If you look at the attached screenshot you will see a design I have created for HTML email.
Screen Shot
In all of the tests I run, the following are on one row next to each other.
The logo, "VIP Edition" and the View all Deals button.
In Safari the VIP Edition and the View all Deals fall down a row and the logo centers. Can anyone explain this behaviour to me? I'm struggling to understand why it doesn't happen for the rest of the email, and I can't think how to phrase this question to find my answer.
It would be great to see your code, even if just for that section.
But I have seen this before and I know that when I see this it's usually when I have two aligned tables with an align=center on the parent td.
So for example in your instance, the VIP Edition logo would be in a left aligned table and the View all deals button would be in a right aligned table.
Make sure the td housing both of those aligned tables does not have an align attribute set.
Taking that off always fixes the issue for me.
If you need to center elements for mobile, set the align=center further up
I ended up starting again, I can only assume that it was something to do with the widths of the columns. I found this post which was useful.
In the frameworks section I decided to try a few. The first I tried was Zurb Foundations Ink, because I have used Zurb Foundation in the past. However, their supported clients wasn't comprehensive enough for my liking. They make no mention of the differing browsers, and in my opinion that matters. I've done a lot of testing in the last month. I will test it more thoroughly when I get time, at least they offer a version that works responsively in Gmail which doesn't use media queries.
Wanting something that worked on all platforms out of the box I tried Email on Acid's responsive template. It looks great, and I use Email on Acid to test, so I thought they would have it solved. Their website is full of useful tit-bits. However, their template didn't work in Safari and had the drop down issue I had initially started with. They don't claim it works there, but being as they offer a testing service, I had hoped it would work on all the platforms they use.
Then I moved onto AntWorts solution. That worked in my initial tests, and I found it remarkably easy to adapt to my needs, eventually adding additional columns using their methodology which was clearly explained in one of the templates.
My final template has 1,2,3,4 column grids which work responsively part fluid part adaptive. My advise to people in the future is to start with this boilerplate, I redid my whole template from scratch and it took half the time I have spent trying to troubleshoot a different boilerplate to start with.
Related
I'm trying to build an app that looks great on all devices but I'm having an issue with the responsiveness, actually I have a dought for what should I do. so here is what I'm thinking about:
1- If I build the app using the device toolbar which means I start with a media querie of 320px up to 1440px
like this :
and that's what I did actually and everything is going Ok at least that's what I thought but when I use the viewport width ( increasing, decreasing it) I see some unexpected results
this is on 605px viewport width:
I built this app with absolute positioning and I applied a position relative to the img in the background, maybe this is bad practice I know , please note that the app looks great on all devices that the device toolbar offers me.
some of my friends adviced me to use a framework and get rid of all these headaches but really I wanna practice vanilla CSS very well please consider that this is my first app and I'm doing my best to make it look great on all devices
so my question is:
should I leave it like this because logically If it looks ok on the
devices like Iphone 6 ... (the devices that the device toolbar
offers me) I don't need to address the viewport width issue.
or should I use a framework and I don't like this solution I know
it's feasible and as I told you I wanna practice vanilla css.
or should I use another technologie like flexbox or grid system and
this is the hardest solution I think because I'm gonna rebuild the
entire app, but it's ok.
and the last thing I wanna ask about is: is there anythings should I be aware of in my future projects especially if I'm working with vanilla CSS
Congrats on building your first app!
1) When posting questions on Stackoverflow, it is always helpful to provide either an example of your code directly in your post, and/or to include a link to a running version of your code on a site like jsfiddle.net, JSbin.com, codepen.io, etc.
2) For most responsive apps, there are almost always a couple of widths where things do not look exactly perfect. These points are usually right before/after a breakpoint transition.
3) In general, you don't want to use position relative or absolute for handling page layout. There are a number of situations where they can be helpful, but I think its safe to say that they should never be the first thing you reach for when trying to create the layout of a page.
4) Right now, the best way to handle page layout with regular CSS -- no library -- is probably Flexbox because of its versatility and adoption of all major browsers. I highly recommend you learn it and become familiar with it.
5) There is nothing wrong with using a library for general page structure stuff. Because of its use with a ton of companies, I highly recommend you become familiar with Bootstrap -- specifically its grid framework. If you do go this route, read the rules for certain things very carefully. For example, I cannot tell you how many people have their apps look screwed up because they don't follow the cardinal rule of Bootstrap's grid system: The only children of a row should be col. Say that 10 times.
Best of luck to you!
I've got a series of links to press articles I am publishing on a client's site (basic html and css, no php allowed). The client would like the articles neatly lined up in nice rows and columns. I'm trying not to use a table, but cannot seem to get things to line up correctly. Of course the article titles are different lengths which throws everything off.
I've got a jsfiddle which demonstrates what I am trying to do:
http://jsfiddle.net/ktpmm5/ug5s4Leq/5/
I would also like to do this without using a background image, but I can do that if need be (it might look fancier that way). The client also wants this to be responsive, and be viewed on the usual smartphones, tablets, etc.
Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks-
I would use the new CSS3 flexbox:
http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/
but before you start, check if it is usable in the browsers you're developing for:
http://caniuse.com/#search=flexbox
Complex Grid Layout, Help!
I'm making a responsive website using bootstrap 3.0.2 and can't figure out the layout that is stated in the requirements document for the project. I made an image of what I need, and will give more detail, or update my question, if needed. I am open to any suggestion on how to accomplish this.
The Issue
This image describes what I need the design to look like at three different widths.
I should add, each box will be basically a div with an image, article title and summary within it.
Like to say ... in advanced
Id like to say thanks and apologize in advanced if the question is dumb or the answer is obvious. I have been a dev for a long time, but I'm new to responsive design and I've been banging my head on the wall trying to get this to work
The problematic part of your project is to make two smaller blocks side with a bigger one and make these two 50%. As far as I know, there are no mature cross-browser solutions that would accomplish that without javascript.
You may want to take a look at: Flexbox and for Comrade IE Flexie.
Another approach to accomplish the same could be using viewport dimensions. Just be aware of the browsers support.
All in all, if you can do that, I would suggest just using JS, with a fallback to css that will not break the site's look too much. Having just finished a project with similar requirements, I would just like to say good luck.
So this is my first time trying to use a responsive framework...also fairly new to building responsive sites in general - but had a lot more luck with just building them from scratch and sizing each element...though Foundation seems like a much better solution if I could just get my head around it!
Work in progress is here: http://client.analog.la/360/
It's behaving 'alright' in my desktop browsers (resizing down to 400) except for a problem with the menu - the issue I'm having is trying to get the menu to drop down below the logo and be properly centered.
On actual mobile and tablet having way more issues...the menu is sitting above and the whole layout or to one side and not dropping down at all. On ipad the whole layout seems to be only about 95% page width with a random margin down the right hand side...on iPhone the whole layout only seems to be about 50% width...which just looks...awful. There's so much discrepancy between how the layout looks on devices vs. how it looks on desktop at the same resolution that I'm a bit baffled...Also, really not sure where I went wrong with the sizing to make it look so wrong on devices!
Any help would be massively appreciated!
Thanks,
Not sure if you're still looking for help on this, but there are a number of issues in your codebase, and it's hard to say which ones are causing the behavior you're trying to address. Your very first div uses the columns class, but it's not nested in a row. Elsewhere, you have rows immediately nested in other rows with no apparent benefit, more columns nested in other columns without an interposing row, and nested rows that aren't set to collapse. You're also using spacer.png in a few places, which almost reduced me to tears.
And your top level headers are in spans instead of h1. My only guess here is that you were attempting to sidestep Foundation's default styles? Use a class. You need those h1s for SEO, semantics, etc.
No insult intended, but you might do well to check out Treehouse and sharpen your coding skills - could save you a lot of time and frustration in future work.
Could you please show me a website (preferably, a forum) that has perfect liquid layout (that does not break at all if the browser window gets resized)? Would be nice to see...
Once again, where on the web can I see a website that doesn't become a mess when squeezed down and doesn't cap its own width when enlarged?
Have you ever been concerned about that? Or a fat lot you care? 'Cause I see that popular websites (even portals, I am not going to name any) have this problem (as I consider it to be).
Well, I'd like to see what your code would be for an avatar on the left and some user's info on the right. Please see this picture to figure out what I mean: savepic.ru/780576.png
The main reason why this is broken in many places is that it's broken at the fundamental level: CSS doesn't really support fluid layouts, there are still corner cases even when you start using tables for layout. On top of that, every browser and every version of every browser does CSS a little bit different.
The net result is that even highly paid web designers can't get it right (or someone would have come up with a solution by now and every would be using that).
The only hope is that browser developers finally agree to make their products compliant to the Acid3 test. But as I write this, my Firefox 3.5.1 gets only 92%. WebKit (Safari and Google Chrome) and Opera go the full 100% (see this article).
I personally have given up on this and I won't revisit this topic until IE 7 drops below 5% in the popular usage charts which will probably take five to ten years (IE 6 is dead as a log but still gets 12%).
Smashing Magazine have a couple of posts on fluid layouts. Try searching around there to find good examples and explanations.
One of my favourite from their examples is Vivabit.
Personally I haven't been to concerned about it yet, but I probably should, with the rise of netbooks and mobile browsers. I still believe you should serve a different layout to mobile browsers, though, but it's interesting to look at possibilities of serving the same to all browsers.
Well, Slashdot has a completely fluid middle column (down to some minimum which is pretty small) with fixed-width columns to left and right. As far as I can see it doesn't cap its width (tested on my 1900x1200 monitor).
It's not a forum on the main page, but the comments to articles are kind of like it. It doesn't have the avatar example you're looking for though :(