I hope you can help me.
I am writing a desktop program that will run in a web browser (in HTML/CSS/javascript in case that wasn't clear). It will be entirely disconnected from the internet and obtain files and data using only FILE protocol. My question is: how can you obtain a listing of the contents of a directory referenced this way?
I've been searching for months and really turned up almost nothing! Maybe I just don't know how to search but there doesn't seem to be much information about how browsers actually deal with File protocol.
For example, when you open a directory in Chrome, it gives you a nice table with hyperlinks of all the parent directory's children. However, when you look at the source code, it's as if Chrome just magically knew exactly what files were in the directory. I feel that if I could understand how it knew that, maybe I'd be able to get somewhere...
Also, I am open to other ideas about how to get a directory listing. I've read about being able to do it with php but it requires running a server. Does anyone know if it is possible to run php code with File protocol rather than HTTP?
Thanks for reading this far and truely any information that could remove me from this standstill is appreciated!
Web Apps do not have access to the user's file system so you will not be able to do what the chrome file browser does with a web app. I believe chrome is using some sort of native code to do this.
I would recommend trying something a little more on the native-side. A chrome app will let you use html, css, javascript while also allowing you access to the file system. https://developer.chrome.com/apps/app_storage#filesystem
Another alternative is you could write some sort of native java application. That would allow you to read/write all the files you want.
Related
I appreciate this question may appear broad. But it is because I am looking anywhere and everywhere for a possible solution to do something very simple.
The goal is from a web page opened in Chrome, to scan the DOM, extract specific elements and save them silently in some way that I can then access.
There is no intention for any of this to be published as an app or extension, it is simply me wanting to access my own rendered browser data and extract and store this data on my own computer. For this reason, I am currently finding Chrome's exhaustive sandboxing security frustrating and irrelevant to say the least.
I have a working Chrome Extension which extracts all of the data I want, has a list of 5 strings that I want to save and that's as far as I have gotten.
I have looked into these areas:
Existing NPAPI Plugins (could not get npapi file io to work).
Creating my own NPAPI Plugin - seems like a huge overhead and learning exercise simply to get external access to 5 strings
Every aspect of Chrome extension (and even App) apis (particularly their localstorage which is not accessible from outside the extension)
Any other thoughts?
I realise there is a solution through creating my own NPAPI plugin but I would like to believe that there is another approach that allows me to link a constructed DOM with my local system. I am open to any other option? (I have considered a Linux purely bash approach but I need to generate the DOM as though it was in my browser).
I just want to be able to access specifically extracted parts of a DOM on my local system, not write an entirely new C++ plugin to facilitate this very basic feature.
I want to perform a hack on devtools.js to expand all of the DOM elements by default. I read in another post on here that this was possible.
However, I can't find devtools.js, or for that matter, the Application folder that supposedly exists at C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome. I've tried this both on my Windows 7 laptop and my Windows XP desktop (different path for the desktop, obviously) and the folder doesn't even exist...which leads me to believe it's somewhere else and named something else. I'm showing hidden folders on both machines, so that's not it, either. I even searched both computers...no devtools.js file on either one.
Where would I look for the devtools.js file?
It appears to be packed in a file called resources.pak. The package seems to contain a lot of other (binary) files as well, so I'm not sure if you're going to have much luck editing it.
Might be a bit late to the party but i was searching for a very comparable question i had and found some answers, so i thought i'd share my findings.
It seems that the devTools.js and also the other files for the DevTools front-end are packaged inside the browser.
So there is no file on your hard-drive named devTools.js, there is an option to get the source for the Developer Tools and use it as a stand alone front-end though.
On this page i found some instructions as to how you would go about using your own front-end.
http://dev.chromium.org/devtools
Good luck!
PM5544
This is for an iphone app. The file uploaded/downloaded on the internet would be a basic leaderboard with a username or id or some sort, and three separate highscores for three modes within one game.
Further - I would like to know if this can be achieved for free? For example could I upload an xml file or a plist file to a site like mediafire and still be able to upload there using objective-c? With mediafire, for example, I already got the download working using the NSArray method initWithContentsOfURL:. So far I have been unsuccessful in uploading to mediafire (Maybe using something with the NSURL password and host methods?). Is there a way to do this on mediafire? or would it require another way of doing this?
I don't really wish to use Apple's Game-center. Do you think MySQL is required?
I seriously doubt MediaFire will offer an easy to use upload API (or an easy to use download API for that matter). Also, what happens when more than one user updates their high score at the same time?
I don't think MySQL is required, however you have moved beyond simple push/pull of a file, especially since the file has global state. This is what GameCenter and OpenFeint have tried to solve for you already, and if you don't have at least a shared hosting account with server side scripting capability you won't be able to solve this issue in an acceptable fashion.
Is it possible to access Google Chrome's cache from within an extension?
I'd like to write an extension that loads a cached version of a page when the online one can't be accessed (e.g. Internet connectivity issue).
Updated: I know I could write an NPAPI plugin accessible through an extension to accomplish this but I'd rather not suffer writing one... I am after a solution without resorting to NPAPI, please.
Note: as far as I can tell, Google Chrome doesn't support this functionality (at least not out-of-the-box): I just had an episode of "no Internet access" and I was stranded...
Unfortunately, I'm 99% sure that this is impossible without using an NPAPI in your extension.
Chrome extensions are sandboxed to their own process, and can only access files within the extension's folder.
There is some support for things like chrome://favicon/. But that's about it, at least for now.
Source (Google Chrome Extensions Reference)
P.S. I just had a crazy idea. Extensions only have access to files in their folder... but Chrome stores it's cache in the Cache folder. What you might try is, copy (or move) the Cache folder into a subfolder within the extension. The extension should now be able to access the cache.
Whether this is enough to actually enable offline mode... I don't know. I do see some HTML files (and obviously a lot of images) within my Cache folder, though.
In fact, even without using an extension, I can open up the HTML files in Chrome. And because they're stored on your computer, you should be able to access them even without internet.
P.S. the Cache folder is stored at PATH-TO-CHROME/Default/Cache
P.P.S. there is a way to store an entire webpage and archive it for later use. Check out this extension:
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/mpiodijhokgodhhofbcjdecpffjipkle
Just make a simple plugin manifest that calls an AJAX page which loads jQuery from CDN, and then uses it to parse all the <a> elements on the page and alter the href values to have this prefix: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:
So <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/blah"> becomes:
<a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://stackoverflow.com/questions/blah">
Voilà, you are cache surfing, but you still need to get to Google. I understand this answer is a bit outside the scope of the question but still solves a lot of web connectivity issues.
I'm tempted to just go write this plugin but I bet it'd be taboo in Google's eyes, so it'd get blocked or removed rather quickly. :)
I have what seems like a typical usage scenario for users downloading, editing and uploading a document from a web page.
User clicks a link to download a document
User edits downloaded file
User saves the file
User goes back to the web page and uploads the new file with the changes
The problem is that downloaded files are typically saved in a temporary directory, so it can be difficult to find the file after it is saved. The application is for very non-technical users, and I can already imagine the problems with saved files being lost or the wrong versions being uploaded.
Is there a better way? Things I've thought about:
Using Google Docs or something similar.
Problems: forcing users to use new
application with less features,
importing legacy content, setting up
accounts for everyone to edit a
file.
Using WebDAV to serve the files. Not sure how this would work exactly, but seems like it should be possible
Some kind of Flash or Java app that manages downloads and uploads. Not sure if these even exist.
User education :)
If it matters, the files will be mostly Word and Powerpoint documents.
Actually, despite the fact that you have more flexibility with AJAX in developing application, the problem of uploading multiple files is not solved yet.
To the thoughts you've mentioned in your question:
Google Docs:
Online apps like Google docs are certainly appealing for certain use cases. However, if you'd like to upload Word and Powerpoint slides, you don't want the content to be changed once you've uploaded the document. The problem is that Google Docs uses its own data format and therefore changes some of the formats. If you go for an online app, I'd go for a Document Management Solution. I'm sure there are plenty (even free ones) out there; however, I didn't use any on them yet.
WebDAV It is possible and seems to me like the best solution. You can embed WebDav like any directory. Documents are locked until a user releases the document. Unfortunately, you don't have a web front end to manage the files or administer access restrictions.
It
Flash or Java app They do exist, for sure. I'd prefer Flash over Java since Flash Apps still run smoother within a browser. I would definitely not use a rich application, even if it is a Java Web Start app that can be downloaded and opens in a separate window. More and more, users seem to accept browser based web applications. Which brings me to point 4:
User education You can educate them, sure. But in the end you want them to want to use the system. Most often, users get easily used to a tool. However, if they don't like the tool, they're not going to use it.
Clear instructions to save to their desktop is a start. Then clear instructions to go to the desktop to re-up it. I've not run across an online MSWord viewer/editor or whatever format the file is, but I'm sure they exist, now that Google Docs and a few other online versions of MSOffice exist.
I would make sure that there are easy to follow instructions, plus a tutorial somewhere else (perhaps with a video too) to guide users through the process.