Every once in a while, at random times my software crashes due to a an exception with this message:
"Additional information: The runtime has encountered a fatal error. The address of the error was at 0x72938d57, on thread 0xe34. The error code is 0xc0000005. This error may be a bug in the CLR or in the unsafe or non-verifiable portions of user code. Common sources of this bug include user marshaling errors for COM-interop or PInvoke, which may corrupt the stack.
If there is a handler for this exception, the program may be safely continued."
It is begin generated from the .net RSACryptoServiceProvider.Encrypt method.
To take a look at it refer to https://github.com/HadiModarres/MRelay/blob/master/ConsoleApplication9/EncryptedRelay.fs line 94
my question is why is this happening and what can I do to catch exceptions that are generated from unmanaged code like this
Reposting from comment:
rsa.Encrypt is not thread-safe.
Related
I've a question regarding capture of "uncaught" exceptions, which appears with stack trace on System.err, circumventing logging configuration: All the other log messages appear properly formatted on System.out (JSON-formatted in my case). But this doesn't happen with Exceptions and stack traces "logged" to System.err!
I've recognized this to happen under at least two circumstances:
Asynchronous execution of tasks (HTTP requests in my case) via ExecutorService (as mentioned in "Scheduled Tasks" chapter). I've added #Retryable annotation to the method; but after all retries fail, "final" Exception thrown by last unsuccessful retry appears on System.err with its stack trace (the other ones thrown by earlier failed retries do not appear, seems they are caught by retry "mechanism" under the hood).
With Exceptions thrown by failed Health indicators (they are implemented by subclassing AbstractHealthIndicator).
I've tried implementing my own TaskExceptionHandler, replacing the default one (also mentioned in "Scheduled Tasks" chapter); and/or by adding System.setErr(System.out) in main method before building/setup of Micronaut Application Context. But nothing seems to help as my test cases attest.
Have I missed a chapter in Micronaut's documentation?
Thanks for any hints.
Regards
Christian
My wager is that Micronaut doesn't provide tools for setting a global uncaught exception handler because that's governed by the wider JRE. We've solved the problem in a few of our services with Thread.html#setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler by doing something like this at application startup:
Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler((t, e) -> logger.error("Uncaught exception", e));
In Lablgtk, whenever there is an exception in a callback, the exception is automatically caught and an error message is printed in the console, such as:
(prog:12345) LablGTK-CRITICAL **: gtk_tree_model_foreach_func:
callback raised an exception
This gives no stack trace and no details about the exception, and because it is caught I cannot retrieve this information myself.
Can I enable more detailed logging information for this case? Or prevent the exception from being caught automatically?
I guess the best way to do so is to catch your exception manually and handle it yourself.
let callback_print_exn f () =
try f () with
e -> my_exn_printer e
Assuming val my_exn_printer : exn -> unit is your custom exception printer, you can simply print your callbacks exceptions by replacing ~callback:f by ~callback:(callback_print_exn f) in your code.
Of course, you can also with that method send that exception to another
thread, register a "callback id" that would be passed along with your exception...
About the stack trace, I'm not sure you can retrieve it easily. As it's launched as a callback, you probably want to know the signal used and that can be stored in your callback handler.
I had another similar issue, but this time it was harder to find where to put the calls to intercept the exception.
Fortunately, this time there was a very specific error message coming from the Glib C code:
GLib-CRITICAL **: Source ID ... was not found when attempting to remove it`
Stack Overflow + grep led me to the actual C function, but I could not find which of the several Lablgtk functions bound to this code was the culprit.
So I downloaded the Glib source, added an explicit segmentation fault to the code, compiled it and used LD_LIBRARY_PATH to force my modified Glib version to be loaded.
Then I ran the OCaml binary with gdb, and I got my stack trace, with the precise line number where the Lablgtk function was being called. And from there it was a quick 3-line patch.
Hacks like this one (which was still faster than trying to find where to intercept the call) could be avoided by having a "strict mode" preventing exceptions from being automatically caught. I still believe such a switch should be available for Lablgtk users, and hope it will eventually be available.
I stumbled upon a very weird issue in ColdFusion which might very well be a bug, but I wanted to post it here in case I was missing something.
It seems that cfindex is throwing an uncatchable exception when trying to index invalid files.
I'm not entirely sure yet what consists of an invalid file, but the issue occurs with a valid PDF file, but that doesn't have a PDF extension. Obviously, the problem can easily be fixed by adding a valid extension, but that's not the scope of the question.
<cftry>
<cfindex
collection="some_collection"
action="update"
key="//someserver/some_file_without_extension">
After index
<cfcatch type="any">
Exception caught
</cfcatch>
<cffinally>
Finally block
</cffinally>
</cftry>
Completed
When running the above code, the only thing that is output is Finally block, therefore it's like if there is an exception thrown, but which cannot be caught.
I even tried with type="java.lang.Exception", type="java.lang.Throwable" and type="searchengine" and nothing works.
The only way I found to detect such exceptions is to check a boolean flag in the finally block, but gracefully recovering form those errors is very cumbersome.
Another very weird thing that occurs is that right after the issue is encountered, if I refresh the page in the browser, I'll get the following error:
HTTP Error 503.0 - Server Error
The service is unavailable.
Module IsapiModule
Notification ExecuteRequestHandler
Handler JWildCardHandler
Error Code 0x00000000
Then after refreshing again, I get Finally block and if I keep refreshing the same behavior occurs over and over (Finally block then 503 error).
I'm working on some flash app. Now, to test customer side of it I can use Flash Player debugger version that will save logs and show error messages. When it's deployed on the customer side - they will have a regular Flash Player version which means I will have no access to error messages if errors will happen. So I would like to equip it with some tool that would capture all of my trace messages in code and errors text. As for trace messages that's fairly simple, I just override the function in my code so it sends a POST request with trace message to a logger server, but how can I get a hold of the error message? Is there a known approach to this or some trick that somebody can suggest?
You can install the debug version of flash as your browser's default (in Chrome, you must disable the built-in player), so if you wanted to test user experience and debug, this would be the ideal solution.
However, to answer your question: there's no method for universally catching all errors, and redirecting them (that I know of). You'd have to encapsulate problem code ahead of time with try...catch statements, and send the property back on catch. For example:
try {
this["foo"]();
} catch (e:Error) {
trace(e);
}
In the debug version, the traced value would be TypeError: Error #1006: value is not a function. And while the standard version will only output TypeError: Error #1006, (a notably less descriptive error), what we're missing is any reference to where the error occured. To get this, we need to use Error.getStackTrace() to see the call stack and the line where the error occurred. In debug, this outputs the following:
TypeError: Error #1006: value is not a function.
at Shell_fla::MainTimeline/init()[C:\Projects\shell.as:91
In the standard client, we get a dissapointing null. In short, you cannot get any valuable info from the client versions.
The best advice I can give is to write around your problem code with your own custom error reports. For example, catch IO errors and trace the file it failed to load, or if you're expecting an object.foo, first try if (object.hasOwnProperty("foo")) { // do something } else { trace("foo not found in " + object.name) }. Code defensively.
Cheers,
I've discovered this post on StackOverflow:
How to catch all exceptions in Flex?
It answers my question, strange that I haven't ran into it while I was googling prior to asking.
I'm looking for a way to catch the actual exception thrown by BizTalk 2006 R2 when a receive port can't parse a message it picks up.
For example, I have a csv file that was not properly created, say it's missing a comma, so when BizTalk tries to determine the message type, it errors out. Without using failed message routing, there are 2 entries in the application event log. One has a pretty generic error description, something along the lines of "The Messaging Engine encountered an error during the processing of one or more inbound messages." The second entry has what I'm looking for. It will contain the details of where the missing comma is, something along the lines of "Unexpected data found while looking for:
','
The current definition being parsed is POSTrailer. The stream offset where the error occured is 44443. The line number where the error occured is 244. The column where the error occured is 1."
I've tried using the ESB toolkit Exception Handler for BizTalk 2006 R2. Using failed message routing and their exception handing framework, the error description it catches is the first, generic, error description.
I do not see any way to obtain the second, more detailed error description. I'm assuming somewhere in the bowels of the biztalk messaging engine this exception is getting thrown, which is caught by something a little bit higher in the process, which throws it's own generic biztalk exception. I would also assume that the more specific error description is contained as the inner exception of the exception that gets routed to the ESB toolkit, however by the time I can get a hold of it, as far as I can tell, the actual exception object has been replaced by the message context, which is nothing more than a bunch of name/value pairs. The error description is now the generic one that is not helpful, and anything resembling an inner exception is just a hexidecmal code, which means nothing to my end users.
Everything I've found regarding obtaining a specific error message deals with exceptions thrown from an orchestration. I am not dealing with an orchestration, though, I'm dealing with a receive port. The closest thing I can find is here. But even if I could create a custom pipeline component using that, that means I either need to add that component into every exising custom pipline, or create a new one to validate XML and use that instead of the XMLRecieve or XMLSend pipelines that come with BizTalk... That also means trapping errors generated from EDI is out of the question. Does anyone know of a way to get at this more detailed error description from the BizTalk generated error message?
I'm not sure of a tool that will do exactly what you're looking for, but I do have a couple of options.
1) I'm pretty sure SCOM can grab those errors and alert whoever needs to be alerted. I've had some problems with this in the past, though, so it may not be your best bet.
2) For basic Failure handling, you can write code to scrape the EventLog for any warning or error from BizTalk and pass that down the line (my current client does this- it's not super elegant, but it works well).
3) What I would encourage- if you don't want orchestrations- is to set up custom pipelines which simply implement your error handling/monitoring in addition to your normal operations. Then, for non-critical messages, you can still use the standard pipelines (reducing overhead/latency) and for critical messages you can use your "GuaranteedDeliveryPassThruPipeline" or your "GuaranteedDeliveryXMLTransmitPipeline" or whatever.