I have recently been studying Unix system programming. I came across this in the man page of exec,
int execle(const char *path, const char *arg,..., char * const envp[]);
How does this function prototype have a ... in the middle ? This won't even compile !
Can someone explain this prototype please ?
I feel that this is just there for the users to see and there is a different internal implementation. This is just a guess and I am not sure about it.
I feel that this is just there for the users to see
Assuming you're confused by the trailing envp[], you would be correct. If we look at the POSIX documentation, we find the actual prototype should be:
int execle(const char *, const char *, ...);
And indeed, if you consult unistd.h on your system, you'll probably find something of that form:
//glibc
extern int execle (__const char *__path, __const char *__arg, ...)
__THROW __nonnull ((1, 2));
//musl
int execle(const char *, const char *, ...);
//cygwin
int _EXFUN(execle, (const char *__path, const char *, ... ));
Related
I am trying to add 2 char arrays in cuda, but nothing is working.
I tried to use:
char temp[32];
strcpy(temp, my_array);
strcat(temp, my_array_2);
When I used this in kernel - I am getting error : calling a __host__ function("strcpy") from a __global__ function("Process") is not allowed
After this, I tried to use these functions in host, not in kernel - no error,but after addition I am getting strange symbols like ĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶĶ.
So, how I can add two ( or more ) char arrays in CUDA ?
So, how I can add two ( or more ) char arrays in CUDA ?
write your own functions:
__device__ char * my_strcpy(char *dest, const char *src){
int i = 0;
do {
dest[i] = src[i];}
while (src[i++] != 0);
return dest;
}
__device__ char * my_strcat(char *dest, const char *src){
int i = 0;
while (dest[i] != 0) i++;
my_strcpy(dest+i, src);
return dest;
}
And while we're at it, here is strcmp
As the error message explains, you are trying to call host functions ("CPU functions") from a global kernel ("GPU function"). Within a global kernel you only have access to functions provided by the CUDA runtime API, which doesn't include the C standard library (where strcpy and strcat are defined).
You have to create your own str* functions according to what you want to do. Do you want to concatenate an array of chars in parallel, or do it serially in each thread?
Let us assume that we have the following strings that we need to store in a CUDA array.
"hi there"
"this is"
"who is"
How do we declare a array on the GPU to do this. I tried using C++ strings but it does not work.
Probably the best way to do this is to use structure that is similar to common compressed sparse matrix formats. Store the character data packed into a single piece of linear memory, then use a separate integer array to store the starting indices, and perhaps a third array to store the string lengths. The storage overhead of the latter might be more efficient that storing a string termination byte for every entry in the data and trying to parse for the terminator inside the GPU code.
So you might have something like this:
struct gpuStringArray {
unsigned int * pos;
unsigned int * length; // could be a smaller type if strings are short
char4 * data; // 32 bit data type will improve memory throughput, could be 8 bit
}
Note I used a char4 type for the string data; the vector type will give better memory throughput, but it will mean strings need to be aligned/suitably padded to 4 byte boundaries. That may or may not be a problem depending on what a typical real string looks like in your application. Also, the type of the (optional) length parameter should probably be chosen to reflect the maximum admissible string length. If you have a lot of very short strings, it might be worth using an 8 or 16 bit unsigned type for the lengths to save memory.
A really simplistic code to compare strings stored this way in the style of strcmp might look something like this:
__device__ __host__
int cmp4(const char4 & c1, const char4 & c2)
{
int result;
result = c1.x - c2.x; if (result !=0) return result;
result = c1.y - c2.y; if (result !=0) return result;
result = c1.z - c2.z; if (result !=0) return result;
result = c1.w - c2.w; if (result !=0) return result;
return 0;
}
__device__ __host__
int strncmp4(const char4 * s1, const char4 * s2, const unsigned int nwords)
{
for(unsigned int i=0; i<nwords; i++) {
int result = cmp4(s1[i], s2[i]);
if (result != 0) return result;
}
return 0;
}
__global__
void tkernel(const struct gpuStringArray a, const gpuStringArray b, int * result)
{
int idx = threadIdx.x + blockIdx.x * blockDim.x;
char4 * s1 = a.data + a.pos[idx];
char4 * s2 = b.data + b.pos[idx];
unsigned int slen = min(a.length[idx], b.length[idx]);
result[idx] = strncmp4(s1, s2, slen);
}
[disclaimer: never compiled, never tested, no warranty real or implied, use at your own risk]
There are some corner cases and assumptions in this which might catch you out depending on exactly what the real strings in your code look like, but I will leave those as an exercise to the reader to resolve. You should be able to adapt and expand this into whatever it is you are trying to do.
You have to use C-style character strings char *str. Searching for "CUDA string" on google would have given you this CUDA "Hello World" example as first hit: http://computer-graphics.se/hello-world-for-cuda.html
There you can see how to use char*-strings in CUDA. Be aware that standard C-functions like strcpy or strcmp are not available in CUDA!
If you want an array of strings, you just have to use char** (as in C/C++). As for strcmp and similar functions, it highly depends on what you want to do. CUDA is not really well suited for string operations, maybe it would help if you would provide a little more detail about what you want to do.
I'm writing C program to access database.
I recently switch from sqlite to mysql.
I'm not familiar with mysql c api, so I need help converting some code.
Below example is executing sql statement with parameter.
sqlite:
char *zSQL = sqlite3_mprintf("SELECT price FROM warehouse WHERE p_ID='%q'", input_value);
sqlite3_prepare_v2(handle,zSQL,-1,&stmt,0);
my attempt in mysql:
char zSQL[60] = {'\0'};
int n = 0;
n = sprintf(zSQL, "SELECT price FROM warehouse WHERE p_ID='%s'", input_value);
mysql_real_query(conn, zSQL, n);
Another example is parsing result of sql statement to variable
sqlite:
double price_value = 0;
if (sqlite3_step (stmt) == SQLITE_ROW) {
price_value = sqlite3_column_double (stmt, 0);
}
mysql:
MYSQL_ROW row;
while ((row = mysql_fetch_row(result)))
{
price_value = atof(row[0]);
}
While the code in mysql works for me, but I feel like I'm not utilizing the API enough.
Is there any function in mysql c api which has the same functionality as sqlite3_mprintf() and sqlite3_column_double() ?
Edit:
My attempt on mysql_real_escape_string():
ulong in_length = strlen(input_value);
char input_esc[(2 * in_length)+1];
mysql_real_escape_string(conn, input_esc, input_value, in_length);
char sql_stmnt[56] = {'\0'};
n = sprintf(zSQL, "SELECT price FROM warehouse WHERE p_ID='%s'", input_esc);
mysql_real_query(conn, sql_stmnt, n);
For your first exampe, the short answer is no, you have to do it yourself, see http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/mysql-real-escape-string.html
unsigned long mysql_real_escape_string(MYSQL *mysql, char *to, const char *from, unsigned long length)
The second one, yes, that's the way to go, with some additional check that row[0] is indeed of type double.
Alternatively, you can use the prepared statement API which works quite similar to the one in sqlite3. The key is you provide buffers of type MYSQL_BIND and then either bind the inputs to it, or have mysql binding output values there.
Prepared statement documentation: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/c-api-prepared-statement-data-structures.html
I have a C function that returns an unsigned char * that can either be a pointer to a byte array (binary data representing a File..etc) or a pointer to an array of characters. I'm currently using the SWIG %array_class that wraps all C functions that return an unsigned char pointer and creates a Java array utility (SampleArrayUtil.java) to handle the population and retrieval on the Java side.
My problem is that I also use wrap the unsigned char * using: %apply char * { unsigned char * }; so that I get an array of Strings on the Java side. I don't want to wrap the unsigned char * return value (using %apply char * { unsigned char * };) when I get binary data back, I want to just have the byte array on the Java side. I was thinking of creating another C function to handle the binary data, but I'm unsure how to wrap this new function as it will also return an unsigned char * (see getValueFromRowAsByteArray)
C Functions:
unsigned char * getValueFromRowAsStringArray(struct result_row *row, attribute_type type, int32_t *len)
unsigned char * getValueFromRowAsByteArray(struct result_row *row, attribute_type type, int32_t *len)
//*row* input param with data results, *type* input enum type for the data type being requested and *len* is an output param that contains the length of the data being returned.
SWIG Interface File for Wrapping C Function Returning unsigned char * (array of char):
%module Sample
%include "typemaps.i"
%include "stdint.i"
%include "arrays_java.i"
%include "carrays.i"
%array_class(unsigned char, SampleArrayUtil);
%{
#include "C_API.h"
%}
%apply char * { unsigned char * };
%include "C_API.h"
You can apply different type maps to the same types in different places in at least two ways.
Firstly you can change the active typemap with %apply or %clear, e.g.:
%module test
%include "stdint.i"
%apply intptr_t { unsigned char * };
unsigned char * test1();
%apply char * { unsigned char * };
unsigned char * test2();
%clear unsigned char *;
unsigned char * test3();
Gives three functions in Java with different return types, according to the active typemap.
Secondly you can also write more specific typemaps though, for example:
%apply long long { unsigned char * test4 };
%apply char * { unsigned char * test5 };
unsigned char * test4();
unsigned char * test5();
Only applies to test4 and test5 respectively - it matches on the type and the function name. In Java this results in:
public static long test4() {
return testJNI.test4();
}
public static String test5() {
return testJNI.test5();
}
For arguments you can match on the type and the parameter name in the function signature similarly.
I am using C MySQL API
int numr=mysql_num_rows(res);
It always returns zero, but in my table there are 4 rows are there. However, I am getting the correct fields count.
what is the problem? Am i doing anything wrong?
Just a guess:
If you use mysql_use_result(), mysql_num_rows() does not return the correct value until all the rows in the result set have been retrieved.
(from the mysql manual)
The only reason to receive a zero from mysql_num_rows(<variable_name>) is because the query did not return anything.
You haven't posted the query here that you run and then assign the result to your res variable so we can't check it.
But try running that exact query in your DB locally through whatever DB management software you use and see if you are able to achieve any results.
If the query is working fine, then it must be the way you're running the query in C, otherwise your query is broken.
Maybe post up a bit more of your code from C where you make the query and then run it.
Thanks
If you just want to count the number of rows in a table, say
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table_name
You will get back a single column in a single row containing the answer.
I too have this problem. But I noticed that mysql.h defines mysql_num_rows() to return a "my_ulonglong". Also in the header file you will see that there is a type def for my_ulonglong. On my system size of a my_ulonglong is 8 bytes. When we try to print this out or cast this to an int we probably get the first four bytes which are zero. However I printed out the eight bytes at the address of my_ulonglong variable and it prints all zeros. So I think this function just doesn't work.
`my_ulonglong numOfRows;
MYSQL *resource;
MYSQL *connection;
mysql_query(connection,"SELECT * FROM channels");
resource = mysql_use_result(connection);
numChannels = mysql_num_rows(resource);
printf("Writing numChannels: %lu\n", numChannels); // returns 0
printf("Size of numChannels is %d.\n", sizeof(numChannels)); // returns 8
// however
unsigned char * tempChar;
tempChar = (unsigned char *) &numChannels;
for (i=0; i< (int) sizeof(numChannels); ++i) {
printf("%02x", (unsigned int) *tempChar++);
}
printf("\n");
// returned 0000000000000000 so I think its a bug.
//mysql.h typedef for my_ulonglong and function mysql_num_rows()
#ifndef _global_h
#if defined(NO_CLIENT_LONG_LONG)
typedef unsigned long my_ulonglong;
#elif defined (__WIN__)
typedef unsigned __int64 my_ulonglong;
#else
typedef unsigned long long my_ulonglong;
#endif
#endif
my_ulonglong STDCALL mysql_num_rows(MYSQL_RES *res);
`