When you use Jackson's writerWithView any properties that don't have a #JsonView annotation on them are still serialised. However using #JsonView on a Spring MVC action seems to require #JsonView to be on every property.
If say we have the following model:
public class User {
private String username;
private String emailAddress;
public String getUsername() { return username; }
#JsonView(DetailView.class)
public String getEmailAddress() { return emailAddress; }
}
And DetailView extends BasicView, when I serialise with basic view I'd expect username to be serialised. This is what happens when we use writerWithView:
#RequestMapping(value = "/me", method = GET)
#ResponseBody
public String getMe() throws JsonProcessingException {
User user = getCurrentUser();
return objectMapper.writerWithView(BasicView.class).writeValueAsString(user);
}
However from Spring MVC 4.1 we can instead do the following:
#RequestMapping(value = "/me", method = GET)
#ResponseBody
#JsonView(BasicView.class)
public User getMe() throws JsonProcessingException {
return getCurrentUser();
}
The later causes the response to be {} rather than {username:"David"}. If we add #JsonView(BasicView.class) onto the getUsername() this works as expected.
Obviously we could go with the former or add #JsonView to everything, both of which are more verbose and error prone.
This looks a bit like MapperFeature.DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION has been turned off, but explicitly enabling it doesn't seem to have worked.
Is there anyway to get around this?
MapperFeature.DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION being disabled is indeed the problem, but unfortunately the Spring classes don't give an easy way to configure or replace the ObjectMapper used by the default message converters.
The neatest way I found to work around this was to extend DelegatingWebMvcConfiguration and override configureMessageConverters to populate the default converters and then overwrite the problematic MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScan;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.http.converter.HttpMessageConverter;
import org.springframework.http.converter.json.MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter;
import org.springframework.http.converter.support.AllEncompassingFormHttpMessageConverter;
import org.springframework.web.servlet.config.annotation.DelegatingWebMvcConfiguration;
import com.example.config.serialization.AllEncompassingFormHttpMessageConverterWithCustomObjectMapper;
import java.util.List;
#Configuration
#ComponentScan({/*...*/})
public class MyWebConfig extends DelegatingWebMvcConfiguration {
#Bean
public ObjectMapper objectMapper() {
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
//...
return objectMapper;
}
#Override
public void configureMessageConverters(List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> messageConverters) {
super.configureMessageConverters(messageConverters);
if (messageConverters.isEmpty()) {
addDefaultHttpMessageConverters(messageConverters);
}
messageConverters.replaceAll(converter -> {
if (converter instanceof MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter) {
return new MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter(objectMapper());
} else if (converter instanceof AllEncompassingFormHttpMessageConverter) {
return new AllEncompassingFormHttpMessageConverterWithCustomObjectMapper(objectMapper());
}
return converter;
});
}
}
For completeness you may also want to substitute the AllEncompassingFormHttpMessageConverter, as above, with your own copy that also allows specification of an ObjectMapper. I've not included the AllEncompassingFormHttpMessageConverterWithCustomObjectMapper class here - it's a trivial copy of AllEncompassingFormHttpMessageConverter that forwards an ObjectMapper constructor parameter to the MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter that it creates.
Related
I have an issue serializing a spring managed bean.
I want to return an autowired bean as the response for a restcontroller. I have read several responses, one of which advises using a simpleFilter.(Use SimpleFilter to exclude non required fields.). However I do not think this suggestion is very practical, and moreover, I am sure there is a much more simple and concrete way to solve the problem.
I have a spring managed bean called JobStatus.
#Component
#Scope(value="Prototype")
public class JobStatus{
private Integer job_type;
public Integer getJob_type() {
return job_type;
}
public void setJob_type(Integer job_type) {
this.job_type = job_type;
}
public JobStatus(){
}
}
I have a controller as follows:
#RestController
public class JobController {
#Autowired
JobStatus js;
#RequestMapping(value = "/get_job_status", method = RequestMethod.POST, consumes = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)
public #ResponseBody
JobStatus get_job_status(#RequestBody JobStatusRequest req) {
js.setJobType(req.getJobType);
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
try {
System.out.println(mapper.writeValueAsString(js));
} catch (JsonProcessingException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return js;
}
}
It throws the following exception:
com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException: No serializer found for class org.springframework.cglib.proxy.NoOp$1 and no properties discovered to create BeanSerializer (to avoid exception, disable SerializationFeature.FAIL_ON_EMPTY_BEANS) ) (through reference chain: ATM.Job.JobStatus$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$be675215["callbacks"])
I have tried changing the scope of JobStatus to "singleton" and "session" and "request" and it doesn't make any difference. How are we supposed to serialize "proxies"?
You can just tell Jackson: "serialize my class using the very same type as supertype". Since Spring proxies subclass your original class, this seem to work at least on Spring Boot 2.0.4.RELEASE:
#JsonSerialize(as=MyCompontClass.class)
#Component
public class MyCompontClass{
// fields, getters, setters
}
Jackson API docs say:
as
public abstract Class as
Supertype (of declared type, which itself is supertype of runtime
type) to use as type when locating serializer to use.
Create a view class
public class JobStatusView {
public JobStatusView(JobStatus js) {
job_type = js.getJob_type();
}
private Integer job_type;
public Integer getJob_type() {
return job_type;
}
public void setJob_type(Integer job_type) {
this.job_type = job_type;
}
}
Have your controller method return new JobStatusView(js) or create a Factory class or whatever your preferred method for creating instances is.
This has the benefit of separating the data from the view. You can add whichever Jackson annotations on the view class later, if the need arises, without having to pile them into the original bean.
I am not sure if this will work but it worked for me in another context.
You can try using #Configurable on your Jobstatus class(with AspectJ weaving configured) and create a new instance of job status in the controller. Spring would inject the bean whenever JObStatus's new instance is called. You can then serialize the jobstatus object as usual.
If it is acceptable for you to only have fields reachable via public getter method getting serialised, you can configure Jackson to ignore the non-public fields. This results in the proxy fields not being serialised:
add a #Configuration bean somewhere on your class path in a package under where the Application.java class for spring resides:
in there set ObjectMapper properties
objectMapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.ALL,
JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.NONE);
objectMapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.GETTER,
JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.PUBLIC_ONLY);
Here is a complete class:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonAutoDetect;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonInclude;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.PropertyAccessor;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonGenerator;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParser;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.Version;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationFeature;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.MapperFeature;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.SerializationFeature;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.SerializerProvider;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.module.SimpleModule;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.StdSerializer;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Primary;
import org.springframework.http.converter.HttpMessageConverter;
import org.springframework.http.converter.json.Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder;
import
org.springframework.http.converter.json.MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter;
import
org.springframework.web.servlet.config.annotation.WebMvcConfigurerAdapter;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.text.DateFormat;
import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
import java.util.Calendar;
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.List;
#Configuration
public class JacksonConfig extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
#Bean
#Primary
public ObjectMapper objectMapper(Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder builder) {
ObjectMapper objectMapper = builder.createXmlMapper(false).build();
setup(objectMapper);
return objectMapper;
}
public void setup(ObjectMapper objectMapper) {
objectMapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.ALL,
JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.NONE);
objectMapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.GETTER,
JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.PUBLIC_ONLY);
}
#Override
public void configureMessageConverters(
List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> converters) {
final MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter converter =
getMappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter();
converters.add(converter);
super.configureMessageConverters(converters);
}
#Bean
#Primary
public MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter
getMappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter() {
final MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter converter = new
MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter();
final ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
setup(objectMapper);
converter.setObjectMapper(objectMapper);
converter.setPrettyPrint(true);
return converter;
}
}
After extensive investigations, I wanted to share the problem and the resolution.
Problem
I have a RestController that works well, as long as I'm in charge of converting the JSON message. The moment I try to use an HttpMessageConverter to make the conversion more elegant, the client will start receiving HTTP 406.
So this works:
#RequestMapping(value = "/objects", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public Map<String, Object>[] getObjects(#RequestBody Object jsonQuery) {
MyQuery query = new MyConverter().convert(jsonQuery);
// do something with query
}
But, when I configure the converter, like this:
#Configuration
#EnableWebMvc
#ComponentScan
public class WebConfiguration extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
public void configureMessageConverters(List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> httpMessageConverters) {
httpMessageConverters.add(new QueryMessageConverter(new MediaType("application", "json")));
}
}
This causes HTTP 406:
#RequestMapping(value = "/objects", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public Map<String, Object>[] getObjects(#RequestBody Query Query) {
// do something with query
}
My pom.xml only refers spring-boot, and doesn't mention jackson at all.
Solution
See below
The solution is really very simple, and it is to register the jackson handler explicitly:
#Configuration
#EnableWebMvc
#ComponentScan
public class WebConfiguration extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
public void configureMessageConverters(List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> httpMessageConverters) {
httpMessageConverters.add(new QueryMessageConverter(new MediaType("application", "json")));
httpMessageConverters.add(new MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter());
}
}
Every object with Date format is being serialized as a long.
I've read around that I need to create a custom object mapper
and so I did:
public class CustomObjectMapper extends ObjectMapper {
public CustomObjectMapper() {
super();
configure(Feature.WRITE_DATES_AS_TIMESTAMPS, false);
setDateFormat(new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss"));
}
}
I've also registered that custom mapper as a converter
#Override
protected void configureMessageConverters(List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> converters) {
converters.add(converter());
addDefaultHttpMessageConverters(converters);
}
#Bean
MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter converter() {
MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter converter = new MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter();
converter.setObjectMapper(new CustomObjectMapper());
return converter;
}
but still, it doesn't work, and I recieve a long as a date.
Any idea what am I doing wrong?
You'll need to implement your own Dateserializer, just like the following (got it from this tutorial, so props to Loiane, not me ;-) ):
package ....util.json;
import org.codehaus.jackson.JsonGenerator;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.JsonSerializer;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.SerializerProvider;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
import java.util.Date;
#Component
public class JsonDateSerializer extends JsonSerializer<Date>{
private static final SimpleDateFormat dateFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("dd.MM.yyyy HH:mm "); // change according to your needs
#Override
public void serialize(Date date, JsonGenerator gen, SerializerProvider provider)
throws IOException {
String formattedDate = dateFormat.format(date);
gen.writeString(formattedDate);
}
}
then you could just add the following annotation to your Date-Objects and it will persist fine:
#JsonSerialize(using = JsonDateSerializer.class)
public Date getCreated() {
return created;
}
At least it works with spring 3.2.4 and jackson 1.9.13 here.
edit: Think about using FastDateFormat instead of SimpleDateFormat, for it's the threadsafe-alternative (as mentioned in the comments of Loianes article)
Try adding 0 as index in #add()
#Configuration
#ComponentScan()
#EnableWebMvc
#PropertySource("classpath:/web.properties")
public class WebConfig extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter
{
#Override
public void configureMessageConverters(final List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> converters)
{
converters.add(0, jsonConverter());
}
#Bean
public MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter jsonConverter()
{
final MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter converter = new MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter();
converter.setObjectMapper(new CustomObjectMapper());
return converter;
}
}
It worked for me.
In a previous similar question, I asked about, how to serialise two different sets of fields using JacksonJson and Spring.
My use case is the typical Controller mapping with #ResponseBody annotation returning directly a particular object or collections of objects, that are then rendered with JacksonJson whenever the client adds application/json in the Accept header.
I had two answers, the first one suggests to return different interfaces with a different getter list, the second suggests to use Json Views.
I don't have problems to understand the first way, however, for the second, after reading the documentation on JacksonJsonViews, I don't know how to implement it with Spring.
To stay with the example, I would declare three stub classes, inside the class Views:
// View definitions:
public class Views {
public static class Public { }
public static class ExtendedPublic extends PublicView { }
public static class Internal extends ExtendedPublicView { }
}
Then I've to declare the classes mentioned:
public class PublicView { }
public class ExtendedPublicView { }
Why on earth they declare empty static classes and external empty classes, I don't know. I understand that they need a "label", but then the static members of Views would be enough. And it's not that ExtendedPublic extends Public, as it would be logical, but they are in fact totally unrelated.
And finally the bean will specify with annotation the view or list of views:
//changed other classes to String for simplicity and fixed typo
//in classname, the values are hardcoded, just for testing
public class Bean {
// Name is public
#JsonView(Views.Public.class)
String name = "just testing";
// Address semi-public
#JsonView(Views.ExtendedPublic.class)
String address = "address";
// SSN only for internal usage
#JsonView(Views.Internal.class)
String ssn = "32342342";
}
Finally in the Spring Controller, I've to think how to change the original mapping of my test bean:
#RequestMapping(value = "/bean")
#ResponseBody
public final Bean getBean() {
return new Bean();
}
It says to call:
//or, starting with 1.5, more convenient (ObjectWriter is reusable too)
objectMapper.viewWriter(ViewsPublic.class).writeValue(out, beanInstance);
So I have an ObjectMapper instance coming out of nowhere and an out which is not the servlet typical PrintWriter out = response.getWriter();, but is an instance of JsonGenerator and that can't be obtained with the new operator. So I don't know how to modify the method, here is an incomplete try:
#RequestMapping(value = "/bean")
#ResponseBody
public final Bean getBean() throws JsonGenerationException, JsonMappingException, IOException {
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
JsonGenerator out; //how to create?
objectMapper.viewWriter(Views.Public.class).writeValue(out, new Bean());
return ??; //what should I return?
}
So I would like to know if anybody had success using JsonView with Spring and how he/she did. The whole concept seems interesting, but the documentation seems lacking, also the example code is missing.
If it's not possible I will just use interfaces extending each others. Sorry for the long question.
Based on the answers by #igbopie and #chrislovecnm, I've put together an annotation driven solution:
#Controller
public class BookService
{
#RequestMapping("/books")
#ResponseView(SummaryView.class)
public #ResponseBody List<Book> getBookSummaries() {}
#RequestMapping("/books/{bookId}")
public #ResponseBody Book getBook(#PathVariable("bookId") Long BookId) {}
}
Where SummaryView is annotated on the Book model like so:
#Data
class Book extends BaseEntity
{
#JsonView(SummaryView.class)
private String title;
#JsonView(SummaryView.class)
private String author;
private String review;
public static interface SummaryView extends BaseView {}
}
#Data
public class BaseEntity
{
#JsonView(BaseView.class)
private Long id;
}
public interface BaseView {}
A custom HandlerMethodReturnValueHandler is then wired into Spring MVC's context to detect the #ResponseView annotation, and apply the Jackson view accordingly.
I've supplied full code over on my blog.
You need to manually wire in the MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter. In spring 3.1 you are able to use the mvc xml tags like the following:
<mvc:annotation-driven >
<mvc:message-converter>
<bean class="org.springframework.http.converter.json.MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter" />
</mvc:message-converters>
</mvc:annotation-driven>
It is pretty ugly to not use spring 3.1, it will save you about 20 lines of xml. The mvc:annotation tag does ALOT.
You will need to wire in the object mapper with the correct view writer. I have noticed recently the using a #Configuration class can make complicated wiring like this a lot easier. Use a #Configuration class and create a #Bean with your MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter, and wire the reference to that bean instead of the MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter above.
I've manage to solve the problem this way:
Create custom abstract class to contain the json response object:
public abstract AbstractJson<E>{
#JsonView(Views.Public.class)
private E responseObject;
public E getResponseObject() {
return responseObject;
}
public void setResponseObject(E responseObject) {
this.responseObject = responseObject;
}
}
Create a class for each visibility (just to mark the response):
public class PublicJson<E> extends AbstractJson<E> {}
public class ExtendedPublicJson<E> extends AbstractJson<E> {}
public class InternalJson<E> extends AbstractJson<E> {}
Change your method declaration:
#RequestMapping(value = "/bean")
#ResponseBody
public final PublicJson<Bean> getBean() throws JsonGenerationException, JsonMappingException, IOException {
return new PublicJson(new Bean());
}
Create customs MessageConverter:
public class PublicJsonMessageConverter extends MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter{
public PublicApiResponseMessageConverter(){
super();
org.codehaus.jackson.map.ObjectMapper objMapper=new org.codehaus.jackson.map.ObjectMapper();
objMapper.configure(SerializationConfig.Feature.DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION, false);
objMapper.setSerializationConfig(objMapper.getSerializationConfig().withView(Views.Public.class));
this.setObjectMapper(objMapper);
}
public boolean canWrite(Class<?> clazz, MediaType mediaType) {
if(clazz.equals(PublicJson.class)){
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
public class ExtendedPublicJsonMessageConverter extends MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter{
public ExtendedPublicJsonMessageConverter(){
super();
org.codehaus.jackson.map.ObjectMapper objMapper=new org.codehaus.jackson.map.ObjectMapper();
objMapper.configure(SerializationConfig.Feature.DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION, false);
objMapper.setSerializationConfig(objMapper.getSerializationConfig().withView(Views.ExtendedPublic.class));
this.setObjectMapper(objMapper);
}
public boolean canWrite(Class<?> clazz, MediaType mediaType) {
if(clazz.equals(ExtendedPublicJson.class)){
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
public class InternalJsonMessageConverter extends MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter{
public InternalJsonMessageConverter(){
super();
org.codehaus.jackson.map.ObjectMapper objMapper=new org.codehaus.jackson.map.ObjectMapper();
objMapper.configure(SerializationConfig.Feature.DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION, false);
objMapper.setSerializationConfig(objMapper.getSerializationConfig().withView(Views.Internal.class));
this.setObjectMapper(objMapper);
}
public boolean canWrite(Class<?> clazz, MediaType mediaType) {
if(clazz.equals(Internal.class)){
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
Add the following to your xml:
<mvc:annotation-driven>
<mvc:message-converters>
<bean class="PublicJsonMessageConverter"></bean>
<bean class="ExtendedPublicJsonMessageConverter"></bean>
<bean class="InternalJsonMessageConverter"></bean>
</mvc:message-converters>
</mvc:annotation-driven>
That's it! I had to update to spring 3.1 but that's all. I use the responseObject to send more info about the json call but you can override more methods of the MessageConverter to be completely transparent. I hope someday spring include an annotation for this.
Hope this helps!
Does anyone know if there is a Spring MVC mapping view for Gson? I'm looking for something similar to org.springframework.web.servlet.view.json.MappingJacksonJsonView.
Ideally it would take my ModelMap and render it as JSON, respecting my renderedAttributes set in the ContentNegotiatingViewResolver declaration
We plan to use Gson extensively in the application as it seems safer and better than Jackson. That said, we're getting hung up by the need to have two different JSON libraries in order to do native JSON views.
Thanks in advance!
[cross-posted to Spring forums]
aweigold got me most of the way there, but to concretely outline a solution for Spring 3.1 Java based configuration, here's what I did.
Grab GsonHttpMessageConverter.java from the spring-android-rest-template project.
Register your GsonHttpMessageConverter with the message converters in your MVC config.
#EnableWebMvc
public class WebConfig extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
public void configureMessageConverters(List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> converters) {
converters.add(new GsonHttpMessageConverter());
}
}
The Spring docs outline this process, but aren't crystal clear. In order to get this to work properly, I had to extend WebMvcConfigurerAdapter, and then override configureMesageConverters. After doing this, you should be able to do the following in your controller method:
#Controller
public class AppController {
#RequestMapping(value = "messages", produces = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)
public List<Message> getMessages() {
// .. Get list of messages
return messages;
}
}
And voila! JSON output.
I would recommend to extend AbstractView just like the MappingJacksonJsonView does.
Personally, for JSON, I prefer to use #Responsebody, and just return the object rather than a model and view, this makes it easier to test. If you would like to use GSON for that, just create a custom HttpMessageConverter like this:
import com.google.gson.Gson;
import com.google.gson.GsonBuilder;
import com.google.gson.JsonParseException;
import com.google.gson.reflect.TypeToken;
import com.vitalimages.string.StringUtils;
import org.springframework.http.HttpInputMessage;
import org.springframework.http.HttpOutputMessage;
import org.springframework.http.MediaType;
import org.springframework.http.converter.AbstractHttpMessageConverter;
import org.springframework.http.converter.HttpMessageNotReadableException;
import org.springframework.http.converter.HttpMessageNotWritableException;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
import java.io.BufferedWriter;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.OutputStreamWriter;
import java.lang.reflect.Type;
import java.nio.charset.Charset;
import java.sql.Timestamp;
#Component
public class GSONHttpMessageConverter extends AbstractHttpMessageConverter<Object> {
public static final Charset DEFAULT_CHARSET = Charset.forName("UTF-8");
private GsonBuilder gsonBuilder = new GsonBuilder()
.excludeFieldsWithoutExposeAnnotation()
.setDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZ")
.registerTypeAdapter(Timestamp.class, new GSONTimestampConverter());
public GSONHttpMessageConverter() {
super(new MediaType("application", "json", DEFAULT_CHARSET));
}
#Override
protected boolean supports(Class<?> clazz) {
// should not be called, since we override canRead/Write instead
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
#Override
public boolean canRead(Class<?> clazz, MediaType mediaType) {
return MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON.isCompatibleWith(mediaType);
}
public boolean canWrite(Class<?> clazz, MediaType mediaType) {
return MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON.isCompatibleWith(mediaType);
}
public void registerTypeAdapter(Type type, Object serializer) {
gsonBuilder.registerTypeAdapter(type, serializer);
}
#Override
protected Object readInternal(Class<? extends Object> clazz, HttpInputMessage inputMessage) throws IOException, HttpMessageNotReadableException {
try {
Gson gson = gsonBuilder.create();
return gson.fromJson(StringUtils.convertStreamToString(inputMessage.getBody()), clazz);
} catch (JsonParseException e) {
throw new HttpMessageNotReadableException("Could not read JSON: " + e.getMessage(), e);
}
}
#Override
protected void writeInternal(Object o, HttpOutputMessage outputMessage) throws IOException, HttpMessageNotWritableException {
Type genericType = TypeToken.get(o.getClass()).getType();
BufferedWriter writer = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(outputMessage.getBody(), DEFAULT_CHARSET));
try {
// See http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/issues/detail?id=199 for details on SQLTimestamp conversion
Gson gson = gsonBuilder.create();
writer.append(gson.toJson(o, genericType));
} finally {
writer.flush();
writer.close();
}
}
}
And then add it to your converter list in your handler adapter like this:
#Bean
public HandlerAdapter handlerAdapter() {
final AnnotationMethodHandlerAdapter handlerAdapter = new AnnotationMethodHandlerAdapter();
handlerAdapter.setAlwaysUseFullPath(true);
List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> converterList = new ArrayList<HttpMessageConverter<?>>();
converterList.addAll(Arrays.asList(handlerAdapter.getMessageConverters()));
converterList.add(jibxHttpMessageConverter);
converterList.add(gsonHttpMessageConverter);
handlerAdapter.setMessageConverters(converterList.toArray(new HttpMessageConverter<?>[converterList.size()]));
return handlerAdapter;
}