(I'm looking for a workaround for Con 3 of Attempt 1 of this question.)
I have a DocBook 5 doc where some glossentry tags contain multiple glossterm tags.
The HTML output for xref tags having a linkend attribute equalling the xml:id of a glossentry looks good (the link text is the first glossterm and the link correctly points to the glossentry) except that its mouseover text (in the title attribute of the HTML) concatenates all of the glossterm texts together.
I would rather it just output the first glossterm (or maybe separate the glossterms with / or a.k.a or something to indicate they're synonyms.)
How would I go about that? I'm new to DocBook and XSLT.
Related
I have a bunch of records in a QuickBase table that contain a rich text field. In other words, they each contain some paragraphs of text intermingled with HTML tags like <p>, <strong>, etc.
I need to migrate the records to a new table where the corresponding field is a plain text field. For this, I would like to strip out all HTML tags and leave only the text in the field values.
For example, from the below input, I would expect to extract just a small example link to a webpage:
<p>just a small <a href="#">
example</a> link</p><p>to a webpage</p>
As I am trying to get this done quickly and without coding or using an external tool, I am constrained to using Quickbase Pipelines' Text channel tool. The way it works is that I define a regex pattern and it outputs only the bits that match the pattern.
So far I've been able to come up with this regular expression (Python-flavored as QB's backend is written in Python) that correctly does the exact opposite of what I need. I.e. it matches only the HTML tags:
/(<[^>]*>)/
In a sense, I need the negative image of this expression but have not be able to build it myself.
Your help in "negating" the above expression is most appreciated.
Assuming there are no < or > elsewhere or entity-encoded, an idea using a lookbehind.
(?:(?<=>)|^)[^<]+
See this demo at regex101
(?:(?<=>)|^) is an alternation between either ^ start of the string or looking behind for any >. From there [^<]+ matches one or more characters that are not < (negated character class).
I am generating Word docs from html. Basically, I build a file with html and save it as a .doc. Then I open it in Word and apply a template. All good so far.
I would like to automatically generate a custom TOC via the HTML ie when I am building the document. I need to insert a field code to do that, in the same way I do to add page numbering via the HML. eg:
<span style="mso-field-code: PAGE " class="page-field"></span>
If I save my html doc as docx and apply a template, I can make a TOC based in the styles in the way one would normally create a TOC in Word. I customised the TOC so the Title style is the top level followed by H1, H2 then H3. If I then toggle the field code on the TOC, the field code looks like this:
{ TOC \t "Heading 1,2,Heading 2,3,Heading 3,4,Title,1" }
Now, I can add HTML like this to insert the TOC:
<div style="mso-field-code: TOC " class="toc-field">TOC goes HERE</div>
When I do that, if I right click the text "TOC goes HERE" I get the option to "Update field" and if I do that a TOC is generated using the default H1,H2,H3 tags.
But, what I can't work out is how to include the
\t "Heading 1,2,Heading 2,3,Heading 3,4,Title,1"
part so my custom style sequence is applied. I have tried all sorts of combinations and it seems that adding anything after TOC causes Word to not make a field code.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Update:
Based on the essential help from #slightlysnarky below, I thought I would summarise the outcome here because the information I needed was in a Microsoft chm file that was taken down many years ago. If you read the following extract from that help manual and compare it to the solution below you will see how this all works.
Word marks and stores information for simple fields by means of the Span element with the mso-field-code style. The mso-field-code value represents the string value of the field code. Formatting in the original field code might be lost when saving as HTML if only the string value of the code is necessary for its calculation.
Word has a different way of storing field information to HTML for more complex fields, such as ones that have formatted text or long values. Word marks these fields with so the data is not displayed in the browser. Word uses the Span element with the mso-element: field-begin, mso-element: field-separator, and mso-element: field-end attributes to contain the three respective parts of the field code: the field start, the separator between field code and field results, and the field end. Whenever possible, Word will save the field to HTML in the method that uses the least file space.
So, basically, add tags as shown below to your HTML at the point you wish the TOC to appear.
:-)
Word recognises a "complex field format" in HTML, along the same lines as it does in the Office Open XML format. So you can use
<span style='mso-element:field-begin'></span>TOC \t "Heading 1,2,Heading 2,3,Heading 3,4,Title,1"
<span style='mso-element:field-separator'></span>This text will show but the user will need to update the field
<span style='mso-element:field-end'></span>
This construct is outlined in a Microsoft document called "Microsoft Office HTML and XML Reference". It's a Windows .exe that unpacks to a .chm Help file. You can get it here
The info. on encoding fields is in Getting Started with Microsoft Office 2000 HTML and XML->Microsoft Word->Fields
There may be a later version but that's the only one I could find.
I am trying to find an easy way to convert my Word documents to HTML without the awful save-as that is built in. These are structured documents (designed for our screen-reader (JAWS) users), and so they use Heading 1, 2, 3, 4 & the Table of Contents.
We plan to convert these to DAISY audiobooks (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DAISY_Digital_Talking_Book ) , so we need pretty clean, but structured, HTML to convert.
I tried the find-replace, using Styles, but it would just replace anything in the text part of the search. I could convert it from any one style to another, but adding text in the box messed it up.
(I think I see that CSS for DAISY means that instead of just <h2> it will have to be <level2 class=='section' <h2> and closing tags), but that's step 2 after I handle this part.)
I just want to be able to find any text using Style 2 and add text to the start of that line saying "yep, here's some style 2" so that I can do the HTML/CSS stuff.
Thanks!
You can do that with a simple Find/Replace. For example, specify the Heading 1 Style for the Find parameter and use:
Replace = <h1>^&</h1>
For a macro you could incorporate that into, see: Convert a Word Range to a String with HTML tags in VBA
I'm having some difficulty using a RegExp to search for text between HTML tags. This is for a search function to search text on a HTML page without find the characters as a match in the tags or attributes of the HTML. When a match has been found I surround it with a div and assign it a highlight class to highlight the search words in the HTML page. If the RegExp also matches on tags or attributes the HTML code is becoming corrupt.
Here is the HTML code:
<html>
<span>assigned</span>
<span>Assigned > to</span>
<span>assigned > to</span>
<div>ticket assigned to</div>
<div id="assigned" class="assignedClass">Ticket being assigned to</div>
</html>
and the current RegExp I've come up with is:
(?<=(>))assigned(?!\<)(?!>)/gi
which matches if assigned or Assigned is the start of text in a tag, but not on the others. It does a good job of ignoring the attributes and tags but it is not working well if the text does not start with the search string.
Can anyone help me out here? I've been working on this for a an hour now but can' find a solution (RegExp noob here..)
UPDATE 2
https://regex101.com/r/ZwXr4Y/1 show the remaining problem regarding HTML entities and HTML comments.
When searching the problem left is that is not ignored, all text inside HTML entities and comments should be ignored. So when searching for "b" it should not match even if the HTML entity is correctly between HTML tags.
Update #2
Regex:
(<)(script[^>]*>[^<]*(?:<(?!\/script>)[^<]*)*<\/script>|\/?\b[^<>]+>|!(?:--\s*(?:(?:\[if\s*!IE]>\s*-->)?[^-]*(?:-(?!->)-*[^-]*)*)--|\[CDATA[^\]]*(?:](?!]>)[^\]]*)*]])>)|(e)
Usage:
html.replace(/.../g, function(match, p1, p2, p3) {
return p3 ? "<div class=\"highlight\">" + p3 + "</div>" : match;
})
Live demo
Explanation:
As you went through more different situations I had to modify RegEx to cover more possible cases. But now I came with this one that covers almost all cases. How it works:
Captures all <script> tags and their contents
Captures all CDATAblocks
Captures all HTML tags (opening / closing)
Captures all HTML comments (as well as IE if conditional statements)
Captures all targeted strings defined in last group inside remaining text (here it is
(e))
Doing so lets us quickly manipulate our target. E.g. Wrap it in tags as represented in usage section. Talking performance-wise, I tried to write it in a way to perform well.
This RegEx doesn't provide a 100% guarantee to match correct positions (99% does) but it should give expected results most of the time and can get modified later easily.
try this
Live Demo
string.match(/<.{1,15}>(.*?)<\/.{1,15}>/g)
this means <.{1,15}>(.*?)</.{1,15}> that anything that between html tag
<any> Content </any>
will be the target or the result for example
<div> this is the content </content>
"this is the content" this is the result
I am creating an application that will take a URL as input, retrieve the page's html content off the web and extract everything that isn't contained in a tag. In other words, the textual content of the page, as seen by the visitor to that page. That includes 'masking' out everything encapsuled in <script></script>, <style></style> and <!-- -->, since these portions contain text that is not enveloped within a tag (but is best left alone).
I have constructed this regex:
(?:<(?P<tag>script|style)[\s\S]*?</(?P=tag)>)|(?:<!--[\s\S]*?-->)|(?:<[\s\S]*?>)
It correctly selects all the content that i want to ignore, and only leaves the page's text contents. However, that means that what I want to extract won't show up in the match collection (I am using VB.Net in Visual Studio 2010).
Is there a way to "invert" the matching of a whole document like this, so that I'd get matches on all the text strings that are left out by the matching in the above regex?
So far, what I did was to add another alternative at the end, that selects "any sequence that doesn't contain < or >", which then means the leftover text. I named that last bit in a capture group, and when I iterate over the matches, I check for the presence of text in the "text" group. This works, but I was wondering if it was possible to do it all through regex and just end up with matches on the plain text.
This is supposed to work generically, without knowing any specific tags in the html. It's supposed to extract all text. Additionally, I need to preserve the original html so the page retains all its links and scripts - i only need to be able to extract the text so that I can perform searches and replacements within it, without fear of "renaming" any tags, attributes or script variables etc (so I can't just do a "replace with nothing" on all the matches I get, because even though I am then left with what I need, it's a hassle to reinsert that back into the correct places of the fully functional document).
I want to know if this is at all possible using regex (and I know about HTML Agility Pack and XPath, but don't feel like).
Any suggestions?
Update:
Here is the (regex-based) solution I ended up with: http://www.martinwardener.com/regex/, implemented in a demo web application that will show both the active regex strings along with a test engine which lets you run the parsing on any online html page, giving you parse times and extracted results (for link, url and text portions individually - as well as views where all the regex matches are highlighted in place in the complete HTML document).
what I did was to add another alternative at the end, that selects "any sequence that doesn't contain < or >", which then means the leftover text. I named that last bit in a capture group, and when I iterate over the matches, I check for the presence of text in the "text" group.
That's what one would normally do. Or even simpler, replace every match of the markup pattern with and empty string and what you've got left is the stuff you're looking for.
It kind of works, but there seems to be a string here and there that gets picked up that shouldn't be.
Well yeah, that's because your expression—and regex in general—is inadequate to parse even valid HTML, let alone the horrors that are out there on the real web. First tip to look at, if you really want to chase this futile approach: attribute values (as well as text content in general) may contain an unescaped > character.
I would like to once again suggest the benefits of HTML Agility Pack.
ETA: since you seem to want it, here's some examples of markup that looks like it'll trip up your expression.
<a href=link></a> - unquoted
<a href= link></a> - unquoted, space at front matched but then required at back
- very common URL char missing in group
- more URL chars missing in group
<a href=lïnk></a> - IRI
<a href
="link"> - newline (or tab)
<div style="background-image: url(link);"> - unquoted
<div style="background-image: url( 'link' );"> - spaced
<div style="background-image: url('link');"> - html escape
<div style="background-image: ur\l('link');"> - css escape
<div style="background-image: url('link\')link');"> - css escape
<div style="background-image: url(\
'link')"> - CSS folding
<div style="background-image: url
('link')"> - newline (or tab)
and that's just completely valid markup that won't match the right link, not any of the possible invalid markup, markup that shouldn't but does match a link, or any of the many problems with your other technique of splitting markup from text. This is the tip of the iceberg.
Regex is not reliable for retrieving textual contents of HTML documents. Regex cannot handle nested tags. Supposing a document doesn't contain any nested tag, regex still requires every tags are properly closed.
If you are using PHP, for simplicity, I strongly recommend you to use DOM (Document Object Model) to parse/extract HTML documents. DOM library usually exists in every programming language.
If you're looking to extract parts of a string not matched by a regex, you could simply replace the parts that are matched with an empty string for the same effect.
Note that the only reason this might work is because the tags you're interested in removing, <script> and <style> tags, cannot be nested.
However, it's not uncommon for one <script> tag to contain code to programmatically append another <script> tag, in which case your regex will fail. It will also fail in the case where any tag isn't properly closed.
You cannot parse HTML with regular expressions.
Parsing HTML with regular expressions leads to sadness.
I know you're just doing it for fun, but there are so many packages out there than actually do the parsing the right way, AND do it reliably, AND have been tested.
Don't go reinventing the wheel, and doing it a way that is all but guaranteed to frustrate you down the road.
OK, so here's how I'm doing it:
Using my original regex (with the added search pattern for the plain text, which happens to be any text that's left over after the tag searches are done):
(?:(?:<(?P<tag>script|style)[\s\S]*?</(?P=tag)>)|(?:<!--[\s\S]*?-->)|(?:<[\s\S]*?>))|(?P<text>[^<>]*)
Then in VB.Net:
Dim regexText As New Regex("(?:(?:<(?<tag>script|style)[\s\S]*?</\k<tag>>)|(?:<!--[\s\S]*?-->)|(?:<[\s\S]*?>))|(?<text>[^<>]*)", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase)
Dim source As String = File.ReadAllText("html.txt")
Dim evaluator As New MatchEvaluator(AddressOf MatchEvalFunction)
Dim newHtml As String = regexText.Replace(source, evaluator)
The actual replacing of text happens here:
Private Function MatchEvalFunction(ByVal match As Match) As String
Dim plainText As String = match.Groups("text").Value
If plainText IsNot Nothing AndAlso plainText <> "" Then
MatchEvalFunction = match.Value.Replace(plainText, plainText.Replace("Original word", "Replacement word"))
Else
MatchEvalFunction = match.Value
End If
End Function
Voila. newHtml now contains an exact copy of the original, except every occurrence of "Original word" in the page (as it's presented in a browser) is switched with "Replacement word", and all html and script code is preserved untouched. Of course, one could / would put in a more elaborate replacement routine, but this shows the basic principle. This is 12 lines of code, including function declaration and loading of html code etc. I'd be very interested in seeing a parallel solution, done in DOM etc for comparison (yes, I know this approach can be thrown off balance by certain occurrences of some nested tags quirks - in SCRIPT rewriting - but the damage from that will still be very limited, if any (see some of the comments above), and in general this will do the job pretty darn well).
For Your Information,
Instead of Regex, With JQuery , Its possible to extract text alone from a html markup. For that you can use the following pattern.
$("<div/>").html("#elementId").text()
You can refer this JSFIDDLE