My Problem
I want to be able to handle my CSS this way, that when I add a class named "sold-out" to my div , it should add a sold-out overlay stamp. At the moment I have the problem, that it seems like I am destroying the CSS of other classes. However I hope you can help me with a good solution.
My HTML:
<div class="rotate sold-out">
<a href="images/packages/background01.jpg" rel="imagebox" title="">
<img src="images/packages/background01.jpg" alt=""/></a>
</div>
As you can see I have inserted an image there and the sold-out stamp (which is a transparent .png) should be shown at the highest layer ofcourse.
My CSS try:
.sold-out {
content: url(../images/sold_out_stamp.png);
}
This is what happened:
The image inside the div is completely gone. I only see the Sold-out-stamp with a white background.
You are on the right track. Instead of replacing the sold-out element's content with the overlay image (and thereby replacing it entirely) you should set the pseudo element's content and position it over the sold-out element.
.sold-out{ position:relative; }
.sold-out::before{
content:url(../images/sold_out_stamp.png);
position:absolute;
z-index:2;
top:0;
left:0;
}
*didn't test, but should work in theory... If you make a fiddle with the correct images linked I'm happy to refine, but this should at least be close.
Let me know if you need further direction.
Related
In my webpage, I've an image, and a link in this image.
<a href='..'><img src='...' class='img-circle'></a>
(img-circle is part of the Twitter Bootstrap library)
I would like that the link is only on the image, e. g. on the circle, and not on the square. Do you know a solution please ?
You will need to create an anchor link on the image like so:
#a {
position:absolute;
border-radius:100px;
background-color:#72CEE0;
width:100px;
height:100px;
left:150px;}
And the HTML:
<div id="a" onclick="window.location='http://whatever.com';"><img src="image.jpg"></div>
You will have to modify the left, width, border-radius and height properties above in order to match the size, shape and position of your circular image.
Here is an example from another answer on Stack Overflow:
http://jsfiddle.net/avTa8/
EDIT: It seems that Chrome may have a problem with onclick, although I am not sure what the real reason for this problem is, instead just simply place an a href around the div like this:
http://jsfiddle.net/6UYTL/2/
I have an image, on which I want to place links, which could be either text or an image. Pretty much what Wikipedia has here for example (the map of Germany and its states): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States_of_Germany
Back in the 90s I would've used the map tag to create clickable parts on the image.
I've looked at the source code of the map on Wikipedia and noticed that all the states of an absolute position. So is there an easy way to implement such a thing? Or do I have to use, for example, Photoshop to check for the absolute position and hardcode it in CSS/HTML?
As you already noticed, Wikipedia uses <div>-elements which are positioned over the image. One way or another you would need to provide the (absolute) coordinates for the texts you want to place on top of the image.
You can try to fiddle around to get the correct coordinates or use a(ny) image editing application to exactly find the required coordinates within the image.
Wikipedia uses some structure like this
HTML:
<div class="container">
<img src="myImage.png" />
<div class="text1">Text1</div>
<div class="text2">Text2</div>
</div>
CSS:
.text1 {
position:absolute;
left:50px;
top:100px
}
.text2 {
position:absolute;
left:200px;
top:50px
}
(Except that they directly put the CSS styles in the HTML elements...)
See this jsFiddle for an working example.
I guess you need a HTML map (example http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_map.asp) plus some javascript to include the text over it.
Please take a look to the following question, it might help you:
HTML, jQuery : Show text over area of image-map
If you are creating something similar in the link you mentioned, you gotta be pin pointing those positions. Isn't it? absolute positioning is good to go in that case.
But if your scenario does not require you to put those links in the exact locations on the image, you can try something like this.
CSS//////////
div.back{
background:url('path/to/your/image.extension');
width:/*width of the image*/;
height:/*height of the image*/
}
This div with class back will just work like the way you want. Then put the links inside the div and the links will be displayed on top of that image.
Check out this fiddle.
I have a button that, when hovered over, I would like the background image to display also. (It is an arrow an explanation of the button). There are quite a few questions similar, but I couldn't quite tweak the answers to work for me.
The HTML looks like
<div id="header_feedback">
<a href="#contactForm">
<img title="Add an Event" src="./img/header_feedback.png" alt="Give us your Feedback"/>
</a>
</div>
the CSS then is
#header_feedback
{margin-left:730px;
margin-top:-135px;
position:absolute;}
#header_feedback:hover
{
background: url ('./img/addevent_tip.png');
}
Any ideas hugely welcome!
The main problem here is not with your CSS. Itagi's answer correctly identified the minor issue that you can't have a space between url and the parens/address.
But there are two other bigger issues:
Invalid image url: when applied, background: url('./img/addevent_tip.png'); fails to find a valid image. To fix this, you either need two periods or zero. So either background: url('/img/addevent_tip.png'); or background: url('../img/addevent_tip.png');
Backgrounds applied to opaque images aren't visible: Since the entire content of the div is an image and that image has no transparency, you will not be able to see the on-hover change even when it happens correctly. You can adjust for this by making part of the image transparent (and, perhaps, setting a background for the non-hover state that leads it to look the way it normally does), or by abandoning the image in favor of CSS spriting.
you just need to change it the following way:
#header_feedback:hover
{
background: url('./img/addevent_tip.png');
}
no whitespace between 'url' and the actual url
#header_feedback a img{ display:none;}
#header_feedback a:hover img{display:block}
I'd like to add a hyperlink to this background image. Should I create a new class within the stylesheet? (When I attempted to call the new class, the image disappeared).
body{
background-image:url('http://thehypebr.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/boundless-sem-branco-2.jpg');
background-repeat:no-repeat;
background-attachment:fixed;
line-height:20px; font-size:14px;
font-family:"Trebuchet MS";
margin:0
}
EDIT: Now there's whitespace on the top and bottom (created by the new div class?)
You're using a background-image on the body tag. Assigning a hyperlink to it is impossible.
Also, whats stopping you from using it in an img tag? This seems like a semantically valid thing to do:
<img src="http://thehypebr.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/boundless-sem-branco-2.jpg" alt="Image" />
But, if you must use it as a background image, than creating an additional class is the way to go.
You can place a div behind everything on the page, give it a background image, and then add an onclick handler to that div. But you can't hyperlink a background image.
You'd have to do something like:
<body>
<div id='background' onclick='window.location.href="mynewurl"'>
<!-- Rest of page goes here -->
</div>
</body>
Also, add cursor: pointer to the css for the background div so people know it's a link.
OK, I can't tell you if this would be a valid solution, because I would have to see what you actually wanted to be a link. If for example you wanted to make a link to the cream "Boundless" boxes in your background image I do have a work around. It will be a pain to get it correct cross browser, but it's doable.
Make clear gif's the same size as your cream boxes
Put those images in something like this <img src="blank.gif" alt="Link Location" />
Use CSS to make the a tag a block element and place it over the cream boxes in the background image
I would of course clean up my code, it's a mess, but I am sure you can figure that out. Just make sure to have descriptive alt tags for accessibility.
This isn't the best solution, that would be to take the "boundless" boxes out of the background image and place them instead of the blank gifs, but if you HAVE to do it for one reason or another, this option will work.
You're going to have to change your html code a bit to do that. You need to surround the image with a tag, but you can't do that to the <body> tag, obviously.
** EDIT ** Since it's been pointed out my first answer is invalid HTML (thanks, and sorry), you can use a jquery approach like this:
$(document).ready(function(){
$("body").click(function(){
window.location='http://www.yoururl.com';
});
});
The issue with setting up an onClick method, is that you remove the anchor hint at the bottom left of the browser window, as well as any SEO that might be associated with the link.
You can accomplish this with just HTML/CSS:
<style>
.background-div {
background-image:url("/path/to/image.jpg");
position:relative;
}
.href:after {
position:absolute;
top:0;
bottom:0;
left:0;
right:0;
content:"";
}
</style>
<body>
<div class="background-div">
</div>
</body>
In this case, the relative positioning on background-div will keep the link contained to only that div, and by adding a pseudo element to the link, you have the freedom to still add text to the link (if necessary), while expanding the click radius to the entire background div.
If I have two layers on a page, split horrizontally, with the second layer overlapping part of the first layer, is it possible to make it "click through"?
I have links in the first layer, which the second layer overlaps, which stops the links from being clickable. Is there a way to make the layer display, but be click through, while still having it's own links clickable?
edit:
Here is an example, with html and a stylesheet.
The test links become unclickable when inline with the header in Layer3, but below that they are fine. Is there a way to rectify this?
<title>Test</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="test.css" type="text/css">
<body>
<div id="Layer0">
<div id="Layer1" class="Layer1">
<h3 align="left">Brands</h3>
</div>
<div id="Layer2" class="Layer2"><h1>TEST</h1>
<div id="rightlayer">
TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="Layer3" class="Layer3"><h1>Ed Hardy Auctions</h1>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
And the css
#Layer0 {
width:100%;
height:100%;
}
body {
margin:10px 10px 0px 10px;
padding:0px;
color:#999999;
font-family:"Trebuchet MS",arial,sans-serif;
font-size:70.5%;
}
#Layer1 {
position:absolute;
left:10px;
width:200px;
margin-top:17px;
font-size:1.0em;
padding-left:12px;
padding-top:8px;
}
#Layer2 {
background:#fff;
margin-left:199px;
color:#000;
}
#rightlayer {
float:right;
}
.Layer3 {
position:absolute;
top:67%;
padding:20px;
width: 100%;
}
Thought I would update this as I'd been struggling with this for a few hours and think i've found a solution. Looked into using Jquery but the CSS property:
pointer-events:none;
...did exactly what I wanted.
It is not possible if you want the divs to stay in their current x,y, (and most importantly) z - only the "top" layer is clickable.
Addendum post OP edit:
Think of CSS layout as if you were physically working with bits of paper (this is much easier to visualise if you give all your "layer" divs a different background colour). The rendering engine cuts out a bit of paper in the dimensions you give it (or it works out) for each element it finds. It does this in the order it encounters them putting each bit of paper on the page as it goes - the last item is going to be on top.
Now you've told the rendering engine to put your 3rd div in a position where it overlaps the 2nd. And now you expect to be able to "see" the covered content. Wouldn't work with paper, won't work with HTML. Just because it's transparent doesn't mean it's not taking up space.
So you have to change something.
Looking at your CSS and markup (which honestly could be cleaned up, but I'll assume there's other mark-up you're not showing us which justifies it) there's a couple of easy win ways:
1). Set a z-index of -1 on Layer3 - z-index is how you can change the layering order from the default (as encountered). This just moves the entirety of Layer3 below the rest of the page so what was hidden becomes exposed, but also vice versa depending on content.
2). Change the width from 100% to e.g. 80%, or more likely given your use of pos:abs set left:0px and right:199px; (I'm guessing that padding-left on Layer2 is an intended column width?). The cost of this is that your Layer3 is no longer 100% width
3). Google "CSS column layout" and find a pattern that reflects what you need and adapt that. Every CSS layout which can be done has been done a million times already. Standard techniques exist which solve your problems. CSS is hard if you haven't built up the experience, so leverage the experience of others. Don't reinvent wheels.
It would be a mammoth job, but it is possible.
You would need to capture the click event on the top layer/div, and find the cursor x-y position.
Then find all links in the layer/div underneath the top layer, and see if it's position on the screen falls around the current mouse position.
You could then trigger the click of the matched link.
I would use jQuery (if you are not already) for this and then re-post with a jQuery tag if you run into troubles.
It is hard to tell without seeing some code.
You could try setting z-index on the bottom layer but that works on elements that have been positioned with absolute, relative or fixed (position:absolute).
edit after seeing code:
Add position:relative; z-index:100; to #rightLayer.
Or you could remove the width:100% from .Layer3.
You may want to refactor your code and go with a two column layout for #rightLayer and .Layer3.
css
#Layer0 {
width:100%;
height:100%;
}
body {
margin:10px 10px 0px 10px;
padding:0px;
color:#999999;
font-family:"Trebuchet MS",arial,sans-serif;
font-size:70.5%;
}
#Layer1 {
width:200px;
margin-top:17px;
font-size:1.0em;
padding-left:12px;
padding-top:8px;
}
#Layer2 {
background:#fff;
margin-left:199px;
color:#000;
}
#rightlayer {
float:right;
}
.Layer3 {
}
html
<div id="Layer0">
<div id="Layer2" class="Layer2">
<h1>TEST</h1>
</div>
<div id="Layer1" class="Layer1">
<h3 align="left">Brands</h3>
</div>
<div class="content">
<div id="rightlayer">
TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>TEST><p>
</div>
<div id="Layer3" class="Layer3">
<h1>Ed Hardy Auctions</h1>
</div>
</div>
</div>
I'm assuming from the example that the links in the rightlayer are the only links that need to be clicked, and that you don't have links in the other layers. If so, you could solve the problem by changing the z-index order of the divs.
Layer1 and Layer3 have position absolute, so if you add a position style (absolute or relative) to Layer2, you will be able to pull that div to the front, also pulling the rightlayer div to be in a higher layer than Layer3.
I added the following to the CSS:
#Layer2 {
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
}
From what I can see that leaves the current page setup just the way it is, but pulls all the elements (including the rightlayer with the links) to the front, so you'd be able to click all the links in it.
For debugging purposes I suggest adding background colors to all the different layers to get an idea of the z-index order of the different layers. With the background color in place it was quite easy to spot the layer that was falling over the links, but also to verify that the new z-index order makes the links available.
Hope this helps!
I submitted a bug years ago to the Firefox Bugzilla saying that there was this very bug in Firefox.
I was told by a Mozilla engineer that this was not actually a bug and that it is the correct behaviour as per the HTML/CSS specifications.
Unfortunately I can't find the original bug to reference as it was about 6 years ago.
The reason I submitted the bug was because I could click through the top div onto the links below when using IE (6 I think) but Firefox would not let me.
As usual, it turned out hat IE had the incorrect implementation and Firefox was working as intended by the spec.
Just because a div is transparent does not mean you should be able to click through it.
I'm not sure how you could get around this with JavaScript or CSS. I would take a step back and have a re-think about what you're trying to achieve and how you're trying to achieve it.
Greg
Can you not simply set the width of the div to auto (the default for absolute positioning - i.e. just delete the width:100% from .Layer3).
That way the div will only be as wide as is necessary, rather than unnecessarily overlapping the links.