packages from tcllib not found - tcl

I have a strange problem I am using fedora 20 and installed tcllib on my system.
But if I use package require uri in example I got an package not found in response.
Does anyone know what the issue here is or how to determine if the tcllib is added in the package index?

Tcl looks up packages in two ways: with auto_path and with tcl::tm::path.
1. The auto_path — the traditional mechanism.
When you do package require, the package manager looks to see if the package is already present, or if instructions for obtaining the package from the filesystem are present. If neither of these is true, it asks the package unknown handler to load it (strictly, it's the handler installed using the package unknown command). The default implementation of that handler loads packages by looking for pkgIndex.tcl files in the directories on your auto_path, and their immediate subdirectories.
auto_path is a global variable holding a Tcl list of directories to search. You can probably just lappend the right place to it. pkgIndex.tcl is a Tcl script that describes how to make the package available, which it does by calling an appropriate package ifneeded command. The actual loading of the
Once a package is required that isn't present but its instructions for obtaining are, Tcl will simply eval those instructions: they're just a plain old script (that usually just calls source and/or load to do the grunt work).
2. Tcl modules — the new (in 8.5) mechanism.
The Tcl module system uses a different search system managed with the tcl::tm::path command. The tcl::tm::path list subcommand will tell you where it looks (a huge list, to be honest) and you can use the tcl::tm::path add subcommand to extend the path with extra locations to search. Tcl modules have the entire package placed into a single file (with the extension .tm) and have a structured name so that they can avoid having a separate pkgIndex.tcl file; the TM loader can synthesise the package ifneeded calls from the filename itself (in all cases, this is done with source; there are some clever ways to package binary code inside files so they can be loaded, but they're far outside the scope of this answer).
At that point, you're back to the source of the file when the package is actually required; that part is the same whether you're using a module or a traditional package.
The module system is much faster than the traditional search mechanism since it doesn't need to open any files to figure out what to do: it just uses glob with the right options. It is, however, less flexible in how things can be packaged: multi-file packages (e.g., almost anything you make yourself) can't be made into modules (well, not without extra work).

Related

How do I find where a function is declared in Tcl?

I think this is more of a Tcl configuration question rather than a Tcl coding question...
I inherited a whole series of Tcl scripts that are used within a simulation tool that my company built in-house. In my scripts, I'm finding numerous instances where there are function calls to functions that don't seem to be declared anywhere. How can I trace the path to these phantom functions?
For example, rather than use source, someone build a custom include function that they named INCLUDE. Tclsh obviously balks when I try to run it there, but with my simulation software, it runs fine.
I've tried grep-ing through the entire simulation software for INCLUDE, but I'm not having any luck. Are there any other obvious locations outside the simulation software where a Tcl function might be defined?
The possibilities:
Within your software. (you have checked for this).
Within some other package included by the software.
Check and see if the environment variable TCLLIBPATH is set.
Also check and see if the simulation software sets TCLLIBPATH.
This will be a list of directories to search for Tcl packages, and you
will need to search the packages that are located outside of the
main source tree.
Another possibility is that the locations are specified in the pkgIndex.tcl file.
Check any pkgIndex.tcl files and look for locations outside the main source tree.
Within an unknown command handler. This could be in
your software or within some other package. You should be able to find
some code that processes the INCLUDE statement.
Within a binary package. These are shared libraries that are loaded
by Tcl. If this is the case, there should be some C code used to
build the shared library that can be searched.
Since you say there are numerous instances of unknown functions, my first
guess is that you have
not found all the directories where packages are loaded from. But an
''unknown'' command handler is also a possibility.
Edit:
One more possibility I forgot. Check and see if your software sets the auto_path variable. Check any directories added to the auto_path for
other packages.
This isn't a great answer for you, but I suspect it is the best you're going to get...
The procedure could be defined in a great many places. Your best bet for finding it is to use a tool like findstr (on Windows) or grep -R (on POSIX platforms) to search across all the relevant source files. But that still might not help! It might not be a procedure but instead a general command, which could be implemented in C and not as a procedure, or it could be defined in a packaged application archive (which are usually awkward to look inside). There are also other types of script-implemented command too, which could make things awkward. Generally searching and investigating is your best bet, but it might not work.
Tcl doesn't really differentiate strongly between different types of command except in some introspection operations. If you're lucky, you could find that info body tells you the definition of the procedure (and info args and info default tell you about the arguments) but that won't help with other command types at all. Tcl 8.7 will include a command (info cmdtype) that would help a lot with narrowing down what to do next, but that's no use to you now and it definitely doesn't exist in older versions.

Is there an alternative to the load command to import binary Tcl package

I am using a commercial tool interfaced with an homebrew tclsh(Synopsys EDA).
In their version, they removed the load command. Thus I cannot use third party libraries (Graphviz library in my case).
I wonder if there is a another way to import binary files (.so files)
The only command in standard Tcl that brings in a dynamic library is load. (OK, package require can do too, but that's because it can call load inside.) Without that command, you only have options like statically linking your own code in and creating the commands in the Tcl_AppInit function, but that's really unlikely to work if you're already using someone else's code that's already done that sort of thing.
The easiest approach might be to run a normal tclsh as a subprocess via exec tclsh script.tcl (run and wait for termination) or open |tclsh r+ (open pipeline). If they've not turned off those capabilities as well; you might be running in a safe interpreter where all those things are systematically disabled. I don't know of any way to break out of a standard safe interpreter (the mechanism for locking them down errs on the side of caution) so if that's the case, you'll just have to save the data you want to a file somewhere (by any mechanism that works; safe interpreters also can't touch the filesystem at all by default though that is often profiled back in in protected ways) and use a completely separate program to work with it.

package require inside pkgIndex

Recently I found that if package require is evaluated with not existing package name and one of pkgIndex files in auto_path again contains package require with not existing package then tclPkgUnknown enters infinite recursion.
I wonder is it not allowed to eval package require from pkgIndex or this is a hidden bug?
A pkgIndex.tcl file should never run package require itself. It should just call package ifneeded to tell the package management system how to load a particular version of a particular package. This is because the index scripts are loaded at times that are rather different — during package discovery — and not necessarily at the point when that version of the package is really wanted. If you stick to this rule, you won't have any problems.
Here's the sort of thing that ought to be in there.
# Maybe some comments here?
package ifneeded Foo 1.2.3 [list source [file join $dir foo.1-2-3.tcl]]
The $dir? That's just the name of the directory containing the index file, for convenience sake. (It's actually a local variable too; the index files are evaluated inside a procedure context.)

TCL : Regarding source , package , namespace command

I want to know about modular programming in tcl and how we can achieve that .
In some tcl tutorials mention like source command having some drawbacks in achieving "modularity" so that we came to the "package" after that "package" is having some more drawbacks so that we came with the combination of package and namespaces .
I want to know what are the drawbacks and proper hierarchy of 3 concepts . Can Anyone help me ?
I'm not sure if I understand your question correctly, so I'll try to explain the 3 commands you throwed in your question:
source: Evaluates a file as a Tcl script. -
It simply opens the file, reads until the EOF character (^Z on both windows and *nix) and evaluates it.
It does not keep track of sourced files, so you can source the same file again (great for hotpatching), but this is the drawback: It will source the file again.
package: Manages packages. It basically keeps track of the provided packages and tries to figure out which file it has to source to load a new package.
namespace: They provide context for commands and variables, so you don't have to worry about unique names for your commands. Just the namespace has to be unique. Has nothing to do with loading packages or other modules, it just provides namespaces.
I suggest that you use packages, each package in it's own file, each package with a namespace equal to the package name where all commands reside.
You should export the public commands with namespace export.

Tcl version change issue from 8.4 to 8.5.12

I have a problem with changing tcl version from 8.4 to 8.5.12 on RHEL machine. Our product uses TclDevKit components like Tcldom, Tclxml, etc. Also we are using Incr Tcl (Itcl). I am trying to create pkgIndex.tcl file in Itcl in order to find Itcl when that package is required as follown:
package ifneeded Itcl 3.4 [list load [file join $dir "libitcl-O.a"] Itcl ]
but when I use
package require Itcl
Getting report: couldn't load file "/somepath/itcl/lib/libitcl-O.a": /somepath/lib/libitcl-O.a: invalid ELF header
It seems I can't load files with .a extention, but the same is done with previous version of tcl (8.4) and it works fine. I googled a lot, read a lot of documentation, but it doesn't help to go further.
Please help.
Thanks in advance
Libraries come in two general sorts, static libraries and shared libraries. On Linux, static libraries have the extension .a by default, and shared libraries have the extension .so (plus optionally some numbers to indicate the version). Only shared libraries will work with Tcl's load command and even then they have to be designed to work that way (with an appropriate Foobar_Init function, as documented).
When dealing with stub-exporting extensions (fairly rare) or Tcl and Tk themselves, the linking is done in two parts. There's a stub library, normally called somethingstub.a, and there's a main shared library. The main shared library contains the implementation of the code; all that is in the stub library is an ABI/API adaptor so that you can avoid binding your code to an explicit version of the implementation library. By building an extension stub-enabled and linking against the stub library, you gain the ability to have your extension loaded into future versions of Tcl/Tk without any recompilation or relinking steps at all. (You also become able to put the extension inside a starkit for deployment, as those use a rather unusual way of managing shared libraries that the stub mechanism conceals from you.)