I am trying to send html emails with images. Images look good in all email clients but in outlook they are too wide. How to fix max-width of image?
<table id="cg-cmgxsgg" class="widget widget-image " width="580" data-widget-code="email-image">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<div><img src="http://vcap.me//file/get/ce2c1e66-2129-41e8-903c-a40300e7bbd0" width="580" alt="" style="float: none; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Regardless of CSS support or HTML attributes, the main factor that is causing the issue in Outlook is the actual size of the image. Outlook usually ignores whatever HTML sizing (width= or height=) or CSS styling (width:, height:) and goes off of the embedded information in teh image. This is all based off DPI setting as well as the renderings of the Word HTML engine.
Mailchimp solutions
Below is snippet explaining the issue in more detail from here
"This issue usually happens when you are using a picture other than 96dpi.
When inserting a picture, Outlook will rescale the image as if it was a 96dpi image. This means that if you have a picture of 150dpi with a height of 88px, it will be displayed as an image of 56px high;
88px/150dpi * 96dpi = 56px
It even gets worse; upon sending, Outlook will convert and compress (re-render) the images to 96dpi with the new dimensions permanently! This means that all the "detailed" picture information is lost and you'll be sending an image of 96dpi which is 56px high. This is of course a severe and very visible quality loss.
If your picture is less than 96dpi, then the opposite happens. A picture of 88px high with a dpi of 32 would then result in a 96dpi image of 264px high. So the result will be a very large image (but this time you can resize it back without the image becoming blurry).
This is a long outstanding issue/function/design choice which goes back all the way to Word 6.0 from 1993."
For setting a max-width on images for Outlook I add a Width="600" attribute to the img tag. Note the lack of px on that size, with px it doesn't work and it must be on the img tag, not any parent element.
E.g.
<img width="600" src="http://www.myimage.co.nz/myimage.jpg" alt="My Image" />
On a side but related note I use a width of 280 for side by side images in a 600 width table. This is because Outlook adds padding (or maybe margin) and they would stack if you made them both 300.
Couple of things, I'd refrain from using floats etc in your emailer code and also would remove that wrapper div, with emailers you've really got to go with simple table markup. Also try to avoid things like p tags etc as they create additional space etc.
For your actual question I'd try something like this, I'd set a height on my image and ive it display:block
<table id="cg-cmgxsgg" class="widget widget-image" width="580" data-widget-code="email-image" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<img src="http://vcap.me//file/get/ce2c1e66-2129-41e8-903c-a40300e7bbd0" width="580" height="200" alt="" style="display:block;">
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
max-width is not a supported CSS style in Outlook 2007. (Neither is float, apparently.) Outlook is notorious for providing very limited CSS support.
Your best solution is to specify a smaller width (and height) in the HTML attributes:
<td align="center">
<div><img src="..." width="500" height="300" alt="" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"></div>
</td>
I'm a bit late to the party (got here via Google). What works for me, and what I didn't see in the answers, is conditional comments for Outlook.
They work like this:
<!--[if mso]>
<table align="left" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%" style="width:100%;">
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="600" style="width:600px;">
<![endif]-->
<table align="left" width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="min-width:100%;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<img align="center" alt="" src="[image source here]" width="[desired width here]">
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<!--[if mso]>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<![endif]-->
What your're doing here is essentially wrapping your image table in another table with fixed width, but only for Outlook.
MailChimp has a nice reference you should check out if you run into problems with Outlook: https://templates.mailchimp.com/development/css/outlook-conditional-css/
Hope this helps some fellow Googlers!
I am using this with perfect success in Outlook 365 (2022):
<img src="https://picsum.photos/1000/1000" width="100%" style="width: 100%;">
Related
I'm currently building a new HTML-template.
In one section I want to display a different image size for MS-Outlook, as it doesn't react in the same way as other clients.
Original:
<td align="left" class="column_one_half column_image" valign="top" width="100%">
<img alt="" class="mso-size" src="https://xxx" width="100%">
</td>
I need to show the image with the size width="270";height="190" in Outlook. I would like to use a CSS-declaration in the head.
I was trying the approach below, however it doesn't work. Litmus is showing no change. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks and best,
This is what I tried:
The following structure works well, Litmus shows the expected result:
<!--[if mso]>
<td align="left" class="column_one_half column_image" valign="top" width="100%">
<img alt="" src="xxx" width="270" height="190">
</td>
<div style="display:none">
<![endif]-->
<td align="left" class="column_one_half column_image" valign="top" width="100%">
<img alt="" src="xxx" width="100%">
</td>
<!--[if mso]>
<div>
<![endif]-->
But, I don't want everyone to be forced to paste in the image-URL twice. I would like to use the CSS in the head instead.
I tried the following declaration (pasted it under the first -section:
<!--[if mso]>
<style>
img.mso-size {
width:270px!important;
height:190px!important;
}
</style>
<![endif]-->
Unfortunately, Outlook on Windows use Word as a rendering engine. While they do support width and height in CSS, they do not for <img> elements. The only way to size an image is to use the HTML width attribute or VML as you showed.
Usually, what I do is declare the width I want in Outlook in the HTML attribute. And then in an inline style on the same image, apply styles I want for other clients. Based on your example, that could give:
<img alt="" src="https://example.com" width="270" style="width:100%; max-width:270px;" />
Note that percentage values in the width attribute are also buggy in The Outlooks on Windows. (They’ll be based on the physical file size and not on the parent’s element size as you’d normally expect.) For more details on CSS support in email clients, you can refer to Can I email.
I am making an eBlast for a client (it can be found here)
Everything looks good except the bottom picture of of the gentleman, in Outlook it gets blown up to an enormous size.
I am running into issues in certain Outlook email services. The eBlast passed all Litmus test but Outlook 2010 and 2013, when I further researched the issue I found it was because Max-width and min-width just does not matter in Outlook as it does not read that code.
Can anyone please take a look at this code and suggest some fixes that I could apply to the image at the bottom of the eblast, it currently sits in this code block:
<table style="border-spacing: 0;border-collapse: collapse;vertical-align: top" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" border="0">
<tbody><tr style="vertical-align: top">
<td style="word-break: break-word;border-collapse: collapse !important;vertical-align: top;width: 100%;padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 0px;padding-left: 0px" align="center">
<div style="font-size:12px" align="center">
<img class="center" style="outline: none;text-decoration: none;-ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic;clear: both;display: block;border: none;height: auto;line-height: 100%;margin: 0 auto;float: none;max-width: 146px" align="center" border="0" src="http://www.lonebeacondevelopment.com/images/jfir.jpg" alt="Image" title="Image" style="max-width:146px !important; width:50%">
</div>
</td>
</tr>
I would be forever grateful, thanks.
If you're going to be setting a max-width either way why not go ahead and set the size of the image to be that or set it to be a pre-determined width from the get-go.
That way your fallback is that it loads the image at its largest since Outlook is going to ignore that max-width either way and display the full image.
Since you're not going to be going higher than 600px there really shouldn't be any issues with either hard-coding it or just adjusting the actual full size image instead of trying to adjust the size using css.
Part of your problem is that you've got two style attributes in the same element. One of them is going to be ignored. For Outlook, the best solution I've found is to add an old fashioned explicit width="146" before the style where you set a max-width. Outlook will only pay attention the old attribute, while more modern clients will interpret the max-width in the style.
You are correct, Outlook does not support min-width or max-width.
Since Outlook 2010 and 2013 are desktop-only and use Microsoft office to render email, we can use ghost tables and VML to make the image display only at 146 pixels wide in these email clients.
Something like this should do the trick:
<div style="max-width: 146px;">
<!--[if mso]>
/* Everything inside here is only read by Outlook 07/10/13 */
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" width="146" align="center">
<tr>
<td>
<![endif]-->
<img class="center" src="http://www.lonebeacondevelopment.com/images/jfir.jpg" alt="Image" title="Image" style="width: 100%;">
<!--[if mso]>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<![endif]-->
</div>
The structure of my table is
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td width="404">
<img src="assets/Hero-Image2.png" width="404" height="192" style="width:404px;height:192px;border:0;margin:0;outline:0;"/>
</td>
<td width="396" bgcolor="#00188F">
<h1 style="color:#FFF;font-family:Segoe,Tahoma,Verdana,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:16pt;font-weight:100; margin-bottom:10px;">Simpilfied IT management for any enterprise</h1>
<h2 style="color:#FFF;font-family:Segoe,Tahoma,Verdana,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14pt;font-weight:100;">Gain control over any hybrid cloud with our cost-effective all-in-one cloud solution</h2>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
aand I want the image inside the first cell to have the same height as the second cell (so that the image blends into the background color of it. I know there are alternative ways of doing this, but I'm constrained since this is an HTML email for Outlook).
Right now the right cell is always having a height of 196px, even if I strip its contents to nothing:
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td width="404">
<img src="assets/Hero-Image2.png" width="404" height="192" style="width:404px;height:192px;border:0;margin:0;outline:0;"/>
</td>
<td width="396" bgcolor="#00188F">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
The right cell is always 196px and this causes the left cell to be the same height. Makes no sense.
If you add a display: block to the style of your image it will be fixed.
<img src="//placehold.it/404x192" style="width:404px; height:192px; display: block" />
The first answer should help you to understand why
EDIT: Actually, you dont need nothing but the display block and the image sizes.
What are the dimensions of your image?
I don't think HTML is "smart" enough to stretch your image to fit to your exact request.
Maybe you should try resizing your image in paint/photoshop to a dimension that has the same height/width ratio as 404:192 and see if that helps.
I have been working on this newsletter for a customer. Everything looks perfect and exactly the way I want it to. Even Outlook understands the newsletter but then.. Gmail.. I really don't understand what is wrong with Gmail in the browser. I have this piece of code.
<table class="w650" width="650" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="20"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="225" bgcolor="#e1822d" valign="top" align="left">
<div style="padding:12px 20px 0px 20px;">
<div style="font-family:arial;font-size:20px;color:#FFFFFF;line-height:36px;">
<singleline label="Title">Tenerife</singleline>
</div>
<div style="font-family:arial;font-size:11px;color:#FFFFFF;line-height:20px;">
<multiline label="Description">Click to see all properties <br /> Lorem Ipsum Dolor sit amet</multiline>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td width="425" valign="top" align="left">
<img editable="true" src="images/side_image_01.jpg" label="Image" width="425" border="0" style="border:none;" alt="Image" />
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
And in every other mail client it outputs like this:
But in Gmail and Gmail only it outputs with an additional size in the orange column:
I know it is silly to focus on but it really annoys me that my HTML code is bullet proof and even old Outlook mail clients can show it right but then Gmail twists it.
Does anybody know what I should type either in the inline css or head css or anything - to make Gmail understand?
Add display: block; to the image tag's style attribute or img { display: block; } if you have a <style> section anywhere and need to apply this to other images as well.
For some reason Gmail adds extra margin to images that aren't explicitly specified as display: block.
Each mail client has different HTML rendering technique.
I can not really find out the difference from both the images. I see both images are identical.
From what I have understood, All I can say is, you can set fixed width inline in order to force Gmail to use your styling. !important can help you to force the styling.
I have an html newsletter which works in most email carriers but the formatting is messed up in outlook. I have put vspace="10" on the image tag to put 10px margin on the top and bottom of the image to have a space between the image and text below it. However, in Outlook the vspace is not being picked up and the text appears directly under the image with no space between.
Does anyone know how to get this to work? I tried to put a margin-bottom of 10px on the image, but again this did not work.
It might be easier to use a nested table and define the height of the row to be 10px. What you are contending with in Outlook 2007+ is Word HTML rendering which handles CSS in it's own special way.
With HTML Email there is a lot of nuances between the different browsers. One thing i have learnt from creating emails is that it needs to be extremely simple. Both margin & padding are not supported by Outlook (due to it using the word rendering engine).
The solution
Replace the image and the space with a table containing 2 spacer gifs and the image in the centre. For example (you need to use absolute paths to your images):
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td>
<img style="display:block" border="0" src="images/spacer.gif" width="IMAGEWIDTH" height="10" />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<img style="display:block" border="0" src="YOUR IMAGE" width="" height="" />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<img style="display:block" border="0" src="images/spacer.gif" width="IMAGEWIDTH" height="10" />
</td>
</tr>
</table>