Foundation5 grid aligning according to one another - html

I've been working with one problem way too long and haven't found any proper solution to it. I'm currently working with grid product display on foundation5 framework and can't find proper jscript or css code to align my product accordingly to one another.
Here's how it looks now :
I need to look like this atleast :
I need bigger product windows below to fill above smaller windows blank space.
Hope somebody would be able to help, thanks!

If you know divs height it's pretty easy, just add position: relative to your bigger div and move it upper.
If you don't it is very similar but you have to set height of the divs and the offset of the bigger one by JavaScript.
HTML
<div class="row">
<div class="small-4 column">
<div class="inner"></div>
</div>
<div class="small-4 column">
<div class="inner"></div>
</div>
<div class="small-4 column">
<div class="inner small"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="small-4 column">
<div class="inner"></div>
</div>
<div class="small-4 column">
<div class="inner"></div>
</div>
<div class="small-4 column">
<div class="inner big"></div>
</div>
</div>
SASS
$div-height: 200px;
$big-div-height: 250px;
$small-div-height: 100px;
div.inner {
height: $div-height;
background: #99CCFF;
border: 3px solid black;
border-radius: 25px;
}
div.row {
margin-top: 25px;
}
div.big {
height: $big-div-height;
position: relative;
top: $div-height - $big-div-height;
}
div.small {
height: $small-div-height;
}
CodePen example

You can't easily make the Foundation grid do that (it provides a regular grid, that's what it's for). However you could create a div inside the relevant grid column(s) to hold your content, and position that absolutely to get what you want.
Give the containing grid column position: relative, then give your new div inside a class name something like my-class, then do:
.my-class {
position : absolute;
bottom : 0;
left : 0;
width : [same percentage width of the screen as your other columns]
}
Now, since that cell's content will have been taken out of the content flow, the containing row will be able to close up to just be the height of the largest of the remaining grid cells (ie the ones that have not been positioned absolutely), and your content will be positioned on the bottom of that row, extending up as far as it needs.
Just check the height of the smaller cell above, plus the larger cell below, don't exceed the height of the two rows together, or you might have to something extra to cater for that.

Related

How to remove gaps around div with image?

one take col-md-4, second col-md-8, but the second with a picture is not 100% width, there are gaps on the left and right sides, could anyone please advise how to remove gaps and make image full size ? Thanks. Here is screenshot
.upperDiv{
height: 100px;
width: 100%;
background: red;
margin-top: 20px;
margin-bottom: 20px;
}
.fixed-content {
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
object-fit: cover;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row upperDiv">
<div class="col-md-4" style="background: #005AA1;">
</div>
<div class="col-md-8">
<img src="assets/libled.jpg" class="fixed-content">
</div>
</div>
</div>
Bootstrap put that padding for you to better align your content, you can remove it by inserting p-0 (padding = 0px) class name as I remember
<div class="container">
<div class="row upperDiv">
<div class="col-md-4 p-0" style="background: #005AA1;">
</div>
<div class="col-md-8 p-0">
<img src="assets/libled.jpg" class="fixed-content">
</div>
</div>
</div>
Looking at your HTML, you are using bootstrap's grid system (hinted by the col-md-X classes). The gap you see in your example is caused by the padding applied to the cells of the grid system to create the gutter.
You have two possibilities:
You put the picture as a background instead, since padding is part of the element, the picture will cover this space too.
You remove the gutter.
1 is pretty self explanatory so I'll go straight to two. You can read about the .no-gutter helper class. It needs to be applied to a row and will effectively remove all gutters for the columns in it. But that means you'll loose the gutter on your left column too. You could also remove the padding with a custom class that sets padding-left:0 !important;padding-right:0 !important; This will effectively remove the gutter for the specified column element.
Whatever the option you choose, remember that cols are not meant to be used directly for the styling. They are here to help you create columns in which to put your visual elements. Although I pointed 3 different approaches to your problem, the only "pure" solution is to use the .no-gutter. Others might have weird visual impacts such as making the gutter effectively only half wide (since the left col participates in half the gutter too) and will not look right if there are other columns near it.

How to use bootstrap to create responsive two-column layout with left column really narrow

I have been using bootstrap responsive 12 column grid layout for my website.
I have the layout like follows (stripped down version for example purpose)
<div class='container-fluid'>
<div class='row'>
<div class='col-md-1'>
Left side contents go here
</div>
<div class='col-md-11'>
Right side contents go here
</div>
</div>
</div>
What I need now, is that the left side column is wider than what I want. How can I make it fixed-length narrow and still use Bootstrap layout?
Any help is appreciated!
A clean solution would be customizing bootstrap to have more columns, like this answer:
How to use bootstrap with 16 or 24 columns
Other alternative is using nested rows, but that could end up with problems like unused space, so my suggestion is customizing bootstrap.
you can make a nested row within a column
For eg-
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-1">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-offset-9 col-md-3"><!-- offset-9 leave space in left and start in last three of column --></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-md-11"></div>
</div>
The issue you're having is an issue with how grid systems work. What they're designed to do is describe a fixed set of column widths: the content of those columns should expand to fill them. What you want is the inverse of this: you want the content to define the width.
You've effectively got three good options, and in order from least -> best in terms of getting what you want with the simplest markup:
Live with it (or have more columns as suggested, say 24).
Put the two columns of content in a block[1], apply display:table; width: 100%;. Make the two child items display:table-cell, use white-space:nowrap on the left-hand one and make the right-hand one width: 99%.
Put the two columns of content in a block[1], apply display:flex, and apply flex:1 to the right-hand child item.
Flex is the best solution, but needs IE10+ if that's an issue.
.container {
max-width: 400px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
[class^="row-"] {
margin: 10px 0;
}
.row-1 {
display: table;
width: 100%;
}
[class^="col-1-"] {
display: table-cell;
}
.col-1-left {
white-space: nowrap;
}
.col-1-right {
width: 99%;
}
.row-2 {
display: flex;
}
.col-2-right {
flex: 1;
}
<div class='container'>
<div class='row-1'>
<div class='col-1-left'>Some content</div>
<div class='col-1-right'>Some content</div>
</div>
<div class='row-2'>
<div class='col-2-left'>Some content</div>
<div class='col-2-right'>Some content</div>
</div>
</div>

Need to keep image (horizontal / vertical) in a fixed height div

I am following my previous question that has two boxes, that have two images (can be vertical or horizontal), the issue is the height of boxes are fixed and when I change the window screen in some screen sizes the images bypass the border of the boxes.
I checked answers of these questions 1 and 2 but did not help much.
DEMO
CSS
.items { */
position: relative;
margin-bottom: 7px;
margin-left: 7px;
margin-right: 0px;
text-align: left;
background-color: red;
border-top-left-radius: 20px;
border-top-right-radius: 20px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 20px;
padding-left: 1%;
height:260px;
}
.col-md-12.col-xs-12.btn>a>img {
float: right;
width: 100px;
height: 50px;
}
.col-md-12.col-xs-12.my-col {
padding-left: 100%;
}
.my-row {
bottom: 0;
padding-right: 0;
position: absolute;
}
.my-row {
bottom: 0;
padding-right: 0;
position: absolute;
}
.btn {
float: right;
bottom:0;
margin-right:-12px;
margin-bottom:-6px;
position:absolute;
right:0;
}
HTML
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3 items">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 text-center">
<h4>T1</h4>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 text-center">
<h5>T2</h5>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 row text-center">
<a
href="https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQKWYNnGt8d9G1sf8PE0TpOglpZ2dKnHWAP5FB_spYgelcToong"
title="T1" data-gallery rel="nofollow"> <img
id="imageresource"
src="https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQKWYNnGt8d9G1sf8PE0TpOglpZ2dKnHWAP5FB_spYgelcToong"
class="img-thumbnail" width="30%" style="margin-left: 30px;" />
</a>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<img src="#" class="btn" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-md-3 items">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 text-center">
<h4>T1</h4>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 text-center">
<h5>T2</h5>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 row text-center">
<a
href="https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQKWYNnGt8d9G1sf8PE0TpOglpZ2dKnHWAP5FB_spYgelcToong"
title="T1" data-gallery rel="nofollow"> <img
id="imageresource"
src="https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQKWYNnGt8d9G1sf8PE0TpOglpZ2dKnHWAP5FB_spYgelcToong"
class="img-thumbnail" width="25%" style="margin-left: 30px;" />
</a>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<img src="#" class="btn" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
First off, the markup is over complicated for what you want and line 15 and 45 are applying bootstrap classes .col-md-12 and .row on the same element which is in incorrect. Bootstrap class .col-xx-nn must be assigned to a child element with a bootstrap class .row.
Getting back on track to what you want. I have simplified the HTML code to get your desired result, I think. Check it out and let me know what isn't right and I will change it and explain why.
https://jsfiddle.net/6y4uf16y/84/
What I did was create a container div around the sale image that uses the CSS flex box. This div will take up any remaining space. Therefore, if you change the height of your .items element. The flexbox container will adapt and the sale image will respond appropriately to the new size. There is no fixed heights here except for the one that was placed on the .items class of 260px which I believe is what you wanted.
The reason for this is that the bootstrap class .img-reponsive needs a height and/or width attribute to be responsive. Therefore, I have set the height and width equal to the flex box container around it. You can change the width value or .img-sale back to 30% if you wish.
Moreover, as a bonus, I have aligned the button to always be in the bottom right corner as I think you wanted it.
If this answer solves your problem, don't forget to mark it as the correct solution.
Cheers
Edit Sorry wrong JSFiddle link, correct link has been added. I also added proof that it is dynamic with multiple rows of text in the h4 and h5 elements.
You have to add class
.col-md-12 >a>img.btn {
float: right;
width: 100px;
height: 50px;
}
because .col-md-12.col-xs-12.btn>a>img is not applying to any of your given HTML div content
Is it a design requirement that the images get wider as the boxes get wider? If so, the only way to keep the images within the boxes is to increase the height of the boxes as you increase the height of the images.
If it's not a requirement that the images scale up, then you can see my solution here: http://jsfiddle.net/6y4uf16y/75/
All I did was remove the explicit widths from your images (the first was width="25%" and the second was width="30%") and instead used CSS to control the scale by limiting the max-height of the images. .items img {max-height:100px;}.
Since you have a fixed height and need to keep the images inside the boxes, you know for a fact that also have a fixed maximum height on the images
I am not sure if you can have line break on T1 & T2, otherwise you can do this
img{
max-height:170px;
width:auto
}
DEMO
i agree with #Bhavin Solanki and may be the one thing i will suggest that try to give the
width: 100px;
height: 50px;
in to percentages Or else you can go with Media queries for the particular image selectors that will help you to manage a lot
Your HTML Bootstrap code isn't totally correct:
You can't nest a .col-md-12 class inside a .col-md-3 class not
in my knowledge at least.
Your .rows classes are not always well positioned within the code
see the fiddle link that i prepared below.
I tried to do my best to understand what you want to achieve with your code i also ordered tags within your code so that your divs fit the window size regardless of its width.
EDIT
Try to define the width of your image with vw unit (width:15vw;) That will keep the image from crossing the containing item.
I illustrated an example for you here :
http://jsfiddle.net/merhzqwg/65/
Hope it helps.
OK this is the thing, your code is not very clean. there are some errors as well
for eg: you have used the id="imageresource" twice. An id can ONLY be used once on a single page. Very Important.
but i will provide a quick fix for this.
by default bootstrap adds max-width: 100%; height: auto; to the class img-thumbnail to override that what i have done is i have added a class to both of the images img-sale.
<img class="img-thumbnail img-sale" id="imageresource" src="https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQKWYNnGt8d9G1sf8PE0TpOglpZ2dKnHWAP5FB_spYgelcToong" width="30%" style="margin-left: 30px;" />
and added the following css:
.img-sale {
max-height: 170px;
width: auto;
}
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/OVwrpJ?editors=110
http://jsfiddle.net/6y4uf16y/82/
but the rest of the code is not recommended to proceed with.

Div not taking height of parent div (w/ bootstrap)

I'll start off by stating that I know this question has been asked a lot, but none of the answers I saw seemed to work for me.
Basically, I have some divs inside of a larger div. They'll have dynamic text, so I don't know how many lines each will be. The problem is that I can't seem to get the divs to size themselves to the parent's height. I want the column divs to take up the entire height of the row div (basically, I want that blue part to fill all the space between the bars).
HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="row divOne">
<div class="col-xs-3 divTwo">Some Text</div>
<div class="col-xs-3">
Some text that could wrap to multiple lines
</div>
</div>
<div class="row divOne">
<div class="col-xs-3 divTwo">Different Text</div>
<div class="col-xs-3 divThree">
With some more text
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.divOne
{
border-top:10px solid black;
}
.divTwo
{
background-color: #32649b;
height:100%;
color:white;
}
jsfiddle:
Now, what I've learned from other versions of this question are that
float:left might be screwing it up
height:100% doesn't work if the parent's height is defined
position:relative might help on the parent
The problem with the float is that I'm using bootstrap, and that's where the float is coming from, so I don't really want to mess with that.
I can't really define parent height, because it'll be dynamic based on the children.
I also tried messing around with position:relative on the parent and absolute on the child, but that seemed to get really screwy. I'm also guessing this won't work because I'm using bootstrap. It's possible that I'm just missing something, though. I'll admit to not being the greatest with CSS.
I don't know if I'm having these issues because I'm using bootstrap, or because I'm just being an idiot right now.
Something else that seems to be throwing a wrench into things: These columns will be laid out differently on smaller screens vs. larger ones. I actually want something along the lines of col-xs-12 col-md-3 for these.
The short answer is that you can't really achieve this within the constraints of the bootstrap framework. There are plenty of articles that explain why div elements can't stretch to the height of their container, and how to get around this problem. One of the solutions I'm most fond of is Faux Columns.
But, let's get a little more creative then that.
I came up with something that might work for your scenario, but requires a bit of change to your markup. Here's a solution that wraps the bootstrap grid with display: table.
http://jsfiddle.net/Wexcode/13Lfqmjo/
HTML:
<div class="table-container">
<div class="table-row divOne">
<div class="col-xs-3 divTwo">Some Text</div>
<div class="col-xs-3">
Some text that could wrap to multiple lines
</div>
<div class="col-xs-6"></div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.table-container {
margin: 0 -15px;
}
.table-row {
display: table;
width: 100%;
}
.table-row [class^="col"] {
display: table-cell;
padding: 0 15px;
float: none;
}
Note that for this solution to work, you must include enough col elements to stretch it all 12 columns (see that I added an empty .col-xs-6 div).
You can add
display:flex;
to divOne , and will act like you wanted.
in bootstrap 4 'row' class applies this on div, but in ealier versions you need to add manually if you expect such behavior.
Give .divOne a display: flex and remove the height: 100% from .divTwo:
.divOne
{
border-top:10px solid black;
display: flex;
}
.divTwo
{
background-color: #32649b;
/*height:100%;*/
color:white;
}
<link href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.2.0/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
<div class="container">
<div class="row divOne">
<div class="col-xs-3 divTwo">Some Text</div>
<div class="col-xs-3">
Some text that could wrap to multiple lines
</div>
</div>
<div class="row divOne">
<div class="col-xs-3 divTwo">Different Text</div>
<div class="col-xs-3 divThree">
With some more text
</div>
</div>
</div>

How to make panels full height of parent div?

I use Bootstrap 3 on a form with the following HTML, containing 4 panels with the same structure as the example below.
My problem here is that each panel contains a different and therefore appears with a different height. I tried adding style="height:100%" to them but that didn't change anything.
Can someone tell me how I can set them to always take the full height, independent of their content? Basically, what I am trying to achieve is to have all 4 panels take the same height as they appear in one row - they only thing the differ is the paragraph with the variable text, everything else is the same for all panels and takes the same height for each of them.
Example panel:
<form role="form">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-3 col-md-3 col-sm-6 col-xs-12">
<div class="thumbnail thumbnail-hover">
<div class="txtcntr" style="width:100%"><span>Placeholder for icon</span></div>
<div class="caption">
<h3 class="text-primary">Title</h3>
<p>Some variable text</p>
<p>View</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
// ...same structure for other panels...
</form>
Here is what I did: http://jsfiddle.net/o7p1jtjv/1/
By setting the .row to have a hidden overflow, and then giving each column div a margin-bottom equalling the padding-bottom, you force them to all be larger than the .row, but none of the overflowing content (extra div space) is shown.
For comparison, here is one without the extra rules: http://jsfiddle.net/o7p1jtjv/2/
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-4">
<p>text</p>
</div>
<div class="col-xs-4">
<p>text</p>
</div>
<div class="col-xs-4">
<p>text</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
.row
{
overflow: hidden;
}
.row > div
{
background: red;
margin-bottom: -999999px;
padding-bottom: 999999px;
}
To adjust the height of your thumbnail use a fixed pixel height like 300px.
.thumbnail {
height: 300px;
}
The thumbnail class does not respond to percentage height changes.
Like #Dan said, the panel class would be a better option. If you prefer not to use fixed height, you can use CSS flexbox like this..
http://www.bootply.com/IwBoyELqpx