I am trying to access an SQL server from a c/c++ application using mySql on an embedded ARM processor running Debian. I am compiling using the DS-5 eclipse based IDE (with gcc) under Windows.
The problem is that several of the header files are only present as '.h.in' files which I presume from googling is an autoconf thing. I am somewhat lost as to how to move forward.
Is autoconf something I can get eclipse to handle, or do I have to do this separately?
How is this configured for the target device rather than the compiling machine?
And as a last question, are there any lighter weight SQL clients that I should be looking at?
Related
I'm currently developing a Python application and I would like to know if there are any ways to pack MongoDB and MySQL (or Postgresql) into the application. By packing I mean taking those application binaries and distribute them with the application files.
For example, Metasploit PRO has some applications like nginx, postgresql, java, ruby, etc... under /opt/metasploit (they come with the application setup), and I would like to know if that could be done with any Linux application. And if so, how could I "choose" what binaries are needed? Would they work for any Debian distro? Can any application follow that procedure? Could it be done with MySQL and MongoDB?
P.D: I would like to do this to distribute one unique application instead of having to "obligate" the user to setup the databases independently, and for pure curiosity.
Thank you very much in advance!
MongoDB already distributes its binaries as standalone binaries in the sense that everything needed for the database (or shell tools) to run is included in the respective binary (mongo/mongos/mongod).
However, these binaries are OS (Linux distribution)-specific. Meaning, for example, they dynamically link against libssl and libcurl and you need to have the right versions of those libraries on the host system. So, for example, a MongoDB binary for Ubuntu 14.04 is likely to not work on Ubuntu 16.04.
As far as I know MongoDB does not support building for "generic linux". Only specific OSes like Ubuntu 16.04 are supported.
With that said, you could possibly build a "portable" MongoDB yourself if you accept some limitations, since its source code is available:
You need to figure out how to build MongoDB on some linux distribution that gives you the baseline glibc that would be compatible with all of your targets.
You may have to forego functionality like TLS connections, or figure out how to link against openssl statically (probably non-trivial).
This would be easier with older MongoDB versions (4.0, 3.6) since they have fewer system dependencies.
I think you can pack the required services and your application as Docker image or Virtual Machine box.
As my experience, I used to package the MongoDB and other Linux CLI tools with my NodeJS web application into a VM box using Vagrant. Or you can use Docker if you prefer container-based application.
If you use Vagrant, the provisioning feature may help you to setup the database before running the application. Check https://www.vagrantup.com/docs/provisioning
I am a Java developer. To speed some of our algorithms, we have decided to try CUDA.
But the Issue is, currently we have only one server with GPU installed and 3 developers have to work on it (by transferring the file each time over ssh and compiling and running it over there). This obviously is a tedious process.
What I would like to know is: On my machine which does not have GPU, can I using NSight work on CUDA by compiling and generating files locally. This can automatically be transferred to server to get the result.
If we can at least work on algorithm locally using NSight (or any other IDE) and not pure vim and then compile it to remove compile time errors, this would save quite some time.
On Linux you can do remote debugging using Nsight Eclipse Edition as documented here. This requires 5.5 or later. On Windows you need to start the Nsight monitor on the server and then just configure Nsight Visual Studio Edition to use the remote machine.
A project with the following technologies and components has surfaced: to up a Web stack solution initially composed with Ubuntu, JDK, JBoss, Spring MVC 3.0+, and MySQL.
In planning this project, I have been struggling to find answers to the following questions for first steps, best practices, and sequence:
1) Does the JDK (and JBoss) need to be installed as ‘root’? (I have seen articles that mention it is not a good idea to operate in root unless absolutely necessary due to the fatal consequences.)
2) Does Ubuntu need to be installed as a Server in order to accomplish all this, or can it also be installed as a Desktop? I have not been able to determine if having a JBoss and MySQL need to be installed on top of Linux as a server.
3) Does Maven need to be used within Spring STS in order to get JBoss, and MySQL (and in the future Hibernate) to work successfully together?
4) My intent is to install in this order: a) Ubuntu -> b) Java -> c) JBoss -> d) Spring STS -> and e) MySQL. Are there any blatant conflicts in this sequence?
JBoss will require Java (recommend Java 7) before it will do anything. I don't think it really "installs" per-say, but rather just unpacks to some directory (even if you install from the package manager, it just really extracts itself). I question your need for Spring since JBoss and Java EE in general really does everything Spring does, and better now-a-days. Unless you have a specific requirement for Spring, I'd question this extra dependency.
For linux - in a high level, any OS can be a "server", all it needs is to be capable of serving things (web pages, ssh connections, etc). In M$ world, different "levels" of the OS have been specially designed based on anticipated task/workload. So for example, while Windows 7 can indeed run as a server, it was not designed for it and therefore may not be optimized or include helper utilities and tools to make life easier as a sys admin of the system. Windows Server on the other hand does include all the "normal" server tools and lots of goodies to make maintaining and setting the server up easier.
In linux land, this is no such thing. Linux is the kernel that talks back and forth with the bare metal, etc... and Distro makers will take that and build an OS around the kernel, basically just attaching any packages they feel their distro needs... such as wget, or cat, or any other standard userland apps, plus some non-standard such as mysql or java or whatever they want.
Now, some distributions of linux will tailor themselves at being "server" ready, while others will tailor themselves at being a desktop OS. The difference? It's really just whatever default packages the distribution maker decides to include or not. For example, the overwhelming majority of linux servers are run completely headless, and therefore there is absolutely no reason to have X11 and a huge bloated GUI environment installed and/or running on that system... it's pointless. Also, an "average joe" user does not need MySQL installed by default on his desktop system since it would only bloat his system and he likely won't ever use it.
So basically it comes down to default installed packages.
Some linux server distros take this further and exercise extreme caution when making updates, patches, or new releases in the name of stability and security, while on the other hand most desktop distros are more haphazard with their updates since if it breaks a home users web browser, it's probably not a huge deal... but if a server update breaks the webserver application stack, now that's a serious problem.
So you'll find server OS's like CentOS (based on upstream RHEL) are extremely slow to bring in the "latest and greatest" features that desktop OS's get early on. Their goal is high security and long term stability.
Now, for Ubuntu. While I certainty know a lot of folks run Ubuntu as their server OS choice (partly due to Amazon choosing Ubuntu as the default linux VM for their ECS cloud), but I'd really question this. Ubuntu is not focused on being a server. It's focused on being a great all-around desktop oriented OS. Yes the LTS version is meant for long term stability, but it's based out of a desktop OS, so it's still not the focus.
IMHO, I'd go with CentOS because it's free and completely binary compatible version of RHEL - and RHEL is the de-facto standard for enterprise-grade linux servers. Be aware though, the RHEL way of doing things is a bit different than the debian way -- so there is no apt-get, you must use yum install instead. Startup scripts are different and some ways of doing things are different, but really, once you know linux, you know linux.
EDIT: Also check into Jenkins - its a free opensource continuous integration system that runs on JBoss or Tomcat or any other container, and can automagically pull your code from a repo (github, git, svn, etc) and compile/package it then push it to live deployment. You setup your ANT or Maven build scripts, and it can kick off on a schedule or however you configure it.
EDIT EDIT: I'd also recommend using OpenJDK -- as it's likely included in your package manager (for just about every disto) and will be more updated than the oracle version if it's in your package manager too. I've found most "server" distros will have OpenJDK 7 while only having Oracle java 6 in their package managers. Also, installing it via the package manager will enable you to keep it updated a ton easier.
Installed as root, why not? Run as root, probably not a good idea.
If you want a desktop, install a desktop distrib. If you want a server, install a server distrib. This doesn't change what can and can't be run in the OS. It only changes what is installed by default.
Maven is a build tool. JBoss doesn't care how you build your app. All it cares about is if the application you deploy is a valid Java EE application.
No. You need an OS, so Ubuntu must come first. JBoss and (AFAIK) Spring STS need a JRE to run, as they're Java applications, so Java should be installed before them. MySQL is independent of JBoss, STS and Java, so you can install it whenever you want.
Note that if you're struggling just with this installation part, be prepared to suffer with the rest. Building a Java EE webapp is not a piece of cake, and you should probably find some experienced developer to help you, as it seems you're only beginning with Java.
I have the following strange situation here I need some help with:
I am building a Qt application with MySQL access. For this I have:
- a dedicated building machine, using Qt 2010.05 and a MySQL 5.1 just for the libraries, Windows 7 32 bit. This machine creates the install package.
- a dedicated development machine, CentOS 5.5
- two testing machines:
- - an "always" fresh install of Windows 7
- - another Windows 7 machine with a newer Qt on it used for other stuff too.
I have built the previous version of the application sometime in February this year (on the bilding machine), it works nicely and perfectly, loads the MySQL driver (I have put it in the sqldrivers directory as indicated by everyone else). The install package installs, works everywhere (at least on all my Windows machines).
Now, I have built another release of the application, on the same machine. In the install package the only important difference is the executable (and some HTML files, but those are not relevant). Everything else is the same. When I run the NEW executable on the build machine I get ("QSQLITE", "QMYSQL3", "QMYSQL", "QODBC3", "QODBC") as the QSqlDatabase::drivers() output. If I run the NEW exectuable on any other machine I get an empty list of drivers. If I run the OLD package on any machine it works...
The loaded modules by the two processess (old executable, new executable) are basically the same, except is the qtmysql DLL which gets loaded in the old one and not in the new.
Have you ever encountered a situation like this? If yes do you have a feasible solution for it?
Thanks,
f.
Qt will only load plugins which are compatible with the program or version of Qt used. See the Deploying Plugins document.
You could also try using QPluginLoader to manually load a plugin and check what is reported as the QPluginLoader::errorString when it doesn't load (add the error message to your question if you can't fix it still).
I'm working on a database-driven QT project (basically a journal/diary tool) that will eventually allow users to connect with MySQL, SQLite, and Postgres. For now, only the MYSQL module is built, but i'm having problems making it work on Windows.
I'm compiling against a static-built QT 4.7.4 library on windows 7, and this allowed the program to find the QMYSQL driver properly. I know this because I'm not getting the "QMYSQL driver not loaded" error when I build everything staticly. However, when I try to connect to the database, I get "QSqlQuery::exec: database not open" errors. At first, I thought this was because the remote database wouldn't accept connections from my address, but I couldn't connect to localhost (as root, with the correct password) either.
I know the application code is good because it works perfectly on Linux (Same QT version, non-static build... it seemed to "just work" when built on Linux without any extra steps) so I'm wondering if QT is built correctly on Windows. I wrote a batch file to automate the build process:
TITLE Build QT 4.7.4 (static)
ECHO ON
cd C:\qt-4.7.4\
path C:\MinGW\bin
configure.exe -opensource -platform win32-g++ -release -static -qt-sql-mysql -l mysql -I C:\include -L C:\lib
PAUSE
mingw32-make
PAUSE
Am I building QT correctly on Windows? When I first experienced this problem, I followed these instructions: http://rag.com.au/linux/qt4howto.html but it still wouldn't work after the most recent build.
I had to build QT staticly because without that my application couldn't find the QMySQL driver. At first, I tried using the includes/libraries from the MySQL 5.5 community edition, but the build failed about halfway through for some reason. (It didn't like something about that particular libmysql.lib) When I tried using the headers/libs I compiled against in Linux, the build finished properly, but I'm getting this problem now.
Does it matter where the Headers/Libraries are stored when QT is compiled?
Also, I have a triple-core CPU. During Windows build, I noticed that mingw32-make only used one core since my CPU was pegged at 33% the whole time. Is there a way to make it use the whole CPU so it won't take 4-5 hours to build?
Thanks in advance for any help/suggestions.
Try this to get the available drivers for you.
QSqlDatabase * db = new QSqlDatabase;
qDebug() << db->drivers();
This will give you the list of available drivers.
Check whether "QMYSQL" is there or not.
If it is not there, you'll have to install the driver.
Check this link for the installation.