OK i found myself in a dead end, and i know must be a way but my brain is just about to explode. This is the case: I have two tables with tons of rows, one for works done (lets call it works table), something like this:
ID | Home_Work_ID | task_id | Person_id
1 | 23 | 1 | 30
2 | 23 | 2 | 31
3 | 23 | 3 | 30
4 | 876 | 1 | 31
5 | 123 | 3 | 32
and another table to report the fixes to do on the works mentioned before, lets call it fixes table
ID | Home_Work_ID | Person_reporting_id | Task_id | Details
1 | 23 | 93 | 1 | Fix this
2 | 23 | 85 | 3 | Fix that
3 | 123 | 86 | 3 | Fix something
As we can see, in the fixes table there are home works with fixes reported, and those home works was done by the person_id 30 and 32 (from the work table). The results that im trying to achieve would be:
Person | Fixes
John (lets say this is person id 30) | 2
Kate (lets say this is person id 32) | 1
The problem is, i need to create a report that show me who was the person responsable of the work done in the works table that have reported fixes in the second table and how many fixes was reported for that person. The only link is the home work id and probably the task id, so i was testing something like this
SELECT P.person_name AS Person, COUNT(F.id) AS fixes
FROM fixes F
INNER JOIN homeworks H ON F.home_work_id = H.id
INNER JOIN works as W
INNER JOIN people AS P ON W.person_id = P.id
INNER JOIN tasks AS T ON T.task_id = F.task_id
WHERE F.task_id = W.task_id
AND F.home_work_id = W.home_work_id
AND W.home_work_id IN (SELECT home_work_id FROM fixes GROUP BY home_work_id)
GROUP BY P.person_name ORDER BY fixes DESC
Ok there are three more inner/left joinable tables with the id and name of the person, home work and task. This show me the person responsable but the number of fixes for that person and that home_work/task dont match the ones in the fixes table, i guess im doing wrong inner joining the work table that way but i dont see the light yet. Any help will be really appreciated.
Regards
I think this query should give you the expected result:
SELECT P.Person_name AS Person, COUNT(F.id) AS fixes
FROM works W
INNER JOIN fixes F ON W.home_work_id = F.home_work_id and W.task_id=F.Task_id
INNER JOIN people P ON W.person_id = P.id
group by P.Person_name
however because I didn't read the question deeply, so I'm not sure
100% this will give exact result.
EDIT: question owner wrote the exact query of answer below.
Note from owner of the answer: Check the query, its based on it but not the "exact" query.
Ok after do some tests and thanks to the comments from Farhang Amary and Rick James from dba.stackexchange, the following query seems to do the job, so im posting it here for anyone that find itself on the same situation or for anything tha can be fixed on it:
SELECT P.Person_name AS Person, COUNT(F.id) AS fixes
FROM (SELECT person_id, home_work_id, task_id FROM work) W
LEFT JOIN fixes_table F ON W.home_work_id = F.home_work_id AND W.task_id = F.taks_id
LEFT JOIN People_table P ON W.person_id = P.id
GROUP BY P.person_name ORDER BY fixes DESC;
Related
i have 3 tables like this
questions_table
question_id | content | user |
1 | my first question | userOne#email.com |
2 | my second question | userTwo#email.com|
replies_table
reply_id | question_id|user |content |voteCount|
1 | 1 |userSeven#email.com |first reply question 1 |0 |
2 | 1 |userEight#email.com |second reply question1 |0 |
vote_table
vote_id | reply_id| voted_by |
1 | 2 | userThree#email.com|
2 | 2 | userFour#email.com |
so to explain this:
A question was posted by two users userOne#email.com and
UserTwo#email.com
Then userSeven#email.com and userEight#email.com replied to
question 1.
Then the reply of userEight#email.com which has a reply_id of 2 was voted up by
userThree#email.com and userFour#email.com
what i need to do is to write an event scheduler in myphpmyadmin which will run every 2 hours.
what i want the query to do is to update the column voteCount in replies_table by counting the votes on that reply id.
this is what i got so far
SELECT COUNT(voteCount)
FROM replies_table
WHERE reply_id = .../**dont know how am i suppose to do this part **/;
i know it would be something like this but i have never wrote a event scheduler
You may simply use join to get the total vote count.
select r.reply_id, v.Countreply as count from replies_table as r
inner join
(select reply_id, count(reply_id) as CountReply from vote_table group by reply_id) as v
on r.reply_id= v.reply_id
If you want to update then it is simply done by update.
update r set r.votecount = v.Countreply
from replies_table as r inner join
(select reply_id, count(reply_id) as CountReply from vote_table group by reply_id) as v
on r.reply_id= v.reply_id
In MySQL, you would express the update as:
i want the query to do is to update the column voteCount in replies_table by counting the votes on that reply id. this is what i got so far
update replies_table rt join
(select reply_id, count(*) as numvotes
from votes v
group by reply_id
) v
set rt.VoteCount = v.numvotes;
This may not be the best way to keep your data up-to-date.
If your tables are not very big, then there is no need to store the VoteCount separately. Just run the query when you need it.
If the VoteCount is actually important, then use a trigger to keep it up-to-date.
And, there is no need to update all the rows, even if you take this route. You can keep track of timestamps and the last time updated to limit the number of updates.
I have two tables, one is an index (or map) which helps when other when pulling queries.
SELECT v.*
FROM smv_ v
WHERE (SELECT p.network
FROM providers p
WHERE p.provider_id = v.provider_id) = 'RUU='
AND (SELECT p.va
FROM providers p
WHERE p.provider_id = v.provider_id) = 'MjU='
LIMIT 1;
Because we do not know the name of the column that holds the main data, we need to look it up, using the provider_id which is in both tables, and then query.
I am not getting any errors, but also no data back. I have spent the past hour trying to put this on sqlfiddle, but it kept crashing, so I just wanted to check if my code is really wrong, hence the crashing?
In the above example, I am looking in the providers table for column network, where the provider_id matches, and then use that as the column on smv.
I am sure i have done this before just like this, but after the weekend trying I thought i would ask on here.
Thanks in Advance.
UPDATE
Here is an example of the data:
THis is the providers, this links so no matter what the name of the column on the smv table, we can link them.
+---+---+---------------+---------+-------+--------+-----+-------+--------+
| | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H |
+---+---+---------------+---------+-------+--------+-----+-------+--------+
| 1 | 1 | Home | network | batch | bs | bp | va | bex |
| 2 | 2 | Recharge | code | id | serial | pin | value | expire |
+---+---+---------------+---------+-------+--------+-----+-------+--------+
In the example above, G will mean in the smv column for recharge we be value. So that is what we would look for in our WHERE clause.
Here is the smv table:
+---+---+-----------+-----------+---+----+---------------------+-----+--+
| | A | B | C | D | E | F | value | va |
+---+---+-----------+-----------+---+----+---------------------+-----+--+
| 1 | 1 | X2 | Home | 4 | 10 | 2016-09-26 15:20:58 | | 7 |
| 2 | 2 | X2 | Recharge | 4 | 11 | 2016-09-26 15:20:58 | 9 | |
+---+---+-----------+-----------+---+----+---------------------+-----+--+
value in the same example as above would be 9, or 'RUU=' decoded.
So we do not know the name of the rows, until the row from smv is called, once we have this, we can look up what column name we need to get the correct information.
Hope this helps.
MORE INFO
At the point of triggering, we do not know what the row consists of the right data because some many of the fields would be empty. The map is there to help we query the right column, to get the right row (smv grows over time depending on whats uploaded.)
1) SELECT p.va FROM providers p WHERE p.network = 'Recharge' ;
2) SELECT s.* FROM smv s, providers p WHERE p.network = 'Recharge';
1) gives me the correct column I need to look up and query smv, using the above examples it would come back with "value". So I need to now look up, within the smv table, C = Recharge, and value = '9'. This should bring me back row 2 of the smv table.
So individually both 1 and 2 queries work, but I need them put together so the query is done on the database server.
Hope this gives more insight
Even More Info
From reading other posts, which are not really doing what I need, i have come up with this:
SELECT s.*
FROM (SELECT
(SELECT p.va
FROM dh_smv_providers p
WHERE p.provider_name = 'vodaphone'
LIMIT 1) AS net,
(SELECT p.bex
FROM dh_smv_providers p
WHERE p.provider_name = 'vodaphone'
LIMIT 1) AS bex
FROM dh_smv_providers) AS val, dh_smv_ s
WHERE s.provider_id = 'vodaphone' AND net = '20'
ORDER BY from_base64(val.bex) DESC;
The above comes back blank, but if i replace net, in the WHERE clause with a column I know exists, I do get the results expected:
SELECT s.*
FROM (SELECT
(SELECT p.va
FROM dh_smv_providers p
WHERE p.provider_name = 'vodaphone'
LIMIT 1) AS net,
(SELECT p.bex
FROM dh_smv_providers p
WHERE p.provider_name = 'vodaphone'
LIMIT 1) AS bex
FROM dh_smv_providers) AS val, dh_smv_ s
WHERE s.provider_id = 'vodaphone' AND value = '20'
ORDER BY from_base64(val.bex) DESC;
So what I am doing wrong, which is net, not showing the value derived from the subquery "value" ?
Thanks
SELECT
v.*,
p.network, p.va
FROM
smv_ v
INNER JOIN
providers p ON p.provider_id = v.provider_id
WHERE
p.network = 'RUU=' AND p.va = 'MjU='
LIMIT 1;
The tables talk to each other via the JOIN syntax. This completely circumvents the need (and limitations) of sub-selects.
The INNER JOIN means that only fully successful matches are returned, you may need to adjust this type of join for your situation but the SQL will return a row of all v columns where p.va = MjU and p.network = RUU and p.provider_id = v.provider_id.
What I was trying to explain in comments is that subqueries do not have any knowledge of their outer query:
SELECT *
FROM a
WHERE (SELECT * FROM b WHERE a)
AND (SELECT * FROM c WHERE a OR b)
This layout (as you have in your question) is that b knows nothing about a because the b query is executed first, then the c query, then finally the a query. So your original query is looking for WHERE p.provider_id = v.provider_id but v has not yet been defined so the result is false.
I'm having 2 tables. Table A contains a list of people who booked for an event, table B has a list of people the booker from table A brings with him/her. Both tables have many colums with unique data that I need to do certain calculations on in PHP , and as of now I do so by doing queries on the tables with a recursive PHP function to resolve it. I want to simplify the PHP and reduce the amount of queries that come from this recursive function by doing better MYSQL queries but I'm kind of stuck.
Because the table has way to many columns I will give an Excerpt of table A instead:
booking_id | A_customer | A_insurance
1 | 134 | 4
Excerpt of table B:
id | booking_id | B_insurance
1 | 1 | 0
2 | 1 | 1
3 | 1 | 1
4 | 1 | 3
The booking_id in table A is unique and set to auto increment, the booking_id in table b can occur many times (depending on how many guests the client from table A brings with him). Lets say I want to know every selected insurance from customer 134 and his guests, then I want the output like this:
booking_id | insurance
1 | 4
1 | 0
1 | 1
1 | 1
1 | 3
I have tried a couple of joins and this is the closest I've came yet, unfortunately this fails to show the row from A and only shows the matching rows in B.
SELECT a.booking_id,a.A_customer,a.A_insurance,b.booking_id,b.insurance FROM b INNER JOIN a ON (b.booking_id = a.booking_id) WHERE a.booking_id = 134
Can someone point me into the right direction ?
Please note: I have altered the table and column names for stackoverflow so it's easy for you guys to read, so it's possible that there is a typo that would break the query in it right now.
I think you need a union all for this:
select a.booking_id, a.insurance
from a
where a.a_customer = 134
union all
select b.booking_id, b.insurance
from a join
b
on a.booking_id = b.booking_id
where a.a_customer = 134;
The simplest way I can think of to achieve this is to use a UNION:
SELECT booking_id, A_insurance insurance
FROM A
WHERE booking_id = 134
UNION
SELECT booking_id, B_insurance insurance
FROM B
WHERE booking_id = 134
As my understanging of your isso is right, that should give you the result you need:
SELECT a.booking_id,a.insurance FROM a WHERE a.booking_id = 134
union
SELECT a.booking_id,b.insurance FROM b INNER JOIN a ON (b.booking_id = a.booking_id) WHERE a.booking_id = 134
I've got THREE MYSQL TABLES (innoDB) :
NAMES
id nid version fname lname birth
RELATIONS
id rid version idname idperson roleid
ROLES
id role
I want to select the last version of each RELATIONS joined to the last version of their related NAMES for a particular idperson (and the name of the ROLE)
Of course, idperson will have 0, 1 or more relations and there will be one or more versions of RELATIONS and NAMES
I wrote something like :
SELECT A.id,A.nid,MAX(A.version),A.idname,A.idperson,A.roleid,B.id,B.role
FROM RELATIONS A
INNER JOIN
ROLES
ON A.roleid = B.id
INNER JOIN
(SELECT id,nid,MAX(version),fname,lname,birth FROM NAMES) C
ON A.idname = C.id
WHERE A.idperson = xx
It doesn't work maybe because MAX() seems to return only one line...
How to get the maximum value for more than one line in this joining context?
PS: how do you generate this kind of nice data set?
i.e. :
id home datetime player resource
---|-----|------------|--------|---------
1 | 10 | 04/03/2009 | john | 399
2 | 11 | 04/03/2009 | juliet | 244
5 | 12 | 04/03/2009 | borat | 555
8 | 13 | 01/01/2009 | borat | 700
Adding a GROUP BY statement, both in the subquery you have, as well as in the outer query should allow the MAX function to generate the result that you're looking for.
This is untested code, but should give you the result that you're looking for:
SELECT A.id,A.nid,MAX(A.version),A.idname,A.idperson,A.roleid,B.id,B.role
FROM RELATIONS A
INNER JOIN
ROLES
ON A.roleid = B.id
INNER JOIN
(SELECT id,nid,MAX(version),fname,lname,birth FROM NAMES GROUP BY fname,lname) C
ON A.idname = C.id
WHERE A.idperson = xx
GROUP BY fname,lname
Alternatively, if it works better for your database architecture, you can use any unique identifier for the employees you'd like (possibly nid?).
As to the question that you've posed in your PS, I'm unsure as to what you're asking. I don't seem a home, datetime, player, or resource field in the examples of your tables that you've provided. If you could clarify, I'd be happy to try and help you with that as well.
I have two table:
Site:
id | name
1 | google
2 | stackoverflow
3 | cnn.com
Confirm:
id | site_id | type // (type = 1, 2 or 3)
1 | 1 | 2
2 | 2 | 1
so and would like get Sites which is not added to table Confirm with type for example 1.
SELECT *
FROM Site
LEFT JOIN Confirm
ON Site.id = Confirm.site_id
and what next?
A natural way to write this query is as a NOT EXISTS query:
SELECT s.*
FROM Sites s
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM Confirm c WHERE c.site_id = s.id AND type = 1);
It is almost a 1-1 translation of the problem statement: "would like to get sites that are not added to Confirm with type = 1".
I do not understand what you meant. But if you are in doubt about how to work with result sets from the database, look at this, maybe it can help you: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/database/Visual_SQL_Joins/Visual_SQL_JOINS_orig.jpg