In the code below, the content "Foo" of template#bar are always empty when I try to access it programatically or when inspecting the DOM in Chrome. Can someone explain why?
In general, how does one provide a template defined in an outer element to an inner element so the inner element can access the content and conditionally clone or import that content?
I am using polymer 0.4.2.
<polymer-element name="x-inner" noscript>
<!--
How can I access the content "Foo" of <template>Foo</template>,
So that I can import/clone it here?
Using <content> moves the template from x-outer to x-inner,
but the template's .content property is empty, instead of 'Foo' as I expected.
-->
<content></content>
</polymer-element>
<polymer-element name="x-outer" noscript>
<template>
<x-inner>
<!--
How can I pass a template to a custom element?
I don't want the contents of this template to be rendered
here in x-outer, but instead conditionally rendered by x-inner
-->
<template id="bar">Foo</template>
</x-inner>
</template>
</polymer-element>
<x-outer></x-outer>
This topic is potentially complicated, below is something to get you started.
(This is the third update to this answer, confirming the bit above about 'complicated' =P).
Polymer includes the TemplateBinding.js library.
The TemplateBinding.jslibrary imbues <template> with numerous features, including data-binding to models, conditional stamping, and replication/iteration via arrays. It also adds a feature whereby cloned nested templates do not replicate their own contents, preventing a possible explosion of useless nodes when iterating. Instead, TemplateBinding.js creates references in cloned-nested-templates to original content-ful templates. The upshot is that if you are using TemplateBinding.js you should use template.createInstance() API for best results.
Now, when using raw templates without TemplateBinding.js, you can stamp a template simply using var nodes = document.importNode(template.content, true). Of course, in this case you do not get the nested template replication optimization (which may or may not matter).
Note:
I removed the <content> node from the <x-inner>
template because it serves no purpose. The code below plucks the
template directly out of light-dom, and stamps the instance into the
shadow-root.
Declare x-inner before x-outer because the latter depends on the former.
Example code:
<x-outer></x-outer>
<polymer-element name="x-inner">
<template>
</template>
<script>
Polymer({
domReady: function() {
this.renderTemplate();
},
renderTemplate: function() {
// note: this only works if `template` is a true child of `this`
// (as opposed to projected)
var template = this.querySelector('template');
// use createInstance from TemplateBinding.js library API
this.shadowRoot.appendChild(template.createInstance());
/*
// this would work for raw templates, but Polymer includes TemplateBinding.js
this.shadowRoot.appendChild(stampTemplate(template));
*/
/*
// if you don't know whether TemplateBinding.js exists or not,
// you could do something like this (see stampTemplate definition below)
this.shadowRoot.appendChild(stampTemplate(template));
*/
/*
// this way uses the binding feature of TemplateBinding.js
template.setAttribute('bind', '');
template.model = { /* some data */ };
*/
}
});
// use best available API
function stampTemplate(template) {
if (template.createInstance) {
return template.createInstance();
} else {
return document.importNode(template.content, true);
}
}
</script>
</polymer-element>
<polymer-element name="x-outer" noscript>
<template>
<x-inner>
<template id="bar">Foo</template>
</x-inner>
</template>
</polymer-element>
http://jsbin.com/nemaha/14/edit
Related
I am working on a dashboard, in which I have a search panel at the top (let's call it component A), where users can enter a query. The value of this input will change a lot of other components in the dashboard (not only components that are its direct descendants or siblings). I want to send the search value from component A to component B, which should then respond by performing some action with the input value.
I have tried a few things:
Directly calling the function in component B. Haven't been able to get that to work at all.
Manually setting B's local property value and using an observer to trigger a function call. I manager to set the value, but the observer does not trigger.
Using a global variable, which I can easily access across components, but I still can't trigger functions in specific components.
How can I best do this?
I'm relatively new to Polymer, so forgive me if my ideas aren't completely 'Polymerised' :)
Approach 1
<dom-module id="component-B">
<template>
</template>
<script>
Polymer({
is: 'component-B',
properties: {
id: '',
observer: '_idUpdate'
},
_idUpdate: function(){
console.log("HELLO");
}
});
</script>
</dom-module>
<dom-module id="component-A">
<template>
</template>
<script>
Polymer({
is: 'component-A',
idSearch: function() {
var id = this.$.search.value;
document.querySelector('component-B').properties.id = id;
},
});
</script>
</dom-module>
As you want to send data to multiple elements (which might not be siblings of the firing element) you can use any of these two methods
Use iron-signal to fire the signal and then in all the elements where you want the data use iron-signal tag to listen to the signal
<iron-signals on-iron-signal-<signal-name>="<function>"></iron-signals>
You can also use standard HTML method dispatchEvent to fire a signal and then add eventListeners in all the element where you want data.
I'm trying to work out how to make dynamic values available to sub-elements before the local DOM is initialised. I've created a custom element with a Google Map element embedded in it:
<dom-module id="place-picker">
<template>
<google-map api-key="..." />
</template>
</dom-module>
Polymer({
is: "place-picker",
created: function() {
this.apiKey = someFunctionToRetreiveApiKey()
}
})
I want to provide the API key to the google-map element immediately. It needs to be before the DOM is initialised because the google-map element attempts to load immediately. But Polymer's properties are not evaluated . Using data binding api-key="[[apiKey]]" doesn't work because I haven't declared it as a property.
I worked it out in a slightly hacky fashion. The context of the created callback is a raw HTML element, so you can simply set its attribute, which for some reason is evaluated as a property before local DOM creation. I ended up with:
# CoffeeScript
Polymer
is: "place-picker"
properties:
googleWebApiKey:
type: String
created: ->
#setAttribute("google-web-api-key", functionToRetrieveApiKey())
# Slim HTML
template
google-map api-key="[[googleWebApiKey]]"
I prefer to use the "value" key of the properties object to set the value, but is should work similar to the created function mentioned above, you could also you the computed key.
<dom-module id="place-picker">
<template>
<google-map api-key="[[apiKey]]" />
</template>
</dom-module>
Polymer({
is: "place-picker",
properties : {
apiKey : {
type: String,
value: functionToRetrieveApiKey()
}
}
})
In a custom element I want to access a span and append a child to it but all usual accessors give undefined:
<template>
<template is="dom-if" if="[[condition]]" restamp>
<span id="myspan"></span>
</template>
</template>
ready() {
var a = this.$.myspan; //<------- is undefined
var b = this.$$.myspan; //<------- is undefined
var c = document.getElementById("myspan"); //<------- is undefined
var d = this.$$("#myspan"); //<------- is undefined
}
How to access a span in this case?
UPDATE: here is plunk
The reason this didn't work inside the lifecycle callback without setTimeout or this.async is that right after attaching your element the dom-if template has not yet rendered. Upon attaching your element, Polymer calls the attached callback. However, when the value gets set on the the dom-if, an observer runs and debounces its own _render function. The debounce waits an amount of time to catch any other calls to it, and then it executes the ._render function and attaches the element to the DOM. In other words, when the attached callback runs, normally the dom-if template hasn't rendered yet.
The reason for this debounce is performance. If several changes were made within a very short span of time, this debounce prevents the template from rendering several times when the result we would care about is the end result.
Fortunately, dom-if provides a .render() method which allows you to make it render synchronously. All you need to do is add an id to your dom-if, switch to an attached callback and call like this:
<template>
<template id="someDomIf" is="dom-if" if="[[condition]]" restamp>
<span id="myspan"></span>
</template>
</template>
attached() {
this.$.someDomIf.render();
var c = document.getElementById("myspan"); //<------- should be defined
var d = this.$$("#myspan"); //<------- should be defined
}
Triggering a synchronous render on the dom-if shouldn't be a huge performance problem, since luckily your element should only be getting attached once.
Edit: As it turns it, this even works in a ready callback:
<template>
<template id="someDomIf" is="dom-if" if="[[condition]]" restamp>
<span id="myspan"></span>
</template>
</template>
ready() {
this.$.someDomIf.render();
var c = document.getElementById("myspan"); //<------- should be defined
var d = this.$$("#myspan"); //<------- should be defined
}
See this fork of your plunker:
http://plnkr.co/edit/u3richtnt4COpEfx1CSN?p=preview
Try to do it asynchronously in the attached method as follows, this method works:
attached: function(){
this.async(function(){
var d = this.$$("#myspan");
console.log(d);
},someTimeIfThereAreManyItemsToLoad);
}
The responses above only work if your condition is true initially. Please see my answer to your initial question that lead to this one :
https://stackoverflow.com/a/34137955/3085985
Not sure if you should mix in the .render-stuff from Dogs, but I still think the observer would be the right place for it as it otherwise does not work if condition is false initially.
As in Polymer documentation:
Note: Nodes created dynamically using data binding (including those in dom-repeat and dom-if templates) are not added to the this.$ hash. The hash includes only statically created local DOM nodes (that is, the nodes defined in the element’s outermost template).
You will need to use this.$$('#yourElementId");
A flux architecture is trending in web applications and so is polymer elements.
Is there any example how to make a polymer application, which use flux architecture?
I've been thinking about using the Flux pattern with (Polymer) Web Components. Up to date I have come up with three possible solutions, all different from your way, so here they are:
DISCLAIMER I use Reflux library and not the Facebook's one.
Actions and Stores as elements
My first attempt was to make Flux pattern into elements so that any view, which need access to a store and invokes actions simply imports them.
<dom-module id="a-view">
<template>
<my-actions id="actions"></my-actions>
<my-store model="{{model}}"></my-store>
<span>{{model.property}}</span>
<button on-click="executeAction"></button>
</template>
</dom-module>
<script>
Polymer({
is: 'a-view',
executeAction: function() {
this.$.actions.doSomething({});
}
});
</script>
<my-actions> and <my-store> simply encapsulate actions and stores. There are some downsides to this method. First, potentially numerous non-visual elements are created, which can have detrimental effect on performance. Also creating those elements can be tricky if they should be Polymer elements, because they need static state. For a complete example see this repo
Flux without Flux
Recently I realized, again, what Web Components really are. With WC, your main API is the browser, namely elements, attributes and events. And Flux essentially is an event-driven data flow. So why not use Custom Events to communicate between custom elements? Here's an excerpt from my yesterday's plunk
<template is="dom-bind">
<a-view clicks="[[clicks]]" id="one"></a-view>
<a-view clicks="[[clicks]]" id="two"></a-view>
<a-view clicks="[[clicks]]" id="three"></a-view>
<a-store click-history="{{clicks}}"></a-store>
</template>
<script>
Polymer({
is: 'a-view',
properties: { clicks: Object },
fireClick: function() {
// invoking action is simply firing an event
this.fire('a-view-click', {});
}
});
Polymer({
is: 'a-store',
attached: function(){
document.addEventListener('a-view-click', function(ev) {
// do work and update store here
}.bind(this));
}
});
</script>
This is nice, because is not limited in any way to Polymer. Custom elements can be created with native API or other library and simply communicate with browser acting as your dispatcher. Of course this doesn't give you ways of synchronization out of the box, but is a simple and clean way without any clutter.
As you will see on Plunker, store updates by data-bindings. Another possibility is to fire off another event, though I'm not sure which would be better or when
Use Polymer's behaviors
Finally I've just had an idea, which improves upon the first, by replacing action/store custom elements by behaviors. There's no code yet, but here's a sketch:
var MyActionsBehaviour = PolymerFlux.createActions({ /*...*/ });
var MyStore = PolymerFlux.createStore({ /*...*/ });
Polymer({
is: 'a-view',
behaviours: [ MyActionsBehaviour, MyStore ],
onClick: function() {
this.behaviourAction.invoke({});
}
}});
Polymer({
is: 'a-store',
behaviours: [ MyActionsBehaviour, MyStore ],
attached: function() {
this.behaviourAction.listen(function() {
// 1. do work
// 2. update views
});
}
}});
I left the view updating part blank. It would likely take place by signalling an event but another possibility would be firing another action (Reflux has a nice concept of nested actions). Also I'm currently leaving the PolymerFlux.createActions and PolymerFlux.createStore for your imagination ;). The exact internals would ofc depend on the Flux implementation you choose.
I have made an attempt to use flux-type architecture in a polymer application.
Here is the main-app.html:
<link rel="import" href="./bower_components/polymer/polymer.html">
<link rel="import" href="store-cart.html">
<link rel="import" href="store-cart2.html">
<link rel="import" href="view-cart.html">
<link rel="import" href="view-additems.html">
<dom-module id="main-app">
<style>
</style>
<template>
<!-- Stores-->
<store-cart id="cart1" action=[[action]]></store-cart>
<store-cart2 id="cart2" action=[[action]]></store-cart2>
<!--Views and other stuff-->
<view-additems cart="cart1"></view-additems>
<view-additems cart="cart2" add="3"></view-additems>
<view-cart update="[[updateView]]"></view-cart>
</template>
</dom-module>
<script>
Polymer({
is: 'main-app',
properties: {
action: {
type: Object,
value: {}
},
updateView: {
value: ""
}
},
listeners: { //dispatcher event -> action
'viewAction': 'viewAction', // Action from view to be dispatched to the store/stores
'storeUpdated': 'storeUpdated' // storeUpdated-event from store to views
},
viewAction: function(e) {
action = e.detail;
switch (action.type) {
// "CombineCarts" is needed because both of the stores needs to be updated in order
case 'combineCarts':
this.$.cart1.addItems(this.$.cart2.nbItems);
this.$.cart1.updateViews();
this.$.cart2.emptyCart();
this.$.cart2.updateViews();
break;
// default action when store/stores can be updated independently
default:
this.action = action;
}
},
storeUpdated: function(e) {
this.updateView = e.detail;
}
});
</script>
The whole example: https://github.com/grohjy/polymer_flux_example
The main idea is that a "dispatcher" is located at the top most level of the polymer application and it's role is to redirect messages from stores to views and viceversa. Each store and view defines to which messages they reacts and how. At the dispatcher there is also an example how to update multiple stores in needed order.
The stores and some of the views are also located at the top most level of the application. A view can also have child views. A store shouldn't have any visual dom elements.
Please feel free to comment and share ideas.
I want to set filters dynamically. Is it possible?
dynamicFilter is a variable with name of the Polymer expression.
<template is="auto-binding">
<span>{{value | dynamicFilter}}</span>
</template>
AFAIK, there is no handy way to assign Filter to element in runtime. But there is a simple workaround you might find useful:
We are to define the staticFilter function, which would be a proxy (wrapper) to calls to dynamicFilters. Assuming dynamic filters to be instances of PolymerExpression, this might be put together as follows:
<polymer-element name="my-element" attributes="dynamicFilter">
<template>
<span>{{value | staticFilter(dynamicFilter)}}</span>
</template>
<script>
PolymerExpressions.prototype.uppercase = function(input) {
return input.toUpperCase();
},
PolymerExpressions.prototype.lowercase = function(input) {
return input.toLowerCase();
},
Polymer({
value: '¡Hola!',
dynamicFilter: null,
staticFilter: function(v, df) {
return df ? PolymerExpressions.prototype[df](v) : v;
}
});
</script>
</polymer-element>
<my-element></my-element>
<my-element dynamicFilter='uppercase'></my-element>
<my-element dynamicFilter='lowercase'></my-element>
Now you are free to set the dynamicFilter attribute of my-element even in runtime.
The reason is that filters are compiled and bound during element initialization; for security reasons there is no eval behind and therefore you cannot simply pass the arbitrary dynamic value there. On the other hand, filters are ready to receive parameters and that fact actually does the trick. BTW, you might even pass the function instance there whether you are not satisfied with PolymerExpressions for this purpose.
Your use case is not really clear, but you could use this.injectBoundHTML as a workaround.
When you need to change the filter dynamically, just reinject the content of the span