MS Access rejects arguments, always asking for "=" - ms-access

I have used VBA to program MS Access for many years but never before with Office 2010. Whenever I try to use any arguments I get the message "Expected: =" after I close the brackets.
For example, a simple messagebox accepts the caption but will only produce the default argument (vbOKCancel). In some circumstances I would prefer to use vbYesNo but if I enter MsgBox("Do you wish to cancel",vbYesNo) then although the various alternative responses drop down for selection, I get "Expected: =" on trying to complete the statement. This happens whenever I try to use arguments - for example if I use DoCmd in the OnCurrent event of the Form object to display a particular record.
Example code:
'If closed without a preference being selected, continue:
If IsNull(cboPreference) Then
MsgBox ("You have not selected a preference. Do you want to cancel?",vbYesNo)
Select Case Response
Case vbYes
Exit Sub
Case vbNo
cboPreference.SetFocus
End Select
End If
I have tried uninstalling and reinstalling the application; but the error occurs both in Windows 7 on my PC and Windows 8 on my laptop (both 64-bit).
I have also installed the latest updates for MS Access 2010. What else can I do?

Test these two statements in the Immediate window to see the effect of the parentheses.
MsgBox("Do you wish to cancel",vbYesNo) ' complains about expected =
MsgBox "Do you wish to cancel",vbYesNo ' this works
If you want to capture the value returned from MsgBox, assign it to a variable ... and you need an equal sign and the parentheses in that situation.
Response = MsgBox("You have not selected a preference. Do you want to cancel?",vbYesNo)
More about when to use parentheses with a function call, and when not to use them ...
MsgBox "Hi"
Call MsgBox("Hi")
intResponse = MsgBox("Hi")

Related

Wildcard in Access VBA

This is kind of a follow up question to this post: Access VBA recordset string comparison not working with wildcard but I don't have the rep to answer/comment on it to ask it in house. What I'm curious about is this line of code specifically:
If ![ACOD] = "*_X" Then '"$ICP_X" works
Debug.Print ![ACOD] 'For testing
'.Delete
End If
I want to know if this can be modified so that on a button click, it looks at all fields in a form with the field name of *_New (with the hope to catch all fields where the name ends in _New) and if they are not Null then confirm that the user wanted to make a the change indicated in the field. I was thinking of something along the lines like this:
If Not isNull(*_New.value) Then
If Msgbox ("Do you want to make these changes?",vbOKCancel, "Confirm Changes") = 1 Then
'### Do something with the record ###
End If
End If
EDIT
As of posting the above information, I did not have the Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions Reference installed, currently I have version 5.5 (it was the latest version). With that installed (referenced?) and seeing the information from this site MS Access with VBA Regex, I'm wondering if it's better to do something like this:
Dim re As RegExp
Set re = New RegExp
re.IgnoreCase = True
re.Global = True
re.Pattern = "*_New"
If ##Not sure on syntax to match all fields## Then
Msgbox(##Same stuff as above MsgBox##)
End If
EDIT 2
Here's a sample case for my form I'm working on. Each of the fields to the right have names that end in _New. What I want to do is on the button click, to check and see what fields on the right have been filled in and ask the user if they want to confirm the changes to the record.
Not sure what you are trying to achieve but there is a way to access the control collection in a form. Here is a public function where you can loop through all controls and check its name.
Public Function FN_CONFIRM_CHANGES(iSender As Form)
Dim mCtl As control
For Each mCtl In iSender
If VBA.Right(mCtl.name, 4) = "_New" Then
Debug.Print mCtl.name & " is a match and its a " & VBA.TypeName(mCtl)
End If
Next mCtl
End Function
Call this function like
FN_CONFIRM_CHANGES Me 'Where me is referencing the form you are in.
You can modify the above code to return a boolean value to stop further execution if user decided not to save your changes or whatever logic you are trying to implement.

MS Access 2010 VBA: mysterious compile error on custom LostFocus sub

In a data validation form, I have a subroutine checking previously-entered data on a LostFocus event by ensuring that the release time (TimeReleased in table; Me.txtTimeReleased on form) is after the capture time (ObservationTime in table; Me.txtObservationTime on form). I'm using LostFocus rather than BeforeUpdate because the data were bulk-imported into the db and are now being error-checked.
My users keep getting a compile error (Compile Error: method or data member not found) upon tabbing out of the field this sub is attached to but I cannot reproduce the problem locally. The error occurs on this line:
If (Me.txtTimeReleased) <= (Me.ObservationTime) Then
and the part highlighted is '.txtTimeReleased'
Full code block:
Private Sub txtTimeReleased_LostFocus()
Dim badData As Variant
Dim resp As Variant
'Also check that time released is after time captured
If Not IsNull(Me.txtObservationTime) And Not IsNull(Me.txtTimeReleased) Then
If (Me.txtTimeReleased) <= (Me.ObservationTime) Then
resp = MsgBox("Release time must be after capture time." & vbCrLf & "Please double check this field's value: is it correct?", _
vbYesNo + vbExclamation + vbDefaultButton2, "Release Time Before Capture Time")
If resp <> vbYes Then badData = True
End If
End If
If badData = True Then
Me.cmbTaxonId.SetFocus 'set focus away so can set focus back
With Me.txtTimeReleased
.SetFocus
.SelStart = 0
.SelLength = 10
End With
End If
End Sub
Other things to note:
Both the table field and form control are formatted as 'Short Time' (24-hour time)
There is an input mask on that form control for 24-hour time; I use input masks very rarely and thus aren't familiar with them--perhaps the input mask could be causing the problem?
There are similar LostFocus subs on most of the other controls which do not produce this (or any other) error
Things I've tried:
Checking spelling
Fully decompling and recompiling the code: starting with shift, compact and repair with shift, open with /decompile flag while holding shift, compact and repair with shift, re-open with shift, and finally compile (without error)
Replacing the form in their database with one that works fine for me on the same data
Google
Things that seem odd to me:
I can't reproduce the error locally.
The error is triggering on the second instance of
Me.txtTimeReleased rather than the first: it has already passed a Not
IsNull(Me.txtTimeReleased) check.
The fact that it's a compile error: could that be masking something else?
Thanks for your time, and please let me know if there's any additional information that would be useful. Any thoughts are most welcome!
You checked for Null txtObservationTime and txtTimeReleased, but compare then txtTimeReleased and ObservationTime. Maybe solution is:
If Not IsNull(Me.txtObservationTime) And Not IsNull(Me.txtTimeReleased) Then
If (Me.txtTimeReleased) <= (Me.txtObservationTime) Then
Opening the .mdb with the /decompile flag is one of the first things I would have suggested, but you said you already tried that.
Here's another undocumented trick to deal with "hidden" compile problems that get baked in by VBA behind the scenes:
First, make a backup copy of your .mdb just to be safe (this is, after all, an undocumented technique).
Then, save your form to a text file using SaveAsText:
SaveAsText acForm, "MyFormName", "C:\MyFormName.txt"
Finally, re-load your form using the equally undocumented LoadFromText:
LoadFromText acForm, "MyFormName", "C:\MyFormName.txt"
Compile.
Compact.
Repair.
Hope for the best.
Good luck.
I suggest you use variables:
intThat = Me.txtTimeReleased
If intThis <= intThat Then
Try using ! instead of a dot:
intThat = Me!txtTimeReleased
If intThis <= intThat Then
And now, the answer that worked for me last week:
Comment out the offending line.
Run a compile that is successful.
Restore the offending line.
The compile may work now. Don't ask me why.

access to oldValue for control in continous form generates error 3251 in beforeUpdate when a checkbox on form is updated

This is one of the stranger issues I have seen in MS Access. I have the following code in a continuous form:
Private Sub thisForm_BeforeUpdate(Cancel As Integer)
If Not Cancel Then
Debug.Print "pre-logging data changes..."
' here we need to doublecheck to see if any values changed.
' we simply iterate through the whole list, re-setting oldValue
' and newValue.
For Each control In thisForm.Section(acDetail).controls
If control.ControlType = acTextBox Or _
control.ControlType = acComboBox Or _
control.ControlType = acListBox Or _
control.ControlType = acOptionGroup Or _
control.ControlType = acCheckBox Then
Debug.Print control.Name
oldValues(control.Name) = control.oldValue
newValues(control.Name) = control.value
End If
Next
End If
End Sub
oldValues and newValues are Dictionary objects (although likely not related to the issue).
My form has 3 textbox controls, and a checkbox control. One of the text box controls is disabled, and is populated via the results of a simple inner join (to get the human readable name associated with a foreign key). The data source comes from the form's recordsource (no DLookup or anything is used).
If I edit one of the other two textbox controls, this code runs absolutely fine. HOWEVER, if I toggle the checkbox on the form, i get a runtime error 3251. In the watches window, I get the error again when i try to view the properties of "control". It shows the value of oldValue for the disabled control to be "Reserved Error".
If it did this consistently, I would think it was due to the control being disabled; but since it works without a problem when the other textboxes receive edits, and only breaks when the checkbox is toggled; I am stumped. I'm almost inclined to believe I found a bug in access, but I could use some extra input.
Anyone else every encounter an issue like this?
EDIT: Upon digging further, I found that in actuality only one of the 3 editable fields will not trigger this error. It holds string data. The other two controls hold a date value, and a yes/no value. Now I am even more confused.
i've got two ideas to that issue.
First one: If the RecordSource of your Form is an ODBC-Table thats linked to a SQL-Server then you should set a standard value for the CheckBox-Column. Otherwise it will try to set NULL to False and throw an error saying that somebody else edited the current record.
Second idea: Sometimes Access just has a little "hiccup" when it compiles the code. You could make a backup of your database and then try to decompile it using "C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office 2007\Office12\MSACCESS.EXE" "C:\yourFolder\yourDatabase.accdb" /decompile in the Run... Window (of course you have to insert the Path as it is on your machine). That often helps solving strange Problems.

On Error GoTo not working; Code breaks

I am writing a VBA function to import data from one table to another in Access. The table I'm importing into has more strict data constraints (i.e. types, size etc.), so I'm expecting a lot of errors.
Rather than sift through every VBA error that comes up, I want my recordset loop to skip the entire current record and make a note of it in a separate table whenever it runs into an error. So every other line I've inserted On Error GoTo RecordError. But for some reason it's not handling every error. My code just breaks and tells me what the error is. I have the "Break on Unhandled Exceptions" option checked already.
Here's a screenshot that should explain it.
Why would it be breaking on the line immediately following an Error handler?
I think you're not understanding how VB(A) error handling works. Follow these principles:
An On Error... statement only applies to the routine (Sub or Function) in which it appears (though it will also catch errors that "bubble up" from routines that are called from within the routine in which you use it).
On Error sets a state. That is, Once you issue an On Error... it remains in force for the rest of the routine, unless superceded by a new On Error....
There are four forms of On Error...:
On Error GoTo <label>: <label> must be defined in the same routine, by writing the label name immediately followed by a colon (:) on a line by itself.
On Error Resume: immediately retries the error-throwing statement. Hardly ever used, since it's potentially infinite.
On Error Resume Next: ignores the error & continues. Sometimes useful at the end of routines for cleanup (for instance, if you want to Close a Recordset that may or may not be open). Alternatively, this form can also be used if you check the Err object immediately after any potentially error-throwing line (if Err.Number is zero (0), the statement succeeded without throwing an error). This is way too much work for most situations.
On Error GoTo 0: turns off error handling.
Given this, it's usual to place the On Error... statement immediately followng the routine's declaration (the Sub or Function statement), though some people put their Dim statements in between. If you want to temporarily change the manner of error handling within a routine, put the "new" one right before the code to which it is to apply, and (if used), the "revert" (reissuing the original), right after.
Even given all that, I have no idea why it would break on the error-throwing line when "Break on Unhandled Errors" is selected, unless you've managed to confuse it so much that it thinks there's no active error handling (and I'd be surprised if it compiled if that were the case).
Note that David Heffernan gave you the essential part of this in his answer, and it was here before mine....
The reason it is not working is because you cannot use On Error Goto ... within an error handler.
see http://www.cpearson.com/excel/errorhandling.htm
you cannot use On Error to skip a few lines, instead on error should go to a error handler which then resume's to the desired next line (in your example you could probably get away with one error handler which contains a resume next which will take you back to the next field).
thanks to Tim Williams on this question: The second of 2 'On Error goto ' statements gets ignored
and BTW ParseInt on a ZIP will destroy zip codes that begin with a 0, zipcodes should probably be treated as text.
You need to place the On Error line before the code whose errors you wish to handle.
What's more you only need to have one On Error line. The error handler then stays active until the subroutine exits or you execute another On Error statement.
Error handling with VBA is a real PITA. I'd propose you to have a look at this answer to the 'MS-Access, VBA and error handling' question, and have it adapted to your own situation. You can easily write down some code that will store all your error messages in a table, building a de facto error reporting system.
Setting the debug mode to 'break on all errors' will make the program execution stop at the line that causes an error even when the error handler has been correctly written. This can be confusing as it appears that error handling is not working.
Nobody has really answered your question.
Say your code is something like this (a skeletal framework):
Public Sub MySub()
On Error GoTo errHandler
Dim rs As DAO.Recordset
Set rs = CurrentDB.OpenRecords([SQL SELECT])
If rs.RecordCount >0 Then
rs.MoveFirst
Do Until rs.EOF
[do whatever that produces the error]
errSkipToNext:
rs.MoveNext
Loop
End If
exitRoutine:
If Not (rs Is Nothing) Then
rs.Close
Set rs = Nothing
Exit Sub
errHandler:
Select Case Err.Number
Case X, Y, Z ' where these are error numbers you want to ignore
Err.Clear
' do whatever it is you need to do in order to record the offending row
Call RecordError(rs!PK, Err.Number) ' PK is a field that identifies the bad record
GoTo errSkipToNext
Case Else
MsgBox Err.Number & ": " & Err.Description, vbExclamation, _
"Error!"
Resume exitRoutine
End Select
End Sub
In this code, you use a SELECT CASE in your error handler to decide which errors you want to ignore. In my code framework above, I listed the error numbers as X, Y, Z, but you'd replace that with the real error numbers you want to ignore, instead.
You don't want to ignore every single error because you might end up ignoring important errors elsewhere in your subroutine. If you don't want to figure out what the limited number of errors you want to ignore happen to be, I would suggest that you set a flag at the beginning of the code block that produces the errors you want to ignore, then use an `If bolErrorInCodeBlockToIgnore Then to decide if you're ignoring all errors or not. Something like this:
Public Sub MySub()
On Error GoTo errHandler
Dim rs As DAO.Recordset
Dim bolErrorInCodeBlockToIgnore As Boolean
Set rs = CurrentDB.OpenRecords([SQL SELECT])
If rs.RecordCount >0 Then
rs.MoveFirst
Do Until rs.EOF
bolErrorInCodeBlockToIgnore = True
[do whatever that produces the error]
errSkipToNext:
rs.MoveNext
Loop
End If
exitRoutine:
If Not (rs Is Nothing) Then
rs.Close
Set rs = Nothing
Exit Sub
errHandler:
If bolErrorInCodeBlockToIgnore Then
Err.Clear
' do whatever it is you need to do in order to record the offending row
Call RecordError(rs!PK, Err.Number) ' PK is a field that identifies the bad record
bolErrorInCodeBlockToIgnore = False
GoTo errSkipToNext
Else
MsgBox Err.Number & ": " & Err.Description, vbExclamation, _
"Error!"
Resume exitRoutine
End If
End Sub
I would much prefer the first, as I'm a firm believer in only ignoring known errors, not any old error that happens. But it might be quite difficult to come up with tests that will produce all the possible errors you want to ignore.
I have seen error handling fail too. Here is one example.
Public Function Have(ByVal item As Variant) As Boolean
'Have = Have data. Simplifies handling nulls and empty strings in validation code
On Error GoTo Procerr
If IsNull(item) Then
Have = False
**ElseIf Len(Trim(item)) = 0 Then 'Faster than Item <> ""**
Have = False
ElseIf item = 0 Then
Have = False
Else
Have = True
End If
exitproc:
Exit Function
Procerr:
'Errors sometimes occur if an unbound control is referenced
Have = False
End Function
The code sometimes fails on the line flagged with **. Here is the error message.
Note that the error handler has failed. In this case, the form that called the code returned had its recordsource set on the fly to an empty recordset, hence the fields on the screen are not visible. The form is a continuous form, so records and fields are not visible when the form is loaded with an empty recordset. The have() function is not directly called by my code, but somehow seems to be triggered by the me.requery method. The have() has been called hundreds of millions of times in my code but this is the only instance that causes it to fail and the error handler is not involked.
To Lance Roberts re original question. utf-8 unicode can sometimes play havoc with ms-access as it seems to be allow data to be confused for instruction codes (my guess). utf-8 can get into your data if data was originally loaded from a text file. utf-8 with a byte order mark (BoM) is particularly nasty. When you run some procedure that works with the data, strange errors can occur and it may look like your file has become corrupt. In other cases, text handling functions give wrong answers, e.g. Mid() will see the BOM and if you specify a starting point will start at the BOM, but Len() ignores the BOM. I am speculating that if you have this issue, then ms-access may not handle errors correctly. I have had similar issues importing data and importing utf-8 as ANSI was the cause. Note that utf-8 and ANSI are identical most of the time for plain English data so your errors may not be on every line. My errors were mostly with time-date fields. Try exporting the data first and then forcing it to be ANSI and remove any BoM and and reimporting it.

Disabling multi-line fields in MS Access

Is there a way to disable entering multi-line entries in a Text Box (i.e., I'd like to stop my users from doing ctrl-enter to get a newline)?
I was able to do it on using KeyPress event.
Here's the code example:
Private Sub SingleLineTextBox_ KeyPress(ByRef KeyAscii As Integer)
If KeyAscii = 10 _
or KeyAscii = 13 Then
'10 -> Ctrl-Enter. AKA ^J or ctrl-j
'13 -> Enter. AKA ^M or ctrl-m
KeyAscii = 0 'clear the the KeyPress
End If
End Sub
The way I did it before (and the last time I worked in Access was around '97 so my memory is not so hot) was raising a key-up event and executing a VBA function. It's a similar method to what you do with an AJAX suggest text box in a modern webform application, but as I recall it could get tripped up if your Access form has other events which tend to occur frequently such a onMouseMove over the entire form object.
Using the KeyPress event means that your code will fire every time the user types. This can lead to screen flickering and other problems (the OnChange event would be the same).
It seems to me that you should use a single event to strip out the CrLf's, and the correct event would be AfterUpdate. You'd simply do this:
If InStr(Me!MyMemoControl, vbCrLf) Then
Me!MyMemoControl = Replace(Me!MyMemoControl, vbCrLf, vbNullString)
End If
Note the use of the Access global constants, vbCrLf (for Chr(10) & Chr(13)) and vbNullString (for zero-length string).
Using a validation rule means that you're going to pop up an ugly error message to your user, but provide them with little in the way of tools to correct the problem. The AfterUpdate approach is much cleaner and easier for the users, seems to me.
Thanks Ian and BIBD. I created a public sub based on your answer that is reusable.
Public Sub PreventNewlines(ByRef KeyAscii As Integer)
If KeyAscii = 10 Or KeyAscii = 13 Then KeyAscii = 0
End Sub
Private Sub textbox_KeyPress(KeyAscii As Integer)
Call PreventNewlines(KeyAscii)
End Sub
Screen flicker should never be an issue, as these are handled events, not constant polling (and it's per control further limiting the scope). Seems to me like an invalid argument, as every text editor is executing some code per keystroke.
Thanks
not entirely sure about that one, you should be able to remove the line breaks when you render the content though, or even run a vbscript to clear it out, you just need to check for chr(13) or vbCrLf.
If you don't want an event interfering, you can set up the Validation Rule property for the textbox to be
NOT LIKE "*"+Chr(10)+"*" OR "*"+Chr(13)+"*"
You will probably also want to set the Validation Text to explain specifically why Access is throwing up an error box.
Jason's response works well. Just to add to it..
If you want to allow the user to leave the text box blank, you could use this:
Not Like ""+Chr(10)+"" Or ""+Chr(13)+"" Or Is Null