I have an MS Access database where all the users will be in the same group, except a few. I don't need to restrict certain objects from users. Instead, I need to give the current user write capabilities to his record and its related records only and read-only capabilities to all other records. Is this possible?
Unfortunately, be it Access, SQL server or Oracle, the restriction of rows to a single user is not built in. This means you have to build some type of interface in which you grab/use the users Logged on ID (their network pc id, or say prompt for a user + password). Then you when a form loads you have to restrict the records to that one given user. There are many ways to do this and they are all standard approaches to filtering or restricting data. However "YOU" have to build and write such code into the forms. You could perhaps base the form on a query with a expression (VBA or macro TempVars) that limits the records returned to the given user.
So you have to “cook” and “code” this ability for most any database. You thus also need to code to “save” the user name who created the record. This coding requirement as noted is required for most systems when looking to restrict data to single rows and such features are not generally built into the database system. You also likely need to restrict and prevent users from opening the database and seeing the table view.
Related
I have a specific dataset that I want a client to have access to, but only in a manner that they cannot see/query the data, but can reference table and fields for their calculations. A well documented user guide will be provided. Is this technically possible? If so, how can I go about doing this.
Hello helpful internet strangers. I have created a fairly simple database for a client that has one main entry form and a search form that uses unbound text boxes for searching around 15 fields.
Details are below, but here is my problem: When I add new records and use the search form all the fields work as expected and return the correct results in the datasheet. When I sent the database to the client and they add new records, they are not returned in the search. I had them save the database with their records and send it back to me, and I confirmed that when I search for the records they added (I can see the records in the table) they are not returned in the search. If I add new records to the copy they sent me back, my records do appear in the search.
I created the database in Access 2013 on a Windows 8 machine. The client is using Access 2010 on Windows Vista.
The field types are text, dropdown and date. The dropdowns are all based on lookup queries so they store the id number in the main info table and pull the name value from the query. All of the fields in the search query are written to allow nulls, including the date range searches. And again, all fields test out correctly on my machine when I enter the records.
I went on site and compared settings and nothing jumped out at me except the different versions. I also watched the client enter new records and she didn't do anything 'wrong' or unusual. When I try to do a save as 2007-2010 it says I am using features that won't allow for that, but for the life of me I can't think of anything like that since this is really a very straightforward design.
I'm going to do a package as executable, but am highly doubtful that will help. Any insights?
Thanks in advance.
A few things. Most important - always, always develop in the earliest version of Access that the system will be used with. So, you need to rebuild, using Access 2010, period. Try creating a new blank database (in 2010) and importing the objects one (or a few) at a time. Make sure the system is split. One file for the FE (forms, queries, reports, code, etc.) and one for the BE (tables only). Make sure that the Filter On Load property of all forms is set to No. If the recordsource for the form contains a where clause, make sure that the newly entered records meet the criteria for the where clause.
(Access 2003)
I have a single user form that has been designed with no associated table. It's sole purpose is to collect user entered criteria then perform a database search.
I have recently added a save facility so that separate search criterias can be held in an accompanying save table. The intention is to allow users the ability to save a new criteria, delete an existing one, navigate to previous criteria saves, edit previous saves. The criterias can be quite extensive and there is a requirement to run /edit-run the same criterias at a later date as the database grows. so this is a handy feature.
Problem:
While I am able to set the control source of e.g. a combobox to the savetable, I can't get record navigation to work..."DoCmd.GoToRecord , , acNext" fails.
I think this problem is due to the user form not being linked in some way to this new savetable.
I'm using MS Access 2007 as a front end and have all linked tables in SQLServer 2008 R2 backend.
In a form in Access I am trying to execute the FIND button either in the ribbon or by creating a button on the form with the expressed purpose of looking for records with a specific value in a particular field.
When I complete the entry in the FIND window, I click on Find Next. In some cases, the record(s) is found immediately. In others, it can go for hours only to report that it can't find anything (when I know it should).
The table I am looking in has approximately 99,000 records in it. It doesn't seem to matter whether or not the field is indexed.
Is there something I'm doing wrong, or is Access unable to handle this? Also, is creating a stored procedure with handling multiple search requests and passing the info to Access the answer?
The find methods are known to be slow with ODBC data sources. Here is what the Access 2007 Recordset.FindFirst Method help topic says:
When working with Microsoft Access database engine-connected ODBC databases and large dynaset-type Recordset objects, you might discover that using the Find methods or using the Sort or Filter property is slow. To improve performance, use SQL queries with customized ORDER BY or WHERE clauses, parameter queries, or QueryDef objects that retrieve specific indexed records.
Futhermore, binding an Access form to a record source of 99K records is a performance challenge. Use a query as the form's record source, and design the query to return only one or a few rows.
Give the user an option to choose a different set of rows, and modify the form's record source property to reflect the user's choice.
This depends on the type of search you need and on the data type of the column (field) to be searched. For example, if I have a text data type in an indexed column and I search using Start of field or Whole field, it will be quite fast, however, if I search for Any part of field, it may well fall over. In other words, if Access can use an index for the search, it will work, even on quite a large table, otherwise, you may be best with a stored procedure, though I doubt that will be fast without an index, either.
I'm trying to make access conditionally only show rows that meet a certain condition, allow me to give you some background info before I proceed :
I've created an Access form and linked it to a test DB on my machine. The particular table I am interested in contains the following (important) rows :
ID , Office, Name, SecurityNumber
The thing is, ID is not unique. There are two Office locations, and each Office has it's own set of unique ID numbers. This means that ID 10 here and there may or may not be the same person. (this data comes out of a legacy security system we're not looking to change yet, so I cannot change it)
But ID -is- unique to each Office.
SO! I created an Access form with TABS! Two tabs, one for each office. What I am trying to achieve now is :
Have the ID/Name/SecurityNumber fields for each tab populate with only rows that match it's particular 'Office' value.
Thank you for reading and thank you for helping! :D
If you want the data for the office locations presented in separate tab page controls, you could use subforms on the pages which differ only in the WHERE clause of the queries used as their record sources. So for the Office1 subform, the query could be:
SELECT ID, Office, [Name], SecurityNumber
FROM YourTable
WHERE Office = 'Office1'
ORDER BY [Name];
Then for Office2, the query would be the same except for the WHERE clause:
WHERE Office = 'Office2'
As I understand your question, that approach would do what you're asking for.
However, that's not really the easy "Access way" to do it. Instead consider a combo box control to allow your users to choose which office they want to view. In the code for the combo's after update event, either modify the SELECT statement used as the form's record source or create a filter expression an apply it.
Also, since you're pulling the form's data from SQL Server, consider whether you want your form to load every record for the selected office location. It may not be much concern if you have only a few to moderate number of rows for each location, but if you'll be dealing with multiple thousands of rows it could be. In general, you should try to avoid pulling copious amounts of data across the wire; pull sparingly instead ... only what you need for the immediate task at hand.