurerm_resource_group.azure_networking.name
virtual_hub_id = azurerm_virtual_hub.azure_hub.id
bgp_settings {
asn = 65515
peer_weight = 50
instance_0_bgp_peering_address {
custom_ips = ["169.254.21.1"]
}
instance_1_bgp_peering_address {
custom_ips = ["169.254.22.1"]
}
}
}
And I need to accesss last element in tunnel_ips list, so 20.184.79.231.
I have been trying diff things like
azurerm_vpn_gateway.azure_vpngw.bgp_settings[0].instance_0_bgp_peering_address[0].tunnel_ips[0][1]
but it did not work. So, issue is in last part - tunnel_ips[0][1] I believe. If anybody has idea, it would be very wellcome.
Since your code is not a valid TF code, I modified it to actually be such, and this is how you can access your ip:
locals {
t = <<EOL
{
"mode": "managed",
"type": "azurerm_vpn_gateway",
"name": "azure_vpngw",
"provider": "provider[azure_clusters",
"instances": [{
"schema_version": 0,
"attributes": {
"bgp_settings": [{
"asn": 65515,
"bgp_peering_address": "",
"instance_0_bgp_peering_address": [{
"custom_ips": [
"169.254.21.1"
],
"default_ips": [
"10.255.176.12"
],
"ip_configuration_id": "Instance0",
"tunnel_ips": [
"10.255.176.4",
"20.184.79.231"
]
}]
}]
}
}]
}
EOL
v = jsondecode(local.t)
}
output "test" {
value = local.v["instances"][0]["attributes"]["bgp_settings"][0]["instance_0_bgp_peering_address"][0]["tunnel_ips"][1]
}
gives:
test = "20.184.79.231"
I figure it out. So, to fetch IP and use it in another resource definition I did:
ip_address = sort(azurerm_vpn_gateway.azure_vpngw.bgp_settings[0].instance_0_bgp_peering_address[0].tunnel_ips)[1]
I have the following (simplified) jOOQ query:
val result = context.select(
jsonObject(
key("id").value(ITEM.ID),
key("title").value(ITEM.NAAM),
key("resources").value(
jsonArrayAgg(ITEM_INHOUD.RESOURCE_ID).absentOnNull()
)
)
).from(ITEM).fetch()
Now the output that I want is:
[
{
"id": "0da04cc5-f70c-4fb3-b5c7-dc645d342631",
"title": "Title1",
"resources": [
"8b0f6d5c-67fc-47ca-be77-d1735e7721ce",
"ea0316db-1cfd-46d7-8260-5c1a4e65a0cd"
]
},
{
"id": "0f7e67e6-5187-47e2-9f1d-dab08feba38b",
"title": "Title2"
}
]
result.formtJSON() gives the following output:
{
"fields": [
{
"name": "json_object",
"type": "JSON"
}
],
"records": [
[
{
"id": "0da04cc5-f70c-4fb3-b5c7-dc645d342631",
"title": "Title 1"
}
]
]
}
Disabling the headers with result.formatJSON(JSONFormat.DEFAULT_FOR_RECORDS) will get me:
[
[
{
"id": "0da04cc5-f70c-4fb3-b5c7-dc645d342631",
"title": "Title1",
"resources": [
"8b0f6d5c-67fc-47ca-be77-d1735e7721ce",
"ea0316db-1cfd-46d7-8260-5c1a4e65a0cd"
]
}
],
[
{
"id": "0f7e67e6-5187-47e2-9f1d-dab08feba38b",
"title": "Title2"
}
]
]
where I don't want the extra array.
Further customizing the JSONformatter with result.formatJSON(JSONFormat().header(false).recordFormat(JSONFormat.RecordFormat.OBJECT)) I get:
[
{
"json_object": {
"id": "0da04cc5-f70c-4fb3-b5c7-dc645d342631",
"title": "Title1",
"resources": [
"8b0f6d5c-67fc-47ca-be77-d1735e7721ce",
"ea0316db-1cfd-46d7-8260-5c1a4e65a0cd"
]
}
},
{
"json_object": {
"id": "0f7e67e6-5187-47e2-9f1d-dab08feba38b",
"title": "Title2"
}
}
]
where I don't want the object wrapped in json_object.
Is there a way to get the output I want?
Doing it with Result.formatJSON()
This is clearly a flaw in the jOOQ 3.14.0 implementation of Result.formatJSON(). In the special case where there is only one column, and that column is of type JSON or JSONB, the column name may not really matter, and thus its contents should be flattened into the object describing the row. I've created a feature request for this: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/10953. It will be available in jOOQ 3.15.0 and 3.14.4. You will be able to do this:
result.formatJSON(JSONFormat().header(false).wrapSingleColumnRecords(false));
The RecordFormat is irrelevant here. This works the same way for RecordFormat.ARRAY and RecordFormat.OBJECT
Doing it directly with SQL
Of course, you can always work around this by moving all the logic into SQL. You probably simplified your query by omitting a JOIN and GROUP BY. I'm assuming this is equivalent to what you want:
JSON result = context.select(
jsonArrayAgg(jsonObject(
key("id").value(ITEM.ID),
key("title").value(ITEM.NAAM),
key("resources").value(
select(jsonArrayAgg(ITEM_INHOUD.RESOURCE_ID).absentOnNull())
.from(ITEM_INHOUD)
.where(ITEM_INHOUD.ITEM_ID.eq(ITEM.ID))
)
))
).from(ITEM).fetchSingle().value1()
Note that JSON_ARRAYAGG() aggregates empty sets into NULL, not into an empty []. If that's a problem, use COALESCE()
I have a nested JSON returned from an API that I am hitting using a GET request, in POSTMAN chrome app. My JSON looks like this.
{
"resultset": {
"violations": {
"hpd": [
{
"0": {
"ViolationID": "110971",
"BuildingID": "775548",
"RegistrationID": "500590",
"Boro": "STATEN ISLAND",
"HouseNumber": "275",
"LowHouseNumber": "275",
"HighHouseNumber": "275",
"StreetName": "RICHMOND AVENUE",
"StreetCode": "44750",
"Zip": "10302",
"Apartment": "",
"Story": "All Stories ",
"Block": "1036",
"Lot": "1",
"Class": "A",
"InspectionDate": "1997-04-11",
"OriginalCertifyByDate": "1997-08-15",
"OriginalCorrectByDate": "1997-08-08",
"NewCertifyByDate": "",
"NewCorrectByDate": "",
"CertifiedDate": "",
"OrderNumber": "772",
"NOVID": "3370",
"NOVDescription": "§ 27-2098 ADM CODE FILE WITH THIS DEPARTMENT A REGISTRATION STATEMENT FOR BUILDING. ",
"NOVIssuedDate": "1997-04-22",
"CurrentStatus": "VIOLATION CLOSED",
"CurrentStatusDate": "2015-03-10"
},
"count": "1"
}
]
}
},
"count": "1",
"total_page": 1,
"current_page": 1,
"limit": [
"0",
"1000"
],
"status": "success",
"error_code": "",
"message": ""
}
I am trying to test whether my response body has "ViolationID":"110971".
I tried the below code in postman:
var jsonData =JSON.parse(responseBody);
tests["Getting Violation Id"] = jsonData.resultset.violations.hpd[0].ViolationID === 110971;
Two issues I noticed in the provided data. The following suggestions might help you:
Add missing closing braces at the end.
Add missing 0 in the index like this: resultset.violations.hpd[0].0.ViolationID
If the hpd array always contains only 1 member, the test might be pretty straightforward:
pm.test('Body contains ViolationID', () => {
const jsonBody = pm.response.json();
const violationId = jsonBody.resultset.violations.hpd[0]["0"].ViolationID;
pm.expect(parseInt(violationId)).to.eql(110971);
})
However, if hpd array might contain more than one member, it gets a bit trickier. I would suggest mapping only ViolationID keys from nested objects:
pm.test('Body contains ViolationID', () => {
const jsonBody = pm.response.json();
const violationIds = jsonBody.resultset.violations.hpd.map(hpd => hpd["0"].ViolationID);
pm.expect(violationIds).to.contain('110971');
})